PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Cuvelier

Publications and source records attributed to D Cuvelier.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Hydrodynamic narrowing of tubes extruded from cells.

We discuss the pulling force f required to extrude a lipid tube from a living cell as a function of the extrusion velocity L. The main feature is membrane friction on the cytoskeleton. As recently observed for neutrophils, the tether force exhibits a "shear thinning" response over a large range of pulling velocities, which was previously interpreted by assuming viscoelastic flows of the sliding membrane. Here, we propose an alternative explanation based on purely Newtonian flow: The diameter of the tether decreases concomitantly with the increase of the membrane tension in the lipid tube. The pulling force is found to vary as L(1/3), which is consistent with reported experimental data for various types of cells.

Biophysical Phenomena↗

[Factors determining the choice of a modality of treatment by dialysis: a study of nine dialysis centers].

BACKGROUND: The objective of this cross-sectional study in a population of 1472 dialysis patients was to identify the main factors involved in the choice of a specific option for dialysis therapy, taking into account three different types of criteria such as medical dependence (DM), nurse care requirement (SI) and independence for dialysis therapy (CA). METHODS: Each patient has been analysed, independently of present treatment modality, according to the above three criteria, namely DM, SI and CA. For each type of parameter, patients have been allocated to one of three levels, each level being established to evaluate whether dialytic treatment should be undertaken as hospital centre dialysis (HDC) or in a facility off the hospital. Level 3 of any one category corresponded to the inability of doing haemodialysis at home (HHD) or in self-care unit (AD). Level 2 included patients who could be treated in AD or by peritoneal dialysis (PD) with the assistance of a nurse. CAPD or HHD were considered as potential treatment modalities only in patients qualifying for level 1 of each criterion. RESULTS: In the patient population as a whole, the following treatment options were observed: HHD 3.6%, CAPD 6%, PD 1.8%, AD 16.3% and HDC 72.2%. For medical dependence (DM) there was a relatively even distribution for the three levels in six centres. In contrast, two centres were characterized by a predominance of DM level 3. Differences in DM levels between centres were greatly reduced when considering separately only those patients who were actually treated by CAPD, HDC and AD. SI levels were more uniformly distributed within all centres, and this was true for HCD and AD patients. When considering CA levels in HDC patients, a large predominance of CA level 3 was observed in all centres whereas CA level 1 was nearly in existent. CONCLUSION: The major finding of this study was that the inability or the refusal of dialysis patients to participate at treatment, independently of medical condition and nurse care requirement, was the main factor in the choice of hospital centre dialysis.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗