PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Cynn

Publications and source records attributed to D Cynn.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Relative contribution of mental health and exercise-related pain increment to treadmill test intolerance in patients with chronic low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative contribution of pain increase and mental health to testing performance during a single bout of exercise in patients with chronic low back pain. BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to which factors principally limit physical performance in patients with chronic low back pain. Some believe psychological factors limit physical performance, whereas others believe activity-related increases in pain intensity limit performance. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with chronic low back pain reported pain intensity before and after undergoing a maximal, symptom-limited modified treadmill test. Walking time (in minutes) and aerobic fitness were measured. The Short Form 36 Health Survey was administered to all patients. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of the sample stopped testing because of a significant increase in pain intensity (P = 0.0001). Treadmill performance was lower in patients who stopped because of pain than in those who stopped because of fatigue (P = 0.02). The patients who stopped because of pain were also more likely to have low mental health as assessed by the Short Form 36 Health Survey. Low mental health, however, did not have a statistically significant influence on treadmill performance. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that impairment of physical performance during treadmill testing in patients with chronic low back pain is attributable to testing-induced increase in pain intensity rather than to individual low mental health scores.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The Work Limitations Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to develop a psychometrically sound questionnaire for measuring the on-the-job impact of chronic health problems and/or treatment ("work limitations"). RESEARCH DESIGN: Three pilot studies (focus groups, cognitive interviews, and an alternate forms test) generated candidate items, dimensions, and response scales. Two field trials tested the psychometric performance of the questionnaire (studies 1 and 2). To test recall error, study 1 subjects were randomly assigned to 2 different questionnaire groups, a questionnaire with a 4-week reporting period completed once or a 2-week version completed twice. Responses were compared with data from concurrent work limitation diaries (the gold standard). To test construct validity, we compared questionnaire scores of patients with those of healthy job-matched control subjects. Study 2 was a cross-sectional mail survey testing scale reliability and construct validity. SUBJECTS: The study subjects were employed individuals (18-64 years of age) from several chronic condition groups (study 1, n = 48; study 2, n = 121) and, in study 1, 17 healthy matched control subjects. MEASURES: Study 1 included the assigned questionnaires and weekly diaries. Study 2 included the new questionnaire, SF-36, and work productivity loss items. RESULTS: In study 1, questionnaire responses were consistent with diary data but were most highly correlated with the most recent week. Patients had significantly higher (worse) limitation scores than control subjects. In study 2, 4 scales from a 25-item questionnaire achieved Cronbach alphas of > or = 0.90 and correlated with health status and self-reported work productivity in the hypothesized manner (P < or = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With 25 items, 4 dimensions (limitations handling time, physical, mental-interpersonal, and output demands), and a 2-week reporting period, the Work Limitations Questionnaire demonstrated high reliability and validity.

Adult↗