PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D D Denton

Publications and source records attributed to D D Denton.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Plasma polymerized N-isopropylacrylamide: synthesis and characterization of a smart thermally responsive coating.

A lower critical solution temperature (LCST) in an aqueous environment has been observed with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAM) deposited onto solid surfaces from a plasma glow discharge of NIPAM vapor. The synthesis and spectroscopic data (ESCA, FTIR) for the plasma polymerized NIPAM (ppNIPAM) shows a remarkable retention of the monomer structure. The phase transition at 29 degrees C was measured by a novel AFM method. The phase transition was surprising because of the expectation that the plasma environment would destroy the specific NIPAM structure associated with the thermal responsiveness. The phase change of ppNIPAM is also responsible for the changes in the level of the meniscus when coated capillaries are placed in warm and cold water. Plasma polymerization of NIPAM represents a one-step method to fabricate thermally responsive coatings on real-world biomaterials without the need for specially prepared substrates and functionalized polymers.

Acrylamides↗

A silicon-based tactile sensor for finger-mounted applications.

This paper presents a silicon-based force sensor packaged in a flexible package and describes the sensors performance on human subjects. The sensing element consists of a circular silicon diaphragm (200-micron thick with a 2-mm radius) over a 10-micron sealed cavity with a solid Torlon dome providing force-to-pressure transduction to the diaphragm. Two dome heights (0.5 and 1.5 mm) were compared. The sensor with the taller dome showed improved sensitivity. Dynamic calibration and tracking experiments are performed with the sensor mounted on the dominant thumb of five human subjects. Both force and loading direction are statistically significant (P < 0.05). Subject variability accounted for 8.7% of the variance, while loading direction accounted for 1.9% of the variance. Average errors for the tracking experiment range from-2.8 to 1.0 N and are subject dependent. Three out of four subjects showed increasing negative error with increasing load.

Adult↗