Biomedical subjects

D D Loy

Publications and source records attributed to D D Loy.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1988

Hormone secretory patterns, pituitary characteristics and selected blood metabolites in feedlot steers implanted with growth stimulants.

Twelve Charolais-crossbred steers (256 kg) received one of three treatments: nonimplanted controls (C), implanted initially and at 84 days with 36 mg zeranol (Ralgro, R) and implanted initially and at 84 days with 200 mg of progesterone and 20 mg of estradiol benzoate (Synovex-S,S). All steers were fed a corn-based diet (calculated metabolizable energy 2.89 Mcal/kg dry matter) ad libitum. In a parallel comparative slaughter trial, rates of empty body protein accretion were increased 14% in R and 24% in S steers (P less than .01). R and S steers in the present study had heavier pituitary weights (P less than .001), more pituitary growth hormone content (P less than .04) and more pituitary weight/unit live weight (P less than .05) than did C steers. Cattle implanted with R or S exhibited an increased growth hormone (GH) secretory response to a pituitary challenge with thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH). Plasma insulin profiles were not significantly altered, but tended to be greater for steers given implants. Overall 9-hr GH secretory profiles were not affected by implantation. Plasma urea N at 94 days post-implantation was decreased (P less than .01) by implantation. Plasma glucose was increased (P less than .04) at both 94 and 199 days in R and S vs C steers. Overall mean and total (integrated area) plasma GH, as well as secretory profile components (baseline mean, amplitude of secretory spikes) were negatively correlated with body weight and size on days 94 and 199. Overall mean, baseline and integrated area of plasma insulin on days 94 and 199 were positively related to body weight and size. Thus positive protein anabolic growth responses from implantation (parallel comparative slaughter trial) were coupled with increased pituitary GH content and little change in circulating plasma GH concentrations between implanted and control steers. This may suggest that changes in tissue sensitivity, an increased plasma clearance rate of GH and/or a direct effect on target tissues may be involved in the improved growth performance of cattle implanted with R or S.

Animals↗

PubMed1988

Rate, composition and efficiency of growth in feedlot steers reimplanted with growth stimulants.

Eighty Charolais-cross steer calves (283 kg) were fed a moderately high-energy (2.89 Mcal ME/kg) diet for 189 d to examine the effects of reimplantation of 36 mg of zeranol (Ralgro) or 200 mg progesterone plus 20 mg estradiol benzoate (Synovex-S) on the rate, composition and efficiency of gain, skeletal size and carcass parameters in a comparative slaughter trial. The implant treatments included unimplanted controls (C), Ralgro initially (R1), Synovex-S initially (S1), Ralgro initially and a reimplant at 84 d (R2) and Synovex-S initially and a reimplant at 84 d (S2). Both implants increased (P less than .06) gains by 8.1% from 0 to 84 d. Ralgro and Synovex-S increased (P less than .01) daily gains by 11.5% and 25.2%, respectively, from 84 to 189 d. The duration of the response to a single implant appeared to be in excess of 140 d; thus, reimplantation did not further increase daily gains. Reimplantation did improve (P less than .05) feed utilization in Ralgro implanted steers, however. Ralgro and Synovex-S increased (P less than .01) the rate of empty body (EB) protein accretion by 14.1% and 24%, respectively, without affecting EB fat growth. The efficiency of protein gain per unit protein (P less than .05) or energy intake (P less than .04) was improved, but the efficiency of energy gain per unit energy intake was not affected by implantation. Carcass weights of implanted steers were 5% greater (P less than .04) when adjusted to an equal carcass fatness. Both growth stimulants increased hip height (P less than .02), wither height (P less than .08) and body length (P less than .08) over C steers at slaughter.

Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena↗

PubMed1988

Optimal beef cattle diets formulated by nonlinear programming.

A beef diet model based on National Research Council recommendations is significantly nonlinear for feed ingredients, daily gain and weight of cattle. Solving a diet model has been difficult, but advances in nonlinear programming now allow solutions that are quick and easy. This study developed a nonlinear programming method for optimally planning a feeding program by choosing feeds, daily gains and selling weight. Two types of diets are important for this purpose:optimal-return diets and least-cost-gain diets. For a given weight of cattle, an optimal-return diet chooses feeds and daily gain to maximize returns above feed costs. A least-cost-gain diet chooses feeds and daily gain to minimize feed plus yardage costs per kilogram of gain. In an optimal feeding program, a sequence of optimal-return diets is fed to increasing weights of cattle. Feed costs plus yardage per kilogram of gain rise to equal the actual selling price at the optimal selling weight, and the cattle are sold. Cattle feeders and researchers with access to a microcomputer can maximize net returns from a feeding program.

Animal Husbandry↗