PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

D DeCristofaro

Publications and source records attributed to D DeCristofaro.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Pulsed Doppler evaluation of regurgitation in mitral valve prostheses.

Prosthetic mitral valve regurgitation was evaluated by both pulsed Doppler ultrasound and left ventriculography. Pulsed Doppler ultrasound was found to have only a 20% sensitivity in detecting prosthetic mitral valve regurgitation documented by left ventriculography. Possible reasons for this poor sensitivity include 1) an eccentric jet not identified by the small pulsed Doppler sample volume; 2) prosthesis interference with the Doppler signal in the apical four chamber view; and 3) the large angle of incidence between the pulsed Doppler signal and the regurgitant jet. Mitral insufficiency, especially when not severe, may be missed by this technique. Care must be taken in interpreting negative results from a pulsed Doppler ultrasound evaluation of a prosthetic mitral valve.

Echocardiography

Mitral valve prolapse: comparative value of m-mode, two-dimensional and doppler echocardiography.

M-mode, two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography were used to assess the comparative value of each in the detection of clinically diagnosed mitral valve prolapse; 125 consecutive patients with a mid- to late systolic click, with or without a late systolic murmur, were included. There were 46 men and 79 women; their mean age was 42 years. M-mode echocardiography detected 62 of 125 cases (sensitivity 50%). Two-dimensional echocardiography was positive in 85 cases (sensitivity 68%) and 90 cases were detected with Doppler echocardiography (sensitivity 72%). When all three techniques were combined, 116 cases were correctly diagnosed (total echographic sensitivity 93%). The relative insensitivity of the M-mode technique and the additive value of two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in the detection of auscultatory mitral prolapse are emphasized.

Adolescent