PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D F Hayes

Publications and source records attributed to D F Hayes.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Phase II evaluation of thalidomide in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and effect on serum angiogenic growth factors of two dose levels of thalidomide in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either daily 200 mg of thalidomide or 800 mg to be escalated to 1,200 mg. Fourteen heavily pretreated patients were assigned to each dose level. Each cycle consisted of 8 weeks of treatment. Pharmacokinetics and growth factor serum levels were evaluated. RESULTS: No patient had a true partial or complete response. On the 800-mg arm, 13 patients had progressive disease at or before 8 weeks of treatment and one refused to continue treatment. The dose was reduced because of somnolence to 600 mg for five patients and to 400 mg for two and was increased for one to 1,000 mg and for four to 1,200 mg. On the 200-mg arm, 12 patients had progressive disease at or before 8 weeks and two had stable disease at 8 weeks, of whom one was removed from study at week 11 because of grade 3 neuropathy and the other had progressive disease at week 16. Dose-limiting toxicities included somnolence and neuropathy. Adverse events that did not require dose or schedule modifications included constipation, fatigue, dry mouth, dizziness, nausea, anorexia, arrhythmia, headaches, skin rash, hypotension, and neutropenia. Evaluation of circulating angiogenic factors and pharmacokinetic studies failed to provide insight into the reason for the lack of efficacy. CONCLUSION: Single-agent thalidomide has little or no activity in patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer. Further studies that include different patient populations and/or combinations with other agents might be performed at the lower dose levels.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

BACKGROUND: Under the auspices of the College of American Pathologists, a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, pathologists, and statisticians considered prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer and stratified them into categories reflecting the strength of published evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Factors were ranked according to previously established College of American Pathologists categorical rankings: category I, factors proven to be of prognostic import and useful in clinical patient management; category II, factors that had been extensively studied biologically and clinically, but whose import remains to be validated in statistically robust studies; and category III, all other factors not sufficiently studied to demonstrate their prognostic value. Factors in categories I and II were considered with respect to variations in methods of analysis, interpretation of findings, reporting of data, and statistical evaluation. For each factor, detailed recommendations for improvement were made. Recommendations were based on the following aims: (1) increasing uniformity and completeness of pathologic evaluation of tumor specimens, (2) enhancing the quality of data collected about existing prognostic factors, and (3) improving patient care. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Factors ranked in category I included TNM staging information, histologic grade, histologic type, mitotic figure counts, and hormone receptor status. Category II factors included c-erbB-2 (Her2-neu), proliferation markers, lymphatic and vascular channel invasion, and p53. Factors in category III included DNA ploidy analysis, microvessel density, epidermal growth factor receptor, transforming growth factor-alpha, bcl-2, pS2, and cathepsin D. This report constitutes a detailed outline of the findings and recommendations of the consensus conference group, organized according to structural guidelines as defined.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

Treatment-related toxicity from a randomized trial of the sequencing of doxorubicin and radiation therapy in patients treated for early stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: There is concern that breast cancer patients treated with left-sided radiation therapy (XRT) and doxorubicin (DOX) may have an increased risk of cardiac toxicity. In addition, the effect of different sequencing of XRT and chemotherapy (CT) on the likelihood of cardiotoxicity, as well as cellulitis, arm edema, or brachial plexopathy, is not well understood. We reviewed the records of patients treated on a randomized trial testing the sequencing of CT and XRT to determine if there was an increase in cardiac events or other complications in patients treated with a total dose of DOX of 180 mg/m2 and XRT, comparing patients with treatment to the left breast and the right breast, and comparing patients treated with initial CT and initial RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 1984 to December 1992, 244 patients with clinical stage I or II breast cancer were randomized following conservative surgery to receive CT (4 cycles of CAMFP at 3 week intervals) either before or after XRT (45 Gy to the entire breast, followed by a boost of 16 Gy; nodal radiation therapy was optional). Two hundred thirty-one patients were evaluable for the development of cardiac toxicity. The median age at diagnosis was 45 years (range, 20-68). CT doses were: doxorubicin, 45 mg/m2 IV bolus, d 3; methotrexate, 200 mg/m2 IV, d 1 and 15; 5-fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2 IV, d 1; cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m2 IV, d 1; prednisone 40 mg p.o., d 1-5. A cardiac event was defined as a myocardial infarction or clinical evidence of congestive heart failure. Median follow-up time was 53 months. RESULTS: No cardiac events were observed for patients with either left- or right-sided breast cancer. The sequencing of CT and XRT had no significant effect on the risk of cardiac toxicity, cellulitis, arm edema or brachial plexopathy. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no evidence of an increased risk of cardiac toxicity from the addition of left breast tangential irradiation to DOX at a total dose of 180 mg/m2. Additional follow-up is needed to exclude possible late events. In addition, the sequencing of CT and XRT does not appear to affect the risk of cellulitis, arm edema, or brachial plexopathy.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Inability to escalate vinorelbine dose intensity using a daily x3 schedule with and without filgrastim in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Vinorelbine (Navelbine) is a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid with documented activity in breast cancer. The major dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) when given weekly is myelosuppression with minimal neurologic toxicity. This phase I study attempted to define the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and the DLT of vinorelbine on a daily x3 schedule with and without filgrastim support. METHODS: A total of 19 patients with stage IV breast cancer were enrolled in separate studies at Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). Eligible patients could have received up to two prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting and had to have an ANC > 1500/mm2, PLT > 100000 m3, creatinine < 2.0 mg/dl, bilirubin < 2.0 mg/dL, SGOT not more than three times normal, and performance status 0-1. Vinorelbine was administered using a daily x3 schedule every 3 weeks. The protocols were designed to study dose escalation with and without growth factor support. At DUMC, in the initial phase of the study, the starting dose was 15 mg/m2 per day and dose escalations of 5 mg/m2 were planned until DLT developed and the MTD was defined. DLT was defined as granulocytopenia < 500/mm3 for > 7 days, grade IV thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, or grade III or greater nonhematologic toxicity. In the second phase of the study, growth factor support was given with vinorelbine at the MTD. Filgrastim at a dose of 5 microg/kg was started on day 4 of the 21-day cycle and was continued until the neutrophil count exceeded 10000 cells/ mm3. At DFCI, all patients received growth factor starting on day 4 and the starting dose of vinorelbine was 25 mg/m2. RESULTS: At DUMC, DLT was seen at 20 mg/m2 in three of three patients and included febrile neutropenia, grade IV neutropenia > 7 days, grade III neurotoxicity, and grade III vomiting. Despite the addition of filgrastim, DLT was again seen at 20 mg/m2 and included grade III neurotoxicity (jaw pain, abdominal pain, constipation, ileus) and grade IV mucositis. Three patients at DFCI were treated with vinorelbine at a dose of 25 mg/m2 with growth factor support, and two developed DLT including febrile neutropenia, neutropenia > 7 days, and grade III stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our effort to escalate the dose intensity of vinorelbine on this schedule was not successful and was complicated by hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. A daily x3 schedule of vinorelbine should not be pursued as an alternative treatment regimen in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) and antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) of breast cancer cells mediated by bispecific antibody, MDX-210.

BACKGROUND: MDX-210 is a bispecific antibody (BsAb) with specificity for both the proto-oncogene product of HER-2/neu (c-erbB-2) and FcgammaRI (CD64). HER-2/neu is overexpressed in malignant tissue of approximately 30% of patients with breast cancer, and FcgammaRI is expressed on human monocytes, macrophages, and IFN-gamma activated granulocytes. We investigated phagocytosis and cytolysis of cultured human breast cancer cells by human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) mediated by BsAb MDX-210, its partially humanized derivative (MDX-H210), and its parent MoAb 520C9 (anti-HER-2/neu) under various conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Purified monocytes were cultured with GM-CSF, M-CSF, or no cytokine for five or six days. Antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) and cytolysis (ADCC) assays were performed with the MDM and HER-2/neu positive target cells (SK-BR-3). ADCP was measured by two-color fluorescence flow cytometry using PKH2 (green fluorescent dye) and phycoerythrin-conjugated (red) monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) against human CD14 and CD11b. ADCC was measured with a non-radioactive LDH detection kit. RESULTS: Both BsAb MDX-210 (via FcgammaRI) and MoAb 520C9 (mouse IgG1, via FcgammaRII) mediated similar levels of ADCP and ADCC. ADCP mediated by BsAb MDX-H210 was identical to that mediated by BsAb MDX-210. Confocal microscopy demonstrated that dual-labeled cells represented true phagocytosis. Both ADCP and ADCC were higher when MDM were pre-incubated with GM-CSF than when incubated with M-CSF. CONCLUSIONS: BsAb MDX-210 is as active in vitro as the parent MoAb 520C9 in inducing both phagocytosis and cytolysis of MDM. MDX-210 and its partially humanized derivative, MDX-H210, mediated similar levels of ADCP. GM-CSF appears to superior to M-CSF in inducing MDM-mediated ADCC and ADCP. These studies support the ongoing clinical investigations of BsAb MDX-210 and its partially humanized derivative.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Meta-analysis of trials comparing toremifene with tamoxifen and factors predicting outcome of antiestrogen therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Meta-analysis of all clinical data was conducted to compare toremifene 40-60 mg/day (TOR) with tamoxifen 20-40 mg/day (TAM) in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive or ER unknown advanced breast cancer and assess factors predicting treatment outcome. Data from five randomized parallel group studies (all studies) were combined. Efficacy variables were the response rate in all studies and also the time to treatment failure and survival in the three major studies (pivotal studies). Of the 1421 patients, 725 received TOR and 696 TAM. Response rates were 24.0% and 25.3%, respectively (p = 0.675) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the difference -5.3 to 3.4. Of the 1157 patients in the pivotal studies, 75% had progressed and 50% expired. Median treatment times were 4.9 months in TOR and 5.3 months in TAM groups (p = 0.762, hazard ratio 0.98 with 95% CI 0.87-1.11). Median survival times were 31.0 (TOR) and 33.1 (TAM) months (p = 0.758, hazard ratio 0.98 with 95% CI 0.83-1.15). All results are consistent with the criteria of statistical equivalence between TOR and TAM. More patients in TAM (20%) than in TOR (14%, p = 0.007) discontinued the treatment prematurely but overall the treatments were well tolerated. As the treatments were equally effective all data were analyzed together for predictive factors. High tumor ER concentration, long disease free time, soft tissue metastases, few metastatic sites, and good performance status all independently predicted longer survival (p<0.001). Previous adjuvant tamoxifen predicted shorter survival (p = 0.008). Objective response to treatment or disease stabilization for at least 12 months both predicted prolonged survival (p = 0.001). TOR 60 mg/day and TAM are equally effective and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Probability of survival may be predicted based on patient characteristics and on the initial response to the treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Phase II trial of high-dose liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in metastatic breast cancer. TLC D-99 Study Group.

PURPOSE: To estimate the toxicity and response rate of high-dose liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (TLC D-99, Evacet, The Liposome Company Inc, Princeton, NJ) in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two breast cancer patients with bidimensionally measurable metastatic disease and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease received a 135 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) bolus of TLC D-99 with 5 microg/kg of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor via subcutaneous injection every 21 days. RESULTS: The median number of treatment cycles of TLC D-99 was three (range, one to 10 cycles), and the median total cumulative dose of TLC D-99 was 405 mg/m2 (range, 135 to 1,065 mg/m2). Grade IV neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and mucositis were experienced by 48 (92%), 46 (88%), and 10 (19%) patients, respectively. Twenty (38%) of patients experienced cardiac toxicity: four (8%) experienced a decrease of 20% or more in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to a final value > or = 50%, nine (17%) experienced a decrease of 10% or more in LVEF to a final value less than 50%, and seven (13%) developed symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF), including one patient who died of cardiomyopathy after receiving a total dose of 1,035 mg/m2. In a stepwise logistic regression model, the significant risk factors for the development of CHF were the cumulative dose of prior adjuvant doxorubicin (P = .007) and the total cumulative dose of TLC D-99 (P = .032). The overall response rate was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32% to 61%) on an intent-to-treat basis. The median duration of response was 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.1 to 19.6 months) and the median progression-free survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 7.5 months). CONCLUSION: There was no added therapeutic benefit to the dose escalation of TLC D-99 in this study. A high rate of cardiotoxicity was also observed, especially among patients who had received prior adjuvant doxorubicin. This was probably attributable to the dose and schedule of TLC D-99 used in this trial, as well as the patient's lifetime cumulative doxorubicin dose. Administration of high-dose TLC D-99 at 135 mg/m2 every 3 weeks by i.v. bolus infusion does not warrant further investigation.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Determination of clinical utility of tumor markers: a tumor marker utility grading system.

TMUGS should help make order out of the chaos that exists in evaluation of tumor markers for clinical use. Although it seems cumbersome at first, application of this system by expert reviewers should help separate those markers for which clinical utility clearly exists from those markers for which either more data are necessary or for which further consideration can be discarded. Perhaps as important, this system may serve as a framework in which clinical and translational investigators can design studies prospectively to generate LOE I or II data, and thus hasten the acceptance of new biologic factors into routine clinical practice.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed1998

Circulating tumor markers in breast cancer: accepted utilities and novel prospects.

Detecting and/or monitoring changes in circulating tumor markers might assist in evaluating cancer risk, diagnosis, prognosis, or response to treatment. Several categories of circulating tumor markers have been investigated in breast cancer. These categories include classical tumor-associated antigens, such as CEA and CA 15-3, markers of tumor biology, including markers of angiogenesis, adhesion, and invasion, and antibody response to tumor-associated antigens such as HER2/neu and p53. We used a recently proposed Tumor Marker Utility Grading System to evaluate the use of several circulating tumor markers for different clinical utilities in breast cancer. While there are no tumor markers with established clinical utilities for most uses, tumor-associated antigens can be used for monitoring patients with metastatic disease. In addition, markers of tumor biology such as the circulating extracellular domain of HER2/neu might be useful in determining not only prognosis, but also response to specific treatments. However, further investigations are required to further assess the utility of individual tumor markers for specific clinical uses.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed1998

Assessing the clinical impact of prognostic factors: when is "statistically significant" clinically useful?

Very few tumor markers have been recommended for routine clinical care of patients with breast cancer. A framework to determine the clinical utility of tumor markers is required. In a previous publication, a "Tumor Marker Utility Grading System" (TMUGS) was proposed. TMUGS included a semi-quantitative grading scale (0-3+) which can be used to assign a score to a given tumor marker for a given outcome. Only those markers that are felt to be sufficiently strong to influence a therapeutic decision that results in improved clinical outcome for the patient are recommended. The studies from which data are used to assign a TMUGS grade can be placed into one of five Levels of Evidence (LOE). An extension of TMUGS ("TMUGS-Plus") is now proposed in which the relative strength of a prognostic or predictive factor can be estimated and expressed in terms of a risk ratio (RR) for prognostic factors or benefit ratio (BR) for predictive factors. Three categories of prognostic factors and three categories of predictive factors are proposed (strong, moderate, and weak). It is recommended that only LOE type I studies (prospective, highly powered studies of the tumor marker, or meta-analysis of LOE II or III datasets), be used to estimate the RR or BR of a given factor. Finally, a matrix, based on assumptions of acceptable absolute benefits relative to risks, is proposed in which any given tumor marker can be assessed for its clinical utility. TMUGS-Plus should aid in the assessment of published data regarding clinical utility of tumor markers. Perhaps more important, clinical investigators can use TMUGS-Plus to design tumor marker studies that will fulfill criteria for clinical utility, resulting in more rapid acceptance of tumor markers for routine clinical use.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed1998

Cardiac effects of adjuvant doxorubicin and radiation therapy in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To assess the cardiac effects of two different cumulative doses of adjuvant doxorubicin and radiation therapy (RT) in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred ninety-nine breast cancer patients were prospectively randomized to receive either five cycles (CA5) or 10 cycles (CA10) of adjuvant treatment with cyclophosphamide (500 mg/ m2) and doxorubicin (45 mg/m2) administered by intravenous bolus every 21 days. One hundred twenty-two of these patients also received RT. Estimates of the cardiac RT dose-volume were retrospectively categorized as low, moderate, or high. The risk of major cardiac events (congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction) was assessable in 276 patients (92%), with a median follow-up time of 6.0 years (range, 0.5 to 19.4). RESULTS: The estimated risk (95% confidence interval) of cardiac events per 100 patient-years was significantly higher for CA10 than for CA5 [1.7 (1.0 to 2.8) v 0.5 (0.1 to 1.2); P=.02]. The risk of cardiac events in CA5 patients, irrespective of the cardiac RT dose-volume, did not differ significantly from rates of cardiac events predicted for the general female population by the Framingham Heart Study. In CA10 patients, the incidence of cardiac events was significantly increased (relative risk ratio, 3.6; P < .00003) compared with the Framingham population, particularly in groups that also received moderate and high dose-volume cardiac RT. CONCLUSION: Conventional-dose adjuvant doxorubicin as delivered in the CA5 regimen by itself, or in combination with locoregional RT, was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of cardiac events. Higher doses of adjuvant doxorubicin (CA10) were associated with a threefold to fourfold increased risk of cardiac events. This appears to be especially true in patients treated with higher dose-volumes of cardiac RT. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these results.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase II study of receptor-enhanced chemosensitivity using recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2/neu monoclonal antibody plus cisplatin in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer refractory to chemotherapy treatment.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, response rate, and response duration of intravenous (i.v.) administration of recombinant, humanized anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody (rhuMAb HER2) plus cisplatin (CDDP) in a phase II, open-label, multicenter clinical trial for patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of extensively pretreated advanced breast cancer patients with HER2/neu overexpression and disease progression during standard chemotherapy. Patients received a loading dose of rhuMAb HER2 (250 mg i.v.) on day 0, followed by weekly doses of 100 mg i.v. for 9 weeks. Patients received CDDP (75 mg/m2) on days 1, 29, and 57. RESULTS: Of 37 patients assessable for response, nine (24.3%) achieved a PR, nine (24.3%) had a minor response or stable disease, and disease progression occurred in 19 (51.3%). The median response duration was 5.3 months (range, 1.6-18). Grade III or IV toxicity was observed in 22 of 39 patients (56%). The toxicity profile reflected that expected from CDDP alone with the most common toxicities being cytopenias (n = 10), nausea/vomiting (n = 9), and asthenia (n = 5). Mean pharmacokinetic parameters of rhuMAb HER2 were unaltered by coadministration of CDDP. CONCLUSION: The use of rhuMAb HER2 in combination with CDDP in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer results in objective clinical response rates higher than those reported previously for CDDP alone, or rhuMAb HER2 alone. In addition, the combination results in no apparent increase in toxicity. Finally, the pharmacology of rhuMAb HER2 was unaffected by coadministration with CDDP.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Do prognostic marker studies on core needle biopsy specimens of breast carcinoma accurately reflect the marker status of the tumor?

Core needle biopsies (CNB) are often used for the diagnosis of breast lesions. In some breast cancer patients, e.g., those treated with preoperative chemotherapy, the CNB specimen might be the only pretreatment tissue sample available for studies of prognostic and predictive markers. Our purpose was to evaluate whether marker studies performed on CNB specimens accurately reflect the marker status of the tumor. Immunostaining for five commonly used prognostic and predictive markers was performed on both CNB and subsequent excision specimens from 56 consecutive patients who had a CNB with carcinoma followed by excision of the tumor. None of the patients received radiotherapy or chemotherapy between the CNB and the excision. Paraffin sections of the CNB and excision specimens were immunostained for bcl-2, estrogen receptor (ER), c-erbB-2, and p53. These markers were scored as positive or negative. Microvessel density (MVD) was scored as a continuous variable on sections immunostained for Factor VIII-related antigen by calculating the average number of microvessels in three 224x fields of highest tumor vascularity ("hot spots"). Immunostaining results for bcl-2, ER, c-erbB-2, and p53 on the CNB and the corresponding excision specimens were 100% concordant. Although there was significant correlation between MVD on the CNB specimens and the corresponding excisions (r = 0.507, P = 0.0002), the mean MVD on the CNB and corresponding excision specimens differed by more than 10% in 85.7% of cases, with differences ranging from 4.3 to 233.3%. MVD was higher in the CNB than in the excision specimens in 30 (61.2%) of 49 cases. In conclusion, in all of the cases studied, accurate results for the dichotomously scored markers bcl-2, ER, c-erbB-2, and p53 were obtained on CNB specimens. In contrast, in most cases, MVD, which was scored as a continuous variable, could not be reliably assessed on the CNB specimen.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗