PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Faulds

Publications and source records attributed to D Faulds.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Repaglinide.

Repaglinide is a novel insulin secretagogue being developed for the management of type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. It stimulates release of insulin from the pancreatic beta-cell, but appears to bind to a different receptor site from sulphonylureas. Repaglinide lowers fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels in animals, healthy volunteers and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Repaglinide is rapidly absorbed and eliminated, which may allow a relatively fast onset and offset of action. Excretion occurs almost entirely by non-renal mechanisms. In comparative clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, repaglinide 0.5 to 4 mg twice or 3 times daily before meals provided similar glycaemic control to glibenclamide (glyburide) 2.5 to 15 mg/day. Addition of repaglinide to existing metformin therapy resulted in improved glycaemic control. In contrast with glibenclamide, use of repaglinide allowed patients to miss a meal without apparently increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Rabeprazole.

Rabeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor with antisecretory properties. In vitro animal experiments have indicated that the inhibition of the proton pump by rabeprazole is partially reversible. Rabeprazole has 2- to 10-fold greater antisecretory activity than omeprazole in vitro. However, it dissociates more readily from H+,K(+)-ATPase than omeprazole, resulting in a shorter duration of action. In comparative clinical trials rabeprazole was significantly more effective than placebo, famotidine or ranitidine and as effective as omeprazole in the treatment of patients with erosive or ulcerative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or gastric or duodenal ulcers. Healing rates with rabeprazole were independent of Helicobacter pylori status. Rabeprazole in combination with either clarithromycin and metronidazole or clarithromycin and amoxicillin or amoxicillin and metronidazole or clarithromycin for 7 days produced eradication of H. pylori in 100, 95, 90 and 63% of patients. The tolerability profile of rabeprazole 20mg once daily was similar to that of famotidine 20mg twice daily, ranitidine 150mg 4 times daily or omeprazole 20mg once daily in comparative trials. The adverse events reported with once daily administration of rabeprazole 20mg include malaise, nausea, diarrhoea, headache, dizziness and skin eruptions in 0.7 to 2.2% of patients.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed1998

Raltitrexed. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of advanced colorectal cancer.

Raltitrexed (ZD-1694) is a quinazoline-based folate analogue that exerts its cytotoxic activity by the specific inhibition of thymidylate synthase. In vitro studies show that raltitrexed is actively transported into cells and is then rapidly and extensively metabolised to a series of polyglutamates. These metabolites are significantly more potent inhibitors of thymidylate synthase than the parent drug and are retained intracellularly, producing prolonged cytotoxic effects without the need for continuous drug exposure. Phase III clinical trials in patients with advanced colorectal cancer evaluated raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 administered as a 15-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks. This schedule produced objective response rates of 14.3 to 19.3%, which were similar to those in patients treated with fluorouracil plus leucovorin (15.2 to 18.1%). Median survival durations ranged from 9.7 to 10.9 months with raltitrexed treatment and from 10.2 to 12.7 months with fluorouracil plus leucovorin. The major toxicities associated with raltitrexed involve the haematological and gastrointestinal systems, although severe asthenia also occurred in 6 to 18% of patients receiving the drug. Grade 3 or 4 nausea or vomiting occurred in up to 13% of raltitrexed recipients and grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea in up to 14%. Similar incidences of grade 3 or 4 nausea or vomiting and diarrhoea were seen with fluorouracil plus leucovorin treatment. Raltitrexed generally showed significant advantages over fluorouracil plus leucovorin with respect to the incidence of leucopenia and mucositis. A greater proportion of raltitrexed than fluorouracil plus leucovorin recipients were able to receive the scheduled dosage. Thus, with its similar efficacy to fluorouracil-based regimens, convenient administration schedule and favourable tolerability profile, raltitrexed provides clinicians with a worthwhile alternative to fluorouracil-based treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1998

Abacavir.

Abacavir is a nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor that inhibits clinical isolates of HIV in vitro with a potency similar to that of zidovudine. Resistance to abacavir develops relatively slowly. Cross-resistance between abacavir and didanosine, zalcitabine or lamivudine, but not zidovudine or stavudine, has been reported in vitro. Abacavir has good oral bioavailability, as demonstrated in animals, and penetrates the CNS. Treatment with abacavir, alone or in combination with other anti-HIV agents (zidovudine, lamivudine, nevirapine, amprenavir and/or other protease inhibitors), decreased viral load and increased CD4+ cell count in patients with HIV infection. Effectiveness was maintained for at least 48 weeks. In early phase I/II trials, headache, gastrointestinal disturbances, rash, malaise, fatigue and/or asthenia were the most common adverse events reported with abacavir alone or in combination with other anti-HIV agents. Hypersensitivity reactions lead to discontinuation of therapy in 2 to 3% of patients.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1998

Amprenavir.

Amprenavir is a viral protease inhibitor with specificity for the HIV protease enzyme. The resistance profile of amprenavir appears to differ from that of other protease inhibitors such as saquinavir and indinavir. Twelve hours after single-dose administration of amprenavir 1200mg to HIV-infected individuals, the mean plasma concentration of the drug was more than 10-fold greater than the 50% inhibitory concentration for HIV-1IIIB in peripheral blood lymphocytes. In a small nonblind study, amprenavir monotherapy increased CD4+ cell count and decreased viral load in 37 patients with HIV infection and no previous exposure to protease inhibitor therapy. Combination therapy comprising amprenavir and other antiretroviral agents (abacavir, zidovudine, lamivudine, indinavir, saquinavir or nelfinavir) decreased viral load and increased CD4+ cell counts in patients with HIV infection. Antiviral efficacy was maintained during up to 24 weeks' follow-up. Available data suggest that rash, headache and diarrhoea or loose stools are the most frequent adverse events associated with amprenavir therapy.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Ganciclovir. An update of its use in the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients.

UNLABELLED: Ganciclovir is a nucleoside analogue which is used to treat and prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Most recent clinical studies of ganciclovir in transplant recipients have focused on preventive approaches. When ganciclovir was last reviewed in Drugs in 1994, substantial data on post-transplantation CMV prophylaxis with this drug were available only for patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Two strategies had emerged: prophylaxis for all patients or early treatment started after detection of asymptomatic CMV infection. Subsequently, a large double-blind study has shown that ganciclovir prophylaxis is more effective than early treatment in preventing early CMV disease after allogeneic BMT and is not associated with an increased incidence of neutropenia. However, mortality for the 2 strategies was similar. The efficacy of prophylactic intravenous ganciclovir in liver transplant recipients [including high risk donor seropositive/recipient seronegative (D+/R-) or antilymphocyte-treated patients] is now well established. Prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir was effective both overall and in D+/R-patients in a large placebo controlled study, and prolonged intravenous ganciclovir was significantly more effective than high dose aciclovir (acyclovir) in seropositive liver recipients. Early treatment with ganciclovir has proved useful in this setting. More limited data indicate that CMV prophylaxis with intravenous ganciclovir may be useful after heart or lung transplantation but its value in D+/-patients remains unclear. Combined chemoimmunotherapy may be valuable in these high risk patients but controlled data are lacking. Targeted prophylaxis with intravenous ganciclovir is effective in renal transplant recipients receiving antilymphocyte therapy; the role of oral ganciclovir in this setting is less clear. The value of ganciclovir in D+/- renal transplant recipients and its efficacy compared with high dose aciclovir have not been determined. CONCLUSIONS: Ganciclovir is the only antiviral chemotherapy which reduces the risk of CMV infection or disease after most types of major transplantation. Unresolved issues include the best (and most cost-effective) use of ganciclovir and aciclovir after allogeneic BMT, the efficacy of oral ganciclovir compared with other anti-CMV regiments, the potential clinical effect of viral resistance during prolonged ganciclovir exposure and the value of ganciclovir in certain high risk transplant populations. In the meantime, ganciclovir has an important role in the prevention of CMV infection and disease after bone marrow and liver transplantation and is likely to gain wider clinical use in heart, lung and kidney transplant recipients.

Acyclovir↗
PubMed1998

Nelfinavir. A review of its therapeutic efficacy in HIV infection.

UNLABELLED: Nelfinavir is a selective inhibitor of HIV protease, the enzyme responsible for post-translational processing of HIV propeptides. In the presence of the drug, immature, noninfectious virus particles are produced. Nelfinavir in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors profoundly suppresses viral replication. Plasma HIV RNA levels (viral loan) rapidly fall below the limit of detection (LOD; usually 400 or 500 copies/ml in the majority of patients. When used in combination with NRTIs, nelfinavir 1250mg twice daily produced similar results to 3-times-daily nelfinavir at a range of total daily dosages. In an ongoing study > 70% of adults receiving a nelfinavir based combination regimen had plasma HIV RNA levels below the LOD (< 400 copies/ml) after 84 weeks. In addition, 73% of paediatric patients receiving nelfinavir plus at least 1 new NRTI had viral loads below the LOD (< 400 copies/ml) after 34 weeks. Furthermore, CD4+ cell counts generally increased in conjunction with reductions in viral load. Combination therapy with nelfinavir and saquinavir results in higher saquinavir plasma concentrations, make twice-daily administration of saquinavir feasible and may delay the emergence of resistant viral strains. A unique mutation at codon 30 (D30N) of the protease gene confers resistance to nelfinavir, but HIV with D30N mutation remains fully susceptible to indinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir in vitro. Nonetheless, in clinical use, significant cross-resistance is seen with all currently available protease inhibitors. Diarrhoea is the most frequently reported adverse event in patients receiving nelfinavir-based combination therapy and has been reported in up to 32% of nelfinavir recipients in randomised trials. Diarrhoea is generally of mild to moderate severity and does not result in weight loss. Rash, nausea, headache and asthenia were each reported in < or = 5% of patients. Approximately 5% of patients enrolled in an expanded access programme in the US discontinued nelfinavir because of adverse events. Nelfinavir is metabolised by the cytochrome P450 system. Several clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions between nelfinavir and other drugs (i.e. ketoconazole, rifabutin, rifabutin, rifampicin), including other protease inhibitors (i.e. indinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir) have been documented. As with other available protease inhibitors, hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidaemia and abnormal fat distribution have been reported, albeit infrequently, in association with nelfinavir. CONCLUSION: Nelfinavir-based combination regimens are well tolerated and produce profound and prolonged suppression of HIV replication in adult and paediatric patients. Hence, nelfinavir is suitable for inclusion in antiretroviral regimens for initial therapy for HIV infection and, alternatively, in regimens for patients unable to tolerate other protease inhibitors.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Montelukast.

Montelukast is a selective antagonist of the leukotriene D4 (LTD4) receptor. In patients with asthma, montelukast 5 to 250 mg/day attenuated LTD4-induced bronchoconstriction and, at a dosage of 10 mg, significantly reduced early and late airway response to allergen (dust mite extract) relative to placebo. In studies evaluating the effects of various dosages of montelukast on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction the optimal dose of the drug was found to be 10 mg. Montelukast 10 mg/day controlled asthma significantly more effectively than placebo in a 3-month randomised double-blind study. In a 9-month open extension of this trial, during which patients were randomised to treatment with montelukast 10 mg/day or beclomethasone (approximately 400 micrograms/day), daytime symptom score and beta-agonist use decreased to a similar extent in each group. In a further study, treatment with montelukast 10 mg/day permitted clinically significant tapering of corticosteroid dosage in patients with stable asthma. Montelukast (5 mg/day) has also demonstrated efficacy in childhood asthma. The tolerability profile of montelukast was similar to that of placebo in placebo-controlled clinical trials in adults and children; the most common adverse event was headache.

Acetates↗
PubMed1998

Theophylline. A review of its potential steroid sparing effects in asthma.

UNLABELLED: Theophylline is generally considered to be a bronchodilatory drug. However, recent pharmacodynamic studies indicate that it has anti-inflammatory effects. It reduced eosinophil survival rates in vitro, and reduced eosinophil accumulation in bronchial tissue in patients with atopic asthma. Theophylline has also been shown to reduce T cell proliferation and accumulation. These changes were mirrored by improved pulmonary function in patients with asthma in studies that evaluated this parameter. Three randomised double-blind studies have evaluated the potential role of theophylline as an anti-inflammatory treatment in patients with asthma not controlled by low doses of inhaled corticosteroids. Patients were randomised to receive low dose theophylline (400 to 750 mg daily) plus low dose inhaled corticosteroids, or an increased dose of inhaled corticosteroids. Clinical pulmonary function improved to the same or a greater extent in patients who received low dose inhaled corticosteroids plus theophylline than in those treated with high dose inhaled corticosteroids plus placebo. Where reported, the dosages of theophylline used in these studies resulted in serum theophylline concentrations of approximately 9 to 10 mg/L. Approximate monthly costs were provided in one study: these were $60 (year and currency not specified) for theophylline plus budesonide 800 micrograms/day, compared with $100 for budesonide 1600 micrograms/day, and $155 for a regimen of budesonide 800 micrograms/day and salmeterol 100 micrograms/day. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose theophylline has been shown to reduce requirements for inhaled corticosteroid therapy in patients with asthma and may reduce overall treatment costs.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
PubMed1997

Phosphodiesterase type IV inhibitors in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease with inflammatory lesions localized to the white matter of the central nervous system. Early on, the disease is characterized by episodes of exacerbations and remissions. During exacerbations there is an acute inflammatory infiltrate characterized by the presence of mononuclear cells, monocytes, and T lymphocytes. These cells produce proinflammatory cytokines that have been implicated in the amplification of the inflammatory response as well as in the damage of oligodendrocytes. The inflammation ultimately results in loss of myelin and oligodendrocyte cell death (demyelination). Thus therapies aimed at preventing the inflammatory response may have a beneficial effect on the course of the disease. One such therapy is treatment with inhibitors of phosphodiesterase type IV. These drugs have proven to be extremely effective in the prevention and treatment of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis, the animal model for multiple sclerosis. These experiments, as well as other data discussed here, provide a rationale for the treatment of multiple sclerosis with inhibitors of phosphodiesterase type IV.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Nadroparin calcium. A review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.

Nadroparin (nadroparin calcium) is a low molecular weight heparin with a mean molecular weight of 4.5 kD. Compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH), nadroparin has a greater ratio of anti-factor Xa to anti-factor Ha activity, greater bioavailability and a longer duration of action, allowing it to be administered by subcutaneous injection for prophylaxis or treatment of thromboembolic disorders. In clinical trials conducted in older patients (mean age usually > 60 years), nadroparin was at least as effective as UFH in preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism after major general or orthopaedic surgery, and in bedridden medical patients. Nadroparin was also at least as effective as dalteparin or oral acenocoumarol in preventing thromboembolic events following general and orthopaedic surgery, respectively. When used for treatment of established DVT, nadroparin was at least as effective as intravenous UFH. Subcutaneous nadroparin, at dosages similar to those used for the treatment of DVT, produced promising results in older patients with pulmonary embolism, acute ischaemic stroke or unstable angina. In 1 study, 75% of nadroparin-treated patients were able to complete their treatment at home and 36% did not require admission to hospital; the potential pharmacoeconomic implications of these results deserve further evaluation. Overall treatment costs (drug acquisition and monitoring costs) were similar for nadroparin and UFH in a French study, but nadroparin was associated with significantly less nursing time spent on treatment delivery. Nadroparin is well tolerated by older patients. The most frequently reported adverse events in a large (n approximately 4500) placebo-controlled study in general surgical patients were wound and injection site haematoma (11.8 and 10.2%, respectively, vs approximately 6.5% for placebo). When used as prophylaxis, no significant differences in bleeding complications were noted between nadroparin and UFH or acenocoumarol recipients. Prophylactic nadroparin was associated with significantly fewer withdrawals because of adverse events than UFH in elderly bedridden medical patients. When used as treatment for DVT, nadroparin was generally associated with lower occurrences of major bleeding than intravenous UFH (0.5 to 2.3% vs 2 to 5%); however, trials were not large enough to demonstrate any significant differences between the 2 agents. Similarly, the incidence of thrombocytopenia was slightly, but generally not significantly, lower in nadroparin (< 1%) than in UFH (< or = 3.5%) recipients. Thus, nadroparin should be considered an effective and well tolerated alternative to UFH for prophylaxis and treatment of DVT in older patients, with the advantage of more convenient administration and decreased monitoring requirements.

Absorption↗
PubMed1997

Samarium 153Sm lexidronam.

Samarium 153Sm lexidronam is a medium energy beta-emitting radioisotope chelated to the tetraphosphate, ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonic acid (EDTMP). 153Sm has a physical half-life of 1.9 days. Samarium 153Sm lexidronam concentrates in bone tissue and has a metastatic lesion: normal bone ratio of 4. Clearance of nonskeletal radioactivity after administration of samarium 153Sm lexidronam is rapid, and is almost complete from the blood and urine within 1 and 6 hours, respectively. Some degree of pain relief was achieved in 72% of patients with bone metastases after a single dose of samarium 153Sm lexidronam 1 mCi/kg (37 MBq/kg) compared with 44% of placebo recipients (p < 0.025). Relief was generally attained within 2 weeks and lasted for a median of 8 to 15 weeks. After recurrence of pain, a second dose of samarium 153Sm lexidronam may produce further pain relief in some patients. The dose-limiting toxicity of samarium 153Sm lexidronam is reversible myelosuppression.

Analgesics, Non-Narcotic↗
PubMed1997

Metrifonate.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Triamcinolone acetonide. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of allergic rhinitis.

Triamcinolone acetonide is a synthetic glucocorticoid which has been formulated as both an aerosol and an aqueous metered-dose pump spray for nasal inhalation in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Nasally administered triamcinolone acetonide is not significantly absorbed into the systemic circulation and does not suppress hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function at therapeutic dosages. Clinical trials with either formulation have shown that once-daily triamcinolone acetonide 110 to 220 micrograms reduces symptoms of allergic rhinitis within the first day of administration. Once symptoms are under control, the dosage of aqueous triamcinolone acetonide may be reduced from 220 to 110 micrograms/day without loss of effect. Both aqueous and aerosol formulations of triamcinolone acetonide are significantly more effective in relieving symptoms and reducing nasal eosinophil influx than placebo. Once-daily intranasal triamcinolone acetonide 220 micrograms/day produced similar reductions from baseline in nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis, when measured both subjectively (visual analogue scales) and objectively (anterior rhinomanometry), to those seen with beclomethasone 84 to 168 micrograms twice daily, fluticasone 200 micrograms once daily or flunisolide 100 micrograms twice daily for 3 to 12 weeks. Furthermore, triamcinolone acetonide aerosol 220 micrograms/day was significantly more effective at reducing the nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis than the oral antihistamines loratadine and astemizole (both 10mg daily) and was equally as effective in reducing the associated ocular symptoms. The use of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide and oral loratadine in combination did not confer any additional advantage over triamcinolone acetonide alone. Triamcinolone acetonide [110 to either 220 micrograms/day (aqueous) or 440 micrograms/day (aerosol)] was well tolerated in clinical trials; headache and epistaxis were the only adverse events considered possibly or probably related to aerosol therapy in a 1-year study (110 to 440 micrograms/day). Therefore, in accordance with the recommendations from the International Rhinitis Management Working Group regarding the use of nasal glucocorticoids, triamcinolone acetonide may be considered a first-line therapy option in adults with moderately severe seasonal allergic rhinitis with predominantly nasal symptoms and also in children and adult patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Epirubicin. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of breast cancer.

Epirubicin, an anthracycline antitumour antibiotic which is structurally related to doxorubicin, is among the most active single agents used in the management of patients with breast cancer. The drug may be administered alone or in combination with other agents both to patients with early breast cancer and to those with metastatic disease. There is a clear relationship between epirubicin dose and tumour response. Dose intensified regimens have produced improved response rates in patients with advanced breast cancer compared with standard dose therapy; however, improved overall survival has not yet been demonstrated. The combination of epirubicin with newer agents such as vinorelbine or paclitaxel shows considerable promise, as does the use of epirubicin in high dose regimens with peripheral blood progenitor cell support. The major adverse effects of epirubicin are acute dose-limiting haematological toxicity and cumulative dose-related cardiac toxicity. These effects are less severe after epirubicin administration than after equimolar doses of doxorubicin. Other major adverse effects of epirubicin administration include mucositis, nausea and vomiting, reversible alopecia and local cutaneous and vesicant reactions. In summary, epirubicin has an established role in the treatment of both early and advanced breast cancer. Incombination with other highly active agents or in dose intensified regimens administered with haemopoietic growth factor and/or peripheral blood progenitor cell support, epirubicin may play a significant role in emerging breast cancer treatment strategies.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1997

Lamivudine. A review of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of HIV infection.

Lamivudine is a dideoxynucleoside analogue which undergoes intracellular phosphorylation to the putative active metabolite, lamivudine triphosphate. Lamivudine triphosphate prevents HIV replication by competitively inhibiting viral reverse transcriptase. Lamivudine has a unique resistance profile and has the ability to delay resistance to zidovudine and restore zidovudine sensitivity in zidovudine-experienced patients. Combination antiretroviral drug therapy is now generally considered preferable to monotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with HIV infection. In double-blind trials in antiretroviral drug-experienced or -naive adults, improvements in surrogate markers of disease progression were significantly greater in patients receiving lamivudine plus zidovudine combination therapy than in patients who received either drug as monotherapy. Preliminary results of CAESAR, a large multicentre trial in patients with moderately advanced HIV infection receiving zidovudine-based treatment regimens, show a 54% reduction in the rate of disease progression or death with the addition of lamivudine, compared with the addition of placebo. Initial virological data from studies of combination regimens including lamivudine and protease inhibitors are also promising, although the longer term efficacy of these regimens remains to be established. Improvements in surrogate disease markers were also seen in children and adolescents with symptomatic HIV infection who received lamivudine monotherapy. Studies of lamivudine-containing combination therapy in children and adolescents are in progress, but few data have yet been published. Lamivudine is generally well tolerated as monotherapy or in combination with other antiretroviral agents in HIV-infected adults with CD4+ counts > or = 100 cells/microliter. Gastrointestinal disturbances were reported as the most common adverse events during lamivudine monotherapy or combination therapy. Lamivudine appears to be less well tolerated in patients with advanced disease (CD4+ cell counts < 100 cells/microliter), but more data are required to clarify its tolerability in such patients. Pancreatitis has been reported in children with advanced disease during treatment with the drug, but was not directly attributable to lamivudine therapy. Thus, lamivudine, administered in combination with zidovudine, is now established as an effective agent for the treatment of antiretroviral drug-experienced or -naive individuals with asymptomatic or symptomatic HIV disease. Moreover, encouraging preliminary data suggest that lamivudine is poised to become an important component of other regimens, in combination with drugs such as the protease inhibitors.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Cisatracurium besilate. A review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in anaesthetic practice.

Cisatracurium besilate (besylate) is a nondepolarising neuromuscular blocking agent with an intermediate duration of action. It is the R-cis, R'-cis isomer of atracurium besilate and is approximately 3-fold more potent than the mixture of isomers that constitute the parent drug. The ED95 for cisatracurium besilate (dose required to produce 95% suppression of twitch response to nerve stimulation) in adults is 0.05 mg/kg during N2O/O2 opioid anaesthesia. As for atracurium besilate, the primary route of elimination of cisatracurium besilate is by spontaneous degradation. Cisatracurium besilate is not associated with dose-related histamine release (at bolus doses of < or = 8 x ED95) and, consistent with this, has demonstrated cardiovascular stability in both healthy patients (< or = 8 x ED95) and those with coronary artery disease (< or = 6 x ED95). In clinical trials, cisatracurium besilate has been used successfully to facilitate intubation (at 2 to 4 x ED95) and as a muscle relaxant during surgery and in intensive care. Compared with vecuronium, cisatracurium besilate was associated with a significantly faster recovery after continuous infusion in patients in intensive care. Relative to atracurium besilate, cisatracurium besilate has a lower propensity to cause histamine release is more potent but has a slightly longer onset time at equipotent doses. It also offers a more predictable recovery profile than vecuronium after prolonged use in patients in intensive care. Thus, comparative data provide some indication of the potential of cisatracurium besilate as an intermediate-duration neuromuscular blocking agent but further comparisons with other like agents are required to define precisely its relative merits.

Adult↗