Biomedical subjects

D Faulds

Publications and source records attributed to D Faulds.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed1993

Fludarabine. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in malignancy.

Fludarabine is a fluorinated purine analogue with antineoplastic activity in lymphoproliferative malignancies. Noncomparative studies have shown response rates in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) that appear to be at least equivalent to those achieved with conventional therapy. Prolymphocytic leukaemia, a form of CLL which is often resistant to conventional chemotherapy, has also responded to treatment with fludarabine. Fludarabine combined with prednisone has also induced good response rates in patients with CLL but the limited data suggest that this does not offer an advantage over fludarabine alone. Several clinical trials have demonstrated a good cytoreductive response in patients with advanced, low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, particularly that of follicular histology. Preliminary evidence indicates fludarabine in combination with cytarabine has therapeutic activity as salvage therapy in patients with acute leukaemia. Myelosuppression has been the major dose-limiting adverse effect reported in clinical trials of fludarabine. A reduction in CD4+ cell count may be associated with the increased incidence of fever and opportunistic infections in fludarabine recipients. Nausea and vomiting have also been commonly reported, but these are generally mild to moderate in severity. Reversible neurotoxicity has also been occasionally reported. Thus, fludarabine appears to offer a viable alternative to currently used treatments in CLL and low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Other potential areas of use for fludarabine include acute leukaemias. Waldenstrom's macroglobulinaemia and mycosis fungoides. However, trials of fludarabine in comparison with currently used therapies and also in combination with other antineoplastic agents are required to fully define its role in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies. In addition, because relapse in these diseases is common, long term trials assessing improvement in survival duration and quality of life would be of value.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy.

Epirubicin is the 4' epimer of the anthracycline antibiotic doxorubicin, and has been used alone or in combination with other cytotoxic agents in the treatment of a variety of malignancies. Comparative and noncomparative clinical trials have demonstrated that regimens containing conventional doses of epirubicin achieved equivalent objective response rates and overall median survival as similar doxorubicin-containing regimens in the treatment of advanced and early breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer and nonresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, dose-intensive regimens of epirubicin have achieved high response rates in a number of malignancies including early and advanced breast cancer and lung cancer. The major acute dose-limiting toxicity of anthracyclines is myelosuppression. In vitro and clinical studies have shown that, at equimolar doses, epirubicin is less myelotoxic than doxorubicin. The lower haematological toxicity of epirubicin, as well as the recent introduction of supportive measures such as colony-stimulating factors, has allowed dose-intensification of epirubicin-containing regimens, which is particularly significant because of the definite dose-response relationship of anthracyclines. Cardiotoxicity, which is manifested clinically as irreversible congestive heart failure and/or cardiomyopathy, is the most important chronic cumulative dose-limiting toxicity of anthracyclines. Epirubicin has a lower propensity to produce cardiotoxic effects than doxorubicin, and its recommended maximum cumulative dose is almost double that of doxorubicin, thus allowing for more treatment cycles and/or higher doses of epirubicin. In summary, dose-intensive epirubicin-containing regimens, which are feasible due to its lower myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity, have produced high response rates in early breast cancer, a potentially curable malignancy, as well as advanced breast, and lung cancers. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that improved response rates can improve quality of life in some clinical settings, but whether this leads to prolonged survival has not yet been determined. Recently implemented supportive measures such as colony-stimulating factors, prophylactic antimicrobials and peripheral blood stem cell support may help achieve other potential advantages of dose-intensive epirubicin-containing regimens such as reductions in morbidity and length of hospital admissions.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed1993

Miocamycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.

Miocamycin is an orally administered 16-membered macrolide antimicrobial drug. It has a spectrum of in vitro activity similar to that of erythromycin, inhibiting a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, atypical microbes and some anaerobes. Importantly, miocamycin demonstrates greater in vitro potency than erythromycin against several pathogens including Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma hominis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Equally noteworthy is its activity against erythromycin-resistant staphylococcal and streptococcal species expressing inducible-type resistance. Miocamycin possesses poor overall activity against Haemophilus influenzae and is inactive against Enterobacteriaceae. Penetration of miocamycin into body tissues and fluids is both rapid and extensive. The 3 major metabolites of miocamycin possess antimicrobial activity and may contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of the drug. Clinical data indicate that miocamycin is useful in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections in both adult and paediatric patients. Miocamycin is also effective in the treatment of urogenital tract infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis or U. urealyticum. Several studies suggest that miocamycin is at least as effective as erythromycin in these indications; however, comparisons with newer macrolide agents have yet to be performed. In other studies, miocamycin proved to be a useful agent in the treatment of periodontal infections and as anti-infective prophylaxis in dental surgery. Miocamycin appears to have a tolerability profile qualitatively similar to that of other macrolides, with gastrointestinal and skin disorders being the most commonly reported adverse events. Current data suggest that the potential for drug interactions with miocamycin is low, with the possible exceptions of carbamazepine and cyclosporin. Thus, although further confirmation and elaboration of various aspects of its efficacy and tolerability profile is needed, at this stage miocamycin offers a useful alternative oral therapy to erythromycin for the treatment of uncomplicated community-acquired respiratory tract infections and nongonococcal urethritis.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Tacrolimus. A review of its pharmacology, and therapeutic potential in hepatic and renal transplantation.

Tacrolimus (FK 506) is a macrolide immunosuppressant which possesses similar but more potent immunosuppressant properties compared with cyclosporin, inhibiting cell-mediated and humoral immune responses. Like cyclosporin, tacrolimus demonstrates considerable interindividual variation in its pharmacokinetic profile. This has caused difficulty in defining the optimum dosage regimen and has highlighted the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring. Most clinical studies with tacrolimus have neither been published in their entirety nor subjected to extensive peer review; there is also a paucity of published randomised investigations of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin, particularly in renal transplantation. Despite these drawbacks, tacrolimus has shown notable efficacy as a rescue or primary immunosuppressant therapy when combined with corticosteroids in adult and paediatric recipients following liver or kidney transplantation. Indeed, graft salvage rates in patients experiencing rejection or drug-related toxicity were > or = 50%, although data in renal transplantation are limited. Compared with cyclosporin as a primary immunosuppressant, tacrolimus showed comparable or greater patient/graft survival rates in liver allograft recipients (where cost savings associated with reduced hospitalisation costs were evident in one study), and comparable patient/graft survival in patients following kidney transplantation. Worthy of note was the efficacy of tacrolimus as a primary immunosuppressant in patients who received en bloc kidney allografts. The incidence of rejection was largely reduced following rescue therapy with tacrolimus and was generally lower (notably for refractory rejection) than that observed for cyclosporin, at least in liver allograft recipients. This was reflected in less need for adjunct immunotherapy including antilymphocyte preparations for the treatment of rejection episodes. The potential for reduction or withdrawal of corticosteroid therapy with tacrolimus appears to be a distinct advantage compared with cyclosporin, and this may be enhanced by the reduced incidence of infectious complications and of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia reported by some investigators. In other respects, however, the tolerability profile of tacrolimus appears to be broadly similar to that of cyclosporin. Against this background, preliminary data indicate that tacrolimus provides a valuable therapeutic alternative to retransplantation in patients experiencing liver or kidney graft rejection or drug-related toxicity. Pending confirmation of initial randomised studies and preliminary results from large randomised investigations, tacrolimus may well be considered as an alternative primary immunosuppressant to cyclosporin in hepatic (particularly) and renal transplantation. Furthermore, the steroid-sparing effects of tacrolimus, although of benefit to all patient groups, may prove to be of particular worth in children and in en bloc kidney recipients. In these patients tacrolimus may well emerge as the drug of choice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Cetirizine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in selected allergic disorders.

Cetirizine, the carboxylated metabolite of hydroxyzine, is a specific and long-acting histamine H1-receptor antagonist. It has marked antiallergic properties and inhibits eosinophil chemotaxis during the allergic response. Clinical trial results indicate that cetirizine is an effective and well tolerated treatment for seasonal/perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria in adults, and for seasonal/perennial allergic rhinitis in children. Cetirizine 10 mg/day appears to be as effective as conventional dosages of other established antihistamines such as astemizole, hydroxyzine, ketotifen, loratadine or terfenadine in relieving symptoms of these disorders, and is associated with a significantly lower incidence of sedation than hydroxyzine. However, when sedation was subjectively assessed, cetirizine appeared to be more sedating than placebo, loratadine or terfenadine in some clinical trials. This difference was not observed in several other double-blind studies. In contrast, when assessed objectively in pharmacodynamic comparisons, cetirizine was rarely more sedating than placebo or other second generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists. Cetirizine may also have a role in the treatment of certain forms of physical urticaria, atopic dermatitis and reactions to mosquito bites. In addition, it is being studied for the treatment of allergic asthma in adults and children. The pharmacokinetic profile and predominantly renal excretion of cetirizine suggest that this agent may have a reduced potential for adverse drug interactions involving hepatic enzyme systems compared with other histamine H1-receptor antagonists which are extensively metabolised. Thus, cetirizine, with its rapid onset and long duration of action, appears to provide a useful alternative to the antihistamine agents in clinical use.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1993

Oral ciprofloxacin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of serious infections.

The broad spectrum of antibacterial activity and favourable pharmacokinetic profile of ciprofloxacin permit oral treatment of many serious infections which have traditionally necessitated parenteral antibacterial therapy. This has been demonstrated in comparative studies, in which ciprofloxacin was as effective and well tolerated as standard parenteral therapies (usually aminoglycoside/beta-lactam combinations or broad spectrum cephalosporins) in small numbers of patients with infections of the lower respiratory tract, urinary tract, skin and soft tissue, and bones and joints. Oral ciprofloxacin is considerably less expensive than most parenteral therapies, does not necessitate therapeutic drug monitoring and can be administered on an outpatient basis. In addition, administration by the oral route is more comfortable and convenient for the patient. Pharmacoeconomic studies have confirmed that substitution of oral ciprofloxacin for parenteral therapy in the treatment of serious infections can achieve considerable savings in drug acquisition costs, and labour and supplies associated with parenteral drug administration, and may allow early discharge from hospital, resulting in even greater savings. Mean reductions of 43 to 83% were achieved in antibacterial costs in 3 randomised prospective studies, when patients received oral ciprofloxacin instead of various parenteral agents, from the beginning of treatment, or after 3 days' parenteral therapy. It can be concluded that oral ciprofloxacin offers considerable scope for cost avoidance when appropriately substituted for parenteral therapy in the treatment of serious infections.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1993

Cyclosporin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in renal transplantation.

Cyclosporin is a powerful immunosuppressive agent which has markedly improved the outcome of renal transplantation, a technique now well established as the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Comparison of cyclosporin-based regimens with a regimen of azathioprine and a glucocorticoid (conventional immunosuppression) indicates an improved clinical course and increased long term graft survival rate with cyclosporin which is most apparent in the recipients of a kidney from a living related donor (human leucocyte antigen mismatched) or cadaver donor source. Cyclosporin has also improved the clinical outcome in patient subgroups previously associated with a higher risk of graft failure with conventional immunosuppression, namely older patients and those with diabetes mellitus. Cost-of-treatment studies conducted over the first post-transplant year in the US have found that higher pharmacy charges with cyclosporin-based regimens are associated with lower hospitalisation charges and total billed charges compared with conventional immunosuppression. Lower hospitalisation charges reflect an improved post-transplant clinical course with cyclosporin and this has been associated with an improved quality of life in the recipients of a cadaver donor kidney. Longer term, the direct cost to society of using cyclosporin-based dual therapy (in combination with a glucocorticoid) may be higher than that with conventional immunosuppression, although the difference is likely to be small compared with the ongoing cost of dialysis. Clinical research continues to focus on modified regimens which maximise the clinical benefits of cyclosporin while minimising the associated adverse events, in particular the potential for nephrotoxicity. Sequential drug therapy (induction with globulin, azathioprine and a glucocorticoid followed by delayed administration of cyclosporin) has been associated with an improved clinical course compared with dual therapy, as well as cost containment to a level comparable to that for conventional immunosuppression. Compared with sequential therapy, triple drug therapy (cyclosporin, azathioprine plus a glucocorticoid) has been associated with a similar clinical course and lower acquisition cost during the first post-transplant year, although its overall impact on the longer term cost of transplantation has yet to be assessed. Elimination of cyclosporin from the immunosuppressive protocol of carefully selected patients can be safely achieved during the first post-transplant year. However, it remains to be established whether savings in the long term acquisition cost of immunosuppression are more than offset by the cost of treating a potentially less favourable clinical course.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

PubMed1992

Current options in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer death in industrialised countries, with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 10%. Good patient performance status is associated with a significantly improved prognosis, whereas the presence of metastases, particularly to the bone or liver, is associated with a poor outcome. Disease staging has largely been standardised using the tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) system, and also provides significant prognostic information. More recently, several biomarkers have been identified in patients with NSCLC, although their prognostic relevance remains to be established. Surgery, when feasible, is the treatment of choice in patients with NSCLC. However, most patients present with locally advanced disease that is not completely resectable. The use of combination chemotherapy regimens has generally been restricted to patients with metastatic, recurrent or unresectable disease, and several relatively active drugs that are generally used in combination have been identified. Combination chemotherapy either alone, or with surgery and/or radiotherapy, has produced some improvements in response rates and, in the neoadjuvant setting, has allowed complete resection in an increased number of patients with otherwise marginally resectable disease. There is also evidence that this approach may increase both disease-free interval and survival time. Thus, the most active chemotherapy regimens (generally those including cisplatin and a vinca alkaloid) appear to provide some benefit in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but the identification of more active combinations remains a priority.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1992

Terbinafine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in superficial mycoses.

Terbinafine is an orally and topically active allylamine antifungal agent with a primarily fungicidal action in vitro. Its spectrum of in vitro activity includes a broad range of dermatophyte, filamentous, dimorphic and dematiaceous fungi, and some yeast species. In clinical trials, mycological and overall efficacy rates of around 90 and 80%, respectively, have been achieved in cutaneous dermatophyte infections (tinea corporis/cruris and tinea pedis) with terbinafine, administered either orally (250 or 500 mg/day) or topically (a 1% cream applied twice daily). Similar rates of cure have been obtained with oral terbinafine in dermatophyte nail infections after relatively short treatment periods ranging from 3 to 12 months. Topical terbinafine has been effective in approximately 80% of patients with cutaneous candidiasis or pityriasis versicolor. Few comparative data have been published, but generally oral terbinafine appeared to be at least as effective as oral griseofulvin or ketoconazole in tinea corporis/cruris and more effective than griseofulvin in tinea pedis. Both oral and topical terbinafine have been very well tolerated in clinical trials to date, with only minor adverse effects reported. Although further research is required to establish the efficacy of terbinafine in comparison with other available therapies, as well as to fully clarify its tolerability profile, the early results obtained with terbinafine in superficial fungal infections are very encouraging. Terbinafine appears likely to become a first-line therapy for dermatophyte infections, particularly those affecting the nails.

Antifungal Agents↗

PubMed1992

Moclobemide. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in depressive illness.

Moclobemide is a reversible and selective inhibitor of the enzyme monoamine oxidase (MAO) subtype A with a broad spectrum of antidepressant activity. Controlled clinical studies suggest that the short term clinical efficacy of moclobemide is significantly superior to that of placebo, and comparable to that of the tricyclic antidepressants clomipramine, amitriptyline, imipramine and desipramine, the irreversible MAO inhibitor tranylcypromine and the second-generation antidepressants maprotiline, mianserin and fluvoxamine in the treatment of major depressive illness. Moclobemide appears to be equally effective in endogenous and nonendogenous depression, producing marked amelioration of clinical features of psychomotor retardation and depressed mood. Moclobemide is well tolerated, being largely devoid of the anticholinergic adverse effects, symptomatic postural hypotension and weight gain variously associated with the tricyclic antidepressants and irreversible MAO inhibitors, and appears considerably safer on overdosage than the tricyclic and second generation antidepressants. Moreover, moclobemide offers the advantage over the older, irreversible MAO inhibitors of causing only minimal potentiation of the pressor response to dietary tyramine (the so-called 'cheese effect'). Consequently, the risk of potentially fatal hypertensive crisis, a major deterrent to the wider acceptance of these earlier compounds, is substantially reduced with moclobemide, and the need for dietary precautions is minimised. With its efficacy against endogenous and nonendogenous depression, relatively rapid onset of antidepressant activity, and absence of carry-over effects on treatment withdrawal, moclobemide is likely to make an important contribution to the treatment of major depressive illness. Its favourable tolerability profile, safety on overdosage and beneficial effect on age-related cognitive impairment may be of particular value in the elderly and those with concurrent physical illness.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Cibenzoline. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in arrhythmias.

Cibenzoline is a class I antiarrhythmic drug with limited class III and IV activity which can be administered orally or intravenously. An elimination half-life of about 8 to 12 hours permits twice daily administration, although age and renal function must be considered when determining dosage. Cibenzoline has some activity in ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, including drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia or ventricular arrhythmias following recent acute myocardial infarction, although results in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia are less promising. In comparative trials, cibenzoline has demonstrated efficacy similar to or better than that of a variety of other class I antiarrhythmic drugs and was at least as well tolerated, with a more convenient dosage schedule. However, further studies to clarify the proarrhythmic effects of cibenzoline and its use in patients with impaired left ventricular function are required, and the use of cibenzoline (and other class I antiarrhythmic agents) in patients with other than potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias should be avoided following the results of the CAST studies. Thus, cibenzoline is an effective antiarrhythmic agent with a favourable pharmacokinetic profile that may be considered with other class I drugs in patients requiring therapy for high risk arrhythmias.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Intranasal fluticasone propionate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in allergic rhinitis.

Fluticasone propionate is a potent topical anti-inflammatory corticosteroid with low systemic activity. Available pharmacodynamic data are only preliminary; however, large placebo- and drug-controlled clinical studies involving almost 4000 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and 1500 with perennial allergic and nonallergic rhinitis have confirmed the efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate in the control of nasal symptoms. Fluticasone propionate generally demonstrated similar efficacy compared with intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate, flunisolide acetonide and oral astemizole and better or a trend towards better efficacy compared with oral loratadine, terfenadine, cetirizine and intranasal sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) against nasal symptoms. The incidence of adverse effects in association with intranasal fluticasone propionate appears to be comparable to that observed with placebo; the most frequently reported effects are nasal dryness/burning, epistaxis and headache. Consistent with its minimal systemic availability, intranasal fluticasone propionate in a dosage of up to 4 mg/day does not cause adrenal suppression. Thus, based on early data from large clinical trials, fluticasone propionate administered once daily offers an effective and convenient treatment option in patients with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis, and is distinguished by its low oral bioavailability.

Administration, Intranasal↗

PubMed1992

Oxcarbazepine. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in epilepsy, trigeminal neuralgia and affective disorders.

Oxcarbazepine is the 10-keto analogue of carbamazepine but has a distinct pharmacokinetic profile. In contrast to the oxidative metabolism of carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine is rapidly reduced to its active metabolite, 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxy-carbamazepine. With the possible exception of the P450IIIA isozyme of the cytochrome P450 family, neither oxcarbazepine nor its monohydroxy derivative induce hepatic oxidative metabolism. Direct comparison of oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine has shown no difference in efficacy between these 2 agents in terms of reducing seizure frequency in patients with partial epilepsy with or without secondary generalisation, or with tonic-clonic seizures. Substitution of oxcarbazepine for carbamazepine in multiple antiepileptic drug regimens improved seizure control in some patients with refractory epilepsy; however, the rise in serum concentrations of concurrent antiepileptic agents secondary to elimination of carbamazepine-associated hepatic enzyme induction may have also played a role. Substitution of oxcarbazepine for carbamazepine was associated with improved cognition and alertness in some patients with epilepsy. Limited data indicate that oxcarbazepine may be a useful alternative to carbamazepine in the management of trigeminal neuralgia. Experience in patients with acute mania is promising, but the value of oxcarbazepine in managing affective disorders, particularly as a prophylactic agent, is not established. Oxcarbazepine may be better tolerated than carbamazepine; however, the current published database is small and the potential for oxcarbazepine to induce the type of serious idiosyncratic reactions occasionally associated with carbamazepine is unknown. Hyponatraemia has been reported in patients treated with oxcarbazepine. Although apparently asymptomatic, fluid restriction may be deemed necessary in some patients to reduce the risk of precipitating seizures secondary to low serum sodium. Thus, oxcarbazepine appears to be an effective substitute for carbamazepine in those patients intolerant of this agent, or experiencing significant drug interactions. Wider clinical experience should help clarify the long term efficacy and tolerability of oxcarbazepine. Pharmacokinetic advantages over current antiepileptic drugs, carbamazepine in particular, may then favour oxcarbazepine for consideration as a first-line agent in the management of partial and tonic-clonic epilepsy.

Affective Disorders, Psychotic↗

PubMed1992

Didanosine. A review of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential in human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Didanosine is a dideoxynucleoside analogue which undergoes intracellular conversion to the putative active triphosphate metabolite. The active metabolite appears to inhibit viral reverse transcriptase and terminate the proviral DNA, and produces virustatic inhibition of actively replicating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) at clinically relevant concentrations. In phase I studies didanosine had beneficial effects on various surrogate markers of clinical efficacy and also improved clinical manifestations of HIV infection, with a 21-month survival rate of 80% in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and 93% in patients with AIDS-related complex (ARC) in 1 study. Didanosine also improved CD4+ cell counts in a phase II/III trial in patients previously treated with zidovudine, whereas cell counts declined in patients continuing zidovudine therapy. However, the effects of didanosine on clinical end-points (disease progression, survival, HIV encephalopathy) remain to be established. Peripheral neuropathy and pancreatitis are the predominant dose-limiting adverse events and didanosine therapy should be withdrawn in patients developing signs or symptoms of pancreatitis and during acute treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. However, at currently recommended clinical dosages didanosine is generally well tolerated with minimal haematological toxicity. Thus, in a therapeutic area with few treatment options, didanosine offers a welcome alternative for patients intolerant of, or resistant to, zidovudine. There are a number of clinical trials in progress evaluating didanosine alone or in combination with other antiviral agents, and these results are awaited with considerable interest.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed1992

Lansoprazole. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and its therapeutic efficacy in acid-related disorders.

Lansoprazole is an effective acid pump inhibitor acting at the final enzymatic step of the acid secretory pathway of the parietal cell, decreasing gastric acid secretion regardless of the primary stimulus. Results of short term (less than 8 weeks) clinical trials have shown lansoprazole to be significantly superior to placebo and ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer, both in the rate of healing and in overall healing at 4 weeks. Lansoprazole appears to heal duodenal ulcer more quickly than famotidine, and demonstrates slightly greater efficacy at 4 weeks, although both drugs appear to have equivalent efficacy overall. Gastric ulcers and reflux oesophagitis are also healed by lansoprazole 30 mg/day for 4 to 8 weeks, with healing rates after 8 weeks of approximately 85 to 95% for both indications. Lansoprazole appears to be superior to ranitidine and comparable to omeprazole in treating reflux oesophagitis. Furthermore, lansoprazole has relieved reflux symptoms more quickly than either ranitidine or omeprazole. Preliminary data also indicate that lansoprazole may be effective in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease and reflux oesophagitis refractory to H2-receptor antagonists, and in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. While direct comparisons with omeprazole are limited, results suggest that lansoprazole, used for short term treatment, is at least as effective as omeprazole in the treatment of peptic ulcer and reflux oesphagitis. Lansoprazole has been well tolerated in short term clinical trials, with an incidence of adverse effects comparable with that of other agents in its therapeutic class. Trials assessing long term tolerability data are ongoing and will be required as part of the assessment of the safety profile, if lansoprazole is to be used prophylactically to prevent ulcer recurrence. Thus, by virtue of its ability to heal ulcers and rapidly relieve associated symptomatology, lansoprazole represents a useful alternative for the treatment of acid related disorders.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed1992

Felodipine. A review of the pharmacology and therapeutic use of the extended release formulation in cardiovascular disorders.

Felodipine is a vascular-selective, dihydropyridine calcium antagonist previously investigated as a conventional tablet formulation administered twice daily. More recently considerable experience has been gained with an extended release (ER) formulation which has the convenience of once daily administration. Felodipine ER has been well studied in patients with essential hypertension. As monotherapy in mild to moderate essential hypertension, felodipine ER is at least as effective in reducing blood pressure as other calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, diuretics and ACE inhibitors, with some results favouring felodipine ER at a statistically significant level at the dosages used. It is also effective combined with controlled release metoprolol or enalapril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. In patients with more severe forms of essential hypertension uncontrolled by beta-blocker and/or diuretic therapy, felodipine ER was effective as an 'add-on' therapy in placebo-controlled trials, and, at the dosages used, more effective than either sustained release nifedipine or nitrendipine. Felodipine produces effective control of blood pressure without negative effects on cardiac performance. In addition to its antihypertensive action, results suggest that felodipine therapy is associated with significant regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Furthermore, it appears suitable for use in patients with concomitant diabetes, renal dysfunction or asthma, and is also being investigated for use in patients with congestive heart failure or angina pectoris. Felodipine ER is an effective drug for the treatment of all grades of essential hypertension, and can be used both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihypertensive agents. Further clinical experience should fully establish the long term tolerability of felodipine ER and consequently its place in therapy relative to other accepted antihypertensive drugs. However, with the convenience of once daily administration, felodipine ER is a worthwhile innovation in the treatment of hypertension.

Angina Pectoris↗

PubMed1992

Transdermal Nicotine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy as an aid to smoking cessation.

Transdermal nicotine delivery systems are a cigarette smoking cessation aid designed to deliver nicotine into the systemic circulation via the skin. The partial replacement of plasma nicotine, which would have otherwise been obtained from cigarettes, reduces the severity of nicotine withdrawal symptoms, and so allows the smoker to abstain from smoking more easily. The systems are available in 16- and 24-hour application regimens, and are recommended for daily use for up to 20 weeks, including a series of 'weaning-off' courses. Clinical trials have shown that abstinence rates of 30 to 41% can be achieved during the first 6 weeks of application of transdermal nicotine systems, compared with 4 to 21% with placebo systems. The use of concomitant behavioural therapy may increase the success of treatment, with initial abstinence rates of up to 86% reported. However, long term abstinence rates (greater than 6 months) are considerably lower with or without behavioural therapy, often falling to less than half of the initial rates. Transdermal nicotine systems have been well tolerated in clinical trials, with local irritation at the site of application being the most common adverse event. Mild gastric, central nervous system (CNS) and sleep disturbances have also been reported. The ease of use and unobtrusive nature of the systems have resulted in a high degree of patient compliance. Thus, transdermal nicotine systems offer a convenient form of nicotine replacement therapy which are well tolerated and, due to their pharmacokinetic profile, probably have a low dependency potential. The short term abstinence rates achieved with this therapy are encouraging; however, the maintenance of abstinence in the long term is harder to achieve. Transdermal nicotine replacement therapy, therefore, represents an important advance in the difficult area of smoking cessation management.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

PubMed1992

Bepridil. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in stable angina pectoris.

Bepridil is a calcium antagonist with direct negative chronotropic, dromotropic, inotropic and vasodilatory actions which reduces myocardial oxygen consumption and increases coronary blood flow, leading to a significant anti-ischaemic and antianginal effect in the absence of reflex tachycardia. In contrast to other calcium channel blockers, bepridil produces only modest peripheral vasodilatation and displays weak antihypertensive activity. Its plasma elimination half-life of 1 to 2 days permits once daily administration. Results of short term clinical trials have shown bepridil to be of comparable efficacy to nifedipine, verapamil, diltiazem, propranolol and nadolol in decreasing the frequency of anginal attacks and consumption of nitroglycerin (glyceryl trinitrate) in patients with stable angina. Bepridil is more effective than nifedipine in improving exercise performance in patients with stable angina. Although bepridil proved superior to diltiazem in improving exercise performance in patients refractory to diltiazem, further studies are required to confirm the efficacy of bepridil in patients refractory to, or intolerant of, other antianginal agents. Bepridil in therapeutic doses is well tolerated, and appears to have a similar adverse effect profile to the established calcium antagonists. However, rate-dependent prolongation of the QTc interval and development of torsade de pointes have been associated with the use of bepridil. Therefore, bepridil is contraindicated in patients with hypokalaemia, those receiving other drugs that may prolong the QT interval, and those with congenital QT interval prolongation. Future clinical research will help to further define the position of bepridil as an antianginal treatment relative to the traditional calcium antagonists; in the interim, bepridil is indicated for the treatment of patients with angina refractory to or intolerant of other agents.

Angina Pectoris↗