PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Fazio

Publications and source records attributed to D Fazio.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Heart transplantation in the young and elderly.

INTRODUCTION: Heart transplantation has become an acceptable treatment in pediatric patients with end-stage heart disease and complex congenital heart disease. The liberalization of recipient eligibility criteria, mainly age, along with the expansion of the donor pool has resulted in the acceptable transplantation of older recipients. METHODS: Between July 1994 and June 1998, 39 pediatric patients aged 16 days to 17.6 years (median 6.68 years) and 123 elderly patients aged 60 to 74.8 years (median 64.1 years) were transplanted at our institution. In the pediatric group, 19 had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (46 %), 14 had congenital heart disease (34 %), 4 had other etiologies of cardiomyopathy (10 %), 2 had transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD) (5 %), and 1 each had acute rejection and graft failure. In the elderly group, 71 had ischemic cardiomyopathy (58 %), 38 had DCM (31 %), 9 had other forms of cardiomyopathy (7 %), and 5 had TCAD (4 %). RESULTS: Thirty-day, 1-year, and 4-year survival was 97.4 %, 87.2 %, and 70.9 % for the pediatric group and 92.7 %, 81.3 %, and 79.3 % for the elderly group. One and 4-year freedom from TCAD was 100.0 % and 85.3 % for the pediatric group and 91.9 % and 83.3 % for the elderly group. CONCLUSIONS: [emsp3 ]Orthotopic heart transplantation is effective for the treatment of irreparable congenital and end-stage heart disease. It provides excellent long-term results in both the very young and elderly.

Adolescent↗

Mechanical assist strategy using the BVS 5000i for patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The BVS 5000i external pulsatile assist device is used to support patients with reversible cardiogenic shock. Its low cost and potential for insertion without cardiopulmonary bypass make it an attractive option. METHODS: Nineteen status I patients failing inotropic support were treated with the BVS 5000i with the intention of short-term bridge to transplant. Fourteen patients received left ventricular support whereas 5 received biventricular support. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in less than 50% of patients. RESULTS: Median support time was 7 days. The 2 myocarditis patients were weaned from support. Twelve patients were transplanted and there were 5 deaths on support. Overall 14 of 19 were transplanted or weaned. One-year survival was 79%. Median hospital stay was 31 days. CONCLUSIONS: The BVS 5000i can be used for short-term mechanical assist toward transplantation in selected patients for whom a donor can be expected soon. The device may provide a cost-effective, short-term strategy to optimize end-organ function before orthotopic heart transplant, particularly for patients who are predictably not ideal to be discharged with implantable left ventricular assist device treatment.

Adolescent↗

Short-term bridge to transplant using the BVS 5000 in a 22-kg child.

The availability of pulsatile mechanical assist devices for bridge to transplant in pediatric patients is limited owing to the patients' small sizes. Pulsatile devices offer potential advantages over nonpulsatile devices but the risk of hypertensive bleeding must be balanced against that of device thrombosis. We describe our experience using the BVS 5000 external pulsatile device in an 8-year old patient with a body surface area of 0.88 m2.

Child↗

The use of donor hearts with left ventricular hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed 37 patients who received donor hearts with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) to determine which factors affected outcomes. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients underwent orthotopic heart transplantation (1994 through 1998) with donor hearts qualified as having LVH by echocardiography (EC) and/or electrocardiogram (ECG). We performed univariate analysis on 18 donor and recipient risk factors for mortality. We calculated 12-month survival curves using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared them using the log-rank test. A contemporaneous cohort of 221 patients who received optimal hearts within the same institution served as a control for survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 18 months (1 to 53). Median recipient age was 58 ye ars (25 to 75), and median donor age was 47 years (12 to 63). Median donor/recipient height and weight ratios were 1.01 (0.9 to 1.19) and 1.16 (0.77 to 2.02), respectively. Two-month survival was 86.4%, and 12-month survival was 73.0%. Survival for the control group was 91. 6% at 2 months and 86.9% at 12 months. Clinically inferior survival curves were observed when donors had known hypertension (n = 17, 95% vs 71% at 2 months, 76% vs 65% at 12 months), ischemia > 180 minutes (n = 18, 95% vs 72% at 2 months, 78% vs 65% at 12 months), LVH by ECG (n = 10, 85% vs 80% at 2 months, 77% vs 56% at 12 months), and greater than mild or unknown ECHO grade (n = 18, 89% vs 72% at 2 months, 84% vs 59% at 12 months, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Donor hearts with mild LVH may be used selectively, particularly if there are no ECG criteria and if ischemia time is short. Caution is indicated for donors with documented history of hypertension. Precise measurement of LV wall thickness by EC is needed in all donors to estimate severity and to complement ECG interpretation.

Adolescent↗

Sixteen-year experience with 1,000 heart transplants at UCLA.

1. The consecutive pre- and post-1994 eras have demonstrated improved survival for all age groups. This is linked to improved preservation methods, surgical technique and immunosuppression agents. 2. The use of marginal donor hearts for Status I and alternate elderly patients has followed the model of matching donor and recipient risk without affecting patient outcome and minimized the use of implantable assist devices. 3. A donor history of systemic gram-negative infection, hypertension, or traumatic intracranial bleeds was an important marker for risk. Younger age and shorter ischemia time could compensate for other hazards. 4. Heart transplantation in carefully selected elderly recipients yielded clinical results similar to those of younger patients with less rejection. 5. An adult alternate recipient list proved useful to prevent diversion of standard donors away from younger recipients. 6. Retransplantation for TCAD is acceptable but much less satisfactory for acute graft failure. 7. Trends show an increase in the use of implantable devices; refinement in technology for mechanical assist and replacement is forthcoming.

Adolescent↗

Minimally invasive mechanical cardiac support without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children awaiting heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical cardiac assist for small children (< 30 kg) requiring bridge strategy to orthotopic heart transplantation often requires sternotomy for cannulation access to ensure perfusion to the aortic arch. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) through neck cannulation is an option in very small (< 10 kg) patients, but the risk of stroke is increased in larger children. Another disadvantage is poor decompression of the left atrium, which can cause persistent pulmonary edema. METHODS: Two cases are used to illustrate two methods of avoiding sternotomy during mechanical assist in children with dilated cardiomyopathy. One of these approaches avoids the need for extracorporeal oxygenation. RESULTS: Decompression of the left-sided chambers with a left atrial cannula decreased pulmonary edema and improved pulmonary function. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy may benefit from a left ventricular assist technique using a centrifugal pump, which avoids the neck vessels and sternotomy, as well as ECMO.

Cardiomyopathy, Dilated↗