PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

D G Haller

Publications and source records attributed to D G Haller.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Therapy for early-stage colorectal cancer.

Surgery is the only curative option for patients with colorectal cancer. The goal of other modalities, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy, is to prolong survival and reduce the risk of recurrence. Adjuvant treatment is mandatory for patients with stage III colon cancer. At present, 6 months of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (folinic acid) can be considered standard therapy. The data on stage II colon cancer are less convincing, and perhaps only subgroups benefit from adjuvant therapy. Patients with stage II disease should be encouraged to participate in randomized trials. Outside of such trials, one can consider prognostic factors in the decision to offer adjuvant therapy. Patients with T3 or N1-3 M0 rectal cancer should receive combined-modality therapy, i.e., 5-FU-based chemotherapy and irradiation. Until ongoing trials answer the question of whether a patient should be irradiated preoperatively or postoperatively, the type of surgery determines the timing of irradiation. If the tumor is amenable to a sphincter-preserving operation, surgery can be followed by radiation therapy. In patients with fixed tumors and those in whom resectability is an issue, prolonged preoperative radiotherapy is more appropriate. Ongoing trials should optimize existing adjuvant therapy (by achieving an ideal balance between toxicity and effectiveness) and integrate the advantages of recently approved drugs.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant

Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We performed a multi-institutional randomized trial comparing preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone for patients with local and operable esophageal cancer. METHODS: Preoperative chemotherapy for patients randomly assigned to the chemotherapy group included three cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil. Surgery was performed two to four weeks after the completion of the third cycle; patients also received two additional cycles of chemotherapy after the operation. Patients randomly assigned to the immediate-surgery group underwent the same surgical procedure. The main end point was overall survival. RESULTS: Of the 440 eligible patients with adequate data , 213 were assigned to receive preoperative chemotherapy and 227 to undergo immediate surgery. After a median possible study time of 55.4 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups in median survival: 14.9 months for the patients who received preoperative chemotherapy and 16.1 months for those who underwent immediate surgery (P=0.53). At one year, the survival rate was 59 percent for those who received chemotherapy and 60 percent for those who had surgery alone; at two years, survival was 35 percent and 37 percent, respectively. The toxic effects of chemotherapy were tolerable, and the addition of chemotherapy did not appear to increase the morbidity or mortality associated with surgery. There were no differences in survival between patients with squamous-cell carcinoma and those with adenocarcinoma. Weight loss was a significant predictor of poor outcome (P=0.03). With the addition of chemotherapy, there was no change in the rate of recurrence at locoregional or distant sites. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemotherapy with a combination of cisplatin and fluorouracil did not improve overall survival among patients with epidermoid cancer or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Adenocarcinoma

Combined chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone for early stage squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Squamous carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus has an extremely poor prognosis. This study, EST-1282, was undertaken by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) to determine whether the combined use of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mitomycin C, and radiation therapy improved the disease-free survival and overall survival of patients with carcinoma of the esophagus, compared to those who received radiation therapy alone. Two- and 5-year survivals were 12% and 7% in the radiation alone arm and 27% and 9% in the chemoradiation arm. Patients treated with chemoradiation had a longer median survival (14.8 months), compared to patients receiving radiation therapy alone (9.2 months). This difference was statistically significant. The same pattern of survival was noted in almost all subgroups independent of whether surgical resection was performed.

Analysis of Variance

Surgery for recurrent colon cancer: strategies for identifying resectable recurrence and success rates after resection. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, the North Central Cancer Treatment Group, and the Southwest Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Follow-up testing after surgery for colon cancer is recommended principally to identify resectable recurrences, but data on the efficacy of, outcomes of, and optimal strategies for this testing are limited. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relation between follow-up tests and salvage surgery, assess outcomes, and document surgical mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A North American multi-institutional trial comparing postoperative chemotherapy plus follow-up with follow-up alone. PATIENTS: 1247 patients with resected stage II and stage III colon cancer. INTERVENTION: The protocol mandated follow-up testing that could be supplemented at the discretion of treating physicians. Indications of recurrent disease were documented. MEASUREMENTS: Recurrence, resectable recurrence, surgical mortality, and survival were studied. RESULTS: 548 patients had recurrence of colon cancer. Salvage surgery was attempted in 222 patients (41%). In 109 patients (20%), curative-intent surgery was done for hepatic recurrence (28 patients), pulmonary metastasis (20 patients), local recurrence (24 patients), or recurrence at other sites (37 patients). Most curative-intent surgical procedures were motivated by follow-up testing (36 patients), elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level (41 patients), or symptoms (27 patients). The median follow-up time after curative-intent surgery exceeded 5 years; the estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate was 23%. A solitary lesion was a favorable prognostic factor. The surgical mortality rate was 2%. Curative-intent resections were done in 15 patients with second primary colorectal cancer; 12 of these patients have survived disease-free. CONCLUSIONS: Second operations for colon cancer that are triggered by follow-up testing or symptoms are common and can result in long-term disease-free survival.

Colonic Neoplasms

Epirubicin has modest single-agent activity in head and neck cancer but limited activity in metastatic melanoma and colorectal cancer: phase II studies by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Epirubicin (4'-epidoxorubicin), a diastereoisomer of doxorubicin, has established activity in the treatment of many cancer types sensitive to doxorubicin. Its activity in other tumor targets such as melanoma, head and neck cancer, and recurrent colorectal cancer has been less well defined. Three concurrent phase II studies examined the efficacy and toxicity of epirubicin (90 mg/m2 given intravenously at 3-week intervals) in the treatment of 71 patients with the aforementioned cancers. Of 66 eligible patients who were assessable for response, one patient (with colorectal cancer) achieved a complete response and three patients (with head and neck cancer) achieved partial responses. The response rate in patients with head and neck cancer was 18% (95% confidence interval, 4-43%). Myelosuppression, alopecia, and nausea were the most frequent toxicities. Two patients died of neutropenic sepsis and grade IV leukopenia occurred in six patients (8%). Grade III toxicities were as follows: leukopenia (17%), anemia (10%), alopecia (8%), fever (1%), thrombocytopenia (1%). Grade I or II cardiac toxicity was noted in four patients at cumulative doses ranging between 375 mg/m2 to 1,283 mg/m2. Epirubicin is ineffective as a single agent at this dose and schedule in the treatment of patients with melanoma and colorectal cancer. In head and neck cancer, a modest response rate encourages further exploration of epirubicin and related anthracyclines in combination regimens.

Adult

A phase II trial and pharmacokinetic analysis of 96-hour infusional paclitaxel in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the activity and toxicity of 96-hour infusional paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Twelve patients were enrolled in this study. The first patient received a total dose of 140 mg/m2 over 96 hours resulting in grade 4 neutropenia, neutropenic fever, and grade 3 stomatitis. Subsequent patients received a total dose of 120 mg/m2 over 96 hours. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurred in four of these patients. No significant thrombocytopenia was observed. Grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities in the group treated at 120 mg/m2 over 96 hours included nausea/vomiting in one patient, stomatitis in one patient, and diarrhea in two patients. One patient experienced a possible pulmonary hypersensitivity reaction. None of the 12 patients achieved an objective response. Two patients had stable disease and ten had progressive disease. Pharmacokinetic parameters including maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration time curve were significantly higher in patients with grade 3 to 4 neutropenia than patients who experienced less toxicity. The authors conclude that further study of 96-hour infusional paclitaxel in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma is not warranted.

Aged

Postsurgical surveillance of colon cancer: preliminary cost analysis of physician examination, carcinoembryonic antigen testing, chest x-ray, and colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: This study is the first to examine the relative and absolute costs of physician examination, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assessment, chest x-ray, and colonoscopy in detecting recurrent disease in patients who have undergone surgical resection for primary colon carcinoma. METHODS: Of the 1356 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group patients in Intergroup Protocol 0089 who underwent surgical resection for Dukes' B2 and C colon carcinoma, 421 patients who developed recurrent disease were reviewed. Follow-up testing was performed according to protocol guidelines, with the cost of each test equal to 1995 Medicare reimbursement. Follow-up was defined as the time to recurrence for the 421 patients in whom disease recurred (mean 18.6 months) or up to 5 years for the additional 930 patients in whom disease did not recur (mean 38.6 months). Patients were divided into three categories: nonrecurrent, recurrent but not resectable, and recurrent but resectable with curative intent. The estimated mean cost of each test in detecting group 3 (recurrent but resectable) patients was calculated. RESULTS: Of the 421 patients who developed recurrent disease, 96 underwent surgical resection of their disease with curative intent (group 3). For group 3 patients, the first indication of recurrent disease was CEA testing (30), chest x-ray (12), colonoscopy (14), and other (40). Of the 40 "other" patients, 24 presented with symptoms. Routine physician examination, however, failed to identify a single resectable recurrence, and the total cost for physician examination was $418,615. The detection rate for CEA testing was 2.2%, the total cost was $170,880, and the cost per recurrence was $5,696. The detection rate for chest x-ray was 0.9%, the total cost was $120,934, and the cost per recurrence was $10,078. The detection rate of colonoscopy was 1%, the total cost was $641,344, and the cost per recurrence was $45,810. CONCLUSIONS: CEA measurement was the most cost-effective test in detecting potentially curable recurrent disease. Physician visits were useful only in the evaluation of symptoms; a routine physician examination had no added benefit.

Antineoplastic Agents

Radiation therapy for rectosigmoid and rectal cancer: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care process survey.

PURPOSE: To determine the US national practice standards for patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated in radiation oncology facilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national survey of 57 institutions identified 507 eligible patients who received radiation therapy as a component of their treatment for rectal cancer. A stratified two-stage cluster sampling with simple random sampling at each stage for each stratum was used and on-site surveys were performed. RESULTS: Of the 507 patients, 378 (75%) received postoperative therapy, 110 (22%) received preoperative therapy, 17 (2%) received both preoperative and postoperative therapy, and less than 0.5% received intraoperative radiation alone. To more accurately assess the utilization of modern radiation techniques as well as recommendations of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored, randomized, postoperative, adjuvant combined modality therapy rectal cancer trials into current practice, the analysis was limited to the 243 (48%) patients with tumor, node, and metastasis staging system classification T3 and/or N1-2M0 disease who underwent conventional surgery with negative margins. Although only 7% were treated on a clinical trial, 90% received chemotherapy for a median of 21 weeks. Most were treated with modern radiation treatment techniques. In contrast, techniques to identify and help exclude the small bowel from the radiation field were not routinely used. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that only 7% of patients with T3 and/or N1-2M0 disease were treated on a clinical trial, such trials appear to have resulted in a positive influence on the standard of practice within the oncology community. Although there are still some deficiencies, the majority of these patients received combined modality therapy and were treated with modern radiation therapy techniques.

Adenocarcinoma

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Adjuvant therapy is clearly of great benefit for certain patients with colorectal carcinoma. Validation of new prognostic markers to further define which patients are at highest risk of recurrence will be important. Future investigation for adjuvant therapy includes incorporation of achievements made in the advanced disease setting, including biochemical modulation of 5-FU, identification of new active agents, and incorporation of immunotherapy strategies into adjuvant treatment programs. Further improvements in the treatment of these patients, even if small, may translate into important benefits, given the large number of patients presenting annually with this common cancer. As our therapeutic options broaden and improve, investigators will need to focus on quality of life and pharmacoeconomic parameters to determine which adjuvant approaches are optimal for the individual patient with colorectal cancer, as well as for society in general.

Adjuvants, Immunologic

A phase II study of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, adriamycin, and cisplatin (FLAP) for metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. A Penn Cancer Clinical Trial Group and Roswell Park Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Trial.

A Phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, Adriamycin, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy (FLAP) in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal (GE) junction adenocarcinoma. Forty-two consecutive patients were enrolled to received FLAP in this multi-institutional trial. Response, toxicity, and survival data were noted. Fifteen of 42 (36%) patients demonstrated objective responses, with two complete responses (5%) and 13 partial responses (31%). The median time to disease progression was 17 weeks, and the overall survival duration was 30 weeks. Myelosuppression was significant, requiring dose modifications, but there were no treatment-related deaths. FLAP is an active regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric and GE junction adenocarcinoma. We are presently using this regimen in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with gastric and GE junction cancers.

Adenocarcinoma

Controlled trial of fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months as postoperative adjuvant therapy for colon cancer.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy of intensive-course fluorouracil (5FU) plus low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months following potentially curative resection of colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventeen patients with high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned 3 to 4 weeks following surgery to receive either (1) chemotherapy with six cycles of 5FU (425 mg/m2) plus leucovorin (20 mg/m2) by rapid intravenous injection daily for 5 consecutive days every 4 to 5 weeks, or (2) observation. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration is 72 months for patients still alive. Patients who received postoperative 5FU plus leucovorin experienced significant improvement in time to relapse (P < .01) and survival (P = .02) compared with control patients treated with surgery alone. Stomatitis, diarrhea, and leukopenia were the predominant chemotherapy toxicities. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that intensive-course 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin is effective in preventing tumor relapse and improving survival in patients with high-risk colon cancer. These benefits were seen with only six cycles of treatment, using low-dose leucovorin in combination with 5FU on a schedule convenient for outpatient administration.

Adult

Trimetrexate: experience with solid tumors.

Trimetrexate (TMTX), a potent inhibitor of the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase, is biochemically and metabolically similar to methotrexate (MTX). Fundamental differences between TMTX and MTX, however, mandate investigation of TMTX in both MTX-sensitive and MTX-resistant tumors. In a number of phase II clinical trials, the antitumor activity of single-agent TMTX has been variable, in part because of the heterogeneity of doses and schedules used and in part because of diverse patient populations. Single-agent activity has been documented in some commonly occurring tumors, including breast, non-small cell lung, and head and neck cancers. Other tumors with sensitivity to single-agent TMTX include transitional cell carcinomas of the urothelium, prostate cancer, and gastric carcinoma. In a small series of children with renal cell carcinoma, significant clinical activity was suggested. The single-agent activity of TMTX, coupled with the finding that TMTX may act as a biochemical modulator of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, suggests that the addition of TMTX to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin should be investigated further. The possibility that TMTX may both exhibit single-agent activity and modulate the effectiveness of other agents makes combination therapy attractive.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic

Phase III study of bolus versus infusion fluorouracil with or without cisplatin in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Phase II studies of fluorouracil (5-FU) administered by protracted intravenous infusion have suggested an improved response rate and decreased toxicity profile when compared with 5-FU given by bolus injection in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Additional studies have suggested further enhancement of infusion 5-FU activity when it is combined with low-dose weekly cisplatin administration. PURPOSE: This phase III study in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer was planned as a comparison of objective response rates, toxicity, and survival in patients receiving bolus versus protracted-infusion 5-FU with or without cisplatin. METHODS: Four hundred ninety-seven previously untreated patients with advanced, measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive treatment A (bolus 5-FU at 500 mg/m2 for 5 days followed in 2 weeks by weekly bolus 5-FU at 600 mg/m2), treatment B (bolus 5-FU at 500 mg/m2 for 5 days followed in 2 weeks by weekly bolus 5-FU at 600 mg/m2, plus weekly cisplatin at 20 mg/m2), treatment C (5-FU at 300 mg/m2 per day by continuous infusion), or treatment D (5-FU at 300 mg/m2 per day by continuous infusion plus weekly cisplatin at 20 mg/m2). All drugs were administered intravenously. Enrollment in the trial occurred from August 1987 through December 1990, and follow-up was through September 1995. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall and disease-free survival, and Cox regression models were used to assess the effects of patient characteristics on survival. All P values resulted from two-sided tests. RESULTS: Objective tumor response was observed in 28 (18%) of 153 patients receiving treatment A, in 45 (28%) of 159 patients receiving treatment C (C versus A; P = .045), and in 47 (31%) of 153 patients receiving treatment D (D versus A; P = .016). Because of excessive toxicity, treatment B was discontinued after only 12 patients had begun treatment. Median time to disease progression was 5.1 months for patients in arm A compared with 6.2 and 6.5 months for patients in arms C and D, respectively (C versus A, P = .007; D versus A, P = .017). Patterns of toxic effects differed substantially among the treatment arms. Forty-five percent of the patients receiving bolus 5-FU alone (A) experienced grade 3-4 leukopenia, with two sepsis-related deaths. Hand-foot syndrome and mucositis were the major treatment-limiting toxic effects for patients in the two treatment arms involving infusion. Despite the improvement in response rates and time to disease progression with infusion 5-FU with or without cisplatin (C and D, respectively) (P = .003), the overall survival for the three groups (A, C, and D) was similar (P = .307). This may have been due in part to a longer median survival time of 10.4 months for patients in arm A, compared with an anticipated survival of 7 months. CONCLUSION: 5-FU given as a continuous infusion produced a higher objective response rate, a modest prolongation in time to disease progression, and less life-threatening myelosuppression in patients than bolus 5-FU. Concomitant treatment with low-dose cisplatin caused added toxicity and complexity of treatment and did not provide a major clinical benefit. No statistically significant survival differences were observed among the three treatment groups.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic

A pilot trial of 5-FU, leucovorin, and cisplatin with or without adriamycin in advanced cancer.

In a pilot trial, we treated patients with solid tumors with 5-FU (5-fluorouracil), leucovorin (LV), and cisplatin (FLP) with Adriamycin in selected patients (FLAP). 5-FU/LV were administered weekly for 6 weeks, with cisplatin at two dose levels (and Adriamycin in some patients) at weeks 1 and 4. Nine patients received FLP; 11 received FLAP.FLP was able to be administered with a cisplatin dose of 75 mg/m2; the maximum-tolerated dose of FLAP included a cisplatin dose of 60 mg/m2. Significant toxicities included granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea. Preliminary activity was demonstrated with FLAP in patients with adenocarcinomas of the stomach and gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Ongoing trials of FLAP are underway in patients with gastric and GE junction carcinomas in the neoadjuvant and advanced disease settings.

Adult

Results of combined modality therapy for patients with anal cancer (E7283). An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study assessed combined modality therapy of patients with International Union Against Cancer classification T1-4 N0 M0 anal cancer. METHODS: Protocol therapy consisted of a dose of 4000 cGy to the pelvis, anus, and perineum, followed by a 1000-1300 cGy boost. Infusions of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C were administered when radiation therapy began. A second infusion of 5-fluorouracil was administered 28 days later. Biopsy was performed 6-8 weeks after completion of treatment. Positive biopsy findings resulted in abdominal-perineal resection. RESULTS: Survival at 7 years for 50 eligible patients was 58%. White patients and those with favorable performance status had significantly better survival. Of the 46 patients evaluable for response, 34 had a complete response, 11 had a partial response, and 1 had no response. Seven-year survival for partial responders was 53%. Freedom from locoregional progression was 80% at 7 years. CONCLUSION: Treatment with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy is effective for patients with anal cancer. The investigation of methods of improving therapy is warranted.

Adult

Fluorouracil plus levamisole as effective adjuvant therapy after resection of stage III colon carcinoma: a final report.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of two adjuvant therapy regimens in improving surgical cure rates in stage III (Dukes stage C) colon cancer. DESIGN: Randomized, concurrently controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Major cancer centers, universities, and community clinics affiliated with the North Cancer Treatment Group, the Southwest Oncology Group, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. PATIENTS: Those who had had curative-intent resections of stage III colon cancer in the previous 1 to 5 weeks. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned to observation only, to levamisole alone (50 mg orally three times/d for 3 days, repeated every 2 weeks for 1 year), or to this regimen of levamisole plus fluorouracil (450 mg/m2 body surface area intravenously daily for 5 days and then, beginning at 28 days, weekly for 48 weeks). MEASUREMENTS: Rates of cancer recurrence and death. Early- and late-treatment side effects. RESULTS: With all 929 eligible patients able to be followed for 5 years or more (median follow-up, 6.5 years), fluorouracil plus levamisole reduced the recurrence rate by 40% (P < 0.0001) and the death rate by 33% (P = 0.0007). Levamisole reduced the recurrence rate by only 2% and the death rate by only 6%. With few exceptions, toxicity was mild and patient compliance was excellent. No evidence of late side effects was seen. CONCLUSION: Fluorouracil plus levamisole is tolerable adjuvant therapy to surgery; it has been confirmed to substantially increase cure rates for patients with high-risk (stage III) colon cancer. It should be considered standard treatment for all such patients not entered into clinical trials.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

Phase II trial of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin combination in advanced measurable gastric cancer. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

A phase II study was performed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of the etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin (EAP) regimen in the treatment of patients with advanced measurable gastric cancer in a multi-institutional cooperative group setting. Thirty-one evaluable patients with advanced measurable gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with etoposide 120 mg/m2 on days 3, 4, and 5, doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9. The treatment was repeated every 28 days. Objective responses were seen in 7 (23%) patients, all achieving partial remissions. Median survival was 9 months for the entire group. Toxicity was mostly hematologic, with grade 3 leukopenia in 26% and grade 4 leukopenia in 55% of the patients. There were 4 treatment-related deaths that were attributable to severe leukopenia and sepsis. Because of the high toxicity and moderate response rate, this regimen is not superior to other less toxic regimens and cannot be recommended for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer outside of an investigational protocol.

Adenocarcinoma