PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Galin

Publications and source records attributed to D Galin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

EEG spectra in dyslexic and normal readers during oral and silent reading.

EEGs of extensively screened dyslexics and normal readers were recorded while they read easy and difficult texts silently and orally, and during two other verbal tasks which also differed in overt speaking but had no reading component: narrative speaking and listening to a story. Mid-temporal, central and parietal leads were referenced to linked ears and to Cz. Large differences between tasks and between groups were found. With the linked ears reference, power was higher in all bands in oral reading than in silent reading, with the largest change occurring in the temporal leads. In the theta and low beta bands the difference between oral and silent reading was greater for controls than for dyslexics. These effects were not accounted for by differences in reading speed or in difficulty. Similar results were found in two cohorts of subjects. The difference between groups in theta was found only in the reading tasks. In contrast, the group difference in low beta was also found in the change from listening to speaking. This implies that the oral-silent group difference in theta is related to some aspect of the reading tasks other than the presence or absence of overt speaking, and that the low beta group difference is related to some aspect of overt speaking rather than to reading per se. With the Cz reference no group differences were found. It is suggested that the groups differ in the reading strategies they use, and the degree to which they shift strategy between the silent and oral tasks. We hypothesize that these cognitive differences are reflected in the theta activity from the temporal lobe. While there were many differences between the tasks in alpha power and asymmetry, no group differences involving alpha were found.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Story recall under monaural and binaural conditions in psychiatric patients.

It has been reported that a large proportion of patients with major psychiatric disorders can recall a short story better if they listen with one ear rather than the other (monaural asymmetry), and that binaural performance is worse than with the better ear alone (binaural inferiority). Blocking the poorer ear with an earplug is said to significantly improve speech comprehension in daily life. Because of the theoretical and practical significance of these reports, we have attempted a replication. Forty-four psychotic patients, primarily schizophrenic, were studied. We found a lower incidence of abnormal monaural asymmetry and binaural inferiority than was previously reported. The incidence remained low whether we considered the entire sample or subgroups defined by diagnosis, chronicity, or age. Retest reliability was poor. We also found that binaural superiority was as common as binaural inferiority, and concluded that the instances of relative binaural inferiority in our sample were primarily due to chance. Differences in methods, subject selection, or medication were considered, but did not clearly account for the discrepancies between our results and previous studies. Future research must focus on establishing the conditions determining reliability.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Story recall under monaural and binaural conditions. Patients with anterior temporal lesions.

Recall of a short story is ordinarily the same whether it is heard in the left, right, or both ears. It has been reported that many patients with severe cerebral dysfunctions (including brain damage, major psychiatric disorders, and learning disabilities in children) perform much better with one ear than the other (monaural asymmetry) and that binaural performance is worse than with the better ear alone (binaural interference). Blocking the poorer ear with an earplug is said to significantly improve speech comprehension in daily life. Because of the theoretical and practical significance of these reports, we have attempted a replication. We studied patients with anterior temporal lobectomy because it was proposed that the underlying mechanism of monaural asymmetry and binaural interference in all clinical categories may involve temporal lesions or abnormal inhibition of one temporal lobe by the other. We were unable to confirm the previous reports.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

EEG alpha asymmetry in dyslexics during speaking and block design tasks.

Lateral specialization for speech and spatial construction was investigated in a highly screened group of dyslexic and normal-reading boys, age 9-13, by examining the extent to which their EEG alpha asymmetry changed from one task to the other. EEG was recorded from central, midtemporal, and parietal leads during several minutes of spontaneous narrative speech, and while the child constructed block designs. The dyslexics showed the same strongly task-dependent asymmetry as the normal readers, comparable to that observed in our adult populations. The observations were confirmed with a second independently chosen cohort of subjects. This result is discussed in terms of the constraints it places on models of dyslexia which invoke disorders of lateral specialization and hemisphere integration.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1986

EEG spectra in dyslexic and control boys during resting conditions.

We studied the resting eyes open and eyes closed EEG in carefully screened samples of 9-13-year-old dyslexic and control boys within a 2-cohort cross-validation design with repeat testing 1-3 years later. We found: no difference between groups in delta or theta activity in either cohort or in repeat testing 1-3 years later; in the dyslexics, decreased beta (19-24 c/sec) activity at bilateral central, parietal and mid-temporal leads referenced to vertex; inconsistent group differences in the alpha band: the first cohort dyslexics had lower alpha power than did the controls, but there was no group difference in the second cohort; and significant relative delta differences between groups in the first cohort, which were shown to be a statistical artifact of the use of relative power. We conclude that: dyslexia per se is not associated with increased absolute power in the delta and theta bands; lower power in the high beta band is reliably found in these samples of dyslexics without other disorders; and alpha power levels are not consistently lower in the dyslexic group.

Alpha Rhythm↗
PubMed1986

Neurometrics does not detect 'pure' dyslexics.

Thirty-eight severely dyslexic boys and 38 good readers were evaluated with neurometrics, a diagnostic procedure based on the application of numerical taxonomy to EEG spectra obtained during resting conditions, supplemented by selected evoked potential features. This procedure generates deviance scores for the EEG spectra by comparing each individual's values to those obtained from a normative population and has been reported to discriminate learning disabled children from normal controls (Ahn et al. 1980). In the present study, all subjects, dyslexic and control, passed stringent screening to assure normal intellectual, neurological, sensory and emotional status. The false positive rate obtained in our control group was comparable to that reported earlier. However, none of the deviance scores significantly discriminated dyslexics from controls; most subjects from both groups were classified as normal. Severe dyslexia per se is thus not associated with the specific neurometric abnormalities reported previously in more heterogeneous learning disabled populations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1986

Narrative speech deficits in dyslexics.

Narrative speech of 31 dyslexics and 33 good readers was studied. Subjects were 10- to 12-year-old right-handed boys of normal intelligence, and with normal neurological status, vision, and hearing. The dyslexics used shorter communication units (independent clauses with all their modifiers), and a higher percentage of their words were noncommunications (words which are extraneous to the speaker's intended meaning). Rate of speech was the same in both groups. These findings were replicated in an independent second cohort of 21 dyslexics and 21 controls, aged 9 to 13. Our findings support theories of a general language deficit in dyslexia, and demonstrate the involvement of the previously unexamined area of narrative speech.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

EEG spectra in 9-13-year-old boys are stable over 1-3 years.

Good reliability was found in EEG spectra recorded during resting conditions in two studies 1-3 years apart in groups of adolescent dyslexic and control boys who were well screened for neurological, sensory and emotional disabilities. The studies used different equipment and analysis (FFT in study 1 vs. iterative digital bandpass filters in study 2). The central leads (C3 and C4) referenced to vertex were recorded in both studies. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed as reliability estimates for each spectral band separately for each group, for absolute and relative power and for eyes open and eyes closed recording conditions. For both groups and for all conditions, the absolute power reliabilities were above 0.71 for all bands except delta for which they were above 0.54. Reliabilities were more variable for relative power measures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Sex differences and asymmetries of catecholamines: relation to turning preferences.

Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were tested for turning preferences in a multiple alley maze. The left and right caudate-putamen were dissected and assayed for norepinephrine and dopamine. Dopamine was not found to be lateralized contralateral to turning preference for females as a group. However, dopamine was significantly lateralized contralateral to the females turning preference if a strong turning bias was present. No relationship between dopamine asymmetry and turning preference was evident for males. Females were found to have norepinephrine significantly lateralized to the left caudate-putamen; in males greater striatal norepinephrine levels were equally distributed between left and right sides. This sexual dimorphism in norepinephrine lateralization was not related to turning preference.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Regional brain activity in dyslexic and control children during reading tasks: visual probe event-related potentials.

Event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by task-irrelevant visual stimuli were recorded from 34 control and 32 dyslexic 10- to 12-year-old boys while they performed silent and oral reading at two levels of difficulty. All subjects were extensively screened for neurological problems, IQ, and sensory acuity. Specific features of the ERPs were affected in amplitude and latency by the experimental variables: group membership, oral vs. silent reading, difficulty level, and recording site (within and between hemispheres). A specific effect of difficulty on the central and parietal ERP was seen in the dyslexics but not the controls. Different patterns of asymmetry were found for the two groups in silent vs. oral reading at midtemporal placements. A marked asymmetry (R greater than L) was found at the midtemporal region for both groups.

Attention↗
PubMed1983

Dyslexic children have normal vestibular responses to rotation.

We examined the rotational vestibular responses of carefully screened dyslexic and control populations (34 dyslexics and 33 controls). The subject groups had equivalent performance IQs but differed significantly on verbal IQ and on silent and oral reading. Children with significant neurologic, visual, or hearing deficits were excluded. We measured eye movements provoked by sinusoidal rotation of the subjects (in total darkness) at low frequencies (0.01 to 0.16 Hz). Gain, phase, and preponderance (asymmetry) of the responses were calculated from the eye velocity and stimulus velocity waveforms. There were no differences between the groups in any of these measures. We conclude that there are no clinically measurable differences in this aspect of vestibular function in our carefully selected populations of dyslexic and control children.

Child↗
PubMed1983

Predictive eye movements do not discriminate between dyslexic and control children.

Pavlidis has suggested that predictive saccadic tracking eye movements distinguish between reading disabled and normal children. We have examined saccadic eye movement tracking in 34 dyslexic and 33 control subjects, between 10 and 12 yr old. The subjects were equivalent in performance IQ (WISC-R), with differences between verbal and performance IQ of less than 30 points. Children with neurological, visual or auditory deficits or histories of emotional problems and hyperactivity were excluded. There were no differences between the groups on the eye movement tracking task when scored objectively by computerized analysis of the eye movement records, or by ranking of the records by an experienced observer. Our results (and those of other recent studies) fail to support Pavlidis' contention that eye movements hold the key to dyslexia.

Child↗
PubMed1983

Tracking eye movements are normal in dyslexic children.

We measured saccadic and smooth eye tracking movements in 34 dyslexic and 35 control subjects and were unable to show differences in any of the tasks or parameters measured. Subjects were carefully screened for neurological, optometric, audiological, and behavioral problems before admission to the study. We suggest that differences between our results and those of previous investigators are based on sampling differences. We conclude that while there may be children with reading disorders secondary to visual or oculomotor deficits, dyslexia can and does exist independent of such deficits. Because, in this and other studies, we have ruled out peripheral involvement, we feel that dyslexia is primarily a deficit of central information processing of written or spoken material.

Child↗
PubMed1979

Cerebral specialization, writing posture, and motor control of writing in left-handers.

It has been suggested that the inverted hand position of left-handers during writing indicates the left hemisphere of their brain is linguistically specialized and that the writing of these left-handers may be controlled via ipsilateral pathways. Electroencephalograph alpha asymmetry measures at central and parietal leads, as well as dichotic tests, differentiated right-handers from left-handers, but not inverters from noninverters. Electroencephalograph differences between hand posture groups did appear, but only at occipital leads during reading and writing tasks. Regardless of hand posture or speech lateralization, the right central region of the brain is significantly involved in the control of left-handed writing.

Auditory Perception↗