PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Grasela

Publications and source records attributed to D Grasela.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics.

The ultimate goal of antimicrobial therapy is to provide the best possible outcomes for patients. For this to occur, the clinician should be cognizant of many clinical, microbiologic, pharmacologic, and epidemiologic data as well as fundamental pharmacodynamic concepts. An understanding of pharmacodynamic principles is essential; it forms the scientific basis for the design of dosing strategies that maximize clinical efficacy and minimize toxicity. In the 1990s, data accumulated from in vitro models of infection, animal models of infection, healthy volunteer studies, and clinical trials that have expanded knowledge on how drugs best kill microorganisms. This knowledge has enabled clinicians to establish the best modes of antibiotic administration to maximize the killing of microorganisms and to optimize clinical outcomes.

Aminoglycosides↗

Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of suppression of human antimouse antibody response to monoclonal antibody L6 by deoxyspergualin.

Development of human antimouse antibody (HAMA) is a major limiting factor in the application of murine mAb for clinical use. A novel immunomodulatory drug, deoxyspergualin (DSG), has shown potential to suppress antimouse antibody response in preclinical model systems. We conducted a Phase I trial to determine the effect of DSG on HAMA response to murine mAb L6 administered to patients with advanced cancers (in previous trials, this antibody elicited HAMA in two-thirds of the treated patients). L6 mAb was administered at a fixed dose of 200 mg/m2 on days 1-5. DSG was administered at doses of 50 mg/m2 [dose level (dl) 1] or 150 mg/m2 (dls II and III) on days 1-7. Treatment courses were repeated every 6 weeks (dls I and II) or every 3 weeks (dl III). HAMAs were quantitated by a commercially available ELISA assay (ImmuSTRIP; anti-isotypic antibodies) and a radiometric assay (antiisotypic and anti-idiotypic antibodies). Pharmacokinetics of L6 and DSG was also studied in all consenting patients. Among 24 evaluable patients, 2 patients developed detectable HAMAs using the ELISA (one each at dls I and II) after a median follow-up of 122 days (P = 0.0001 as compared to historical controls). Even in the two patients who developed HAMA, the HAMA levels were quite low (160 and 181 ng/ml; historical experience, 70-38,744 ng/ml). The radiometric assay detected anti-L6 antibodies in 13 patients (4, 6, and 3 at dls I-III, respectively) after a median of 82 days. The median highest anti-L6 antibody level was 129 ng/ml (range, 21-2150). The highest anti-L6 antibody level at dl III was only 44 ng/ml. The results suggest suppression of anti-idiotypic response also. No clinical antitumor activity was observed, and no significant changes in T4/T8 subsets or immunoglobulins occurred (suggesting a lack of generalized immunosuppression). We conclude that DSG can suppress HAMA response to L6. A starting dose of 150 mg/m2/day is recommended for Phase II trials to confirm this observation.

Adult↗