The pathogenesis of acute promyelocytic leukaemia: evaluation of the role of molecular diagnosis and monitoring in the management of the disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Grimwade.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) is characterized by the t(15;17) leading to the formation of PML-RARalpha and RARalpha-PML fusion genes; this rearrangement has been considered both diagnostic for, and restricted to, this subtype of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML FAB M3). We describe two cases of AML with the t(15;17) associated with a PML/RARalpha rearrangement which lacked typical APL morphology, classified as FAB M1 and M2 respectively. In both cases morphological review revealed small populations of cells which exhibited some features associated with APL. In the case classified as M1, PML immunofluorescence studies revealed the classic microparticulate nuclear staining pattern as observed in typical cases of APL with the t(15;17). Similarly, blasts from this case were found to be sensitive to ATRA in vitro as determined by NBT reduction test and by normalization of the PML nuclear body staining pattern. To determine the frequency of PML/RARalpha rearrangements in FAB subtypes other than M3, 530 patients from the MRC AML trials were screened using nested RT-PCR. Only one individual, initially classified as M5 with a normal karyotype, was found to have a PML/RARalpha rearrangement. The diagnosis was revised to M3 variant on subsequent morphological review. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that, in rare cases, the t(15;17) is not restricted to patients with M3 morphology as defined by current FAB criteria. Therefore, although we consider cytogenetic analysis of newly diagnosed cases of AML to be mandatory, our data suggests that routine molecular screening for PML/RARalpha rearrangements is not justified and should be reserved for those cases displaying features which may be suspicious of APL even if such cells comprise only a minority of the total population.
Cytogenetics is considered one of the most valuable prognostic determinants in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, many studies on which this assertion is based were limited by relatively small sample sizes or varying treatment approach, leading to conflicting data regarding the prognostic implications of specific cytogenetic abnormalities. The Medical Research Council (MRC) AML 10 trial, which included children and adults up to 55 years of age, not only affords the opportunity to determine the independent prognostic significance of pretreatment cytogenetics in the context of large patient groups receiving comparable therapy, but also to address their impact on the outcome of subsequent transplantation procedures performed in first complete remission (CR). On the basis of response to induction treatment, relapse risk, and overall survival, three prognostic groups could be defined by cytogenetic abnormalities detected at presentation in comparison with the outcome of patients with normal karyotype. AML associated with t(8;21), t(15;17) or inv(16) predicted a relatively favorable outcome. Whereas in patients lacking these favorable changes, the presence of a complex karyotype, -5, del(5q), -7, or abnormalities of 3q defined a group with relatively poor prognosis. The remaining group of patients including those with 11q23 abnormalities, +8, +21, +22, del(9q), del(7q) or other miscellaneous structural or numerical defects not encompassed by the favorable or adverse risk groups were found to have an intermediate prognosis. The presence of additional cytogenetic abnormalities did not modify the outcome of patients with favorable cytogenetics. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the three cytogenetically defined prognostic groups retained their predictive value in the context of secondary as well as de novo AML, within the pediatric age group and furthermore were found to be a key determinant of outcome from autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in first CR. This study highlights the importance of diagnostic cytogenetics as an independent prognostic factor in AML, providing the framework for a stratified treatment approach of this disease, which has been adopted in the current MRC AML 12 trial.
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) of FAB subtype M3 is associated with t(15;17)(q22;q21) and a relatively good prognosis when treated with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and combination chemotherapy. Rarely, alternative balanced translocations have been described in this subtype of AML. The translocation t(11;17)(q23;q21) leading to a PLZF/RARalpha rearrangement has been described in a very small number of cases and has been associated with a poor response to ATRA and an adverse prognosis. We describe a case of AML FAB type M3 with this translocation who entered morphological and cytogenetic complete remission after concurrent prolonged ATRA and one course of induction chemotherapy and remains in morphological and molecular remission at 10 months after presentation. This diagnosis therefore may not always be associated with a poor initial response to treatment.
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients with either a t(15;17), t(8;21) or inv(16) at diagnosis have 'good-risk' disease with a favourable response to therapy and improved survival. Detection of cryptic fusion genes created by these translocations has been reported where there is no cytogenetic evidence of the corresponding abnormality. It is likely that these cases share the same favourable prognosis. Secondary cytogenetic changes commonly associated with these rearrangements are +8 with t(15;17), del(9q) with t(8;21) and +22 with inv(16). These secondary abnormalities are also observed alone, raising the possibility that they may be markers of underlying cryptic rearrangements. In order to determine the frequency of these rearrangements in AML cases with +8, del(9q) or +22 we have performed an analysis of 63 such patients in whom there was no evidence of a t(15;17), t(8;21) or inv(16) by cytogenetics. No disease-related fusion transcripts were identified, indicating that the secondary changes are rarely markers for cryptic rearrangements.
Detection of residual disease after completion of therapy or following bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) predicts relapse and is associated with a poor prognosis. Here we describe the successful treatment of residual disease post-transplant in APL using prolonged all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) therapy in two children in whom autologous BMT (ABMT) had been performed in second complete remission (CR). ATRA treatment was well tolerated and found to be beneficial despite its prior use as a component of the initial induction protocol. ATRA therapy post-transplant led to molecular remission as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as well as reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses and remission now exceeds 3.5 years in both patients. Overall, this study not only demonstrates that ATRA may successfully salvage APL patients with residual disease post-transplant, but also suggests a potential role for retinoids post-consolidation as a means of eliminating residual disease which could be beneficial even in patients previously exposed to ATRA as a component of the induction protocol.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is typified by the reciprocal translocation, t(15; 17)(q22; q21), leading to the formation of PML-RARalpha and RARalpha-PML fusion genes. We have characterized 7 cases of morphologic APL found to lack the t(15; 17) on conventional cytogenetic assessment. In 6 of 7 cases, cryptic PML-RARalpha rearrangements were identified by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH); whereas, in the remaining patient, APL was associated with the variant translocation, t(11; 17)(q23; q12-21), leading to the formation of PLZF-RARalpha and RARalpha-PLZF fusion genes. In each of the cases with cryptic PML-RARalpha rearrangements, PML-RARalpha transcripts were detected in the absence of RARalpha-PML, consistent with the concept that PML-RARalpha is the critical oncogenic fusion protein. In 4 of these cases with evaluable metaphase spreads, the occurrence of a nonreciprocal translocation was confirmed by FISH with sole formation of the PML-RARalpha fusion gene; in 3 cases with morphologically normal chromosomes 15 and 17, RARalpha was inserted into PML on 15q, whereas in the remaining patient the PML-RARalpha fusion arose due to insertion of 15q-derived material including PML into RARalpha on 17q. Immunofluorescence studies were performed using antibodies raised against PML and PIC 1, a ubiquitin-homology domain protein previously identified as an interaction partner of PML. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of subtypes other than M3, PIC 1 was localized to the nuclear membrane and colocalized with PML within discrete nuclear bodies. In APL cases with cryptic PML-RARalpha rearrangements, the characteristic microparticulate pattern of PML staining was detected with partial colocalization with PIC 1, indicative of disruption of the nuclear bodies; whereas in t(11; 17)-associated APL, PML and PIC 1 remained colocalized within discrete nuclear bodies, as observed in non-APL cases. Although deregulation of the putative growth suppressor PML and delocalization of other nuclear body constituents have been advocated to play a key role in the development of t(15; 17)-associated APL, the present study shows that disruption of PML nuclear bodies per se is not a prerequisite for the pathogenesis of APL.
The vast majority of cases of APL are associated with t(15; 17) leading to the formation of PML-RAR alpha, RAR alpha-PML and aberrant PML fusion products. PML-RAR alpha is invariably transcribed and is believed to mediate leukaemogenesis. PML was initially considered to be a transcription factor. However, characterisation of other RING finger containing proteins shows no direct evidence for DNA binding. The RING, B-box, and coiled-coil domains are more likely to represent sites of protein-protein interaction and may be critical for the stability of the multiprotein nuclear domains of which PML is an integral part. In APL the nuclear bodies become disrupted, presumably as a consequence of the presence of PML-RAR alpha and aberrant PML proteins that might render the structure unstable. PML-RAR alpha is capable of binding RXR and sequestering it into the disrupted nuclear domains. Sequestration of RXR would be expected to limit high affinity binding of VDR, TR and residual RARs to DNA response elements and might account for the block in myeloid differentiation at the promyelocyte stage that characterizes APL. Recently PML has been found to have growth suppressor/anti-oncogenic activity. It is unclear whether this is a property of PML itself or reflects a nonspecific function of the PML-associated nuclear domains. Hence the PML/RAR alpha rearrangement alone may be sufficient to cause APL. Abnormal PML function may prevent its growth-suppressor activity, leading to leukaemic transformation; concomitant disruption of retinoid pathways due to sequestration of RXR and/or an abnormal repertoire and character of response element activation mediated by the fusion protein, causing the block in myeloid differentiation (Fig. 3). Disruption of RAR alpha would be expected to account for the similar leukaemic phenotype associated with the t(5;17) and t(11;17) APL cytogenetic variants. Further characterisation of NPM and PLZF at the structural and functional level will determine whether PML and other proteins disrupted in APL associated translocations play an active or purely permissive role in leukaemogenesis and will help dissect the events leading to transformation from those causing blockade of myeloid differentiation and mediating the response to ATRA.
Cytogenetic analysis performed at diagnosis is widely recognised to provide one of the most valuable prognostic indicators in AML. Yet any role for this technique in residual disease assessment, particularly in the context of subsequent transplantation procedures has been incompletely explored. The present study considers the outcome of 190 patients drawn from the UK MRC AML 10 trial in whom cytogenetics were assessed whilst in morphological CR at the time of bone marrow harvest. Cytogenetics at this stage were abnormal in 19 patients (10%). In 11/19 patients, the abnormalities detected reflected the acquisition of new clonal (3/11) or nonclonal changes (8/11) that were not identified at diagnosis; comparison of this group to patients with normal cytogenetics at harvest provided no evidence that such acquired changes are of prognostic significance. In 8/19 patients, abnormalities detected were indicative of persistence of the disease-related clone in harvested marrow. Two of these patients died of sepsis during consolidation therapy. Two received ABMT in first morphological CR: one patient with AML associated with a favourable karyotype (+8,inv(16)) remains in CR, 5.5 years post-transplant, whereas the other with cytogenetic abnormalities considered to confer a poor prognosis (inv(3q),-7), relapsed within 5 months of ABMT. All four of the remaining patients with cytogenetic evidence of persistent disease who were not transplanted in first CR, relapsed within 6.5 months of harvest. Therefore, among 101 of 190 patients with AML characterised by abnormal karyotype at diagnosis, persistence of the disease-related clone in eight patients (8%), revealed by conventional cytogenetic assessment at bone marrow harvest whilst in morphological remission, was found to predict a poor prognosis. Nevertheless, transplantation procedures using marrow which is obviously contaminated with the original leukaemic clone may occasionally still be associated with long-term survival.
All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is currently recommended as standard treatment for acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). However, there has been increasing concern that ATRA is associated with unusual sites of relapse. We present three cases of APL previously treated with ATRA who ultimately relapsed within the central nervous system (CNS) and hypothesize that, by up-regulating intercellular adhesion molecules, ATRA may facilitate the passage of malignant promyelocytes across the blood-brain barrier.
There is currently no means of identifying the subgroup of APL patients who will succumb to haemorrhagic or thrombotic complications. We have investigated factor V Leiden and thermolabile methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) to determine whether these are of predictive value for thrombosis in the context of APL. Of 48 patients drawn from the MRC ATRA trial, two were heterozygous for factor V Leiden (allele frequency 2.1%). 10 homozygotes and 17 heterozygotes for thermolabile MTHFR were identified (allele frequency 38.5%). Amongst these patients, one thrombosis occurred (thermolabile MTHFR heterozygote). In the group with no identified increased thrombotic risk, three episodes were recorded. This approach failed to predict thrombotic events in APL, although the exact implications of specific genotypes remain to be established by larger studies.
RT-PCR assays used to detect acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) are generally considered less sensitive than those for other hematological malignancies, such as CGL. Most patients with APL express del(17q)-derived RAR alpha-PML transcripts as well as the putative leukemogenic PML-RAR alpha associated with add(15q). We have found that a nested RT-PCR for RAR alpha-PML affords greater sensitivity than that for PML-RAR alpha, particularly in patients with the commonest breakpoint pattern. Therefore, we have evaluated both assays in parallel to monitor a group of 12 de novo APL patients who relapsed despite treatment with both all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and chemotherapy. 5' (bcr 3) breakpoints in PML were over represented among the group and three patients had complex cytogenetic abnormalities suggesting both factors may increase the risk of relapse. The RAR alpha-PML assay changed the PCR status of two patients in morphological remission; in both cases disease contamination of bone marrow harvest specimens was detected. Although parallel assessment of PML-RAR alpha and RAR alpha-PML can enhance minimal residual disease detection in APL, this study demonstrates that treatment strategies involving determination of PCR status post-consolidation, even using RAR alpha-PML in addition to the more conventional PML-RAR alpha assay will fail to identify all patients at risk of relapse. Whether the duration of PCR positivity is a helpful prognostic indicator in those patients who ultimately become PCR negative is being addressed by
Detection of the t(15;17) or its molecular consequence, the PML-RAR alpha rearrangement, is critical for meaningful analysis of clinical trials involving patients with suspected acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). Its presence remains the best predictor of a favourable response to retinoids, such as ATRA, which in combination with chemotherapy confer significant improvements in disease-free survival. We have evaluated the relative efficacy of RT-PCR, cytogenetics and PML immunofluorescence staining to identify the existence of the translocation in 100 patients entered into the Medical Research Council (M.R.C.) ATRA trial. RT-PCR successfully identified PML-RAR alpha rearrangements in 93/100 patients, including 65 where only peripheral blood or post-induction marrow samples were available for analysis and in 12 patients in whom cytogenetic assessment failed to demonstrate t(15;17) due to poor-quality metaphases (10/12) or as a reflection of cryptic PML-RAR alpha rearrangements (2/12). Parallel employment of the RAR alpha-PML assay confirmed expression of del(17q)-derived transcripts in 81% and permitted determination of the PML breakpoint (a potential independent prognostic variable) in all 93 cases. Sequencing of RT-PCR products derived from 50 patients with 3' PML breakpoints revealed five bcr 2 cases, including a novel exon 5 breakpoint. 35/81 (43%) patients with cytogenetic evidence of t(15;17) possessed additional karyotypic abnormalities. In four patients with available buffy coat smears, lack of cytogenetic or molecular evidence of the t(15;17) was confirmed by a wild-type PML immunofluorescence nuclear staining pattern, in contrast to the characteristic microparticulate distribution detected in 14 patients with RT-PCR evidence of the rearrangement. However, although PML immunofluorescence staining is suitable for rapid determination of patients likely to benefit from ATRA, this approach does not obviate the need for cytogenetic and RT-PCR analysis of all patients entered into APL clinical trials, because both techniques provide additional information which may prove to be of independent prognostic significance.
Plasma NOx concentrations were raised in 22 acute painful crises in SCD. We have measured blood concentrations of nitric oxide metabolites (NOx) in sickle-cell disease (SCD), and shown that they are increased compared with healthy controls (P = 0.002), and haemoglobin E/beta-thalassaemic controls (P = 0.05). Concentrations in steady-state SCD were also higher than in healthy controls (P = 0.04) but not significantly different from the concentrations at the beginning of painful crises (P = 0.34). Importantly, in 12 regularly exchanged sicklers, the mean pre-transfusion NOx concentration did not differ significantly from the control population (P = 0.52), suggesting that the changes in NO metabolism can be reversed. It is unlikely that the increased concentrations of NOx in SCD result from anaemia or haemolysis as the untransfused haemoglobin E/beta-thalassaemics did not show increased levels.
The acute tumour lysis syndrome is a well recognised complication of chemotherapy for lymphoid malignancies. There are few reports, however, of this complication after corticosteroid therapy alone. We report a case of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who developed the biochemical picture of tumour lysis after two doses of hydrocortisone given prior to platelet transfusion. Prophylactic corticosteroids prior to blood product infusion should be reserved for patients who have experienced febrile or allergic reactions in the past and it is suggested that they should only be administered to patients with active lymphoid malignancies with due caution.