PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D H Angres

Publications and source records attributed to D H Angres.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Characteristics of physicians presenting for assessment at a behavioral health center.

Physician health and impairment have been of considerable interest in recent years. This study contributes detailed clinical data to the existing body of knowledge, by drawing from a sample of physicians assessed at a behavioral health center over a two year time frame. Demographic, referral, and clinical data were gathered using a systematic medical record review procedure, based on 108 physicians who were evaluated within an intensive multidisciplinary assessment program. The majority suffered from active substance use disorders (52.8%), with other psychiatric disorders (29.6%), and substance use disorders in remission (17.6%) the other largest categories. Of those with an active substance use disorder, primary drugs of choice were alcohol and prescription opiates. Over half had comorbid psychiatric disorders (Axis I, II, or both). Significant relationship, employment, and emotional problems were found in all three groups. The significant increase in presentation and/or detection of psychiatric and behavioral problems, both comorbid with and not substance use related, confirms the need for a revision and expansion of views about physicians' behavioral health concerns.

Adult↗

Differential therapeutics and the impaired physician: patient-treatment matching by specificity and intensity.

The objective of this study was to determine the nature and degree of patient to treatment matching for a sample of physicians based on differential problem type and severity. Methods included a single assessment of variables using retrospective chart review. Subjects included 108 physicians (98 men and 10 women), who were sampled consecutively from assessments performed over a 2-year period. They represented a variety of specialties, and most were third-party referred, predominantly by state medical societies. Main outcome measures included demographic information, DSM-IV multiaxial diagnoses, the Severity of Substance-Related Disorder scale, and the type and intensity of recommended treatment. It was found that the physicians presented with a variety of conditions that were clustered into three categories: active substance use disorders (52.8%), substance use disorders in remission (17.6%), and psychiatric/behavioral problems (29.6%). An analysis of the appropriateness of matching types of treatment to these problem categories appeared to support a differential assignment process. A range in severity was also found within problem categories and was subsequently tested for correspondence with the range in intensity of recommended treatment. It was found that severity correlated strongly with recommended treatment intensity for all groups. In addition, multiple regression analyses showed that two factors, ability to sustain abstinence and emotional disturbance, were predictive of treatment intensity for the two substance use disorder subgroups (64% of variance accounted for). In the psychiatric/behavioral problem subgroup, such analysis demonstrated that the severity of difficulties with one's significant other was predictive of treatment intensity (89% of variance accounted for).

Adult↗

Cocainism--a workable model for recovery.

Presented here is a model for the diagnosis and treatment of cocaine dependence. Intrinsic in the understanding of this model is the use of the disease concept of chemical dependence. Within the construct of this model we regard cocaine dependence or "cocainism" as a disease process and part of the spectrum of the disease of chemical dependence. We note that "pure" cocainism is rare and cocaine is usually just another chemical used in the polyaddicted patient. We call cocaine the "Great Precipitator" as it often brings the polyaddicted chemically-dependent person into a crisis that requires a treatment intervention. Cocainism, with its overwhelming compulsion and destruction, often precipitates a crisis in a matter of months from first use. As psychiatrists practicing addictionology, we understand the need to deal with cocainism as a primary disease process rather than a symptom of an underlying psychiatric illness. We deal with cocainism as we deal with alcoholism. While the DSM-III requires withdrawal and tolerance changes to be an essential feature for dependence, we more easily identify the disease of cocainism by its production of intense psychological addiction. Thereby the diagnosis of the disease of cocainism, as with other drugs (including alcohol) in the spectrum of chemical dependence, is characterized by the persistent, uncontrolled, compulsive use of cocaine. This illogical, irrational compulsion with continued, repeated use of cocaine as it destroys the individual's life, is the primary symptom of this disease. In regards to specific considerations, the psychiatric complications of cocainism, which can include cocaine induced psychosis, can persist beyond the intoxication period. We also note the depression that can accompany abstinence from cocaine and often has a protracted course following initial abstinence as well. We advocate the very cautious use of any psychotropic medications after an alloted period of time since we find that many of these additional symptoms seem to dissipate during the treatment process when involved in our suggested setting. In the cases of where it is determined that additional psychiatric illness co-exist with cocaine and chemical dependence such as in "dual diagnosis" patients, we have had that success by treating both illnesses concomitantly and aggressively. The "contract" with the dual diagnosis patient has afforded excellent results in this instance. The treatment modalities most effective in this model include a treatment team with its multidisciplinary and recovering and non-recovering characteristics, and the use of the group process and peer group therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗

Female physicians and substance abuse. Comparisons with male physicians presenting for assessment.

As with women in general, the vicissitudes of the female physician who suffers from a substance use disorder have been understudied, and such persons remain underrepresented in treatment. The purpose of the present study is to describe the similarities and differences between female and male physicians presenting for assessment; 108 physicians in total were included in the study, 10 of whom were female. Demographically, we found that the female physicians were more likely to be single and younger than their male counterparts. On clinical indices, females showed less impairment on legal and medical functioning, and better capability in sustaining abstinence and eliminating environmental cues to relapse. Of the women with substance use disorders, higher rates of comorbidity were found than with males. Although there were no significant differences in overall severity, males were more likely to be recommended to more intensive levels of care for either substance use or psychiatric disorders. The female physicians were recommended to a level of care of a lower intensity, but more often to a treatment with a dual-diagnosis focus. These findings are discussed in terms of the vulnerabilities of the female physician, barriers to treatment, tailoring treatment to female needs, and opportunities for prevention and further research.

Adult↗