PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

D H Gustafson

Publications and source records attributed to D H Gustafson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Lessons learned from an early attempt to implement CQI principles in a regulatory system.

This article describes the Quality Assurance Project (1978-1982), which was developed as a demonstration project by a Wisconsin research team and was intended to implement and evaluate new methods for carrying out the regulatory roles of facility and resident assessment in Wisconsin nursing homes. The new method included (1) a screening process to distribute efforts between sanctioning and process improvement, (2) role changes that would move surveyors beyond problem identification toward education and consultation, and (3) a resident review process based on efforts to find systems-level problems. For the first three years of the project (reported here) certain principles were followed, many of which were similar to those of continuous quality improvement (CQI). Although this is an imperfect example of CQI implementation in a regulatory organization, it contains important lessons that may be helpful in integrating the CQI philosophy into other external review efforts.

Facility Regulation and Control

CHESS: a computer-based system for providing information, referrals, decision support and social support to people facing medical and other health-related crises.

CHESS (the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System) is an interactive, computer-based system to support people facing health-related crises or concerns. CHESS provides information, referral to service providers, support in making tough decisions and networking to experts and others facing the same concerns. CHESS will improve access to health and human services for people who would otherwise face psychological, social, economic or geographic barriers to receiving services. CHESS has developed programs in five specific topic areas: Academic Crisis, Adult Children of Alcoholics, AIDS/HIV Infection, Breast Cancer and Sexual Assault. The lessons learned, and the structures developed, will serve as a model for future implementation of CHESS programs in a broad range of other topic areas. CHESS is designed around three major desired outcomes: 1) improving the emotional health status of users; 2) increasing the cost-effective use of health and human services; and 3) reducing the incidence of risk-taking behaviors that can lead to injury or illness. Pilot-testing and initial analysis of controlled evaluation data has shown that CHESS is extensively used, is useful and easy-to-use, and produces positive emotional outcomes. Further evaluation in continuing.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Quality assurance for psychiatric emergencies. An analysis of assessment and feedback methodologies.

Improvement in the quality of evaluation and treatment of behavioral emergencies presenting to hospital emergency rooms requires a multicomponent assessment of resources, clinician performance, and outcome. The authors present a summary of data and conclusions derived from index-based assessment of quality of care in over 2000 psychiatric emergencies. The study revealed that emergency room physicians rendered high-quality medical care, but were deficient in crucial aspects of psychiatric evaluation and treatment including evaluation of dangerousness and substance abuse and provision of appropriate follow-up care. A positive association was observed between quality of care and compliance with referral. Subsequent review with the staff pointed to issues such as staffing, emergency room and community resources, and adequacy of documentation as significant influences on quality of care, as assessed by the chart-audit, index approach. A pilot study demonstrated uniform improvement of quality scores in a small group of physicians receiving written and oral feedback about their performance. The use of focused quality assessment studies that examine both structural and process factors, and their correlation with outcome, is discussed in light of the information obtained from the previously described study. A feedback methodology that emphasizes an interactive process to identify deficiencies in care and to explore their causes and remedies is presented.

Aftercare

The Quality Assessment Index (QAI) for measuring nursing home quality.

There have been few detailed evaluations of measures of quality of care in nursing homes. This is unfortunate because it has meant that much research on factors affecting nursing home quality has used measures of questionable reliability and validity. Moreover, some measures currently in use have been developed using methodologies not based on solid conceptual grounds, offering little reason to expect them to have much internal or external validity. In this article we suggest characteristics that should be present in measures of nursing home quality, propose a methodology for the development of such measures, propose a specific nursing home quality measure (the Quality Assessment Index or QAI), and report the results of several tests of its validity and reliability.

Abstracting and Indexing

Impacting quality in health care: the role of the health systems engineer.

Total Quality Management (TQM) is just beginning to influence hospital operations. The health systems engineer (HSE) is uniquely qualified and in an opportune position to expedite the implementation of TQM in hospitals. We discuss how we envision the HSE's roles as technical facilitator, measurer, and modeler in supporting the principles of quality improvement in the hospital. In the process, we suggest that the HSE can be much more valuable in helping the hospital reduce costs by improving quality rather than monitoring productivity. As a result, HSEs will expand their role in the hospital, better utilize their skills and training, and increase their effectiveness.

Efficiency

Suicide risk prediction by computer interview: a prospective study.

A computer interview program that uses a subjective Bayesian probability model to assess suicide risk was evaluated. Predictions made by clinicians for 52 patients were compared with predictions made by the computer for the same patients. The computer was significantly (p = .001) better at predicting attempters, and clinicians were significantly (p = .01) better at predicting nonattempters. An analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the computer had better overall discrimination, but the difference was nonsignificant.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted

Weight loss and body temperature changes in breast-fed and bottle-fed neonates.

Among 1138 newborns in a Level II nursery, breast-fed and formula-fed infants were comparable in terms of sex, mode of delivery, gestational age, birth weight, and birth temperature. Breast-fed neonates subsequently lost more weight and a greater percentage of their birth weight (mean, 7.4% vs. 4.9%) than did formula-fed infants. Loss of more than 10 percent of birth weight was associated with short gestation and low birth weight and with breast feeding. Birth weight loss of greater than or equal to 3 percent was associated with a risk of fever (greater than or equal to 37.5 degrees C) among breast-fed and formula-fed infants, but there was no gradient of increasing risk of fever with increasing percentage weight loss beyond 3 percent. After weight loss and other significant variables were adjusted for in a multivariate analysis, breast feeding was not independently predictive of fever. Although breast feeding may be associated with weight loss, it is not prudent to assume that this is the cause of fever in a breast-fed neonate.

Adolescent

A decision theory approach to measuring severity in illness.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the applicability of a multiattribute utility model for measuring the severity of a patient's illness. A single medical problem (an analysis of the costs and benefits of different burn care systems) was used to test the model. Physicians estimated the relative importance of and severity functions for criteria influencing severity. The model's estimates of severity were compared with survival rates of more than 6000 actual patients and with physicians' rankings of hypothetical patients. Although continued validation is needed, the multiattribute utility model appears to have potential as an index for illness severity and, possibly, health status.

Burns