PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D H Peters

Publications and source records attributed to D H Peters.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Regular use of alcohol and tobacco in India and its association with age, gender, and poverty.

This study provides national estimates of regular tobacco and alcohol use in India and their associations with gender, age, and economic group obtained from a representative survey of 471,143 people over the age of 10 years in 1995-96, the National Sample Survey. The national prevalence of regular use of smoking tobacco is estimated to be 16.2%, chewing tobacco 14.0%, and alcohol 4.5%. Men were 25.5 times more likely than women to report regular smoking, 3.7 times more likely to regularly chew tobacco, and 9.7 times more likely to regularly use alcohol. Respondents belonging to scheduled castes and tribes (recognized disadvantaged groups) were significantly more likely to report regular use of alcohol as well as smoking and chewing tobacco. People from rural areas had higher rates compared to urban dwellers, as did those with no formal education. Individuals with incomes below the poverty line had higher relative odds of use of chewing tobacco and alcohol compared to those above the poverty line. The regular use of both tobacco and alcohol also increased significantly with each diminishing income quintile. Comparisons are made between these results and those found in the United States and elsewhere, highlighting the need to address control of these substances on the public health agenda.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Benchmarks for health expenditures, services and outcomes in Africa during the 1990s.

There is limited information on national health expenditures, services, and outcomes in African countries during the 1990s. We intend to make statistical information available for national level comparisons. National level data were collected from numerous international databases, and supplemented by national household surveys and World Bank expenditure reviews. The results were tabulated and analysed in an exploratory fashion to provide benchmarks for groupings of African countries and individual country comparison. There is wide variation in scale and outcome of health care spending between African countries, with poorer countries tending to do worse than wealthier ones. From 1990-96, the median annual per capita government expenditure on health was nearly US$ 6, but averaged US$ 3 in the lowest-income countries, compared to US$ 72 in middle-income countries. Similar trends were found for health services and outcomes. Results from individual countries (particularly Ethiopia, Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire and Gabon) are used to indicate how the data can be used to identify areas of improvement in health system performance. Serious gaps in data, particularly concerning private sector delivery and financing, health service utilization, equity and efficiency measures, hinder more effective health management. Nonetheless, the data are useful for providing benchmarks for performance and for crudely identifying problem areas in health systems for individual countries.

Africa↗
PubMed1997

Fludarabine. An update of its pharmacology and use in the treatment of haematological malignancies.

Fludarabine is an antineoplastic agent which has been studied in patients with a variety of lymphoproliferative malignancies. Clinical evidence from comparative studies in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) suggests that fludarabine is at least as effective as CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone) or CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone) in previously treated or chemotherapy-naive patients and significantly more effective than chlorambucil in terms of response rate and duration and survival in chemotherapy-naive patients. Promising results have also been reported with fludarabine-based combination therapy in the treatment of patients with CLL. In addition, sequential therapy with fludarabine and cytarabine has demonstrated good efficacy in the treatment of acute leukaemias, as has fludarabine monotherapy and combination therapy in low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A favourable cytoreductive response has been reported in patients with lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma and in a smaller number of patients with cutaneous T cell lymphomas, CLL of T cell origin or prolymphocytic leukaemia. Recent data also support the use of fludarabine, either as a component of a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen or in the attainment of minimal residual disease, in patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplantation. The tolerability profile of fludarabine is similar to that of CAP, with the most common adverse events being granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and infection. Alopecia and nausea/vomiting appear to be less frequent with fludarabine therapy than with CAP although the development of immune cytopenias is more frequent with fludarabine. Severe neurotoxicity has been reported with fludarabine but this is mostly confined to the use of high doses. Clinical experience therefore indicates that fludarabine is an effective and generally well-tolerated antineoplastic agent for the second-line treatment of advanced CLL. Recent data from comparative studies also support the earlier use of fludarabine in the treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with CLL. Furthermore, results of available studies are increasingly highlighting an important future role for fludarabine in the treatment of acute leukaemias and low grade NHL and possibly other lymphoproliferative disorders, particularly when used as a component of combination chemotherapy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1997

Zalcitabine. An update of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy in the management of HIV infection.

Zalcitabine is a dideoxynucleoside antiretroviral agent that is phosphorylated to the active metabolite 2',3'-dideoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate (ddCTP) within both uninfected and HIV-infected cells. At therapeutic concentrations, ddCTP inhibits HIV replication by inhibiting the enzyme reverse transcriptase and terminating elongation of the proviral DNA chain. The results of 3 large pivotal trials comparing zidovudine monotherapy with combination therapy have now clearly established that zalcitabine plus zidovudine combination with an improvement in viral load and CD4+ cell count compared with zidovudine monotherapy. More recently, clinical end-point and surrogate marker data have established the efficacy of zalcitabine in combination with the protease inhibitor saquinavir in zidovudine-experienced patients. Other studies have demonstrated the utility of zalcitabine in combination with ritonavir and the nucleoside analogue lamivudine. Importantly, early use of zalcitabine in the treatment sequence does not appear to limit the therapeutic efficacy of subsequent therapy with other nucleoside analogues such as lamivudine. Peripheral neuropathy is the most frequent dose-limiting adverse effect associated with zalcitabine therapy and is generally reversible on discontinuation of treatment. Stomatitis and mouth ulcers may occur frequently with zalcitabine therapy but tend to resolve with continuing treatment. Haematological toxicity, which is a common adverse effect associated with zidovudine, is reported infrequently with zalcitabine. Overall, combination therapy with zalcitabine plus zidovudine or saquinavir has been shown to have a tolerability profile comparable to that of either agent alone, although treatment with zidovudine plus zalcitabine was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of haematological toxicity compared with zidovudine monotherapy in one study. Therefore, current data suggest that zalcitabine is a useful antiretroviral agent for inclusion as a component of initial double combination therapy with zidovudine or as part of triple combination therapy including zidovudine plus a protease inhibitor in the management of patients with HIV infection.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Enoxaparin. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and clinical applications in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease.

Enoxaparin (enoxaparin sodium) is a low molecular weight derivative of unfractionated heparin which has been evaluated for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disease. Since a previous review in Drugs, well controlled clinical trials have confirmed the effectiveness of enoxaparin as prophylaxis in patients with a high risk for deep venous thrombosis (DVT), i.e. those undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery. Enoxaparin 30mg twice daily, initiated postoperatively, offers an overall balance of prophylactic efficacy and haemorrhagic tolerability which is superior to that of unfractionated heparin. In comparative clinical trials, this dosage demonstrated either improved efficacy and a similar haemorrhagic profile, or a similar degree of efficacy with a lower rate of haemorrhagic events, compared with unfractionated heparin 5000IU 3 times daily. Limited data indicate that an enoxaparin regimen of 40mg once daily, starting preoperatively, is more effective than unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing hip replacement and has a comparable haemorrhagic profile. In patients with a moderate risk for DVT, enoxaparin is similar to unfractionated heparin in both efficacy and haemorrhagic profile, while preliminary investigations have demonstrated the utility of enoxaparin in the prevention of DVT in elderly, nonsurgical patients. Enoxaparin may also be useful for the treatment of existing DVT and as an anticoagulant in haemodialysis. Thus, enoxaparin is an effective form of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease in moderate to high risk surgical situations. Recent evidence for improved efficacy, together with a similar incidence of haemorrhagic complications in most situations, may lead to enoxaparin being preferred to unfractionated heparin for the routine prevention of DVT after high risk surgery. Although detailed comparisons with other low molecular weight heparins and antithrombotic agents are required before its relative clinical utility can be fully assessed, enoxaparin is likely to play a significant role in the prophylaxis of thromboembolic disorders.

Biological Availability↗
PubMed1995

Ramipril. An updated review of its therapeutic use in essential hypertension and heart failure.

Ramipril is a second generation angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. Like enalapril, it is a prodrug and is hydrolysed in vivo to release the active metabolite, ramiprilat, which has a long elimination half-life, permitting once-daily administration. The antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril has been confirmed in large-scale noncomparative studies conducted in general practice as well as in more rigorously controlled clinical trials. In the former, approximately 85% of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension have responded successfully to treatment with ramipril 2.5 or 5 mg/day, while comparative trials indicate that the antihypertensive efficacy of the drug is equivalent to that of other established ACE inhibitors and the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist atenolol. As expected, the response rate to ramipril monotherapy is lower in patients with severe hypertension (around 40%), although the blood pressure lowering effect can be enhanced with the addition of a diuretic such as hydrochlorothiazide or piretanide. The antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril is maintained in patients with diabetes mellitus and preliminary data indicate that the drug has the beneficial effect of decreasing urinary albumin excretion in diabetic patients with nephropathy. Ramipril is superior to atenolol in causing regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, although the clinical significance of this effect per se remains to be established. The large-scale Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) study demonstrated that ramipril 5 or 10 mg/day significantly decreased the risk of all-cause mortality by 27% in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction, even if transient. The beneficial effect of ramipril was apparent by 30 days of treatment and appeared to be greatest in patients with more severe ventricular damage after infarction. Ramipril is well tolerated in general practice, with 5% or fewer patients discontinuing therapy because of drug intolerance. The data available suggest that ramipril shares a similar tolerability profile to that of other established ACE inhibitors. Thus, clinical data confirm ramipril as a useful alternative ACE inhibitor for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension, and indicate a beneficial effect of the drug in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. It is also reasonable to assume that ramipril will be of value in the treatment of patients with more established heart failure or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction.

Aging↗
PubMed1995

Ceftazidime. An update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Ceftazidime is a third generation cephalosporin antibacterial agent which, since its introduction in the early 1980s, has retained a broad spectrum of in vitro antimicrobial activity and clinical utility in serious infections. However, increasing resistance to ceftazidime and other third generation cephalosporins, particularly among Enterobacteriaceae, due to the emergence of plasmid-mediated extended spectrum beta-lactamases and the class I chromosomally mediated beta-lactamases, is of concern. There is now a wealth of information on the pharmacokinetics of the drug. enabling ceftazidime to be used predictably, and with a low potential for adverse effects, in a diversity of patient populations. Overall, ceftazidime remains an effective agent for the treatment of serious infection, particularly those due to major nosocomial pathogens, and respiratory infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. Ceftazidime-containing regimens also remain an important option for the empirical therapy of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients. The tolerability profile of ceftazidime makes the drug a useful option in seriously ill patients who are at risk of developing adverse events with other antibacterial agents. Although patterns of bacterial resistance have changed in the ensuing years since its introduction, judicious use of this important agent will help maintain its present clinical utility.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Metformin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

The biguanide metformin (dimethylbiguanide) is an oral antihyperglycaemic agent used in the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). It reduces blood glucose levels, predominantly by improving hepatic and peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin without affecting the secretion of this hormone. Metformin also appears to have potentially beneficial effects on serum lipid levels and fibrinolytic activity, although the long term clinical implications of these effects are unclear. Metformin possesses similar antihyperglycaemic efficacy to sulphonylureas in obese and nonobese patients with NIDDM. Additionally, interim data from the large multicentre United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) indicated similar antihyperglycaemic efficacy for metformin and insulin in newly diagnosed patients with NIDDM. Unlike the sulphonylureas and insulin, however, metformin treatment is not associated with increased bodyweight. Addition of metformin to existing antidiabetic therapy confers enhanced antihyperglycaemic efficacy. This may be of particular use in improving glycaemic control in patients with NIDDM not adequately controlled with sulphonylurea monotherapy, and may serve to reduce or eliminate the need for daily insulin injections in patients with NIDDM who require this therapy. The acute, reversible gastrointestinal adverse effects seen with metformin may be minimised by administration with or after food, and by using lower dosages, increased slowly where necessary. Lactic acidosis due to metformin is rare, and the risk of this complication may be minimised by observance of prescribing precautions and contraindications intended to avoid accumulation of the drug or lactate in the body. Unlike the sulphonylureas, metformin does not cause hypoglycaemia. Thus, metformin is an effective antihyperglycaemic agent which appears to improve aberrant plasma lipid and fibrinolytic profiles associated with NIDDM. Possible long term clinical benefits of this drug with regard to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity are not yet established but are being assessed in a major ongoing study. Since metformin does not promote weight gain or hypoglycaemia it should be considered first-line pharmacotherapy in obese patients with NIDDM inadequately controlled by nonpharmacological measures. Metformin appears similarly effective for the pharmacological management of NIDDM in nonobese patients.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1995

Fleroxacin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in various infections.

The fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent fleroxacin has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity which encompasses most Gram-negative species (particularly Enterobacteriaceae) and a number of Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-sensitive staphylococci. It is available as oral and intravenous formulations. In clinical trials, fleroxacin has been evaluated in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (single or multiple once-daily oral doses of 200 or 400mg), gonorrhoea and chancroid (single oral doses of 200 or 400mg), complicated urinary tract, nonpneumococcal lower respiratory tract and skin and soft tissue infections and typhoid fever (multiple once-daily oral or intravenous regimens, usually 400 mg/day), bacterial enteritis, and traveller's diarrhoea (single or multiple once-daily oral doses of 400mg). Bacteriological cure rates were generally around 90% or higher in complicated and uncomplicated urinary tract infections, uncomplicated gonorrhoea (approximately 100%), pyelonephritis, bacterial enteritis and typhoid fever, and exceeded 80% in lower respiratory tract, and skin and soft tissue infections and chancroid. These cure rates were similar to, or better than, those achieved with standard comparator antibacterial agents such as penicillins, cephalosporins, cotrimoxazole, or other quinolones. Fleroxacin 400mg once daily also achieved bacteriological cure in approximately 80% of patients with bone and joint infections in preliminary studies. In Japanese studies using a lower dosage of 200 or 300 mg/day, fleroxacin was reported to be bacteriologically effective in a range of infections, including urinary tract and upper and lower respiratory tract infections. Fleroxacin has a relatively long elimination half-life, which allows once-daily administration, and it appears to have less propensity for interactions with other medications in comparison to many other fluoroquinolones. Its tolerability profile is typical of this class of compound, with adverse events mostly relating to the gastrointestinal tract, CNS, and skin and appendages (including phototoxicity). Recent pooled tolerability data from worldwide clinical trials indicate that adverse events are reported by approximately 27% of patients receiving 200 mg/day orally or 400 mg/day orally or intravenously, and 17% of those receiving a single oral dose of 400mg. These exceed incidences reported for established fluoroquinolones, possibly indicating recent trends towards increased rates of reported adverse effects with these agents. However, in direct comparative studies with twice-daily fluoroquinolones, fleroxacin 400mg once daily produced a similar incidence of adverse effects to ofloxacin 800 mg/day and a slightly higher incidence than ciprofloxacin 1000 mg/day, while fleroxacin 200mg once daily produced a similar incidence to norfloxacin 800 mg/day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Salmeterol. An appraisal of its quality-of-life benefits and potential pharmacoeconomic positioning in asthma.

Salmeterol is a selective beta 2-receptor agonist with a long duration of action that permits twice daily administration. It is effective in the prophylaxis of asthma symptoms, including nocturnal and exercise-induced asthma, and it has shown clinical benefits in both adults and children. Because of its slow onset of action, salmeterol is not intended for relief of acute symptoms. The addition of salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily to existing asthma therapy has a positive effect on patient quality of life in the short term (up to 3 months), as assessed by the Living With Asthma Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. This improvement in well-being appears to be greater than that associated with salbutamol (albuterol). Furthermore, in patients with asthma symptoms despite inhaled corticosteroid therapy, a reduced dose of corticosteroid plus salmeterol produced a greater improvement in quality of life as assessed by a daily symptom diary (but not by the Living With Asthma Questionnaire), and was more clinically effective than a higher dose of corticosteroid alone. Evaluation of the effects of salmeterol on quality of life compared with other standard therapies, and extension of these results into the long term are required to consolidate these conclusions. Salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily was associated with an estimated incremental cost of 736 pounds per symptom-free patient in the final week of 7.5 months' therapy, 648 pounds per patient with improved morning (am) peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and 1013 pounds per patient with improved evening (pm) PEFR compared with salbutamol (400 micrograms twice daily) in a cost-effectiveness analysis. However, these results should be tested by sensitivity analyses and compared with the incremental costs of other asthma interventions more applicable to recommended clinical practice. The cost effectiveness of salmeterol relative to other asthma therapies, and the effect of salmeterol on patient quality of life in the long term require further investigation. However, when added to existing asthma therapy, salmeterol improves patient quality of life in the short term (up to 3 months). It may also have some beneficial effects on patient well-being when used to provide a steroid-sparing effect.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Teicoplanin. A reappraisal of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Since an earlier review in the Journal substantial additional data have accumulated, further clarifying the in vitro activity, pharmacokinetic profile, clinical efficacy and tolerability of teicoplanin. Recent therapeutic trials confirm the efficacy of teicoplanin in the treatment of microbiologically confirmed Gram-positive infections, including septicaemia, endocarditis, and infections of skin and soft tissue, bone and joints, and the lower respiratory tract. As teicoplanin can be administered once daily intramuscularly as well as intravenously, it has potential for outpatient treatment of severe Gram-positive infections. Teicoplanin is appropriate as treatment of patients with fever and neutropenia, but there is still controversy over the timing for introduction of glycopeptide antibiotics into therapeutic regimens. Teicoplanin is generally reserved for secondary therapy of patients with documented bacteraemia who fail to respond to initial empirical antibiotic regimens, but probably should be part of the initial empirical regimen in the setting of a high incidence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Teicoplanin has a lower propensity than vancomycin to impair renal function when either drug is combined with an aminoglycoside, causes fewer anaphylactoid reactions, and appears to be of comparable efficacy. Thus, teicoplanin may be preferred to vancomycin in the treatment of Gram-positive infections, and where a glycopeptide antibiotic is deemed a necessary inclusion in a regimen for empirical treatment in patients with fever and neutropenia.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Tiapride. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of alcohol dependence syndrome.

Tiapride, an atypical neuroleptic agent, is a selective dopamine D2-receptor antagonist with little propensity for causing catalepsy and sedation. It shows preferential activity at receptors previously sensitised to dopamine and those located extrastriatally. Tiapride demonstrates antidyskinetic activity reflecting antidopaminergic actions, and also anxiolytic activity mediated by mechanisms that are poorly understood. Unlike the benzodiazepines, tiapride does not affect vigilance and has a low potential for interaction with alcohol (ethanol), and possibly for abuse. Tiapride facilitates management of alcohol withdrawal, but its use in patients at risk of severe reactions in acute withdrawal should be accompanied by adjunct therapy for hallucinosis and seizures. Since it may prove difficult to identify such patients and there is also a small risk of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (particularly with parenteral administration), the usefulness of tiapride in this setting is likely to be limited. Nevertheless, relative freedom from the complications associated with benzodiazepine therapy suggest a possible role for the drug in the treatment of individuals suitable for alcohol detoxification as outpatients. Preliminary clinical studies in alcoholic patients following detoxification have shown that tiapride ameliorates psychological distress, improves abstinence, and reduces drinking behaviour, and in the short term facilitates reintegration within society. These benefits were associated with reduced consumption of health care resources. However, the potential risk of tardive dyskinesia at the dosage employed (300 mg/day) requires evaluation and necessitates medical supervision. Thus, with its lack of adverse effects on vigilance and low propensity for interaction with alcohol and possibly for abuse, tiapride will probably find particular use in the management of alcoholic patients suitable for detoxification in an outpatient setting; and, if initial findings are confirmed in large well-designed trials, in the short term (< or = 6 months) therapy of reformed alcoholic patients under medical supervision.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

Dirithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Dirithromycin is a new macrolide with a spectrum and degree of in vitro antimicrobial activity similar to that of erythromycin. Compared with erythromycin, dirithromycin has a long elimination half-life enabling once-daily administration, and it also achieves a greater cellular:extracellular concentration ratio and higher concentration in some tissues. Multicentre double-blind clinical trials have shown dirithromycin to be similar in efficacy to erythromycin in the treatment of uncomplicated bacterial infections of the respiratory tract and of skin and soft tissues. Since dirithromycin is at least as well tolerated as erythromycin, with its convenient administration schedule and pharmacokinetic profile it is a useful alternative to erythromycin in the treatment of appropriate community-acquired infections. Definition of the place of dirithromycin relative to that of the other newer macrolides awaits the results of further suitably designed therapeutic trials.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1994

Loratadine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in allergic disorders.

Loratadine is a long-acting antihistamine agent, exhibiting partial selectivity for peripheral histamine H1-receptors. To date, loratadine has been evaluated in allergic rhinitis, urticaria and, to a limited extent, in asthma. In several large controlled comparative clinical studies, loratadine was superior to placebo, faster acting than astemizole and as effective as azatadine, cetirizine, chlorpheniramine (chlorphenamine), clemastine, hydroxyzine, mequitazine and terfenadine in patients with allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria. The clinical effectiveness of loratadine in asthma is at present unclear. Loratadine is well tolerated. At dosages of 10 mg daily, commonly reported adverse events were somnolence, fatigue and headache. Sedation occurred less frequently with loratadine than with azatadine, cetirizine, chlorpheniramine, clemastine and mequitazine. Serious ventricular arrhythmias, as reported with some other second generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists, have not been observed with loratadine to date. Thus, loratadine, with its attributes of once daily administration, fast onset of action and essentially nonsedating properties, would appear to be an appropriate first-line agent for the treatment of allergic rhinitis or urticaria.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Metoprolol: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its use in hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Metoprolol is a beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist that is widely used in several indications. A recent investigation has also highlighted a potential role for metoprolol in selected patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life data for metoprolol are limited to the areas of hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. In these settings, metoprolol has shown beneficial effects on morbidity and mortality, or closely-related end-points. Controlled release formulations offer the potential to maximise the confirmed antihypertensive benefits of metoprolol by maintaining clinically effective plasma drug concentrations within a narrow range over a 24-hour interval between doses. Recent data support the use of controlled release metoprolol at the low dose of 50 mg/day. Metoprolol is at least as effective as many other antihypertensive drugs, although compared with thiazide diuretics at relatively high doses in the MAPHY (Metoprolol Atherosclerosis Prevention in Hypertensives) trial, metoprolol was associated with a more favourable effect on mortality. Pharmacoeconomic analysis, also based on the MAPHY trial, indicates that metoprolol is more cost effective than high dose thiazide diuretics in middle-aged men with mild to moderate hypertension. However, the advantage for beta-blockade in this trial is not supported by results of other studies, and the applicability of these data to current medical practice using lower thiazide doses is therefore questionable. Quality of life in patients with mild to moderate hypertension did not deteriorate in most investigations with metoprolol. Furthermore, quality of life was similar for controlled release metoprolol and atenolol. With conventional/matrix-based sustained release metoprolol, quality of life was less satisfactory than with lisinopril but was only marginally different from that with diltiazem (at lower than usual therapeutic doses). Nevertheless, these newer agents have no proven beneficial effect on mortality, and further studies are also warranted with controlled release metoprolol 50 mg/day. When administered post-myocardial infarction, conventional metoprolol was associated with significant improvements in quality of life and was cost saving over a 3-year period. Significant improvements in quality of life were also evident for metoprolol-treated patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. In summary, available data support the continued extensive usage of metoprolol as treatment for hypertension and as therapy post-myocardial infarction. Pharmacoeconomic data supporting an advantage for metoprolol over high dose thiazides in hypertension needs further assessment in settings reflecting usual general practice approaches to managing patients with hypertension, while differences in quality of life between metoprolol and other antihypertensive agents appear to be marginal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Cardiomyopathy, Dilated↗
PubMed1994

Valproic acid. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in epilepsy.

Valproic acid is a branched-chained fatty acid, structurally unrelated to any other antiepileptic drug. Since publication of the original review in the Journal in 1977, several clinical trials have documented its efficacy and safety in adults and children for the treatment of generalised seizures (absence, tonic-clonic, myoclonic), partial seizures (simple, complex, secondarily generalised) and compound/combination seizures (including those refractory to treatment with other antiepileptic drugs). Valproic acid monotherapy has demonstrated efficacy equivalent to that of carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital in the treatment of both generalised and partial seizures and ethosuximide in the treatment of absence seizures. Adverse effects associated with the drug are primarily gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia) in nature, although the use of enteric-coated formulations has reduced the incidence of abdominal discomfort. Weight gain, tremor and transient hair loss are commonly reported. Importantly, valproic acid has minimal neurological adverse effects (sedation, ataxia, impairment of cognitive function) compared with other antiepileptic drugs, a finding that may be of particular relevance in many patients with epilepsy. The incidence of rare, fatal liver failure has been greatly reduced by identifying and avoiding administration of valproic acid to high risk patient populations. An estimated risk of 1 to 2% for neural tube defects, predominantly spina bifida aperta, with maternal use of valproic acid therapy has been reported. Valproic acid inhibits hepatic drug metabolism and displaces other highly bound drugs from their plasma protein binding sites. Therefore, coadministered drugs which are highly protein bound or hepatically metabolised may require dosage adjustment. Enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs may increase valproic acid metabolism and necessitate increasing its dosage. Thus, comparative trials and extensive clinical experience have demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of valproic acid and support its role as a valuable and well established first-line treatment for patients with a broad range of seizure types.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Zonisamide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in epilepsy.

Zonisamide is a 1,2 benzisoxazole derivative and the first agent of this chemical class to be developed as an antiepileptic drug. It has shown activity in various animal models of epilepsy, and although a detailed mode of action awaits clarification it appears to block the propagation/spread of seizure discharges and to suppress the epileptogenic focus. Clinical experience with zonisamide in Japan has documented its efficacy in the treatment of partial seizures (partial-onset generalised tonic-clonic, simple partial and/or complex partial seizures), and to a more variable extent, generalised tonic-clonic, generalised tonic (mainly seen in symptomatic generalised epilepsies including Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome) and compound/combination seizures (including those refractory to treatment with other antiepileptic drugs). Other generalised seizure types have also responded to therapy with zonisamide, although only small patient numbers were studied. Zonisamide has demonstrated efficacy equivalent to that of carbamazepine in patients with (mainly) partial seizures, and to that of valproic acid in a small study of children (n = 32) with generalised seizures. Animal studies suggest that zonisamide possesses a more favourable therapeutic index than most other antiepileptic drugs. However, clinical trials conducted to date, have not confirmed any overt tolerability advantage. Indeed, whereas the recommended therapeutic plasma zonisamide concentration is 20 mg/L, clinical investigations have associated adverse events with plasma zonisamide concentrations of > 30 mg/L, suggesting the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring. Moreover, although plasma concentrations of zonisamide are empirically regarded to be proportional to therapeutic doses in patients in Japan, nonlinear pharmacokinetics have been reported for this drug in patients in the US and may further complicate its use in this patient population. Additional pharmacokinetic studies will help to establish the change in pharmacokinetic profile that occurs with dosage titration in patients outside Japan. Among 700 patients treated with zonisamide in Europe/US, a high incidence of renal calculi (1.9%) has been noted, however, the causal relationship to zonisamide is disputed. Indeed, although urinary lithiasis has also been recorded for patients in Japan, the aetiology, incidence and spontaneous regression of this condition suggest that it is not a serious problem for this patient population. Until this difference is clarified, it is likely that zonisamide will find its greatest use in the treatment of patients in Japan. Like many other established antiepileptic drugs, available data suggest the propensity for zonisamide to alter the pharmacokinetic profile of other anticonvulsant agents, although severe interactions appear to be unlikely.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Finasteride. A review of its potential in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Finasteride is a novel therapeutic agent that selectively inhibits the enzyme 5 alpha-reductase, thereby reducing prostatic dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels and prostate size. In men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), these effects have been associated with improvements in peak urinary flow rate and urological symptoms; withdrawal from therapy, however, results in regrowth of the adenoma and long term therapy is therefore necessary. Although the magnitude of clinical improvement seen with finasteride has been perceived to be modest [especially when compared with that associated with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)], it has been maintained in the medium term (up to 2 years) and thus may represent significant reversal of disease progression. Such beneficial effects, however, may not become apparent until completion of at least 6 months of therapy. Furthermore, since clinical studies have been unable to proactively identify a responsive subgroup, a trial period of 6 or possibly 12 months is necessary to assess patient responsiveness. Despite these potential shortcomings, the benefits of therapy appear to outweigh the risks. Indeed, finasteride is well tolerated; most adverse events have been related to sexual dysfunction (decreased libido, ejaculation disorders and impotence) and occurred in only a small proportion (about 2 to 3%) of patients. Moreover, although there has been concern that finasteride might mask the detection of prostate cancer through its decremental effects on serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, careful monitoring in clinical trials appears to have avoided this problem. Thorough pretreatment assessment and periodic follow-up examinations for malignancy are therefore required in clinical practice. The role of finasteride in the treatment of patients with BPH is still emerging and will no doubt gain in clarity with further planned investigations. TURP (or other invasive procedures such as the insertion of prostatic stents in patients unsuitable for resection), continues to be the mainstay of therapy for those patients with severe symptomatic BPH. However, available data support a first line role for finasteride in the treatment of patients with uncomplicated symptomatic BPH. Within this setting, finasteride appears to offer a needed additional treatment option for those patients in whom surgery is not indicated, and may be of special benefit to the considerable proportion of patients who opt not to undergo prostatectomy.

Animals↗