How many cath labs do we need?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Hackett.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Recent studies have shown that the use of subscales derived from the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) rating scale are just as reliable and enhance sensitivity for detecting response and remission after antidepressant treatment. The purpose of the present study was to determine if the responses on two items of the HAM-D scale, Depressed Mood (item 1) and Psychic Anxiety (item 10), were predictive of remission of depression in placebo-controlled studies following treatment with venlafaxine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Data from eight active- and placebo-controlled studies consisting of 2027 subjects who met the DSM-III-R/-IV criteria for major depressive disorder were analysed. Three treatment groups were compared: venlafaxine (n =843), SSRI (either fluoxetine, paroxetine or fluvoxamine, n=743) and placebo (n=441). Treatment duration was 6-8 weeks. Patients who scored zero on the depressed mood and the psychic anxiety items of the HAM-D17 scale were designated as responders. These two scores were also combined to create an Absence of Depressive and Anxious Mood (ADAM) score. Between-group rate comparisons in outcome measures were carried out using Fisher's exact test and logistic regression models. Venlafaxine treatment improved depressed mood, psychic anxiety and ADAM scores after 2 weeks with greater efficacy than treatment with SSRIs or placebo. ADAM scores could also predict the odds ratio of a patient achieving a clinical remission (defined as total HAM-D17 score </= 7). The present results demonstrate that using just two items of the HAM-D17 can be very useful in assessing treatment response, differentiating between treatment groups and predicting remission rates.
BACKGROUND: Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) has received less study than other anxiety disorders, particularly its long-term treatment. AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine extended release (ER) in patients with GAD. METHOD: A total of 541 out-patients, 18-86 years old, were recruited to this 24-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of three fixed doses (37.5, 75 and 150 mg/day) of venlafaxine ER. RESULTS: All doses of venlafaxine ER showed efficacy superior to placebo, apparent from week 2, that was sustained throughout the 24-week study for the two higher doses. The discontinuation rate did not differ significantly among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Venlafaxine ER is an effective and safe treatment for GAD for up to 6 months.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of anxiolytic drugs in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is conventionally assessed by evaluating changes in the total score of psychometric scales such as the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A). The purpose of this pooled analysis of data was to evaluate the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release (XR) on individual items of the HAM-A and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA). METHOD: Data were pooled from 5 studies of patients with GAD who were treated with either venlafaxine XR or placebo for 8 weeks (N = 2,021) and up to 6 months (N = 767). Individual items of the HAM-A and the BSA were examined. and, using the mean changes from baseline to endpoint, an effect size for each item was calculated by dividing the difference between baseline and endpoint values for each item by the standard deviation of this difference. The effect sizes determined for the venlafaxine group were compared with those for the placebo group. Items from each scale that are concordant with the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for GAD were selected for further examination, and the specific effect sizes of each item were expressed after controlling for placebo effects. RESULTS: The effect size of the majority of the 14 items of the HAM-A scale and the 10 items of the BSA scale associated with treatment with venlafaxine XR was greater than with placebo at both 8 weeks and 6 months. Furthermore, the effect sizes at 6 months were generally greater than at 8 weeks in venlafaxine XR-treated patients. Effect sizes associated with venlafaxine XR were greatest for the HAM-A items that were most closely related to diagnostic symptoms of GAD, namely anxious mood, tension, intellectual functioning, and behavior at interview at both 8 weeks and 6 months. Similarly, GAD-related BSA items of inner tension, worrying over trifles, hostile feelings, and muscular tension were associated with the greatest improvements with venlafaxine XR at both time-points. CONCLUSION: The HAM-A and BSA items that most closely corresponded to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for GAD showed the largest improvement during treatment with venlafaxine XR. This indicates that the specific symptoms of GAD can be treated effectively with venlafaxine XR, both in the short and longer term.
Self-esteem does matter! It matters so much that Oprah dedicated an entire issue of "O" magazine to address the subject. "It's a woman's most treasured possession" (Winfrey, 2000a). Self-esteem has a profound influence on adolescent health promotion behaviors. This study contributes to understanding the role self-esteem plays in the behavior of adolescents. Utilizing a secondary data analysis, race and gender self-esteem differences among adolescents were investigated. The sample of 1,237 students (46% African-American and 52% White) from rural southern areas consisted of 744 females and 493 males. Self-esteem was assessed using the Miller Self-esteem Questionnaire (SEQ). The Hendricks Perceptual Health Promoting Determinants Model (HPHD) provided the theoretical framework for the study. The results of the study revealed a statistically significant difference in various aspects of self-esteem according to race and gender. African-Americans and males had a higher self-esteem which is consistent with many prior studies.
BACKGROUND: Reasons for the increase in mortality due to coronary heart disease (CHD) in UK Indian Asians are not well understood. In this study, we tested the hypotheses that elevated plasma homocysteine concentrations are a risk factor for CHD in Indian Asians, and explain part of their increased CHD risk, compared with Europeans. METHODS: We undertook two parallel case-control studies, one in Europeans and one in Indian Asians. We recruited 551 male cases (294 European, 257 Indian Asian) and 1025 healthy male controls (507 European, 518 Indian Asian). Fasting and post-methionine load homocysteine, vitamin B12 and folate concentrations, and conventional CHD risk factors were measured. FINDINGS: Fasting homocysteine concentrations were 8% higher (95% CI 3-14) in cases compared with controls, in both ethnic groups. The odds ratio of CHD for a 5 micromol/L increment in fasting plasma homocysteine was 1.3 (1.1-1.6) in Europeans and 1.2 (1.0-1.4) in Indian Asians. The association between fasting plasma homocysteine and CHD was independent of conventional CHD risk factors in both ethnic groups. Post-load homocysteine concentrations were not significantly different in cases compared with controls. Among the controls, fasting homocysteine concentrations were 6% (2-10) higher in Indian Asians than in Europeans. From the results we estimate that elevated homocysteine may contribute to twice as many CHD deaths in Indian Asians, compared with Europeans. The differences in homocysteine concentrations between the two ethnic groups were explained by lower vitamin B12 and folate levels in Asians. INTERPRETATION: Plasma homocysteine is a novel and independent risk factor for CHD in Indian Asians, and may contribute to their increased CHD risk. Raised homocysteine concentrations in Indian Asians may be related to their reduced vitamin B12 and folate levels, implying that the increased CHD risk in this group may be reduced by dietary vitamin supplementation.
OBJECTIVE: To present the results of numerous studies that assessed the efficacy, safety and tolerability of venlafaxine extended release (XR) in treating anxiety disorders, particularly generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). METHOD: Efficacy was assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, Clinical Global Impressions scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and other instruments. Standard safety and tolerability assessments were used. RESULTS: In four placebo-controlled trials, venlafaxine XR was effective and well tolerated in patients with GAD. Several additional smaller studies found venlafaxine XR effective in treating anxiety associated with social phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder and panic disorder. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine XR has both short- and long-term efficacy and tolerability in treating symptoms of long-term anxiety and comorbid anxiety and depression, and in achieving remission in GAD patients. These characteristics, combined with early onset of anxiolytic action and dose response effect, make it a logical choice for treating anxiety occurring alone or comorbidly with depression.
A multicentre, randomized, double-blind study was conducted to compare the safety and antidepressant efficacy of venlafaxine and clomipramine in 102 outpatients with major depression. The patients received either venlafaxine or clomipramine at a dose titrated from 50 mg to a maximum of 150 mg/day during the first 2 weeks of treatment. Treatment was continued for up to 43 days. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) scores decreased significantly (p < or = 0.05) from baseline in each treatment group but were not significantly different between groups. Response rates on the MADRS and HAM-D were 62% and 59%, respectively, with venlafaxine and 54% and 43%, respectively, with clomipramine. Treatment-emergent study events were the primary reason for withdrawal in only 13% of venlafaxine-treated patients and 20% of clomipramine-treated patients. On questionnaires, the incidence of anticholinergic-type events was 60% with venlafaxine and 68% with clomipramine. However, significantly (p = 0.043) more patients in the clomipramine group reported multiple anticholinergic events than in the venlafaxine group. In the clomipramine group, mean ventricular heart rate increased significantly (p = 0.003) and mean systolic blood pressure decreased significantly (p = 0.028) from baseline, but no clinically significant electrocardiographic changes were observed. These results confirm the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the treatment of outpatients suffering from major depression.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 229 patients with a Research Diagnostic Criteria diagnosis of major, minor or intermittent depression was used to compare the clinical profiles of venlafaxine and imipramine in general practice. Venlafaxine produced a significant improvement compared to placebo in symptoms of depression and anxiety as rated by the total MADRS and percentage of responders, the CGI improvement, the CGI severity of illness, the BSA psychic anxiety item and the HSCL. On a number of these measures, venlafaxine was also significantly more effective than imipramine. Venlafaxine was significantly superior to both imipramine and placebo for the SARS total score and the items 'social/leisure' and 'extended family.' A similar proportion of patients discontinued treatment in each group, but fewer patients on venlafaxine discontinued treatment because of an unsatisfactory response.
This randomised, double-blind study conducted at nine sites in the UK and the Netherlands compared the safety and antidepressant efficacy of venlafaxine and dothiepin. Ninety-two geriatric patients (aged 64-87 years) with major depression were randomly assigned to receive either venlafaxine or dothiepin for up to 43 days. The dose of venlafaxine or dothiepin was titrated up to a maximum of 150 mg per day for the first 15 days, and thereafter could range from 50 to 150 mg per day. Adjusted mean scores on the MADRS and the HAM-D decreased significantly (p 0.05) for baseline to the end of the study in both groups. A response to therapy was observed in 60% of patients in the venlafaxine group and 53% of patients in the dothiepin group on the MADRS, and in 60% of patients in both groups on the HAM-D. Suicidal ideation scores on the MADRS were significantly (p = 0.042) lower in the venlafaxine group at week 6. Treatment-emergent study events were the primary reasons for withdrawal in only 7% of venlafaxine-treated patients and 8% of dothiepin-treated patients. The results confirm the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine for treating major depression in the elderly.
OBJECTIVE: To compare nurse practitioners with senior house officers (SHOs) for their ability to request and interpret correctly a limited range of x ray views of patients attending a minor injuries unit. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of case records. METHODS: 150 accident and emergency (A&E) records with x ray requests were randomly selected from the SHOs' first, second, and third 2-month period of their 6-month appointments; 150 record cards were randomly selected from a nearby minor injuries unit over the same period. Copies of the records were reviewed blind and a decision made as to whether x ray requests were appropriate; x ray interpretation was compared with that of a consultant radiologist. RESULTS: 106 x rays were taken on the MIU patients (71%) and 124 on the A&E patients (83%). There was no statistically significant differences in the ability of the nurse practitioners and the SHOs to request and interpret appropriate x rays. In both groups the decision to carry out an x ray was considered appropriate in 70% of patients; x rays were positive in about one third. The sensitivity of radiological interpretation was 93% in both groups, and there were 2% missed positives. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriately trained nursae practitioners are at least as good as SHOs in recognising the need for an x ray and are as competent in their interpretation.
The objective of this analysis was to determine the efficacy of venlafaxine in comparison with that of placebo during long-term treatment. A pooled analysis of relapse rates in outpatients with major depression continuing long-term treatment (up to 12 months) after responding to short-term treatment (6 weeks) was performed combining the data from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Relapses were defined as two consecutive Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scores greater than 3 (mildly ill), as a CGI severity score greater than 3 at withdrawal regardless of the reason for withdrawal, or as withdrawal due to lack of efficacy. Data from 304 patients (185 venlafaxine, 119 placebo) well balanced for baseline characteristics were included in the pooled analysis. Percentages of patients completing the long-term phase were 38% venlafaxine and 26% placebo (p = 0.034). Cumulative relapse rates by 6 months of long-term treatment were 11% venlafaxine and 23% placebo (p = 0.019). Cumulative relapse curves for the venlafaxine and placebo groups over the 1-year long-term treatment differed significantly (p = 0.022). The results from this analysis indicate that long-term treatment with venlafaxine in patients with major depressive disorder is effective in maintaining the initial response compared with placebo and suggest that venlafaxine will be effective in the prevention of relapse.
Venlafaxine, a member of a novel chemical class, phenethylamines, is a new antidepressant that inhibits neuronal uptake of serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine (in decreasing order of potency) at doses of 75 to 375 mg per day. Depression and antidepressant drugs are known to modify human sleep patterns. Our objective in this double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to assess the effects of venlafaxine on polysomnographic variables by comparing the effects of venlafaxine and placebo on sleep (hypnographic and all-night electroencephalographic [EEG] spectral analysis) and clinical measures (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D], Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS], and Clinical Global Impressions [CGI]) in inpatients with major depression (DSM-III-R). Following a 7- to 13-day placebo washout period, patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or venlafaxine (maximum dose 225 mg/day) for up to 29 days. Sleep evaluations took place at baseline (3 nights immediately before entering the double-blind phase), after 1 week of treatment, and after 1 month of treatment. Sleep stage parameters and all-night spectral parameters were first tested by analysis of variance for repeated measures and then, if indicated, by two-tailed Student t-test. The results on psychiatric rating scales showed improvement from baseline in both treatment groups at all time points, with improvement tending to be greater in the venlafaxine group. Venlafaxine induced a decrease of sleep continuity (decreased total sleep time and increased wake time), an important increase in the onset latency of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and a decrease in total REM sleep duration. All-night sleep EEG frequency structure was not modified significantly by venlafaxine treatment as compared with placebo. In conclusion, venlafaxine, despite its novel chemical structure, shows a sleep profile comparable with that of most classical antidepressants.
Venlafaxine has been shown in clinical trials to be safe and well tolerated in patients with major depression. Data were pooled from 19 studies in which 2181 patients were given venlafaxine, 451 were given placebo and 591 were given a reference antidepressant (imipramine, trazodone, clomipramine, maprotiline, dothiepin or amineptine). Long-term safety was evaluated in 422 patients who were given venlafaxine for at least 1 year; as well, a total of 229 elderly patients have been treated with venlafaxine, including 66 who were given it for at least 1 year. The adverse events that occurred during short-term treatment in > or = 10% of patients were nausea, headache, insomnia, somnolence, dry mouth, dizziness, constipation, asthenia, sweating and nervousness. In comparator-controlled trials, the frequency of anticholinergic events with the reference agents was approximately twice that with venlafaxine. The safety profile and patient acceptability of venlafaxine are comparable to those of third-generation antidepressants, and possibly better than those of first-generation agents.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of early remodelling of coronary stenosis morphology after thrombolytic treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Coronary angiograms were analysed by a computerised edge detection analysis system. Coronary stenosis severity was measured and morphology classified as smooth or complex. PATIENTS: Coronary arteriograms were obtained approximately 90 min and 24 h after thrombolytic treatment from 40 patients with acute myocardial infarction. MAIN RESULTS: Stenosis morphology was complex in 22 patients (65%) and smooth in 11 (32%) 90 min after thrombolysis. The morphology of 11 (50%) complex coronary stenoses and three (27%) smooth stenoses had changed at 24 h (P < 0.05). The transition from complex to smooth was associated with a reduction in stenosis severity from 65 (4)% to 51 (5)% (P < 0.05). The stenosis severity was 63 (4)% and 60 (5)% in those with persistently complex morphology, and 56 (7)% and 50 (5)% in those with persistently smooth morphology at 90 min and 24 h respectively (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Transition of morphology from complex to smooth within 24 h is common. This transition is associated with a reduction in stenosis severity of a degree greater than that found in persistently smooth stenoses over the same interval. 50% of stenoses are smooth at 24 h.
BACKGROUND: Polymorphonuclear neutrophils are involved in the development of myocardial injury during ischaemia and reperfusion. Coronary angioplasty has been shown to result in neutrophil activation. This may be a result of contact with ligands expressed by endothelial cells or response to soluble stimuli released from ischaemic tissue into the plasma or both. OBJECTIVE: To investigate plasma mediated neutrophil activation during angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: Plasma samples were collected from the coronary sinus, femoral artery, and femoral vein of 14 patients undergoing angioplasty, before and after the first balloon inflation and at the end of the procedure. Plasma samples were incubated with washed neutrophils isolated from healthy donors. Expression of the adhesion molecules CD18 integrin and L-selectin (Leu-8) was measured by flow cytometry, and superoxide anion production was measured by chemiluminescence. Plasma samples from the coronary sinus and femoral artery but not from the peripheral vein induced increased expression of neutrophil CD18 after balloon deflation. Modification of the expression of L-selectin was not noted. Production of superoxide anion by neutrophils was stimulated by plasma samples from the coronary sinus, but not by those from the femoral artery or vein. This plasma mediated neutrophil stimulation was prevented when the neutrophils were pretreated with platelet activating factor receptor antagonists BN52021 or BN50739. The platelet activating factor concentration detected in the coronary sinus was not higher than in control plasma. CONCLUSION: Brief ischaemia during coronary angioplasty leads to the release of soluble stimuli capable of inducing neutrophil integrin expression and free oxygen radical production. Platelet activating factor may act as an autocrine neutrophil stimulus under these conditions.
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to compare the antidepressant efficacy and short-term safety of venlafaxine with those of placebo in hospitalized patients with major depression and melancholia. METHOD: Ninety-three inpatients with a minimum prestudy Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of 25 were treated for up to 4 weeks with either venlafaxine or placebo. Dosage averaged approximately 350 mg/day during Weeks 2 to 4. Efficacy and safety were assessed throughout the study. Efficacy was evaluated using the MADRS, the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale. Recorded study events, vital signs and body weight measurements, laboratory determinations, physical examinations, and ECG recordings were used to assess safety. RESULTS: Venlafaxine provided significantly greater improvement in the MADRS scores after 4 days and in the HAM-D scores after 1 week than did placebo. Response rate (based on a 50% decrease in MADRS scores) was 65% (30 of 46 patients) for venlafaxine and 28% (13 of 47 patients) for placebo. Significantly more placebo-treated patients (40%; N = 19) than venlafaxine-treated patients (9%; N = 4) discontinued treatment early because of lack of efficacy. Nausea and sweating were the most common events, occurring at a significantly higher rate in the venlafaxine group. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine is an effective and well-tolerated antidepressant in hospitalized patients with major depression and melancholia.
In contrast to most Drosophila homeobox genes, which are required during embryogenesis, the rough gene is involved in photoreceptor cell specification in the compound eye. Taking advantage of the viability of null rough alleles and the small size of the rough gene, we have combined in vivo and in vitro mutagenesis to define important functional domains in the rough protein. All missense mutations found to disrupt rough function mapped to highly conserved amino acids in the homeodomain (HD), suggesting that the nature of few, if any, single amino acids outside the HD is critical for rough activity. The analysis of chimeric proteins, in which the whole HD or parts of it were swapped between the rough and Antennapedia (Antp) proteins, revealed that the C-terminus of the rough HD is important for rough activity in vivo. This C-terminal region was also found to be required for the recognition of rough binding sites in vitro. Our data suggest that amino acids located in the C-terminus of the homeodomain may play important roles in selective binding site recognition.