Prey Size Selection under Conditions of Competitive Foraging in Captive Chimpanzees.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Hitchcock.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study provided basic information about spatial memory in the domestic pig, Sus scrofa and examined how susceptible it is to disruption by environmental stimuli. Eight male pigs were tested individually in a foraging arena. Each day, they entered the arena to search for food randomly located in one of 10 enclosed areas (search trial). After finding and eating the food, they were removed from the arena for a retention interval, and then allowed back in to relocate the food in the same area as previously (relocation trial). Once pigs had achieved a criterion level of performance in relocation trials, 'disturbances' (e.g. isolation, novel food source, novel spatial environment) were presented during the retention interval. Disturbance days were separated by control days on which no disturbance was presented. During search trials, pigs did not use food-related cues to locate food, but appeared to use memory to search systematically and avoid revisits to empty areas. During relocation trials, they found food using fewer area visits than expected by chance, indicating that they could remember the location of food across both 10-min and 2-h retention intervals. Disturbances administered during 10-min retention intervals resulted in more relocation errors than on corresponding control days, indicating that spatial memory in pigs is susceptible to interference by relatively mild environmental stimuli, in contrast to that in rats, Rattus norvegicus and pigeons, Columba livia which appears to be highly resistant to retroactive interference even when potent stimuli are used. Analysis of error locations suggested that disturbances probably acted to increase the general area in which the pig remembered the food to be located, and so reduced accuracy of memory without eradicating it. There was no evidence that errors made during relocation trials represented sampling of areas not visited during the preceding search trial.Copyright 1997 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour
1. This paper describes how birds move between horizontal perches at different heights with different angles separating them, using the time to complete the task and the number of birds failing to indicate ability. 2. For the first experiment, 4 groups of 15 birds (ISA Brown) were subjected to each of the experimental treatments (using three perches with angles of 0 degree (horizontal control), 30 degrees, 45 degrees or 60 degrees between them). The birds were required to move upward between the perches for each treatment and then to move downward between the perches, as a second part of the experiment. 3. Birds moving up between the perches took significantly longer at 60 degrees than at any other angle. No birds failed to complete the task. 4. For birds moving downward between the perches, the median time to complete the task increased significantly with angle. Furthermore, the number of birds failing to complete the task increased with angle. 5. A second experiment was conducted to test whether the vertical or horizontal component of distance affected birds' ability to negotiate perches separated by different angles. 6. For the second experiment 4 groups of 10 Lohmann Brown laying hens were subjected to each of the following treatments: two horizontal perches separated by 30 degrees or 60 degrees and either directly, horizontally or vertically separated by a set distance of 50 cm. Birds were required to move both up and down between perches. 7. Birds negotiated horizontally-separated perches more successfully at 30 degrees than at 60 degrees. However, when the vertical distance between the perches was 50 cm there was no significant difference in the ability of birds to move downward at 30 degrees or 60 degrees. For birds moving upward, 60 degrees was easier to negotiate than 30 degrees. 8. The vertical and horizontal separations, as well as the different angles affected the ability of birds to move between perches. There was a general decreasing trend in ability with increasing vertical separation between perches. 9. The findings are important in terms of arrangements of perches to improve bird welfare. To minimise the risk of injury, the angle between perches at different heights should be no more than 45 degrees, and the horizontal and vertical distances between these perches minimised, to allow the birds to be able to move downwards more easily.
We have demonstrated that immediate early genes can be differentially activated within the central nervous system. We examined the effects of tetanic stimulation in the hippocampus and of noxious sensory stimulation of the spinal cord on the expression of eight immediate early genes. Induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) in the dentate gyrus resulted in an increase in mRNA and protein for NGFI-A (also termed Zif/268, Egr-1, or Krox 24), and less consistently for jun-B mRNA. No increase was seen for c-fos, NGFI-B, c-jun, jun-D, SRF, or PC4 mRNAs. Blockade of the NMDA receptor prevented the induction of both LTP and NGFI-A mRNA in the dentate gyrus. However, commissural stimulation, which prevented the induction of LTP, resulted in bilateral activation of all the genes examined, including NGFI-A. No change was seen in animals trained in a water maze. These results suggest that no simple relationship exists between LTP, spatial learning, and immediate early gene induction. Stimulation of sensory fibers resulted in an increase in mRNA for NGFI-A, c-fos, SRF, NGFI-B, and c-jun in spinal cord neurons. Blockade of the NMDA receptor had no effect on immediate early gene induction in the spinal cord.
Planning a multipurpose survey in which nutritional status is assessed requires a series of scientific and practical decisions that are constrained by available resources of money and time and by the limits to what can be expected from the respondents. This paper describes the planning process for a multipurpose survey using our experience with the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) as an example. Ideally, the goals and objectives are well defined at the outset, and these guide the development of the survey content and statistical design. Because the needs for information are so great, criteria need to be developed for evaluating which topics will be included in the survey and what tests will be used. In planning the NHANES III, the evaluation criteria used were the scientific merit of the topic, its public health importance, its practical utility to the government, and the feasibility of implementing it within the survey's mode of operation. After the topics to be covered in a survey have been selected, questionnaires and examination protocols are developed, pilot tested, and revised prior to implementing the survey. Procedures are established for providing for informed consent and assuring the confidentiality of findings.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.