Biomedical subjects

D J Chwilla

Publications and source records attributed to D J Chwilla.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

An event-related brain potential analysis of visual word priming effects.

Two experiments are reported that provide evidence on task-induced effects during visual lexical processing in a prime-target semantic priming paradigm. The research focuses on target expectancy effects by manipulating the proportion of semantically related and unrelated word pairs. In Experiment 1, a lexical decision task was used and reaction times (RTs) and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were obtained. In Experiment 2, subjects silently read the stimuli, without any additional task demands, and ERPs were recorded. The RT and ERP results of Experiment 1 demonstrate that an expectancy mechanism contributed to the priming effect when a high proportion of related word pairs was presented. The ERP results of Experiment 2 show that in the absence of extraneous task requirements, an expectancy mechanism is not active. However, a standard ERP semantic priming effect was obtained in Experiment 2. The combined results show that priming effects due to relatedness proportion are induced by task demands and are not a standard aspect of online lexical processing.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

The N400 as a function of the level of processing.

In a semantic priming paradigm, the effects of different levels of processing on the N400 were assessed by changing the task demands. In the lexical decision task, subjects had to discriminate between words and nonwords, and in the physical task, subjects had to discriminate between uppercase and lowercase letters. The proportion of related versus unrelated word pairs differed between conditions. A lexicality test on reaction times demonstrated that the physical task was performed nonlexically. Moreover, a semantic priming reaction time effect was obtained only in the lexical decision task. The level of processing clearly affected the event-related potentials. An N400 priming effect was only observed in the lexical decision task. In contrast, in the physical task a P300 effect was observed for either related or unrelated targets, depending on their frequency of occurrence. Taken together, the results indicate that an N400 priming effect is only evoked when the task performance induces the semantic aspects of words to become part of an episodic trace of the stimulus event.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Event-related potentials to different feedback stimuli.

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in a time estimation task under different feedback conditions, in which the informative value of the feedback signals (true versus false) was manipulated. A control condition was added in which no signal was presented. Fifteen subjects pressed a button 3 seconds after presentation of a warning signal. Two seconds after the response, a visual feedback signal was presented, indicating whether the preceding interval was estimated correctly. Two different slow waves were observed: the response was preceded by a readiness potential and the feedback stimulus was preceded by a negative slow wave called the stimulus-preceding negativity. The readiness potential was not influenced by the different feedback conditions. The stimulus-preceding negativity was larger in the true feedback condition compared to the false feedback and no feedback conditions. The P300 to the feedback signal was also larger following a true as compared to a false feedback signal. The conclusion is that the stimulus-preceding negativity is an anticipatory component contingent upon the presentation of an informative feedback signal.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Event-related potential correlates of non-motor anticipation.

A slow negative shift called "stimulus-preceding negativity" (SPN) has been observed preceding feedback. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether the SPN is related to perceptual or conceptual anticipation. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in an S1-S2-S3 sequence with intervals of 3 s. S1 was an auditory warning signal; the task stimulus presented at S2 consisted of two digits on which subjects (n = 8) performed an arithmetic task. They had to match their solution with a probe stimulus presented at S3. Perceptual anticipation was manipulated by varying the discriminability of S2 (intact vs. degraded). Conceptual anticipation was manipulated by varying the amount of information processing required at S2 (easy vs. difficult arithmetic). Motor preparation was varied by requiring a speeded versus a delayed response. No negativity was found before the task stimulus (S2), whereas the probe stimulus (S3) was always preceded by a negative shift. The amplitude of this negative shift was larger under the speed than under the delayed instruction. Its amplitude showed a left-hemisphere preponderance and was larger for the difficult than for the easy condition. ERPs preceding task stimuli seem to reflect functionally different processes from ERPs preceding probe and feedback stimuli. The difference is explained in terms of motivational factors that come into play with feedback and probably play a role in the anticipation of the probe stimulus.

Acoustic Stimulation↗