Biomedical subjects

D J Hilton

Publications and source records attributed to D J Hilton.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

Kinetic analyses of the binding of leukemia inhibitory factor to receptor on cells and membranes and in detergent solution.

The equilibrium and kinetic properties of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) binding to a range of cell types have been compared. When binding was examined at 4 degrees C, the majority of cells were found to express a single class of high affinity LIF receptor (KD = 20-100 pM; ka = 2-8 x 10(8) min-1 M-1; kd = 0.0004-0.0011 min-1). In contrast, certain activated macrophage populations expressed apparently independent classes of high and low affinity LIF receptor. The low affinity receptors differed from the high affinity receptors in terms of the dissociation rate of the receptor-ligand complex (KD = 1-2 nM; ka = 3-7 x 10(8) min-1 M-1; kd = 0.30-0.67 min-1). At 37 degrees C, the interaction of LIF with its high affinity receptor was more complicated, since occupied LIF receptors were internalized more rapidly than unoccupied receptors, internalized LIF was hydrolyzed and released from the cell, and new receptors were synthesized and expressed on the cell surface. Interestingly, when membranes were prepared from cells that expressed only high affinity receptors, both high and low affinity receptors were detected, while after detergent solubilization of membranes only low affinity receptors were apparent. These results are discussed in terms of a structural model for the LIF receptor in which interaction of a low affinity binding subunit and a second nonbinding subunit is required for the generation of the high affinity receptor.

3T3 Cells↗

PubMed1992

Homodimerization and constitutive activation of the erythropoietin receptor.

The erythropoietin receptor (EPO-R) is a member of the recently described cytokine receptor superfamily. A constitutively active (hormone independent) form of the EPO-R was isolated that has a single amino acid change in the exoplasmic domain, converting arginine-129 to cysteine (R129C). Since EPO-Rs containing R129S, R129E, and R129P mutations are functionally wild type, the presence of cysteine at residue 129, and not the loss of arginine, is required for constitutive activity. Several mutant forms of the EPO-R were analyzed; all constitutively active mutants form disulfide-linked homodimers, whereas EPO-responsive or inactive forms of the receptor do not. Monomers and disulfide-linked dimers of the constitutive receptor are present on the plasma membrane and bind EPO with a single affinity. Homodimerization of the EPO-R is likely to play a role in ligand-induced signal transduction, and disulfide-linked dimerization of the constitutive receptor may mimic this step.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Distribution and binding properties of receptors for leukaemia inhibitory factor.

The pleiotropic biological actions of leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) on haemopoietic cells (macrophages and megakaryocytes), hepatocytes, osteoblasts, pre-adipocytes, embryonic stem cells, myoblasts and neuronal cells must be mediated through the interactions of LIF with specific cellular receptors. The demonstration by equilibrium binding analysis and autoradiography of LIF receptors on all of the above cells and cell lines suggests that each of these pleiotropic effects of LIF is mediated by direct interactions with the responding cells rather than by the indirect release of secondary cytokines. Despite the differing biological effects of LIF on these cells, equilibrium binding, kinetic analyses and receptor internalization studies have all suggested that these cells display essentially identical high affinity LIF receptors. Nevertheless, there is evidence on some cell types (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF] transgenic peritoneal cells and F9 embryonal carcinoma cells) for a second class of low affinity LIF receptors (Kd = 1.5 nM versus Kd = 30 pM for high affinity receptors) which, LIF receptors (Kd = 1.5 nM versus Kd = 30 pM for high affinity receptors) which differ from the high affinity receptors only in kinetic dissociation rate. Moreover, the evidence suggests that low and high affinity receptors are structurally related and interconvertible, because detergent solubilization of LIF receptors from any cell type results in the quantitative conversion of high affinity receptors into low affinity receptors. As is the case for other related cytokine receptors, these data suggest that high affinity LIF receptors may be composed of two protein subunits--one responsible for LIF-specific low affinity binding and the other responsible for affinity conversion and cell signalling by the receptor. Such a model provides a possible explanation for the pleiotropy of LIF's biological actions.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

LIF: lots of interesting functions.

Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is one of a growing number of cytokines that cannot be readily categorized according to its functions. Rather, these pleiotropic hormones have diverse and often overlapping effects on a multitude of cell types: for example, LIF can inhibit the differentiation of embryonal stem cells on one hand and induce the differentiation of M1 leukaemic cells on the other. Recent work has shed light on the physiological effects of LIF, how these are limited, and the biochemical and biological properties of LIF and its receptor.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1992

Binding and retrograde transport of leukemia inhibitory factor by the sensory nervous system.

Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), a peptide growth factor with multiple activities, has recently been shown to support the generation and survival of sensory neurons in cultures of mouse neural crest and dorsal root ganglia (DRG). We have conducted binding experiments with 125I-LIF on cultures of DRG to determine the receptor distribution for LIF on these cells and found that at least 60% of the sensory neurons in the cultures bound 125I-LIF, all of which could be eliminated by the addition of unlabeled LIF. The other cells in the culture, which morphologically appeared to be Schwann cells, did not bind appreciable quantities of 125I-LIF. In order to investigate whether LIF is retrogradely transported to sensory neurons in vivo, 125I-LIF was injected into the footpads and gastrocnemius muscles of newborn and adult mice, following sciatic nerve ligation. Radioactivity accumulated in the distal portion of the sciatic nerve, indicating retrograde transport of LIF. Subsequent experiments on mice with unligated sciatic nerves showed that 125I-LIF is specifically transported into the sensory neurons of the DRG. There was no apparent transport of 125I-LIF into motor neurons in the spinal cord. These experiments demonstrate that LIF can specifically bind to and be transported by sensory neurons and further support the idea that LIF acts as a target-derived neurotrophic factor, analogous to NGF.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Generation of sensory neurons is stimulated by leukemia inhibitory factor.

The processes that regulate the development of peripheral neurons from their precursors in the embryonic neural crest are essentially unknown. In this report, we show that leukemia inhibitory factor stimulates the generation of neurons in cultures of mouse neural crest. These neurons have the morphology of sensory neurons and contain neuropeptides found in mammalian sensory neurons. Consistent with these neurons being of the sensory lineage is the finding that they arise from nondividing precursors within the neural crest. In addition, we show that leukemia inhibitory factor supports the generation and/or maturation of sensory neurons in cultures of cells obtained from embryonic dorsal root ganglia. In cultures of postnatal dorsal root ganglia, which contain mature sensory neurons, leukemia inhibitory factor acts directly as a survival molecule on the majority of neurons.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Leukemia inhibitory factor: a biological perspective.

The notion that a single hormone may exert a broad range of effects has become well established. As such, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a prime example. LIF was initially described, purified, and genetically cloned on the basis of its ability to induce the differentiation and suppress the clonogenicity of the monocytic leukemia cell line, M1. Subsequently, it has become apparent that in vitro LIF inhibits the differentiation of pluripotential ES cells, stimulates the synthesis of hepatic acute-phase proteins, induces a switch in neurotransmitter phenotype from adrenergic to cholinergic, suppresses adipocyte lipoprotein lipase activity, and results in an increase in bone resorption. Moreover, elevation of LIF levels in vivo has a number of patho-physiological consequences, many of which parallel those effects observed in vitro. The challenge that lies ahead is to determine whether other sites of LIF action exist and to define more clearly the physiological role LIF plays in vivo. A major mechanism of cell-cell communication is by the production and secretion of polypeptide hormones by one cell type, which act either systemically or locally, via interaction with specific receptors on the surface of responsive cells. Recently, it has become apparent that hormones initially described and named, on the basis of a specific action, in many cases exert a spectrum of effects on a broad range of cell types. Moreover, the effects exerted are often mimicked closely by other hormones. Hormones that act in a pleiotropic manner are, for example, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), the various fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). This review will focus on the various biological effects ascribed to LIF.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Distribution and comparison of receptors for leukemia inhibitory factor on murine hemopoietic and hepatic cells.

Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a glycoprotein that induces the differentiation of the monocytic leukemia cell line M1 but suppresses the differentiation of totipotent embryonic stem cells. In an attempt to define the normal cellular targets for LIF, the distribution of LIF receptors within hemopoietic and hepatic tissue was analyzed by binding cells with radioiodinated LIF (125I-LIF) and subsequently carrying out autoradiography. Autoradiography demonstrated that in each hemopoietic tissue examined cells of monocyte/macrophage lineage were the primary cell type labeled with 125I-LIF. Moreover, both fetal and adult parenchymal hepatocytes displayed higher levels of labeling than either monocytes or macrophages. The number of receptors per positive cell varied from 150 for bone marrow monocytes to 2,000 for adult hepatocytes. In each case, however, binding was of high affinity, with an apparent KD of 34-100 pM, and binding was specific, since labeling was competed for by unlabeled LIF but not a range of other structurally unrelated growth and differentiation factors. It is suggested that LIF may play a role in regulating macrophage function and hepatic acute phase protein synthesis in response to infection.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Clearance and fate of leukemia-inhibitory factor (LIF) after injection into mice.

Leukemia-inhibitory factor (LIF) elicits effects on a broad range of cell types, including cells of the monocytic and megakaryocytic series, embryonal stem cells, hepatocytes, adipocytes, and osteoblasts. Native and recombinant LIF, injected intravenously into adult mice, had an initial half-life of 6-8 min and a more prolonged second clearance phase. Clearance of 125I-LIF from the circulation was paralleled by a rapid accumulation in the kidneys, liver, lungs, and spleen and a more gradual accumulation in the thyroid gland. Labeling of the renal glomerular tufts, parenchymal hepatocytes, splenic red pulp, alveolar pneumocytes, and thyroid follicular cells as well as of megakaryocytes and osteoblasts in the bone cavities, placental trophoblasts, and cells of the choroid plexus was demonstrable autoradiographically. The appearance of a large amount of nonprecipitable 125I in the urine suggested that the kidneys were the major route of LIF clearance from the body.

Animals↗

PubMed1990

Osteoblasts display receptors for and responses to leukemia-inhibitory factor.

Specific binding of leukemia-inhibitory factor (LIF) to osteoblasts, but not multinucleated osteoclasts, was demonstrated by receptor autoradiography by using cells isolated from newborn rat long bones. The clonal rat osteogenic sarcoma cells, UMR 106-06, which have several phenotypic properties of osteoblasts, expressed 300 LIF receptors per cell, with an apparent KD of 60 pM. Treatment of calvarial osteoblasts or UMR 106-01 cells with LIF resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of plasminogen activator (PA) activity. Both calvarial osteoblasts and osteogenic sarcoma cells were shown by Western blotting and reverse fibrin autography to produce plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), the production of which was increased by LIF treatment. Northern blot analysis revealed that LIF treatment resulted in a rapid (peak 1 hour), dose-dependent increase in mRNA for PAI-1. LIF treatment of the preosteoblast cell line, UMR 201, enhanced the alkaline phosphatase response of these cells to retinoic acid. Each of the osteoblast-like cell types (calvarial osteoblasts, UMR 106-06, and UMR 201) was shown to produce LIF by bioassay and, by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), was shown to express low levels of mRNA for LIF. These data establish that cells of the osteoblast lineage are targets for LIF action. The reported anabolic effects of this cytokine on bone formation in vivo could be related to inhibition of protease activity. LIF may be an important paracrine modulator in bone, or perhaps an autocrine one, based on the evidence for its production by osteoblasts and osteoblast-like cells.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

PubMed1990

Leukemia inhibitory factor: a novel bone-active cytokine.

A number of cytokines have been found to be potent regulators of bone resorption and to share the properties originally attributed to osteoclast-activating factor. One such activity, differentiation-inducing factor (DIF, D-factor) from mouse spleen cells, shares a number of biological and biochemical properties with the recently characterized and cloned leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). We have assessed the effects of recombinant LIF on bone resorption and other parameters in neonatal mouse calvaria. Both recombinant murine and human (h) LIFs stimulated 45Ca release from prelabeled calvaria in a dose-dependent manner. The increase in bone resorption was associated with an increase in the number of osteoclasts per mm2 bone. The osteolytic effect of hLIF were blocked by 10(-7) M indomethacin. hLIF also stimulated incorporation of [3H] thymidine into calvaria, but the dose-response relationship was distinct from that for bone resorption, and this effect was not blocked by indomethacin. Similarly, hLIF increased [3H]phenylalanine incorporation into calvaria, and this was also not inhibited by indomethacin. It is concluded that LIF stimulates bone resorption by a mechanism involving prostaglandin production, but that a distinct mechanism is responsible for its stimulation of DNA and protein synthesis. The primary structure of LIF differs from that of other fully characterized, bone-active cytokines, and it, thus, represents a novel factor which may be involved in the normal regulation of bone cell function.

Animals↗

PubMed1990

Leukemia inhibitory factor binds with high affinity to preosteoblastic RCT-1 cells and potentiates the retinoic acid induction of alkaline phosphatase.

This study examines the effect of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) on preosteoblastic rat calvaria (RCT-1) cells, which acquire osteoblastic properties when treated with retinoic acid (RA). LIF potentiated the increase in alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity produced by RA. The LIF effect was time and dose dependent (EC50, approximately 1 pM). The earliest effects on AP activity were detected at 48 h, and maximal effects were observed after 72 h. RA increased AP mRNA about 2-fold at 3 h and 6-fold at 6 and 12 h. LIF further increased AP mRNA to 18-fold at 12 h. After RA treatment AP mRNA returned to control levels at 24 h, but in the presence of LIF, AP mRNA remained elevated at 24 and 72 h of treatment. When given alone, LIF had no effect on either AP activity or mRNA levels. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 also potentiated the RA induction of AP, and interleukin-6 had a small effect, whereas granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor had no effect. LIF alone had a small inhibitory effect on type 1 collagen mRNA, but did not oppose the stimulatory effect of RA. Consistent with these biological actions, LIF receptors were demonstrated on these cells. [125I]LIF bound to RCT-1 cells at 0 C with an apparent dissociation constant of 20 pM, and it was found that these cells express an average of 300 receptors/cell. Scatchard analyses showed a single class of high affinity binding site. LIF was internalized with an endocytic rate constant for occupied receptors of 0.03 min-1, and the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant at 37 C was 358 pM. These findings suggest that osteoblast precursor cells are among the target cells of LIF.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗

PubMed1989

LIF: a molecule with divergent actions on myeloid leukaemic cells and embryonic stem cells.

We have previously characterized, purified and cloned a novel murine and human regulator [leukaemia inhibitory factor, LIF] which induces the differentiation of certain murine and human myeloid leukaemic cells. Recently we have shown that there are specific LIF receptors on murine embryonic stem [ES] and embryonal carcinoma [EC] cells and that purified recombinant LIF can substitute for feeder cells and crude sources of differentiation inhibiting activity [DIA] [such as BRL-cell-conditioned medium] in the maintenance of ES cells in a pluripotential state in vitro. Furthermore, ES cells maintained in culture in recombinant LIF for a prolonged period can give rise to germline chimaeric mice. Thus, based on a number of biochemical and biological similarities, it is likely that LIF and DIA are the same molecule. The identification of LIF as a molecule, necessary and sufficient for the maintenance of ES cells in culture, should have a profound impact on the use of these cells for genetic manipulations.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1988

Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells.

Embryonic stem (ES) cells, the totipotent outgrowths of blastocysts, can be cultured and manipulated in vitro and then returned to the embryonic environment where they develop normally and can contribute to all cell lineages. Maintenance of the stem-cell phenotype in vitro requires the presence of a feeder layer of fibroblasts or of a soluble factor, differentiation inhibitory activity (DIA) produced by a number of sources; in the absence of DIA the ES cells differentiate into a wide variety of cell types. We recently noted several similarities between partially purified DIA and a haemopoietic regulator, myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), a molecule which induces differentiation in M1 myeloid leukaemic cells and which we have recently purified, cloned and characterized. We demonstrate here that purified, recombinant LIF can substitute for DIA in the maintenance of totipotent ES cell lines that retain the potential to form chimaeric mice.

Animals↗

PubMed1988

Structural characterization of a murine myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor.

A leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) which induces macrophage differentiation in M1 murine myeloid leukaemia cells and suppresses their proliferation in vitro has been isolated in sufficient quantities (30 micrograms) from Krebs ascites tumour cell conditioned medium to permit its partial characterization by amino acid sequence analysis. The combination of sensitive microbore column (1.0 and 2.1 mm internal diameter) HPLC technology and microsequence analysis has enabled the positive identification of 125 of the total 179 amino acid residues (70%) in the molecule. The amino acid sequence data reported here permitted the isolation of a partial cDNA clone encoding LIF [Gearing et al. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 3995-4002]. A candidate C-terminus of the LIF molecule predicted from the amino acid sequence was confirmed by subsequent isolation of a cDNA clone corresponding to the C-terminus of the protein. No strong similarity was revealed when the amino acid sequence of LIF was compared with other haemopoietic growth factors, in particular granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and tumour necrosis factor-alpha or interleukins. The protein sequence data reported here indicate three sites of post-translational modification (N-linked glycosylation).

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1988

Resolution and purification of three distinct factors produced by Krebs ascites cells which have differentiation-inducing activity on murine myeloid leukemic cell lines.

The use of different myeloid leukemic cell lines (WEHI-3B D+ and M1) and different sources of factors has led to discrepancies concerning the identity of factors capable of inducing differentiation in leukemic cells. We have biochemically fractionated medium conditioned by one such source (Krebs II ascites cells) and assayed fractions for their bone marrow colony-stimulating activity as well as their differentiation-inducing activity for WEHI-3B D+ and M1 cells. This resulted in the resolution of four distinct molecular species with differentiation-inducing activity. One activity was purified to homogeneity and shown by a variety of biochemical, biological, and receptor-binding criteria to be authentic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). A second activity was identified as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Two other activities termed LIF-A and LIF-B (leukemia inhibitory factor) were shown to probably be different glycosylation variants of the same protein and one of these (LIF-A) was purified 12,000-fold to homogeneity. G-CSF induced differentiation in both WEHI-3B D+ and at higher concentrations M1 cells while GM-CSF weakly induced differentiation in WEHI-3B D+ cells. LIF-A had no colony-stimulating activity and induced differentiation in and inhibited the proliferation of only M1 cells. Each factor bound to a unique cell surface receptor with no evidence of direct cross-reactivity.

Animals↗

PubMed1988

Purification of a murine leukemia inhibitory factor from Krebs ascites cells.

A factor capable of inducing terminal differentiation in the murine myeloid leukemia cell line M1 has been purified to apparent homogeneity from the medium conditioned by Krebs II ascites tumor cells. The factor, termed leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a single chain glycoprotein of apparent Mr 58,000 which induces differentiation and inhibits proliferation of the M1 cell line but not the WEHI-3B D+ murine myeloid leukemic cell line and has no detectable proliferative activity on normal myeloid progenitor cells. It was purified using four successive high-efficiency purification steps--anion-exchange chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose; cation-exchange chromatography on CM-Sepharose; affinity chromatography on lentil lectin-Sepharose; and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography on a phenyl-silica matrix--to a specific biological activity of approximately 1.25 X 10(8) units/mg with an overall purification of 12,000-fold and a yield of 73% for the activity failing to bind to DEAE-Sepharose. Sufficient quantities of the factor (12 micrograms, 200 pmol) have been purified to allow structural and functional analysis of the molecule and comparison with other know differentiation inducers.

Animals↗

PubMed1988

Knowledge-based information acquisition: norms and the functions of consensus information.

Mill's (1872/1973) method of difference prescribes that the lay scientist should use consensus information as a control condition for the person and distinctiveness information as a control condition for the stimulus when analyzing their causal effects on the occurrence of the target event. However, in studies of information acquisition, subjects have shown a consistent preference for distinctiveness information when answering causal questions about the person, and for consensus information when answering causal questions about the stimulus. To explain this discrepancy, we distinguish between the evaluative, contrastive, and corroborative functions of consensus and distinctiveness information. In addition, we suggest that subjects seek consensus information only if it is relevant to the question posed to them, and if they cannot supply it from their own presupposed knowledge of behavioral norms. We report four information acquisition experiments that provide support for our analysis.

Choice Behavior↗