PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D J Kereiakes

Publications and source records attributed to D J Kereiakes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Final results of a randomized trial comparing the NIR stent to the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries.

The NIR stent is a novel second generation tubular stent that was designed to overcome some of the limitations of the earlier Palmaz-Schatz (PS) stent design. The NIR Vascular Advanced North American (NIRVANA) trial randomized 849 patients with single coronary lesions to treatment with the NIR stent or the PS stent. The study was an "equivalency" trial, designed to demonstrate that the NIR stent was not inferior to (i.e., equivalent or better than) the PS stent, for the primary end point of target vessel failure (defined as death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) by 9 months. Successful stent delivery was achieved in 100% versus 98.8%, respectively, with a slightly lower postprocedural diameter stenosis (7% vs. 9%, p = 0.04) after NIR and PS stent placement, respectively. Major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, repeat target lesion revascularization) were not different at 30 days (4.3% vs. 4.4%). The primary end point of target vessel failure at 9 months was seen in 16.0% of NIR versus 17.2% of PS patients, with the NIR proving to be equal or superior to the PS stent (p <0.001 by test for equivalency). Angiographic restudy in 71% of a prespecified cohort showed no significant difference in restenosis (19.3% vs 22.4%). Thus, the NIR stent showed excellent deliverability with slightly better acute angiographic results and equivalent or better 9-month target vessel failure rate when compared with the PS stent.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of abciximab platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: an algorithm for percutaneous management.

Coronary perforation is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. The use of both atheroablative technologies for coronary intervention and adjunctive platelet glycoprotein blockade pharmacology may increase the incidence of or risk for life-threatening bleeding complications following the occurrence of coronary artery perforation. The interventional database for 6,214 percutaneous coronary interventions performed between January 1995 and June 1999 was analyzed. Hospital charts and cine angiograms for all patients identified in the database as having had coronary perforation were reviewed. Coronary perforation complicated 0.58% of all procedures and was more commonly observed in patients with a history of congestive heart failure and following use of atheroablative interventional technologies (2.8%). There was no association of abciximab therapy with either the incidence of or classification for coronary perforation. Adverse clinical outcomes (death, emergency surgical exploration) were related to the angiographic classification of perforation and were more frequently observed in patients who experienced a class 3 coronary perforation. These data suggest that specific clinical and procedural demographic factors are associated with the occurrence and severity of angiographic coronary perforation. An angiographic perforation class-specific algorithm for treatment of coronary perforation is proposed.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2001

Severe delayed thrombocytopenia associated with abciximab (ReoPro) therapy.

Acute thrombocytopenia associated with abciximab therapy has been well described, although the exact mechanism remains obscure. We report a case of delayed severe thrombocytopenia associated with abciximab therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention that occurred following hospital discharge. The detection of this phenomenon is important as it may portend heightened risk for severe or profound thrombocytopenia on subsequent reexposure to abciximab therapy.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2001

Dalteparin in combination with abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Despite proved efficacy for either dalteparin or platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade in improving clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, algorithms guiding concomitant therapy with these agents have not been devised. The purpose of this study was to assess anticoagulant effect and clinical safety for several dose regimens of dalteparin administered in combination with abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing PCI with standard dose abciximab received dalteparin as follows: 120 IU/kg subcutaneously (SQ) to a maximum of 10,000 U if < or =8 hours before PCI (n = 3); for PCI 8-12 hours after the SQ dose, an additional 40 IU/kg intravenously (IV) was administered (n = 1); for PCI >12 hours after SQ dalteparin or with no prior dalteparin therapy, random allocation to 40 (n = 27) or 60 (n = 28) IU/kg IV during PCI was performed. Those patients who received 60 IU/kg of dalteparin IV had a lower incidence of procedural thrombosis (0% vs 11.1%, P <.01), more consistent antithrombotic effect (anti-factor Xa activity) and a similar incidence of major bleeding (3.7% vs 2.6%) compared with patients who received 40 IU/kg of intravenous dalteparin. CONCLUSIONS: Dalteparin 60 IU/kg IV appears to be safe and effective when administered in conjunction with abciximab for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2001

Enoxaparin and abciximab adjunctive pharmacotherapy during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Randomized controlled trials of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes have established the superiority of enoxaparin (versus unfractionated heparin) for reducing adverse ischemic outcomes. Furthermore, adjunctive abciximab therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Since algorithms for integrating these pharmacotherapies have not been determined, patients undergoing elective PCI were enrolled into 2 distinct and separate studies conducted by the National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin (NICE) study groups (NICE 1 and NICE 4 studies). Patients in NICE 1 were administered enoxaparin 1.0 mg/kg intravenously (without abciximab) and those enrolled in NICE 4 were administered a reduced dose (0.75 mg/kg) of enoxaparin in combination with standard-dose abciximab intravenously during PCI. Bleeding events and ischemic outcomes assessed in-hospital and at 30-days post-PCI were infrequent with either pharmacologic regimen. In the dose regimens studied, enoxaparin with or without abciximab appears to provide safe and effective anticoagulation during PCI. The combination of reduced-dose enoxaparin and abciximab was associated with a low incidence of adverse outcomes (bleeding or ischemic events). Additional studies may be required to establish the relative safety and efficacy of this new adjunctive pharmacologic strategy when compared with the combination of low-dose, weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin and abciximab.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2000

Therapeutic adjuncts for immediate transfer to the catheterization laboratory in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Early coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina may be made safer and more efficacious with concomitant therapies, including glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and low-molecular-weight heparins. Stent placement has been shown to improve procedural success and reduce major in-hospital complications when compared with balloon angioplasty alone in patients with unstable angina. However, unstable angina remains a major hazard for adverse coronary events in long-term follow-up after elective stent placement. The currently available glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors-eptifibatide, tirofiban, and abciximab--have each been shown to reduce ischemic events before percutaneous coronary intervention when administered to patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in large clinical trials. The adjunctive role of low-molecular-weight heparins in this scenario has been largely unexplored. Enoxaparin, when given before angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention, has been shown to be superior to unfractionated heparin in preventing major coronary events. In this review, an algorithm for treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes is presented and the current role of these newer adjunctive pharmacotherapies is explored. In the future, combinations of these agents may prove to be most beneficial in patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2000

Dose-finding, safety, and tolerability study of an oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, lotrafiban, in patients with coronary or cerebral atherosclerotic disease.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy is the mainstay of the treatment and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ischemic events. We assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of lotrafiban, an oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, as a secondary prevention strategy in patients with cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 451 patients with a recent cardiovascular or cerebrovascular acute ischemic event were randomized in a double-blind fashion to 1 of 5 dosing regimens for 12 weeks: placebo or 5, 20, 50, or 100 mg lotrafiban, both twice daily with 300 to 325 mg/d aspirin. The primary end point was the incidence and tolerability of major and minor bleeding during treatment. Secondary end points included inhibition of platelet aggregation and clinical events. The placebo and lotrafiban 5-mg groups had similarly low rates of minor and major bleeding, but the 100-mg arm was terminated early because of excess major bleeding. Protocol-defined thrombocytopenia (<100 000 platelets/microL) occurred in 5 lotrafiban-treated patients (1.4%, 95% CI 0.2% to 2.7%) and 1 placebo patient (1.1%, 95% CI 0% to 3.1%). Three lotrafiban-treated patients had a nadir platelet count <20 000/microL (0.9%, 95% CI 0% to 1.8%). Lotrafiban produced dose-dependent inhibition of platelet aggregation; 5 mg lotrafiban did not differ significantly from placebo, whereas 100 mg inhibited aggregation by nearly 100%. CONCLUSIONS: -Lotrafiban provides dose-dependent platelet inhibition when administered to a range of patients with atherosclerosis. The level of platelet inhibition appears to correlate with bleeding risk and drug tolerability.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Randomized trial of contrast media utilization in high-risk PTCA: the COURT trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous in vitro and in vivo studies have suggested an association between thrombus-related events and type of contrast media. Low osmolar contrast agents appear to improve the safety of diagnostic and coronary artery interventional procedures. However, no data are available on PTCA outcomes with an isosmolar contrast agent. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multicenter prospective randomized double-blind trial was performed in 856 high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery intervention. The objective was to compare the isosmolar nonionic dimer iodixanol (n=405) with the low osmolar ionic agent ioxaglate (n=410). A composite variable of in-hospital major adverse clinical events (MACE) was the primary end point. A secondary objective was to evaluate major angiographic and procedural events during and after PTCA. The composite in-hospital primary end point was less frequent in those receiving iodixanol compared with those receiving ioxaglate (5.4% versus 9.5%, respectively; P=0.027). Core laboratory defined angiographic success was more frequent in patients receiving iodixanol (92.2% versus 85. 9% for ioxaglate, P=0.004). There was a trend toward lower total clinical events at 30 days in patients randomized to iodixanol (9.1% versus 13.2% for ioxaglate, P=0.07). Multivariate predictors of in-hospital MACE were use of ioxaglate (P=0.01) and treatment of a de novo lesion (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary prospective multicenter trial of PTCA in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, there was a low incidence of in-hospital clinical events for both treatment groups. The cohort receiving the nonionic dimer iodixanol experienced a 45% reduction in in-hospital MACE when compared with the cohort receiving ioxaglate.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

IIb's are not IIb's.

Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockade improves clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and for patients who present with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Although this class of therapeutic agents has been defined by a common affinity for the platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor, the 3 currently available agents differ markedly in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile as well as receptor affinity. Differential (separate) binding sites on the GP IIb/IIIa receptor explain the observation that abciximab binding to platelets is not influenced by either tirofiban or eptifibatide. Abciximab (ReoPro, chimeric 7E3 Fab) is a low K(d) (high affinity) agent with a very short plasma t(1/2) and a prolonged duration of action at the platelet target receptor. Eptifibatide and tirofiban are high K(d) (low affinity) agents with a relatively long plasma t(1/2) and short duration of action at the platelet target receptor. These pharmacodynamic differences underlie the phenomena of gradual redistribution in abciximab binding and smooth tapering of abciximab antiplatelet effect after discontinuation of therapy. Furthermore, abciximab demonstrates affinity for both the CD11b/18 (alpha(m)beta(2) or MAC 1) and alpha(V)beta(3) (vitronectin) receptors. Although a survival advantage in favor of abciximab has been observed after PCI in both randomized controlled trials and high-volume clinical practice, no survival benefit has been observed to date after eptifibatide or tirofiban therapy for PCI. The mechanism of survival advantage after abciximab therapy has not been defined but may be distinct from the degree of platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition during the duration of intravenous treatment. Although this important new "class" of therapeutic agent was simplistically defined by a common affinity for the GP IIb/IIIa receptor, this solitary unifying attribute may not define agent-specific benefit.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy of abciximab readministration in coronary intervention.

Abciximab, an Fab monoclonal antibody fragment that blocks the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, is increasingly used as an adjunct to coronary intervention. Little is known, however, about the efficacy and safety of readministration of abciximab. This study examined and characterized outcomes of patients receiving abciximab for a second time. From April 1995 to June 1997, 164 consecutive patients were readministered abciximab at our 3 institutions. We retrospectively examined and analyzed in-hospital outcomes in this cohort. The median time to readministration was 95 days. The angiographic success rate of percutaneous intervention was 99.5%. Rates and 95% confidence intervals of in-hospital events were death 2% (0.7% to 6.1%), myocardial infarction 3% (1% to 7%), coronary bypass surgery 0% (0% to 2.2%), and intracranial hemorrhage 2% (0.4% to 5.3%). Severe thrombocytopenia was observed in 4% of patients (1.4% to 7.8%) after readministration. Allergic or anaphylactic reactions were not observed. Major bleeding was associated with excessive concomitant antithrombotic therapy. Patients undergoing readministration of abciximab within 2 weeks of first administration experienced a higher incidence of severe thrombocytopenia (12% vs. 2%, p = 0.046). Thus, abciximab remains clinically efficacious when readministered as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention. However, concomitant heparin administration must be carefully monitored and warfarin therapy should be avoided. Vigilant surveillance for thrombocytopenia should be employed. Reduced dosing may be necessary when abciximab is readministered within days of the initial administration.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2000

Effect of intracoronary recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor on myocardial perfusion: evidence for a dose-dependent effect.

BACKGROUND: Animal models of therapeutic angiogenesis have stimulated development of clinical application in patients with limited options for coronary revascularization. The impact of recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor (rhVEGF) on myocardial perfusion in humans has not been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent exercise (n=11), dobutamine (n=2), or dipyridamole (n=1) myocardial perfusion single photon emission CT (SPECT) before as well as 30 and 60 days after rhVEGF administration. After uniform processing and display, 2 observers blinded to the timing of the study and dose of rhVEGF reviewed the SPECT images. By a visual, semiquantitative 20-segment scoring method, summed stress scores (SSS) and summed rest scores (SRS) were generated. Although the SSS did not change from baseline to 30 days (21.6 versus 21.5; P=NS), the SRS improved after rhVEGF (13.2 versus 10.4; P<0.05). Stress and rest perfusion improved in >2 segments infrequently in patients treated with low-dose rhVEGF. However, 5 of 6 patients had improvement in >2 segments at rest and stress with the higher rhVEGF doses. Furthermore, although neither the SSS nor the SRS changed in patients treated with the low doses, the SRS decreased in the high-dose rhVEGF patients at 60 days (14.7 versus 10.7; P<0.05). Quantitative analysis was consistent with the visual findings but failed to demonstrate statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Although not designed to demonstrate rhVEGF efficacy, these phase 1 data support the concept that rhVEGF improves myocardial perfusion at rest and provide evidence of a dose-dependent effect.

Cardiotonic Agents↗
PubMed2000

High platelet count in platelet-rich plasma reduces measured platelet inhibition by abciximab but not tirofiban nor eptifibatide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists.

We evaluated the differential effect of platelet count in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the level of ex vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation provided by abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban as part of a randomized, comparative trial of these agents on platelet function in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Platelet count <350 K/microL in PRP reduced measured platelet inhibition by abciximab, but not eptifibatide nor tirofiban. This observation suggests the need for standardized, uniform platelet counts in PRP during future comparisons of the degree of platelet inhibition by these agents.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2000

Soluble P-selectin is not a surrogate marker for platelet P-selectin: evidence from a multicenter chest pain study group.

It has been reported that platelet expression and plasma levels of soluble P-selectin are increased in patients with unstable coronary artery syndromes. However, the origin of soluble P-selectin remains unknown. We sought to determine whether platelet expression of P-selectin correlates with plasma levels in the population of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. In 338 patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency departments of three different hospitals, simultaneous soluble and platelet P-selection levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and whole blood flow cytometry, respectively. Using regression analysis no correlation (R(2)=0.055) was found between soluble and platelet-bound P-selectin for the study population, including those patients with noncardiac chest pain (R(2)=0.019), unstable angina (R(2)=0.007), acute myocardial infraction (R(2)=0.033), congestive heart failure (R(2)=0.231), and gastrointestinal illness (R(2)=0.020). The platelet expression of P-selectin is unrelated to the level found in plasma in patients with acute chest pain, irrespective of the etiology of chest pain. Dissociation between platelet and soluble P-selectin suggests that the soluble form cannot serve as a surrogate marker to indicate platelet activation in the chest pain population.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Role of soluble and platelet-bound P-selectin in discriminating cardiac from noncardiac chest pain at presentation in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that selectins participate in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes by modulating platelet-leukocyte-endothelium interactions. Elevated P-selectin level also has been observed in the clinical setting of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion; however, its utility in differentiating cardiac from noncardiac origins of chest pain is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Soluble and platelet fractions of P-selectin were measured for 122 patients with chest pain and 14 healthy persons acting as controls. Patients with a cardiac problem (unstable angina, congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction) had significantly elevated levels of soluble P-selectin (156.0 +/- 58.8 ng/mL, P =.002) and platelet-bound P-selectin (11.7% +/- 6.4% positive cells, P =.013) compared with the P-selectin profile among controls (102.6 +/- 29.0 ng/mL, 4.1% +/- 1.2% positivity) and among patients with noncardiac chest pain (114.7 +/- 36.6 ng/mL, 5.7% +/- 2.9% positivity). With a cutpoint of 10% positivity for membrane and 120 ng/mL for soluble P-selectin, the sensitivities were 0.442 and 0. 558, and the specificities were 0.915 and 0.553. CONCLUSIONS: When a patient arrives in the emergency department, measurement of membrane P-selectin may serve as an additional diagnostic tool to detect heightened platelet activity, which is most prevalent among patients with a cardiac origin of chest pain. However, low sensitivity limits the utility of the P-selectin profile alone in suitably differentiating acute coronary syndromes within the overall population of patients with chest pain.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Clinical correlates and course of thrombocytopenia during percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of abciximab platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade.

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is infrequently associated with abciximab therapy but may contribute to hemorrhagic risk. Factors associated with development of thrombocytopenia, the role of weight-adjustment in concomitant heparin administration, and clinical outcomes in patients with thrombocytopenia are not well defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pooled data from 3 placebo-controlled, randomized trials (EPIC, EPILOG, and EPISTENT) of abciximab therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention identified 178 patients (2. 4% of 7290 patients) in whom thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 x 10(9)/L) developed after enrollment. Multivariate regression analysis identified age (>65 years; P <.001), weight (<90 kg; P =. 023), baseline platelet count (<200 x 10(9)/L; P <.001), abciximab therapy (P =.002), and enrollment into the EPIC trial (P <.001) to be associated with development of thrombocytopenia. Major and minor nonsurgical hemorrhage and transfusion were more frequent (all P <. 001) in thrombocytopenic patients. Although the primary composite clinical end point of these trials (death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization to 30 days) was observed with similar frequency in patients with (11.2%) and those without (7.9%; P =.114) thrombocytopenia, 30-day mortality rate was higher in thrombocytopenic patients (8.4% vs 0.6%, respectively; P <.001). This excess mortality rate persisted after excluding patients in whom thrombocytopenia was first noted after the performance of coronary bypass surgery (4.8% vs 0.6%; P <.001). Among patients in whom thrombocytopenia developed during these trials, those who received prophylactic abciximab had fewer primary end point events (7.1% vs 23.1%; P =.056) and had a lower 30-day mortality rate (3.5% vs 15.4%; P =.048) than patients with thrombocytopenia who had received prophylactic placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombocytopenia associated with abciximab therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention was more frequent in older, lighter-weight patients, those with lower baseline platelet counts, and in those patients who were enrolled into the EPIC trial. Both bleeding and transfusion events occur more frequently in patients with thrombocytopenia. Patients in whom thrombocytopenia developed during these trials had increased mortality rates to 30 days not attributable to the performance of coronary bypass surgery. Among patients with thrombocytopenia, those who received prophylactic abciximab had better clinical outcomes including survival than those who did not.

Abciximab↗