Physicians--bane or boon for health care delivery?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D J Loschen.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The reaction of the clinician to the specter of regulation of any part of his or her practice mirrors the reaction of the laboratorian to the implementation of Medicare and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments legislation in 1965 and 1967, respectively. Whether the regulatory burdens that will be visited upon these laboratories are justified or necessary is arguable; the fact of the upcoming regulation is not. The volume and breadth of testing in physicians' office laboratories (POLs) has increased exponentially since passage of the Diagnosis Related Group legislation by Congress in 1983, an increase made possible by remarkable developments in technology. State regulatory initiatives and private accrediting agencies have been perceived as being inadequate to prevent the proliferation of poorly controlled testing in the nontraditional laboratory environment. The testing menu of a given POL varies according to the scope of clinical services offered; the size of the practice group; the funding available for equipment and personnel acquisition; and the general availability of hospital, reference, and consultative laboratory services. Physicians who offer laboratory services as part of their practices must now prepare their laboratories to meet whatever requirements are mandated by regulation. This will include acquisition of trained personnel, improvement of instrumentation and methodologies, participation in proficiency testing, establishment of comprehensive quality-assurance programs, and adequate documentation of laboratory services. Organized medicine should devote its energies to assisting with needed educational processes to assure the survival of POLs.
Between January and March 1984, the first community outbreak of transient thyrotoxicosis in the United States was documented in a seven-county area of southeastern Nebraska; 36 of the total 49 patients resided in York County (2.4 cases per 1,000 population). The median age of patients was 36 years, range six to 82 years; 51 percent were women. By definition, all patients were symptomatic, visited a physician, and had a newly identified elevated serum concentration of thyroxine or triiodothyronine of unknown cause. None had a goiter or a painful thyroid gland. Low 131I uptake measurements were found in all nine patients studied. Six patients were hospitalized; none died. Investigation of all 12 household contacts of eight selected patients revealed five additional persons with thyrotoxicosis and four with asymptomatic hyperthyroxinemia. A case-control study revealed that illness was associated with a significantly higher frequency of a reported recent respiratory viral-like condition. In another case-control study, the HLA-DR3 antigen was present in more case subjects (39 percent) than control subjects (14 percent). In addition, a significantly higher proportion of patients than control subjects purchased beef from one of the three supermarkets in York Country. Concomitant with the outbreak, the supermarket implicated in the outbreak purchased an unusually large quantity of beef (7,000 pounds) from a nonregular supplier in Nebraska, which had reportedly instituted the practice of trimming gullets (a procedure that removes the muscles from bovine larynx for beef) about three months earlier. Thus, it is concluded that the Nebraska outbreak, like one in Minnesota that occurred 18 months later, probably resulted from patients having eaten ground beef that was contaminated with bovine thyroid gland. This form of thyrotoxicosis, perhaps misdiagnosed as painless thyroiditis in the past, probably represents a previously under-recognized public health problem.
The magnitude of the AIDS epidemic is exceeding the predictions of a short time ago. Since AIDS patients are being encountered more frequently in family practice, the possibility of accidental exposure to HIV has become a source of concern. By exercising specific precautions and by minimizing misconceptions about the epidemiology of AIDS, physicians can provide reassurance and protection to their employees in the family practice setting.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.