Biomedical subjects

D J Serrien

Publications and source records attributed to D J Serrien.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1999

Grip force adjustments induced by predictable load perturbations during a manipulative task.

The experiment examined the anticipatory modulation of grip force with respect to load force during a drawer opening task. An impact force was introduced by a mechanical stop that arrested movement of the pulling hand. The results showed a typical grip force profile which consisted of two evolving phases, one to control drawer movement onset, and the other to secure grip force at the expected impact. Initially, grip force increased with the load force that was developed to overcome the inertia of the drawer. After the first peak, a small decline was observed, followed by a proactive grip force increase prior to the time of impact. During this ramp-like increase of grip force, load force remained unchanged. In addition, a reactive response was triggered by the impact. That anticipatory control with respect to an impact force is not innate but, rather, is learned by experience was evidenced by a comparison of adults and children. Whereas adults made the characteristic grip force adjustments to anticipate the impact, children used a probing strategy with irregular build-up of force until impact. Furthermore, adults calibrated the second phase of the grip force profile in the initial trials of the task, indicating that grip force was rapidly updated with information related to the impact force. The present results demonstrate that grip-load force coordination during manipulation is a necessity for dealing with destabilizing load perturbations produced by self-induced movement and impact forces. It is concluded that grip force is adjusted automatically, but in a flexible manner, to secure grip in accordance with the characteristics of the pulling synergy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Load compensation during homologous and non-homologous coordination.

Two-limb coordination of homologous and non-homologous effectors was examined during isofrequency (1:1) and multifrequency (2:1) conditions. The coordination patterns involved flexion and extension movements in the sagittal plane and were performed under unloaded and single-limb (right arm) loaded conditions. Previous studies suggested that the lower degree of 1:1 synchronization observed during nonhomologous as compared to homologous coordination results from natural differences in biophysical (inertial) properties. Elaborating on this idea, adding weight to the right arm was hypothesized to modulate its inertial characteristics, rendering homologous limbs more dissimilar and nonhomologous limbs more similar by enhancing and decreasing their inertial differences, respectively. Therefore, the observations made during unloaded conditions were predicted to be completely reversed during loaded conditions. Findings revealed that during 1:1 coordination (experiment 1) single-limb loading resulted in a decreased relative phase stability, whereas relative phase accuracy depended upon the limb combination. In particular, phase-locking was more accurately maintained for loaded homologous than for nonhomologous limbs, whereas loading the nonhomologous limbs resulted in a deterioration of the quality of synchronization. These findings suggest that there is an additional explanation of differential coordination capabilities among limb combinations. It is hypothesized that the neural networks subserving the control centers of the homologous limbs are more tightly connected than those of the nonhomologous effectors, allowing 1:1 synchronization to be more successfully preserved in the face of (load) perturbations. During 2:1 coordination (experiment 2), the loading procedure disturbed the coordination dynamics across all limb combinations. That no differential effect of loading on effector combination was observed is possibly a result of the fact that only an initial level of practice was studied in which optimal relative phase dynamics are still being explored for both homologous and nonhomologous limbs.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Interactive processes during interlimb coordination: combining movement patterns with different frequency ratios.

The present study examined the formation of a movement pattern that was added to an ongoing coordinative regime across different limb combinations. It was hypothesized that the addition of the secondary mode would perturb the ongoing primary mode by adding rhythmic complexity to the task requirements. Furthermore, the formation of the secondary mode was predicted to be affected by the ongoing coordination pattern. In Exp. 1, a primary multifrequency mode (2:1 ratio) was performed while a secondary isofrequency mode (1:1 ratio) was initiated midway into the trials, whereas the reversed dual-pattern conditions were examined in Exp. 2. The results from both experiments showed that the multifrequency mode deteriorated across limb combination under dual-pattern as compared to single-pattern conditions. The isofrequency mode was also affected under combined pattern conditions, but its degradation was a function of the limb combination under consideration. In particular, the non-homologous limbs, which demonstrated less stable behavior than the homologous limbs under single-pattern conditions, were affected most strongly when confronted with the simultaneous production of the multifrequency mode. In addition, anti-phase movements deteriorated more than in-phase movements, supporting indirectly the contention that afferent feedback monitoring complexity differs for the two movement configurations. The findings of this study suggest that manipulation of task requirements can be used to examine pattern durability and formation in view of dynamical perturbations.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

The organization of patterns of multilimb coordination as revealed through reaction time measures.

Simple visual reaction time (RT) during the performance of sagittal movements of the upper and/or lower limbs was investigated. Experiment 1 demonstrated that RTs increased when more limbs were to be moved simultaneously. This effect was more apparent for the upper than for the lower limbs. Experiment 2 allowed a separation of RT into premotor time (PMT) and motor time (MOT) components through analysis of electromyographic activity, and showed that these longer response delays were associated with increased PMTs. This suggests that the time required for the central organization of movements increased as more limbs were to be controlled simultaneously. Compared to single-limb performance conditions, the increases in RT were much larger in the upper limbs (up to 16%) than in the lower limbs (up to 5%) when limb segments were added. During single-limb conditions, RTs in the upper limbs tended to be smaller than in the lower limbs, in accordance with efferent nerve conduction time estimates. Conversely, the lower limb(s) was (were) initiated before the upper limb(s) when both effector types were moved simultaneously. This pattern of activation is reminiscent of the organization of postural control during upright standing, where goal-directed arm activity is preceded by (bilateral) leg activity to anticipate for the upcoming postural destabilization. Finally, hemifield manipulations in experiment 2 revealed faster RTs and PMTs for stimuli presented in the right visual field in comparison with the left field. This advantage was evident for ipsilateral as well as contralateral responses and supports the pre-eminence of the left hemisphere in the complex organization of gross motor responses.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1995

Relative phase destabilization during interlimb coordination: the disruptive role of kinesthetic afferences induced by passive movement.

The disruption of three patterns of two-limb coordination, involving cyclical flexion-extension movements performed in the same or in different directions, was investigated through application of passive movement to a third limb by the experimenter. The three patterns referred to the homologous, homolateral, and heterolateral (diagonal) limb combinations which were performed in the sagittal plane. The passive movement involved a spatiotemporal trajectory that differed from the movements controlled actively. Even though subjects were instructed to completely ignore the passive limb movement, the findings of experiment 1 demonstrated a moderate to severe destabilization of the two-limb patterns, as revealed by analyses of power spectra, relative phase, cycle duration, and amplitude. This disruption was more pronounced in the homolateral and heterolateral than in the homologous effector combinations, suggesting stronger coupling between homologous than nonhomologous limb pairs. Moreover, passive mobilization affected antiphase (nonisodirectional) movements more than inphase (isodirectional) movements, pointing to the differential stability of these patterns. Experiment 2 focused on homolateral coordination and demonstrated that withdrawal of visual information did not alter the effects induced by passive movement. It was therefore hypothesized that the generation of extra kinesthetic afferences through passive limb motion was primarily responsible for the detriment in interlimb coordination, possibly conflicting with the sensory information accompanying active movement production. In addition, it was demonstrated that the active limbs were more affected by their homologous passive counterpart than by their nonhomologous counterpart, favoring the notion of "specific" interference. The findings are discussed in view of the potential role of kinesthetic afferences in human interlimb coordination, more specifically the preservance of relative phasing through a kinesthetic feedback loop.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1993

Acquiring bimanual skills: contrasting forms of information feedback for interlimb decoupling.

The present experiments addressed the learner's capability to perform different upper-limb actions simultaneously with the help of various sources of information feedback. An elbow flexion movement was made in the left limb together with a flexion-extension-flexion movement in the right limb. Interlimb interactions were assessed at the structural as well as the metrical level of movement specification during acquisition and retention. Despite a strong initial tendency for the limbs to be synchronized, findings revealed that Ss became gradually more successful in interlimb decoupling as a result of practice with augmented feedback. However, detailed knowledge of movement kinematics was no more effective than global outcome information for interlimb decoupling, indicating that knowledge of results may have more potential for acquiring multiple degree-of-freedom tasks than previously believed. Finally, the data support the general notion that learning new coordination tasks involves the suppression of preexisting preferred coordination tendencies, which is often a prerequisite for building new coordination modes.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1991

Control of asymmetrical bimanual movements.

When movements are performed together in the upper-limbs, a strong tendency emerges to synchronize the patterns of motor output. This is most apparent when trying to do different things at the same time. The present experiment explored the simultaneous organization and control of spatiotemporally different movements. There were two practice conditions: symmetrical and asymmetrical. In the symmetrical condition, subjects performed a series of unidirectional elbow flexion movements, followed by a series of elbow flexion-extension-flexion (reversal) movements in both limbs simultaneously. In the asymmetrical practice condition, subjects performed the unidirectional movement in the left limb together with the reversal movement in the right limb. Findings revealed a tendency for each limb movement to assimilate the features of its counterpart under the latter condition. This effect was "asymmetrical" in that the unidirectional movement was more attracted to the reversal movement than vice versa. Nevertheless, subjects were able to partly suppress this synchronization tendency as was evident from the moderate cross correlations between the angular acceleration patterns of both limb movements and from an increasingly successful differentiation of the activity levels in the right and left limb muscles. All together, these findings provide evidence for some degree of parallel control of spatiotemporally different actions. The data are discussed in view of the possible suppression of a bilaterally distributed motor control system, that is mainly held responsible for activiting proximal limb musculature.

Arm↗