PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

D K McCulloch

Publications and source records attributed to D K McCulloch.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Increased specificity and sensitivity of insulin antibody measurements in autoimmune thyroid disease and type I diabetes.

Insulin autoantibodies (IAA), a marker for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), have been reported in other diseases such as thyroid disease and after treatment with sulfhydryl containing medications. Reported prevalences of IAA in non-diabetics vary widely, probably due in part to methodological differences between laboratories. In addition, certain sera may have a high non-specific binding to insulin. We compared a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for IAA which included non-specific binding with an RIA that incorporated a competitive displacement with cold insulin to remove non-specific binding. Using the RIA which measured specific plus non-specific binding, IAA positivity was found in 22/92 (23.9%) of sera from thyroid disease patients, 16/124 (12.9%) of random masked sera from a hospital laboratory, 27/335 (8.1%) of first degree relatives of IDDM patients, 63/178 (35.4%) of subjects with newly diagnosed IDDM, and 0/92 (0%) of normal controls. Insulin antibodies (IA) were found in 80/99 (80.8%) of insulin-treated diabetic subjects. In contrast, using the displacement assay which allowed measurement of specific binding, the frequency of IAA positivity was lower for subjects with thyroid disease (7/92 (7.6%)), random hospital sera (12/124 (9.8%)), and for first degree relatives of IDDM patients (8/335 (2.4%)), while higher for subjects with newly diagnosed IDDM (71/178 (39.9%)). Subjects with insulin-treated diabetes (78/99 (78.8%)) and normal subjects (1/92 (1.1%)) showed little change. Strikingly, three of the eight (37.5%) relatives of IDDM patients that were positive in the RIA measuring specific binding were detected only because cold displacement was utilized. We conclude: (1) subjects with thyroid disease and first degree relatives of IDDM patients frequently have high non-specific binding for IAA in an RIA not employing a cold displacement step, (2) in some newly diagnosed IDDM patients and first degree relatives of IDDM patients, IAA may be missed by an assay not optimized to measure specific binding, and (3) displacement with cold insulin increases both the specificity and sensitivity of RIAs measuring insulin autoantibodies.

Antibody Specificity

Standardization of IVGTT to predict IDDM.

OBJECTIVE: To review current practice in centers that use the IVGTT for prediction of IDDM. To establish consensus protocol for performance of the test. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Postal questionnaires were delivered to 12 centers. RESULTS: Eleven centers used a glucose dose of 0.5 g/kg and 1 used 0.3 g/kg; the dosage in adults was limited to a maximum of 25-50 g in some centers but others applied no upper limit. The glucose concentration of the infusate varied between 20 and 66%. Eight centers injected glucose manually, two used a syringe pump, and two used gravity infusion. The period of infusion ranged from 30 +/- 10 s to 4 +/- 2 min, and time zero was taken as the start (1 center), middle (1 center), or end (10 centers) of the infusion. The potential range in timing of the +1-min sample varied between 1 and 7 min from the start of the infusion. Quality-assurance standards for the insulin assays used were not always appropriate for the fasting and low stimulated range of insulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: The first-phase insulin response to the IVGTT is widely measured as an index of risk of progression to IDDM. We established that methodology varies widely. Because of this, a new standard protocol for use in prediction of IDDM was agreed by an ICARUS working group and is described herein.

Adult