Biomedical subjects

D K Pawar

Publications and source records attributed to D K Pawar.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is an important complication of abdominal surgery. Its repair has progressed from a primary suture repair to various mesh repairs and laparoscopic repair. Laparoscopic mesh repair is a promising alternative, and in the absence of consensus, needs prospective randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Between April 2003 and April 2005, 66 patients with incisional, primary ventral and recurrent hernias were randomized to receive either open retro-rectus mesh repair or laparoscopic mesh repair. These patients were followed up at 1-, 3-, and 6-month intervals thereafter for a mean of 12.17 months (open repair group) and 13.73 months (laparoscopic repair group). RESULTS: Lower abdominal hernias after gynecologic operations constituted the majority of the hernias (approximately 50%) in both groups. There was no significant injury to viscera or vessel in either group and no conversions. The defect size was 42.12 cm in the open (group 1) and 65.66 cm2 in the laparoscopic group (group 2), and the prosthesis sizes were, respectively, 152.67 cm2 and 203.83 cm2. The hospital stay was 3.43 days in open group and 1.47 days in laparoscopic group (p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the pain scores between the two groups. More wound-related infectious complications occurred in the open group (33%) than in the laparoscopic group (6%) (p = 0.013). There was one recurrence in the open repair group (3%) and two recurrences in laparoscopic group (6%) (p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias is superior to open mesh repair in terms of significantly less blood loss, fewer complications, shorter hospital stay, and excellent cosmetic outcome.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Lumbotomy approach for upper urological tract surgery in children--an analysis of 68 consecutive lumbotomies.

OBJECTIVES: To comprehensively analyse the results of upper urological tract surgery performed using a lumbotomy approach in the paediatric age group. METHODS: 68 consecutive patients underwent upper urological tract surgery during the last 5 years in our surgical unit. In all of these patients, a lumbotomy approach was used with a transverse skin incision. The hospital charts were reviewed for age, sex, diagnosis, type of surgery, intra-operative problems, duration of surgery, time to oral feeds, postoperative pain, length of hospitalisation and complications. RESULTS: Age range was 1 month to 12 years with a mean of 66 months. There were 47 boys and 16 girls. Surgeries performed were: pyeloplasty, pyelolithotomy, nephroureterectomy, ureterostomy and heminephrectomy. No intraoperative problems were encountered and the mean duration of surgery was 64.68 minutes. All patients resumed full oral feeds within 24 hours of surgery and postoperative pain was minimal. The mean duration of hospital stay was 6.16 days. No incision-related complications were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbotomy incision is a safe, easy and effective approach for upper urological tract surgery in children.

Child↗

PubMed2001

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of epidural ketamine combined with morphine for postoperative analgesia after major upper abdominal surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of epidural ketamine and morphine compared with epidural morphine alone for postoperative pain relief following major upper abdominal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. SETTING: Tertiary care referral and teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 46 ASA physical status I and II patients who underwent major upper abdominal procedures. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups: patients in Group 1 received epidural morphine 50 microg/kg whereas patients in Group 2 received epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg combined with 50 microg/kg of morphine postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS: A blinded observer using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment followed up patients for 48 hours postoperatively. Top-up dose of epidural morphine was provided when VAS was higher than 4. Analgesic requirements and side effects were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Only 40 patients completed the study. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age, gender, weight, duration, or type of surgical procedure or intraoperative opioid requirements. Onset of analgesia was faster (p < 0.001) in Group 2 (11 min) than in Group 1 patients (25 min). The time for first requirement of analgesia was significantly (p < 0.01) longer (19.8 +/- 9.8 hours) in Group 2 patients than Group 1 (12.8 +/- 6.2 hours). Total number of supplemental doses of epidural morphine required in the first 48 hours postoperatively was also significantly less (p < 0.005) in Group 2 compared to Group 1. Patients in Group 2 had higher sedation scores than Group I patients for the first 2 hours postoperatively. None of the patients in either group developed hallucinations or respiratory depression. Other side effects such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting were also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg to morphine 50 microg/kg improved analgesia after major upper abdominal surgery without increasing side effects.

Abdomen↗

PubMed2001

Preoperative epidural ketamine in combination with morphine does not have a clinically relevant intra- and postoperative opioid-sparing effect.

UNLABELLED: In this prospective, randomized, and double-blinded clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of preincisional administration of epidural ketamine with morphine compared with epidural morphine alone for postoperative pain relief after major upper-abdominal surgery. We studied 50 ASA I and II patients undergoing major upper-abdominal procedures. These patients were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups: patients in Group 1 received epidural morphine 50 microg/kg, whereas those in Group 2 received epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg combined with 50 microg/kg of morphine 30 min before incision. Intraoperative analgesia was provided in addition, with IV morphine, and the requirement was noted. A blinded observer using a visual analog scale for pain assessment observed patients for 48 h after surgery. Additional doses of epidural morphine were provided when the visual analog scale score was more than 4. Analgesic requirements and side effects were compared between the two groups. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age, sex, weight, or duration or type of the surgical procedures. The intraoperative morphine requirement was significantly (P = 0.018) less in Group 2 patients (median, 6.8 mg; range, 3-15 mg) compared with patients in Group 1 (median, 8.3 mg; range, 4.5-15 mg). The time for the first requirement of analgesia was significantly (P = 0.021) longer (median, 17 h; range, 10-48 h) in Group 2 patients than in Group 1 (median, 12 h; range, 4-36 h). The total number of supplemental doses of epidural morphine required in the first 48 h after surgery was comparable (P = 0.1977) in both groups. Sedation scores were similar in both groups. One patient in Group 2 developed hallucinations after study drug administration. None of the patients in either group developed respiratory depression. Other side effects, such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting, were also similar in both groups. Although the addition of ketamine had synergistic analgesic effects with morphine (reduced intraoperative morphine consumption and prolonged time for first requirement of analgesia), there was no long- lasting preemptive benefit seen with this combination (in terms of reduction in supplemental analgesia) for patients undergoing major upper-abdominal procedures. IMPLICATIONS: Ketamine added to epidural morphine given before surgery can decrease postoperative pain by its preemptive effect, opioid potentiation, and prevention of acute opioid tolerance. A single epidural bolus of 1 mg/kg of ketamine with morphine given before major upper-abdominal surgery did not result in a clinically relevant reduction in postoperative pain relief.

Abdomen↗

PubMed2000

Dislodgement of bronchial foreign body during retrieval in children.

Foreign body aspiration is a leading cause of death in children aged less than 1 year. The removal of a foreign body poses a great challenge to the skill of the anaesthetist. Four cases are presented, analysing the part played by modes of respiration in the dislodgement of a bronchial foreign body during its retrieval.

Airway Obstruction↗

PubMed2000

Pre-emptive analgesia with epidural morphine or morphine and bupivacaine.

Studies of preemptive analgesia in humans have shown conflicting results. The study design, patient population and the duration of assessment of postoperative pain are important in the evaluation of preemptive analgesia. We carried out a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study in 80 patients of physical status ASA 1-3 undergoing upper abdominal and thoracic surgery. Patients received two epidural injections, one 20 minutes before induction and the other at the end of surgery. Study solution was either morphine (50 micrograms/kg), with or without 0.1% bupivacaine in 10 ml of normal saline, or normal saline alone. The study groups (Pre M, Pre MB) were given either morphine or morphine-bupivacaine before induction and saline at the end of surgery. The control groups (Post M, Post MB) were given saline before induction and morphine or morphine-bupivacaine at the end of surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during coughing and deep breathing at six-hourly intervals for five days. Epidural morphine was given if the VAS exceeded 4. Pre MB compared to Post MB had a significantly increased interval between the analgesic top-ups (P < 0.01) and decreased total postoperative morphine requirements (P < 0.0001) and number of top-ups (P < 0.001). Pre M and Post M were comparable. Pre MB compared to Pre M had significantly decreased total postoperative morphine requirements (P < 0.0001) and number of top-ups (P < 0.0001). Epidural morphine plus bupivacaine is effective as a preemptive analgesic. Morphine plus bupivacaine has better efficacy than morphine given alone before the induction of anaesthesia.

Abdomen↗

PubMed1999

Oxygen therapy.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Humans↗

PubMed1987

Elapid snake bite.

Four patients were admitted with respiratory muscle paralysis following an elapid snake bite. Two were treated with antivenine, repeated doses of neostigmine and artificial ventilation; the other two with artificial ventilation only. There was no clinically significant difference in recovery. It is suggested that one should avoid the use of antivenine and neostigmine in the management of elapid snake bite once muscle paralysis has become established.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of epidural morphine on minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in humans.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The anaesthetic potency of volatile anaesthetic agents is measured by the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) required to suppress response in 50% of subjects. We studied the effect of epidural morphine on MAC of isoflurane in humans. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A prospective single-blind study designed to study the effect of epidural morphine on MAC of isoflurane. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients were randomly divided into two groups - Group I patients received 3 mg morphine in 10 ml saline, and Group II patients received 10 ml saline epidurally. Anaesthesia was induced with isoflurane in oxygen and nitrous oxide. Later nitrous oxide was discontinued and MAC of isoflurane determined using modified Dixon's method of sequential sampling. RESULTS: Epidural morphine resulted in a significant reduction in MAC of isoflurane, 0.98 vs. 1.14 in control group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural administration of 3 mg morphine in 10 ml saline decreased the MAC of isoflurane.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Thoracoscopic management of thoracic duct injury: Is there a place for conservatism?

Thoracic duct injury is a rare but serious complication following chest surgeries and major neck dissections. Clinically, it can present as cervical chylous fistula, chylothorax or chylopericardium. Without treatment, the mortality is up to 50% and thus, early aggressive therapy is indicated. Traditional conservative management includes low-fat diet, parenteral nutrition, careful monitoring of fluid and electrolytes, and drainage of the neck wound or chylothorax. Patients with failed conservative management require definitive treatment in the form of ligation of the thoracic duct, which has traditionally been done by thoracotomy. The advent of Video-Assisted-Thoracoscopic-Surgery (VATS) over the last decade has changed the approach towards the management of numerous chest diseases. Thoracoscopic ligation of the thoracic duct has also been reported. We report herein a case of postoperative cervical chylous fistula managed successfully by VATS thoracic duct ligation and present a systematic analysis of the English literature to highlight the current trends in the management of thoracic duct injury.

Adult↗