Biomedical subjects

D K Shay

Publications and source records attributed to D K Shay.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1996

Bloodstream infections in home infusion patients: the influence of race and needleless intravascular access devices.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the cause of increased central venous catheter-associated (CVC) bloodstream infection (BSI) rates in a cohort of pediatric hematology /oncology patients receiving home health care (HHC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of hematology/oncology patients with CVCs receiving HHC from January 1992 through November 1994. RESULTS: Of 182 patients with CVCs identified during the study period, 58 (32%) acquired 90 BSIs during 75,085 CVC days. BSI rates increased significantly from 1992 through 1994 (0.8 vs 1.0 vs 1.7 BSIs per 1000 CVC days; p < 0.005). Known risk factors, including catheter type, patient age less than 5 years, sex, or diagnosis, were not associated with increased BSI rates. After introduction of needleless devices for CVC access to the HHC regimen in May 1993, BSI rates increased 80% (from 0.81 to 1.46 BSIs/1000 CVC days, relative risk 1.8; p < 0.02). The only other significant risk factor was the race of the patient. White children had the lowest BSI rate before and after needleless-device introduction (0.4 vs 0.9 BSIs/1000 CVC days; p > 0.1), whereas black patients had the highest, unaffected by the introduction of these devices (2.5 BSIs/1000 CVC days). Both Hispanic (0.5 vs 1.6 BSIs/1000 CVC days) and Asian-American children's (0.4 vs 1.5 BSIs/1000 CVC days) BSI rates increased threefold and fourfold after the introduction of needleless devices. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that pediatric hematology/oncology patients receiving HHC via needleless devices may have an increased risk of BSIs, and this risk may vary by race. We hypothesize that prevention of BSIs may require consideration of cultural, ethnic, and language differences when parents are trained to provide care for their children with CVCs in the home.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Enterococci resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents, including vancomycin. Establishment of endemicity in a university medical center.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the distribution of and risk factors for colonization and infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci; to evaluate the molecular epidemiology of these strains; and to assess the effect of interventions, including 1) strict adherence to infection control procedures and 2) restricted use of vancomycin. DESIGN: Problem identification based on descriptive studies, point-prevalence surveys, and case-control studies and followed by specific interventions and evaluation of the response to these interventions. SETTING: University medical center. PARTICIPANTS: All patients hospitalized between May 1992 and June 1994 (59,196 admissions). MAIN RESULTS: 75 active infections attributed to vancomycin-resistant enterococci were identified. Thirty-one patients (41%) had bloodstream infections and 6 (8%) died. The incidence of active infection was highest in the organ transplantation unit (13.2 infections/1000 admissions). In the point-prevalence studies, vancomycin-resistant enterococci were isolated from 20% of a random sample of hospitalized patients in July, August, and September 1993 (adjusted prevalence, 16.9%). Case-control studies showed significant associations between colonization and infection and 1) receipt of antimicrobial agents, particularly vancomycin, and 2) severity of illness. Although several small case clusters had isolates with identical banding patterns on pulsed field gel electrophoresis, at least 45 different banding patterns were noted among medical center isolates. Interventions took place in November and December 1993. Vancomycin restriction policies resulted in a 59% decrease in intravenous vancomycin use and an 85% decrease in oral vancomycin use. Point-prevalence surveys done in April, May, and June 1994 showed a consistent 20% level of colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci strains (adjusted prevalence, 18.7%). No significant changes were seen in rates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci are an important cause of illness and death in the study institution, particularly among organ transplant recipients and other seriously ill persons; they have also become a common intestinal colonizer among hospitalized patients. The diversity of isolates (based on molecular typing studies) suggests that resistant organisms have been introduced from multiple sources. Interventions that effectively lower the overall level of colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci must still be identified.

Case-Control Studies↗

PubMed1995

Reducing the spread of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms. Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Strategies to reduce the spread of hospital-acquired microorganisms resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents are discussed. Because hospitals have experienced a rapid increase in the incidence of infection and colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in the past 5 years, the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has issued recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance. Controlling VRE dissemination in pediatric patients requires prompt detection of VRE by microbiology laboratories, education of staff and families about VRE, use of infection control measures to prevent person-to-person VRE transmission, and prudent vancomycin use.

Child↗

PubMed1995

Epidemiology and mortality risk of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infections.

Risk factors for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) bloodstream infection (BSI) were studied at a tertiary-care hospital by comparing 46 patients with VRE-BSI with 46 randomly selected patients with vancomycin-susceptible enterococcal (VSE) BSI. Among patients with an enterococcal BSI, risk factors for mortality were determined. Independent risk factors for VRE-BSI were increasing APACHE II score (odds ratio [OR], 2.3/5-point increase; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.9), receipt of vancomycin (OR, 11; 95% CI, 5.5-21), or diagnosis of hematologic malignancy (OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 3.9-18). After controlling for APACHE II score and gender, patients with VRE- versus VSE-BSI did not have a significantly elevated risk of mortality (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 0.7-15). Five of 28 VRE blood isolates typed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis had identical banding patterns. These data suggest that increasing severity of illness, underlying disease, and receipt of vancomycin are major risk factors for VRE-BSI.

APACHE↗

PubMed1994

Prevalence of low birth weight among Hispanic infants with United States-born and foreign-born mothers: the effect of urban poverty.

Although Hispanics are a poorly educated and medically underserved minority, the incidence of low birth weight (less than 2,500 g) Hispanic infants is similar to that of non-Hispanic whites. The authors used 1982-1983 Illinois vital records and 1980 US census income data to determine the contribution of maternal nativity and place of residence to this epidemiologic paradox. The proportion of low birth weight Hispanic (n = 22,892) infants ranged from 4.3% for Mexicans to 9.1% for Puerto Ricans. Maternal age, education, trimester of prenatal care initiation, and place of residence were associated with the prevalence of low birth weight infants among Puerto Rican but not foreign-born Mexican or Central-South American mothers. In very low-income (less than $10,000/year) census tracts, Mexican and other Hispanic infants with US-born mothers had low birth weight rates of 14 and 15%, respectively. In contrast, Mexican and other Hispanic infants with foreign-born mothers who resided in these areas had low birth weight rates of 3 and 7%, respectively. In a logistic model that included only impoverished infants, the adjusted odds ratio of low birth weight for those with US-born mothers equalled 6.3 (95 percent confidence interval 2.3-16.9). The authors conclude that urban poverty is negatively associated with Hispanic birth weight only when the mother is Puerto Rican or a US-born member of another subgroup.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The safety of newborn early discharge. The Washington State experience.

CONTEXT: While early discharge of newborns following routine vaginal delivery has become common practice, its safety has not been firmly established. OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk for rehospitalization following newborn early discharge. DESIGN: Population-based, case-control study. SETTING: Washington State linked birth certificate and hospital discharge abstracts covering 310578 live births from 1991 through 1994. PATIENTS: Case patients were 2029 newborns rehospitalized in the first month of life. Control subjects were 8657 randomly selected newborns not rehospitalized and frequency matched to case patients on year of birth. Cesarean deliveries, multiple births, and births at less than 36 weeks' gestation were not included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Stratified analyses and logistic regression were performed to assess the risk for rehospitalization within a month of birth after early discharge (<30 hours after birth) compared with later discharge (30-78 hours after birth). RESULTS: Seventeen percent of newborns were discharged early. Newborns discharged early were more likely to be rehospitalized within 7 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.47), 14 days (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32), and 28 days (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25) of discharge than newborns sent home later. Subgroups at increased risk for rehospitalization following early discharge included newborns born to primigravidas (OR,1.25; 95% CI, 1.07-1.45), mothers younger than 18 years (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.79-1.91), and mothers with premature rupture of membranes (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.85-2.36). Early discharge was also associated with an increased risk of readmission for jaundice, dehydration, and sepsis. CONCLUSION: Newborns discharged home early (<30 hours after birth) are at increased risk for rehospitalization during the first month of life.

Case-Control Studies↗