PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Korolija

Publications and source records attributed to D Korolija.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Measuring health-related quality of life (QoL) after surgery is essential for decision making by patients, surgeons, and payers. The aim of this consensus conference was twofold. First, it was to determine for which diseases endoscopic surgery results in better postoperative QoL than open surgery. Second, it was to recommend QoL instruments for clinical research. METHODS: An expert panel selected 12 conditions in which QoL and endoscopic surgery are important. For each condition, studies comparing endoscopic and open surgery in terms of QoL were identified. The expert panel reached consensus on the relative benefits of endoscopic surgery and recommended generic and disease-specific QoL instruments for use in clinical research. RESULTS: Randomized trials indicate that QoL improves earlier after endoscopic than open surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), cholecystolithiasis, colorectal cancer, inguinal hernia, obesity (gastric bypass), and uterine disorders that require hysterectomy. For spleen, prostate, malignant kidney, benign colorectal, and benign non-GERD esophageal diseases, evidence from nonrandomized trials supports the use of laparoscopic surgery. However, many studies failed to collect long-term results, used nonvalidated questionnaires, or measured QoL components only incompletely. The following QoL instruments can be recommended: for benign esophageal and gallbladder disease, the GIQLI or the QOLRAD together with SF-36 or the PGWB; for obesity surgery, the IWQOL-Lite with the SF-36; for colorectal cancer, the FACT-C or the EORTC QLQ-C30/CR38; for inguinal and renal surgery, the VAS for pain with the SF-36 (or the EORTC QLQ-C30 in case of malignancy); and after hysterectomy, the SF-36 together with an evaluation of urinary and sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery provides better postoperative QoL in many clinical situations. Researchers would improve the quality of future studies by using validated QoL instruments such as those recommended here.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗
PubMed2002

Extent of oncological resection in laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery: meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is not yet wide accepted in cancer colorectal surgery. This study investigated whether the extent of anatomical resection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is equivalent to that in the open colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined reports on the results of laparoscopic or open colorectal procedures published between 1990 and 1999 and selected 35 with data on lymph node count and distal margin clearance (total of 3935 patients). There were 16 comparative studies, 6 open series, and 13 laparoscopic series of patients. Several meta-analytic models were used to evaluate the difference between open and laparoscopic surgery, including multiple-outcome random-effects models that account for correlation between multiple-outcomes. RESULTS: More lymph nodes were extracted laparoscopically (0.3-2.14 lymph nodes more); however, only for the fixed-effects single-outcome model this difference was statistically significant. The average distal margin clearance was 4.6 cm with the laparoscopic approach and 5.3 with the open approach Accounting for random variation among the studies, the estimate of this difference obtained from meta-analysis was 0.64-1.19 cm, favoring the open approach; this difference was statistically significant. The estimated within-study correlation between lymph node count and distal margin clearance was 0.26 with the open and 0.19 with the laparoscopic procedure. The estimated within-study correlation between outcomes of laparoscopic and open procedures was 0.86 for the lymph node count and 0.96 for the distal margin clearance. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that laparoscopic approach is as adequate as the conventional approach. Estimates of difference between the two therapeutic options obtained from random-effects models were more precise than those from fixed-effects models.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Partial laryngectomies].

After introduction of partial laryngectomies into the treatment of malignant larynx tumors, within a research project we analyzed symptoms, occurrence and the type of partial larynx resections for the two year period (October 1990 to September 1992). During this period of time 111 patients with malignant tumors were operated, while total laryngectomy was performed in 50 (45.0%). Laryngomicroscopy was performed in 14 patients (12.6%), and in 47 patients (42.3%) one of the partial resections of larynx was performed. Horizontal laryngectomy was performed in 25 patients (22.5%), while one of the vertical laryngectomies in 22 patients (19.8%). Concerning horizontal laryngectomies the following were performed: horizontal glossectomy, horizontal supraglottic laryngectomy and horizontal supraglottic laryngectomy spread to the tongue base, arytenoid and vocal cord. Concerning vertical laryngectomies the following were performed: hordectomy, frontal, frontolateral laryngectomy, vertical laryngectomy and hemilaryngectomy.

Adult↗