Clinical picture. Prinzmetal angina.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Koschyk.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Radio frequency catheter ablation of cardiac tissues has evolved rapidly as the standard therapy for various arrhythmias. Current mapping techniques include fluoroscopy and endocardial ECG recordings. These techniques are time-consuming and give only limited information with regard to cardiac anatomy and pathology. Moreover, fluoroscopy leads to significant radiation exposure to the patient and the operator. Intracardiac ultrasonography is a promising new technique that may improve intracardiac anatomic orientation, reduce radiation exposure, allow better control of lesion formation during radio frequency current application, and identify possible complications such as thrombus formation or perforation. Intracardiac ultrasonography systems that are presently available are limited by insufficient penetration depth and image resolution. Technical refinements are discussed that may improve the applicability of intracardiac echocardiography for electrophysiologic mapping procedures.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine the accuracy of proximal accelerating flow calculations in estimating regurgitant flow rate or volume in patients with different types of mitral valve disease. BACKGROUND: Flow acceleration proximal to a regurgitant orifice, observed with Doppler color flow mapping, is constituted by isovelocity surfaces centered at the orifice. By conservation of mass, the flow rate through each isovelocity surface equals the flow rate through the regurgitant orifice. METHODS: Forty-six adults with mitral regurgitation of angiographic grades I to IV were studied. The proximal accelerating flow rate (Q) was calculated by: Q = 2 pi r2.Vn, where pi r2 is the area of the hemisphere and Vn is the Nyquist velocity. Radius of the hemisphere (r) was measured from two-dimensional or M-mode Doppler color recording. From the M-mode color study, integration of accelerating flow rate throughout systole yielded stroke accelerating flow volume and mean flow rate. Mitral regurgitant flow rate and stroke regurgitant volume were measured by using a combination of pulsed wave Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of aortic forward flow and mitral inflow. RESULTS: The proximal accelerating flow region was observed in 42 of 46 patients. Maximal accelerating flow measured from either two-dimensional (372 +/- 389 ml/s) or M-mode (406 +/- 421 ml/s) Doppler color study tended to overestimate the mean regurgitant flow rate (306 +/- 253 ml/s, p < 0.05). Mean Doppler accelerating flow rate correlated well with mean regurgitant flow rate (r = 0.95, p < 0.001), although there was a tendency toward slight overestimation of mean regurgitant flow by mean accelerating flow in severe mitral regurgitation. However, there was no significant difference between the mean accelerating flow rate (318 +/- 304 ml/s) and the mean regurgitant flow rate (306 +/- 253 ml/s, p = NS) for all patients. A similar relation was found between accelerating flow stroke volume (78.27 +/- 62.72 ml) and regurgitant flow stroke volume (76.06 +/- 59.76 ml) (r = 0.95, p < 0.001). The etiology of mitral regurgitation did not appear to affect the relation between accelerating flow and regurgitant flow. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal accelerating flow rate calculated by the hemispheric model of the isovelocity surface was applicable and accurate in most patients with mitral regurgitation of a variety of causes. There was slight overestimation of regurgitant flow rate by accelerating flow rate when the regurgitant lesion was more severe.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether transesophageal echocardiography could clarify the nature of equivocal echodense structures in the left ventricular apical region frequently found on transthoracic echocardiography by directing the ultrasound beam from the left ventricular base to the apex and achieving better image quality. BACKGROUND: Transthoracic echocardiography often reveals an echogenic structure suggesting thrombus in the left ventricular apical region because of limited near-field resolution and echo vibration artifact in apical views. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with coronary artery disease or dilated cardiomyopathy who had apical wall motion abnormalities and equivocal transthoracic echodense structures were studied with transesophageal echocardiography using special manipulation of the transesophageal probe for adequate imaging of the apical region. Left ventricular thrombus was defined when echogenic structures with a clearly delineated margin adjacent to but distinct from the endocardium were observed in at least two different tomographic views in the four-chamber and left ventricular long-axis views during both systole and diastole. RESULTS: Left ventricular thrombus (mean size 1.3 +/- 0.7 cm2) was defined by transesophageal echocardiography in 19 (53%) of 36 patients with suspected thrombus on transthoracic echocardiography in the four-chamber or left ventricular long-axis view. Heavy trabeculation or extremely high echo reflection, or both, was observed in the apical region in 12 patients (33%). No extra structures in the apical region were found in five patients. In 19 patients with transesophageal echocardiographically defined thrombus, 6 patients (31%) experienced arterial embolic events before the transesophageal procedure. In contrast, none of 17 patients without transesophageal echocardiographically defined thrombi had systemic embolism (p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: 1) Transesophageal echocardiography is useful in identifying left ventricular apical thrombus in patients with unclear echogenic structures on transthoracic apical images; and 2) the high incidence of arterial embolism in patients with transesophageal echocardiographically detected left ventricular thrombus indicates the clinical importance of such thrombus.
Biplane transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography can image the mitral valve orifice in two orthogonal views. If the maximal stenotic jet width through the mitral valve obtained with the vertical transducer represents the major axis, the stenotic jet width dissected by the horizontal transducer should be the minor axis of the mitral orifice. Thus the mitral valve area can be calculated assuming an oval shape of mitral orifice. Nineteen patients with mitral stenosis were investigated. Maximal mitral stenotic jet width (JW1) was searched on a vertical plane and the jet width from the orthogonal view (JW2) was obtained on a horizontal plane. Mitral valve areas from the color Doppler jet widths were calculated by pi.JW1/2.JW2/2 and compared with those derived from Gorlin's formula. Adequate quality of echocardiographic images could be obtained in all patients for transesophageal color Doppler jet width measurements or Doppler pressure half-time determinations and in 16 of 19 patients for transthoracic planimetery of the mitral orifice at the parasternal short axis. Mitral valve areas derived from biplane transesophageal color Doppler imaging (1.31 +/- 0.53 cm2) were not different from those calculated according to Gorlin's formula from the catheterization data (1.25 +/- 0.50 cm2), those determined by transthoracic echocardiographic planimetery (1.38 +/- 0.5 cm2), or those calculated from the Doppler pressure half-time method (1.32 +/- 0.41 cm2) (difference not significant by analysis of variance). There was a very strong correlation between transesophageal echocardiographic mitral valve areas and those derived from catheterization data (r = 0.94; standard error of the estimate = 0.13 cm2). A similar correlation was obtained for the planimetric echocardiographic method (r = 0.94; standard error of the estimate = 0.14 cm2). A slightly less strong correlation was found between mitral valve areas derived from the Doppler pressure half-time method and those derived from Gorlin's formula (r = 0.83; standard error of the estimate = 0.24 cm2). The pressure half-time method accurately predicted the mitral valve area in most (15/19) patients, but it significantly (> 0.4 cm2) overestimated mitral valve area in two patients with aortic regurgitation and underestimated (< 0.4 cm2) mitral valve area in two patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Determination of mitral valve area by color Doppler biplane transesophageal echocardiography is an alternative for accurate estimation of mitral valve area and may be most useful in intraoperative monitoring during surgical or balloon mitral commissurotomy or in the case of inadequate imaging quality of transthoracic echocardiography.