Biomedical subjects

D L Forkey

Publications and source records attributed to D L Forkey.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons' upper extremity workload.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery may be kinder to the patient, but it is more demanding on the surgeon. Fixed trocar positions often require the surgeon to work with instruments at awkward angles to their body. We studied the effect of horizontal and vertical laparoscopic instrument working angle on the surgeon's thumb, forearm, and shoulder muscle work. METHODS: Electronyographic (EMG) signals were collected from the thenar compartment (TH), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), and deltoid (DEL) muscles of the dominant arm of eighth surgeons while they were closing a standard pistol-grip disposable laparoscopic grasper against a fixed resistance of 3 N. With the aid of a special testing bench, the instruments' position was randomly changed among 15 degrees, 45 degrees, and 75 degrees of horizontal angulation relative to the surgeons' sagital plane, and 15 degrees, 45 degrees, and 75 degrees degrees of vertical angulation relative to a horizontal plane. EMG signals were rectified and smoothed using analogue circuitry and digitally sampled at l0 Hz using a National Instruments DAQCard-700 connected to a Macintosh PowerBook 5300c running LabVIEW software. Statistical analysis was carried out by analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: The effects of vertical and horizontal working angles on the muscle effort were as follows: TH (horizontal, N.S.; vertical, N.S.), FDS (horizontal, p 45 degrees to the surgeon's sagital plane significantly increases the workload of the flexor digitorium superficialis and deltoid muscles. The deltoid muscle is also adversely affected by vertical angulation of the instrument. The instrument working angle has no effect on the thenar muscles. Whenever possible, laparoscopic surgeons should strive to place their instruments and trocars so as to minimize extreme horizontal or vertical displacement of their hands away from a resting position of comfort.

Arm↗

PubMed1999

Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Task Force on Ergonomics conducted a subjective and objective assessment of ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic instrument use. The goal was to assess the prevalence, causes, and consequences of operational difficulties associated with the use of laparoscopic instruments. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed asking respondents to rate the frequency with which they experienced pain, stiffness, or numbness in several body areas after laparoscopic operations. An ergonomics station was assembled to quantify forearm and thumb muscle workload. Processed electromyogram (EMG) signals were acquired from 27 volunteer surgeon subjects while they completed simulated surgical tasks using a hemostat and an Ethicon laparoscopic grasper, with the aid of an endoscopic trainer and video monitoring system. RESULTS: Of 149 surgeons responding to the questionnaire, 8% to 12% reported frequent pain in the neck and upper extremities associated with laparoscopic surgery. The ergonomics station demonstrated that the peak and total muscle effort of forearm and thumb muscles were significantly greater (p < 0.01) when the grasping task was performed using the laparoscopic instrument rather than the hemostat. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that laparoscopic surgical technique is more taxing on the surgeon.

Cumulative Trauma Disorders↗

PubMed1998

The Virtual Instrumentation (VI) Laboratory facilitates customized on-site ergonomic analysis of minimally invasive surgery.

Ergonomic studies are needed to understand and improve the visual and physical interface that minimally invasive surgery methods interpose between the surgeon and the operating field. We used the Virtual Instrumentation (VI) Laboratory of the Biomedical Engineering Program at California State University, Sacramento to develop a portable ergonomic analysis system to compare the physical workloads imposed on the surgeon by tradition open and laparoscopic surgery techniques. We used the system at a national surgery conference to measure electromyogram (EMG) activity from thumb and forearm muscles of volunteer subjects as they performed simulated surgical tasks using open and laparoscopic techniques. We found that EMG activity was significantly greater for the laparoscopic than for the open surgery technique, suggesting that the laparoscopic technique was more physically demanding. The portable ergonomic analysis VI system was quick to set up and convenient to use. We are using the rapid prototyping and modular design capabilities of the VI Lab to develop additional ergonomic analysis VI systems.

Electromyography↗

PubMed1998

Virtual ergonomic studies in endoscopic intervention.

Virtual instrumentation provides a strong platform for the rapid design and prototyping of biomedical instruments. Virtual instrument software written using a block diagram approach familiar to instrument designers quickly turns a personal computer into a custom biomedical instrument. The portable VIs we have developed for ergonomic analysis of video-endoscopic surgery are quick to set up and convenient to use. We have collected a large amount of ergonomic data in a short time with these VIs because of their custom design and because we can take them to sites where there are many willing surgeon-subjects. We are preparing to use these VIs in studies of actual surgery.

Endoscopes↗