PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D L McKinzie

Publications and source records attributed to D L McKinzie.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Procholinergic and memory enhancing properties of the selective norepinephrine uptake inhibitor atomoxetine.

Atomoxetine has been approved by the FDA as the first new drug in 30 years for the treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). As a selective norepinephrine uptake inhibitor and a nonstimulant, atomoxetine has a different mechanism of action from the stimulant drugs used up to now for the treatment of ADHD. Since brain acetylcholine (ACh) has been associated with memory, attention and motivation, processes dysregulated in ADHD, we investigated the effects of atomoxetine on cholinergic neurotransmission. We showed here that, in rats, atomoxetine (0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.),--increases in vivo extracellular levels of ACh in cortical but not subcortical brain regions. The marked increase of cortical ACh induced by atomoxetine was dependent upon norepinephrine alpha-1 and/or dopamine D1 receptor activation. We observed similar increases in cortical and hippocampal ACh release with methylphenidate (1 and 3 mg/kg, i.p.)--currently the most commonly prescribed medication for the treatment of ADHD--and with the norepinephrine uptake inhibitor reboxetine (3-30 mg/kg, i.p.). Since drugs that increase cholinergic neurotransmission are used in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction and dementias, we also investigated the effects of atomoxetine on memory tasks. We showed that, consistent with its cortical procholinergic and catecholamine-enhancing profile, atomoxetine (1-3 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly ameliorated performance in the object recognition test and the radial arm-maze test.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2004

Low-dose stimulatory effects of ethanol during adolescence in rat lines selectively bred for high alcohol intake.

BACKGROUND: The low-dose stimulatory effect of ethanol (EtOH) in rats has been hypothesized to reflect its hedonic effects and to be associated with a genetic predisposition toward high alcohol preference. To test the hypothesis that phenotypes associated with high alcohol preference in adulthood are also present in adolescent rats at the time of onset of alcohol drinking, the current study examined the effects of EtOH on locomotor activity (LMA) during adolescence in lines of rats selectively bred for divergent alcohol intakes. METHODS: Subjects were adolescent (31-40 days of age) rats from the alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) lines and from the high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) and low-alcohol-drinking (LAD) replicate lines. On day 1, all subjects (n = 8-10/line/gender/dose) received intraperitoneal saline injections and were placed in the activity monitor for 30 min. On day 2, subjects received intraperitoneal saline or 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, or 1.5 g EtOH/kg. RESULTS: The LMA of male and female P rats was increased with low doses (0.25-0.75 g/kg) and decreased at the highest dose (1.5 g/kg) of EtOH. Similar effects were observed with low doses of EtOH on the LMA of HAD-1 and HAD-2 rats. None of the EtOH doses stimulated LMA in the NP, LAD-1, or LAD-2 rats, although all of the low-alcohol-intake lines of rats showed decreased LMA at the highest dose of EtOH. Only the P rats among the high-alcohol-consuming lines of rats showed decreased LMA at the highest dose of EtOH. CONCLUSION: Selective breeding for high alcohol consumption seems to be associated with increased sensitivity to the low-dose stimulating effects of EtOH and reduced sensitivity to the high-dose motor-impairing effects of ethanol. The expression of these phenotypes emerges during adolescence by the age of onset of alcohol-drinking behavior.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Dysregulated hippocampal acetylcholine neurotransmission and impaired cognition in M2, M4 and M2/M4 muscarinic receptor knockout mice.

Among the five different muscarinic receptors that have been cloned and characterized, M2 and M4 receptors are localized both post- and presynaptically and are believed to have a pronounced autoreceptor role. The functional importance of these receptors in the regulation of acetylcholine release in the hippocampus and in cognitive processes was investigated by using M2 and M4 receptor single knockout (KO) as well as M2/M4 receptor double KO mice. We found profound alterations in acetylcholine homeostasis in the hippocampus of both M2- and M4-KO mice as well as of the combined M2/M4-KOs, as assessed by in vivo microdialysis. Basal acetylcholine efflux in the hippocampus was significantly increased in M4-KO and was elevated further in M2/M4-KOs. The increase in hippocampal acetylcholine induced by local administration of scopolamine was markedly reduced in M2-KO and completely abolished in M2/M4-KOs. In M2-KO and much more in M2/M4-KOs, the increase in hippocampal acetylcholine triggered by exposure to a novel environment was more pronounced both in amplitude and duration, with a similar trend observed for M4-KOs. Dysregulation of cholinergic function in the hippocampus, as it could result from perturbed autoreceptor function, may be associated with cognitive deficits. Importantly, M2- and M2/M4-KO, but not M4-KO, animals showed an impaired performance in the passive avoidance test. Together these results suggest a crucial role for muscarinic M2 and M4 receptors in the tonic and phasic regulation of acetylcholine efflux in the hippocampus as well as in cognitive processes.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2001

Cholinergic dilation of cerebral blood vessels is abolished in M(5) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knockout mice.

The M(5) muscarinic receptor is the most recent member of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor family (M(1)-M(5)) to be cloned. At present, the physiological relevance of this receptor subtype remains unknown, primarily because of its low expression levels and the lack of M(5) receptor-selective ligands. To circumvent these difficulties, we used gene targeting technology to generate M(5) receptor-deficient mice (M5R(-/-) mice). M5R(-/-) mice did not differ from their wild-type littermates in various behavioral and pharmacologic tests. However, in vitro neurotransmitter release experiments showed that M(5) receptors play a role in facilitating muscarinic agonist-induced dopamine release in the striatum. Because M(5) receptor mRNA has been detected in several blood vessels, we also investigated whether the lack of M(5) receptors led to changes in vascular tone by using several in vivo and in vitro vascular preparations. Strikingly, acetylcholine, a powerful dilator of most vascular beds, virtually lost the ability to dilate cerebral arteries and arterioles in M5R(-/-) mice. This effect was specific for cerebral blood vessels, because acetylcholine-mediated dilation of extra-cerebral arteries remained fully intact in M5R(-/-) mice. Our findings provide direct evidence that M(5) muscarinic receptors are physiologically relevant. Because it has been suggested that impaired cholinergic dilation of cerebral blood vessels may play a role in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease and focal cerebral ischemia, cerebrovascular M(5) receptors may represent an attractive therapeutic target.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2001

Elucidating the role of muscarinic receptors in psychosis.

Muscarinic receptors have been implicated in the regulation of cognition and psychosis based on pharmacological evidence from pre-clinical and clinical studies. Muscarinic agonists have shown promise in the clinic in improving cognition and reducing psychotic episodes in Alzheimer's patients. However, lack of selective muscarinic ligands has limited their use due to troublesome side effects observed at higher doses. Without selective ligands, it has been difficult to assign a specific muscarinic receptor subtype to these high order mental processes. Recent development of muscarinic receptor knockout mice has provided additional tools to investigate cognition and psychosis in behavioral assays and to determine the receptor subtypes associated with parasympathomimetic physiology. Biochemical studies indicate that the M1 receptor plays a significant role in regulating G alpha q-mediated signal transduction in the hippocampus and cortex. Behavioral studies suggest that the M4 receptor is involved in movement regulation and prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex, a measure of attention. These findings support a role for the development of M1 and M4 receptor agonists for diseases in which symptoms include cognitive impairment and psychotic behaviors.

Alzheimer Disease↗
PubMed2000

Regional heterogeneity for the intracranial self-administration of ethanol within the ventral tegmental area of female Wistar rats.

RATIONALE: Because current findings indicate that the selectively bred alcohol-preferring P line of rats self-administers 50-200 mg% ethanol (EtOH) directly into the ventral tegmental area (VTA), whereas the alcohol-nonpreferring NP line does not, it is important to determine whether unselected, common stock rats would self-administer EtOH directly into the VTA. In addition, because neuroanatomical and self-administration studies indicate that the VTA may be functionally heterogeneous, the present study was designed to determine whether there were subregional differences within the VTA for the intracranial self-administration (ICSA) of EtOH. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to employ the ICSA technique to determine whether adult female Wistar rats would self-administer EtOH directly into the VTA, and whether regional heterogeneity existed for EtOH self-infusion within the VTA. METHODS: Following surgery to implant guide cannulae aimed at either the posterior or anterior VTA, subjects were placed in standard experimental chambers equipped with an 'active lever' [fixed ratio (FR)1 schedule of reinforcement], which caused the delivery of the infusate, and an 'inactive lever', which had no programmed consequence. Subjects were assigned to groups that self-administered either artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) throughout, or 100-400 mg% EtOH for the first four sessions (acquisition), aCSF in sessions 5 and 6 (extinction), and EtOH again during session 7 (reinstatement). RESULTS: During the four acquisition sessions, rats with posterior VTA placements readily self-administered 200 mg% and 250 mg% EtOH and discriminated between the active and inactive levers. These subjects also demonstrated extinction, when aCSF was substituted for EtOH, and reinstatement when EtOH was reintroduced. Rats with posterior VTA placements self-infused 300 mg% and 400 mg% EtOH, and demonstrated lever discrimination only during the initial acquisition sessions. In contrast, rats with anterior VTA placements did not self-administer EtOH. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that EtOH is reinforcing within the posterior VTA of Wistar rats, and the VTA is a functionally heterogeneous structure with regard to EtOH reinforcement.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Effects of ethanol on startle responding in alcohol-preferring and -non-preferring rats.

The objectives of the present study were to determine (a) if differences exist between the selectively bred alcohol-preferring (P) and -non-preferring (NP) lines of rats in the acoustic startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI), and (b) the effects of ethanol on these measures. Alcohol-naïve adult female P and NP rats received a single i.p. injection of saline or ethanol (0.25, 0.5, 1. 0, or 1.5 g/kg) and were placed in the startle apparatus 10 min later. After a 5-min acclimation period, rats received five alternating trials of a startle stimulus alone (SSA) (115-dB white noise) or a PPI trial (90-dB white noise preceding a 115-dB white noise). Analysis of the ASR revealed that P rats exhibited higher startle amplitudes than did NP rats with saline injections. The 0. 5-g/kg ethanol dose reduced the startle amplitude in P, but not NP, rats. The 1.0- and 1.5-g/kg ethanol doses nearly abolished the ASR in the NP line, whereas only the highest ethanol dose had this effect in the P line. Vehicle-treated P and NP rats exhibited comparable PPI levels, but only P rats showed a significant disruption (30%) at the 0.50-g/kg ethanol dose. Neither P nor NP rats were affected by ethanol treatment at the 0.25-g/kg dose. Overall, the results suggest that: (a) the difference in baseline ASR may indicate line differences in the neurocircuitry mediating this response, possibly reflecting higher innate levels of emotional reactivity in the P line; (b) the P line may be more sensitive than the NP line to the effects of ethanol in reducing emotional reactivity; and (c) low-dose ethanol may have a greater disruptive effect on sensorimotor gating mechanisms in the P than NP rat.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed2000

Sensitivity and tolerance to the motor impairing effects of moderate doses of ethanol.

The present study assessed sensitivity and the development of tolerance to the motor impairing effects of moderate doses of ethanol, using an oscillating bar task. Adult male Wistar rats were trained for 5 consecutive days to stay on the oscillating bar for 120 s to avoid a 0.5-mA foot shock. On the 5 consecutive test days, animals were injected once a day with ethanol (ip: 1.0, 1.25, or 1.5 g/kg) and tested at 15 min intervals until recovery to the 120 s criterion. On test day 1, rats in the 1.5 g/kg group took significantly longer to recover (81+/-9 min; mean+/-S.E.M.) than did animals in the 1.25 (49+/-9 min) and 1.0 (29+/-5 min) g/kg groups. Tolerance developed to all doses by test day 3, with the 1.5, 1.25, and 1.0 g/kg groups reaching criterion in significantly shorter times (42+/-8, 31+/-5, and 18+/-2 min, respectively), as compared to test day 1. BACs associated with recovery time on test day 3, for the 1.5 g/kg group, were significantly higher than the BACs associated with recovery time on test day 1. The data suggest that the oscillating bar task can be used to measure the acute ataxic effects of ethanol, across a narrow range of moderate ethanol doses, and, as well, the development of tolerance to the motor impairing effects of these ethanol doses.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Effects of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists on daily alcohol intake under acquisition, maintenance, and relapse conditions in alcohol-preferring (P) rats.

Previous research indicated that 5-HT(3) antagonists can reduce ethanol drinking in rats, but drinking conditions and other environmental manipulations influenced the efficacy of these antagonists. The current experiments were conducted to examine the effects of the 5-HT(3) antagonists MDL 72222 (MDL) or ICS 205-930 (ICS) on 24-h ethanol (10% v/v) consumption during acquisition, maintenance, and following a period of deprivation in selectively bred high alcohol-preferring (P) male rats. In an analysis of the acquisition of ethanol consumption, daily injections of MDL (1 mg/kg; s.c.) or ICS (1 or 5 mg/kg) were administered to separate groups of P rats during the initial 10 days of ethanol exposure. To examine the maintenance of ethanol drinking, these same groups of rats were allowed access to ethanol for 21 days with no pharmacological manipulations, and were then administered either saline or the 5-HT(3) antagonist. To examine the effects of a 5-HT(3) antagonist on relapse of ethanol drinking, another group of P rats was allowed access to ethanol for 6 weeks and was then deprived of ethanol for 3 weeks. Prior to ethanol reinstatement, rats were treated chronically (seven daily injections) or acutely with MDL (1 mg/kg), saline, or received no injections. MDL (1 mg/kg) and ICS (1 or 5 mg/kg) reduced ethanol intake during acquisition (60-80%) and during maintenance drinking (35-70%) in P rats pretreated with saline during acquisition. However, in rats pretreated with MDL or ICS during acquisition, there was a significant reduction in the effectiveness of either MDL or ICS to reduce ongoing ethanol drinking. Neither acute nor chronic treatment with 1 mg/kg MDL altered the 80% increase in ethanol consumption observed on the first day of reinstatement following a 3-week deprivation period. However, in a follow-up study, acute treatment with MDL (3 mg/kg) or ICS (5 mg/kg) did prevent the 80% increase in ethanol consumption observed on the first day of reinstatement. Overall, the results suggest that 5-HT(3) receptors are involved in the acquisition and maintenance of 24-h ethanol drinking, and that neuroadaptations may occur as a result of chronic treatment with 5-HT(3) antagonists, or during prolonged alcohol deprivation, which alter the involvement of these receptors in regulating alcohol drinking in the P rat.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed2000

Alcohol deprivation effect is prolonged in the alcohol preferring (P) rat after repeated deprivations.

BACKGROUND: The alcohol deprivation effect (ADE) is a temporary increase in the ratio of ethanol/total fluid intake and the voluntary intake of ethanol solutions over baseline drinking conditions when ethanol access is reinstated after a period of alcohol deprivation. The ADE has been posited to be an animal model for alcohol craving. The current study examined the effects of initial deprivation length and number of deprivation exposures on the ADE in alcohol-preferring (P) rats. METHODS: Adult female P rats received 24-hr free-choice access to 10% (v/v) ethanol and water for 6 weeks. Rats were then randomly assigned to five groups deprived of ethanol for 0 (control), 2, 4, 6, or 8 weeks (W). All deprived groups were then given 24-hr access to ethanol for 2 weeks before being deprived of ethanol for another 2 weeks. RESULTS: After the initial ethanol deprivation period, the deprived groups displayed a similar 2-fold ADE (e.g., 4-W group; 4.6 +/- 0.5 for baseline vs. 10.5 +/- 0.3 g/kg/day for the 1st reinstatement day) during the initial 24-hr period. Ethanol consumption began to return to control levels 48 (7.1 +/- 0.4 g/kg/day) and 72 (6.4 +/- 0.4 g/kg/day) hrs later. In addition, each deprived group showed increases in the ratio of ethanol/total fluid intake upon reinstatement, and there was a tendency for sustained higher ethanol intake ratios during the first 3 postexposure days for the 4-, 6-, and 8-W groups, but only during the first 2 reinstatement days for the 2-W group. The second deprivation did not increase the magnitude of the ADE over that observed in the first deprivation during the initial 24-hr period of re-exposure, but it did prolong the duration of the ADE into the 2nd and 3rd reinstatement day for the 2-, 4-, and 6-W groups and into the 5th reinstatement day for the 8-W group. CONCLUSIONS: Equivalent robust ADEs can be seen in P rats with deprivation periods of 2-8 W, which suggests that the ADE has a rapid onset and is not affected by the durations of deprivation that were tested. The duration of the ADE was prolonged in P rats exposed to a second deprivation period, suggesting that factors associated with the ADE phenomenon could be strengthened by repeated deprivations.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed2000

The expression of an alcohol deprivation effect in the high-alcohol-drinking replicate rat lines is dependent on repeated deprivations.

BACKGROUND: The alcohol deprivation effect (ADE) is a temporary increase in the ratio of alcohol/total fluid intake and voluntary intake of ethanol (EtOH) solutions over baseline drinking conditions when EtOH access is reinstated after a period of alcohol deprivation. The ADE has been posited to be an animal model for alcohol craving. In the current study, we examined the effects of initial deprivation length and number of deprivation exposures on the ADE in the replicate lines of the high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) rats. METHODS: Adult male HAD-1 and HAD-2 rats received 24 hr free-choice access to 10% (v/v) EtOH and water for 6 weeks. Rats were then assigned to groups deprived of EtOH for 0 (control), or 2 to 8 weeks. All deprived groups were then given 24 hr access to EtOH for 2 weeks before being deprived of EtOH for another 2 weeks. This cycle of 2 weeks of access and 2 weeks of deprivation was carried out for a total of four deprivations. RESULTS: After the initial EtOH deprivation period, EtOH consumption in HAD-1 and HAD-2 rats returned to baseline levels but failed to exhibit either an early onset ADE (initial 2 hr) or prolonged ADE (24 hr). An ADE was observed in two of the four deprived groups for the HAD-1 rats (2 week and 6 week groups) and in all deprived groups for the HAD-2 rats after a second deprivation, and in all deprived groups of both lines after a third deprivation. In the HAD-2 line, but not in the HAD-1 line, the duration of the ADE was prolonged into the second reinstatement day after the fourth deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: The expression of an ADE was observed only after repeated deprivation periods in the HAD lines. The duration of the ADE was prolonged in the HAD-2 line, but not in the HAD-1 line, with repeated deprivations, which suggests a dissociation between selection for alcohol preference and the effects of repeated deprivations on the duration of the ADE.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed2000

Effects of MDL 72222, a serotonin3 antagonist, on operant responding for ethanol by alcohol-preferring P rats.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicated that, under continuous access conditions, the 5-HT3 antagonist MDL 72222 (MDL) effectively reduced ethanol drinking of alcohol-preferring P rats. However, MDL was without effect when similar doses were tested under scheduled access conditions, unless the ethanol access period was randomly presented. This study examined the effects of MDL on operant responding for ethanol and water by adult male alcohol-preferring P rats. METHODS: During the dark cycle, subjects in the first experiment were trained to respond concurrently for 15% ethanol and water on a fixed-ratio 5 (FR-5) and FR-1 schedule of reinforcement, respectively. Approximately 30 min before the 4-hr operant session, rats were injected subcutaneously (sc) with saline or MDL (1, 3, or 5 mg/kg). A second experiment tested the effects of 1 mg/kg MDL on operant responding for 15% ethanol in 1-hr sessions when operant access was given at a fixed time each day (fixed scheduled access, FSA group) or at variable time periods throughout the dark cycle (variable scheduled access, VSA group). RESULTS: In the first experiment, only the 5 mg/kg dose of MDL decreased responding for ethanol (approximately 20%) during the first 30 min of the 4-hr session. This dose also reduced total 4-hr responding for ethanol and water. In the second experiment, the 1 mg/kg dose of MDL had no effect on operant responding by the FSA group, but significantly reduced ethanol responding by the VSA group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that 5-HT3 receptors may be involved in mediating the reinforcing effects of ethanol, and that temporal-environmental cues associated with the presentation of ethanol may be one factor involved in reducing the effectiveness of 5-HT3 antagonists to attenuate ethanol intake.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed1999

Patterns of ethanol and saccharin intake in P rats under limited-access conditions.

Patterns of drinking and responding for ethanol (EtOH) and saccharin (SACC) were examined in the alcohol-preferring P rat using various limited-access paradigms. Adult female P rats (n = 10-20) were given 2-h access to EtOH (10-13% v/v) and SACC (0.0125% g/v) concurrently each day, or each solution individually on alternate days. Total 2-h SACC intake was significantly greater than EtOH under both concurrent (12+/-2 vs. 7+/-0.8 ml, p<0.05) and alternate-day access (18+/-1.6 vs. 10+/-0.5 ml) conditions. Under both conditions, however, EtOH intake (over 55% of the total) in the first 15 min was significantly greater than that of SACC (<25% of total). In an operant paradigm, total responding for EtOH (124+/-29) and SACC (114+/-7) under 2-h alternate-day conditions did not differ, but 65% of total EtOH responding occurred during the first 20 min versus less than 45% for SACC (p<0.05). Increasing response requirements (FR-1 to FR-5) did not significantly alter the total number of EtOH reinforcements, but decreased the total number of SACC reinforcements by approximately 50% (p<0.05). Increasing the EtOH concentration from 15% to 35% decreased the number of reinforcements approximately 50% but did not decrease the estimated g/kg EtOH intake. Increasing the SACC concentration from 0.0125% to 0.05%, however, nearly doubled the number of reinforcements. The greater preference for EtOH versus SACC during the initial part of the access period, together with the maintenance of EtOH intake in g/kg when the response requirements and the EtOH concentration were increased, suggests that EtOH intake is motivated by pharmacological consequences. Therefore, different motivational factors appear to underlie EtOH and SACC intake of the P rat. Furthermore, the pattern of EtOH intake and responding displayed by the P rat may be the result of a "bout-" or "binge-" like loss of control under restricted EtOH access conditions.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed1999

Voluntary ethanol drinking during the first three postnatal weeks in lines of rats selectively bred for divergent ethanol preference.

BACKGROUND: Using a procedure first developed by Hall (1979), we examined ethanol self-administration in preweanling pups from Wistar rats and in lines of rats selectively bred for divergent ethanol preference (alcohol-preferring P, alcohol-nonpreferring NP, high-alcohol-drinking HAD-1 and -2, and low-alcohol-drinking LAD-2) to determine if factors contributing to high and low alcohol intakes are present early in development. METHODS: From postnatal days 5 to 20, nondeprived male and female rat pups received 30 min daily access to either water or a 15% (v/v) ethanol solution. In each daily session, pups were placed in a heated chamber containing Kimwipes soaked with a water or ethanol solution. Pups were weighed before and after each session, and intake levels were calculated as a percentage of body weight change. RESULTS: Similar to previous reports, Wistar pups exhibited over a 2-fold higher level of ethanol ingestion than water on postnatal days 9 through 14, with ethanol intakes approaching 3 g/kg body weight. When the drinking patterns of the selected lines were examined, only the HAD replicate lines showed a comparable preference for ethanol versus water during the preweanling period. The ethanol consumption of P, NP, and LAD lines was not consistently distinguishable from water intake levels. To reveal whether early ethanol exposure would influence later ethanol drinking behavior, a subset of HAD and LAD rat pups received free-choice ethanol access upon weaning. Although the divergent ethanol preference between high- and low-alcohol-drinking lines was evident within the first 4 days of access (>4 g/kg/day for HAD; <2 g/kg/day for LAD), preweanling ethanol exposure did not alter the acquisition or maintenance of ethanol drinking in either line. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these results suggest that (a) the enhanced ethanol ingestion observed during the middle portion of the preweanling period is a robust phenomenon and generalizes across nonselected strains of rats, (b) selective breeding for divergent alcohol preference has arrested this age-specific effect in all but the HAD lines of rats, and (c) early ethanol exposure does not alter genetic dispositions for later high or low alcohol preference.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed1998

Serotonin3 receptor antagonism of alcohol intake: effects of drinking conditions.

The effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists on ethanol intake were examined in the selectively bred alcohol-preferring P line of rats under continuous and limited access to 10% (v/v) ethanol with food and water ad lib. Single daily injections of either MDL 72222 (MDL) or ICS 205-930 (ICS) (0.01-3.0 mg/kg, SC) given 60 min before a 4-h scheduled access period for 4 consecutive days failed at all doses to alter the intake of a 10% (v/v) ethanol solution by P rats. However, multiple daily injections of either MDL (1-3 mg/kg, SC) or ICS (3.0 and 5.0 mg/kg, SC), given three times daily at 4-h intervals, significantly reduced ethanol intake under 24-h free-choice conditions on the first treatment day. Additionally, a single administration of 1.0 mg/kg MDL reduced 24-h free-choice ethanol intake by approximately 50% of control values and had no effect on 24-h saccharin intake. The effects of MDL were further examined in a 2-h schedule access paradigm in which rats received the access period at the same time every day (Fixed) or randomly during the dark cycle (Variable). Although 1.0 mg/kg MDL had little effect on ethanol drinking in the Fixed group, ethanol intake was reduced by 55% of control levels in the Variable group. Overall, the data indicate that drinking conditions influence the effectiveness of 5-HT3 antagonists to reduce ethanol consumption. Furthermore, the results suggest that conditions, associated with limited access ethanol drinking, markedly reduce the actions of 5-HT3 antagonists on ethanol intake.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed1998

Quantitative autoradiography of mu-opioid receptors in the CNS of alcohol-naive alcohol-preferring P and -nonpreferring NP rats.

The densities of mu-opioid binding sites in the CNS of alcohol-naive adult male P and NP rats (N = 9 each line) were examined using quantitative autoradiography. Coronal sections (20 microm) were prepared from frozen brains and incubated in 5 nM [3H]DAMGO to label mu-opioid receptor sites. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 microM DAMGO. The amount of [3H]DAMGO binding was (a) 20-25% higher in the olfactory tubercle, nucleus accumbens shell and core, and basolateral and lateral amygdaloid nuclei; (b) 15% higher in the lateral septal intermediate nucleus and caudate-putamen patches; and (c) 10-30% lower in the pyramidal and radiatum layers in the CA1 region of the anterior dorsal hippocampus, ventral dentate gyrus and CA1 pyramidal layer of the posterior hippocampus, and posterior medial cortical amygdaloid nucleus of the P compared to the NP rat. No line differences were found in any of the other regions examined (e.g., the cerebral cortical subregions and layers, thalamic nuclei, ventral tegmental area, ventral pallidum, lateral hypothalamus, other regions of the hippocampus, and several subcortical structures). The innate differences in the amount of binding to mu-opioid recognition sites in certain limbic structures, such as the nucleus accumbens, amygdala, and olfactory tubercle, of the P and NP lines may be factors contributing to their disparate alcohol drinking characteristics.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed1998

Ontogenetic differences in the expression of conditioned stimulus conditioning: effects of retention interval.

Preweanling 17-day-old rats were tested for retention of the conditioned emotional response after a 5-min or 24-hr retention interval. For a variety of conditioning parameters (i.e., variation in conditioned stimulus modality, unconditioned stimulus intensity, number of training trials), conditioned responding was consistently weaker after 5 min than after 24 hr. This apparent "incubation," or "hypermnesic," effect was not found in adult rats, even when comparable conditioning levels were indicated on the 24-hr test. The transient short-term retention deficit observed in 17-day-old preweanlings was alleviated by placing the pup in its home cage during the 5-min retention interval or by extending the conditioning session. Fifteen-day-old rat pups did not benefit from home cage exposure or extended training and displayed the transient short-term retention deficit regardless. The results are discussed in terms of age-related effects on time-dependent memory consolidation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗