PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D L Palenzona

Publications and source records attributed to D L Palenzona.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Autoaggregation and adhesion ability in a Bifidobacterium suis strain.

On the basis of autoaggregation ability, two different phenotypes (Agg+ and Agg-) were selected from a strain (BSu895) of Bifidobacterium suis. The relationship between autoaggregation and adhesion of bacteria to intestinal tissue was investigated by observing the adhesivity of the two phenotypic variants to ileum and colon tissue pieces collected from six new-born piglets. The results suggest that there is a good relationship between autoaggregation and adhesion as variant Agg+ (autoaggregating) has a stronger adhesion ability than Agg- (non-autoaggregating).

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Modification of muscle proteins IEF patterns in a fish Lebistes reticulatus, related to diet, immunization and genetic selection.

The effects of some environmental and genetic factors on the isoelectric focusing (IEF) patterns of muscle proteins from a fish Lebistes reticulatus (Cyprinodonts) were investigated. Of two diets applied the restricted one resulted in a loss of bands in the IEF patterns of the treated fishes muscle homogenate. Instead immunization gave an increase in both number and intensity of IEF bands in (4.0-6.0; 7.0-7.9) pH ranges which are typical of immunoglobulins. Lastly IEF patterns from random and assortative mating animals were compared, resulting in loss of IEF-bands in the inbred lines. Results showed that IEF of muscle proteins could be an excellent method to evaluate the response by fish phenotypes to environmental or genetic factors.

Animals↗
PubMed1973

Differential response to selection on the two sexes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Artificial selection for short wing was performed in two Drosophila melanogaster populations with partially different gene pools: the C populations were derived from a Canton stock while the H lines were derived from a cross between Canton and a b, cn, vg strain. It is shown that in both populations selection on females (CF, HF) was more effective than selection on males (CM, HM). This difference cannot be explained in terms of differences in additive genetic variability between the two sexes because: (1) both sexes contribute to the genetic variability utilized by selection applied to one sex only, and (2) switching selection pressure on females in the M lines does not result in a response comparable to that obtained in the F populations; this rules out almost completely recombination as the responsible agent for the differences between the selection limits reached by M and F selections.-These results, together with several additional observations concerning sexual dimorphism, fitness and the effect of natural selection, suggest that a complex interaction should be involved in the differential response of M and F lines, controlling the wing length phenotype.

Animals↗