PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D L Storer

Publications and source records attributed to D L Storer.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Out-of-hospital administration of mannitol to head-injured patients does not change systolic blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of out-of-hospital mannitol administration on systolic blood pressure (BP) in the head-injured multiple-trauma patient. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial involving a university-based helicopter air medical service and level-1 trauma center hospital. Endotracheally intubated head-trauma victims with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores < 12 were enrolled from November 22, 1991, to November 20, 1992, if evaluated by the participating aeromedical transport team within 6 hours of injury. Patients were excluded if they were < 18 years old, had already received mannitol or another diuretic, were potentially pregnant, or were receiving CPR. All patients were intubated prior to study drug (mannitol [1 g/kg] or normal saline) use. Pulse and BP were measured every 15 minutes for 2 hours following study drug administration. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were enrolled. After exclusion of 3 patients who did not meet all inclusion criteria, there were 20 patients in the mannitol group and 21 patients in the placebo group. The groups were similar at baseline in age, pulse, systolic BP (baseline mannitol: 124 +/- 47 mm Hg; placebo: 128 +/- 32 mm Hg), GCS score, and Injury Severity Scale score. Systolic BP did not change significantly throughout the observation period in either group. This study had 83% power to detect a mean systolic BP drop to < 90 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: Out-of-hospital administration of mannitol did not significantly change systolic BP in this group of head-injured multiple-trauma patients.

Adult↗

Differences in air ambulance patient mix demonstrated by physiologic scoring.

Severity of illness or injury should be the primary justification for aeromedical transport. To determine whether differences in patient severity were detectable in air transport programs, helicopter-transported patients were examined by three established physiologic scores: the Trauma Score, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Score, and the Rapid Acute Physiology Score. These scores were obtained prospectively on 1,868 consecutive patient transfer requests from six air medical services for periods ranging from two to six months. A patient meeting strict physiologic criteria was considered critically ill. Overall, 42.6% of the patients (range, 34.8% to 53.3%) were considered critically ill. Patients transported from inpatient hospital units and patients with cardiac disease were less likely to be critically ill than those transported emergently from scenes of accident or from emergency departments. There were also significant differences between programs with regard to the percentage of critically ill patients transported. This study suggests that physiologic scoring may be useful in comparing air ambulance programs and that a majority of patients transported by these services may not be critically ill.

Aircraft↗

APACHE II scoring in the injured patient.

The purpose of this study was to measure the predictive power of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) with respect to mortality in a group of seriously injured patients and to compare this predictive power with that of the Trauma Score (TS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS). Six hundred ninety-one helicopter-transported patients were studied. Individual logistic regressions demonstrated that all three scores had significant predictive power when considered individually (TS chi 2 = 136, p less than .0001; APACHE II chi 2 = 171, p less than .0001; ISS chi 2 = 109, p less than .0001). In addition, each severity score added significantly to the predictive power in a stepwise logistic regression (TS chi 2 = 15, p less than .0001; APACHE II chi 2 = 45, p less than .0001; ISS chi 2 = 15, p less than .0001). Areas under the receiver operating curves for the three scores were not significantly different (TS 0.8116, SD 0.0245; APACHE II 0.8515, SD 0.0204; ISS 0.7967; SD 0.0223). APACHE II is a good predictor of mortality, and its predictive power is complemented by TS and ISS.

Adolescent↗

Rapid acute physiology scoring in transport systems.

A multi-institutional study was undertaken to define the predictive power for mortality of the Rapid Acute Physiology Score (RAPS) in a large and diverse group of transported patients. RAPS is a truncated version of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score that uses definitions and weighting consistent with APACHE II, but is modified to provide a consistent score just before transport, just after transport, and to use the most deranged (worst) physiologic values during the initial 4 h after arrival at the receiving hospital. During an 8-month period, 1,927 patients transported by six helicopter emergency medical service programs were studied. Over 97% (1,881) of the patients had RAPS obtained before and after transport to the receiving hospital and 92.6% (1,785) had APACHE II scoring completed after hospital admission. Receiver operating curves demonstrate similar predictive power for RAPS and APACHE II (both based on the most deranged physiologic values during the initial 24 h after admission). Before- and after-transport RAPS were also highly predictive of mortality. RAPS appears to be a reliable and highly predictive measure of patient severity/physiologic stability before and after transport to critical care.

Adult↗

Prehospital use of neuromuscular blocking agents in a helicopter ambulance program.

We prospectively studied the use of succinylcholine chloride and pancuronium bromide by the physician/nurse flight team of our hospital-based helicopter ambulance service. Patients who received these agents at the scene of an accident (prehospital group, n = 39) were compared with patients who were paralyzed by the flight team in the emergency department of transferring hospitals (control group, n = 35). By protocol, succinylcholine was used primarily for endotracheal intubation and pancuronium for prolonged paralysis after endotracheal intubation. Seventy-four patients received one or both agents. Overall, 61 of 74 patients had intracranial pathology as their primary diagnosis (82%). Endotracheal intubation was the primary indication for paralysis in the majority of patients (67 of 74), although intracranial pressure control, ventilation, agitation control, and seizure control were frequent secondary indications. Prior intubation attempts had failed in 40 of 74 patients (54%). After paralysis, intubation was successful in 68 of 71 patients (96%). Serious complications (ie, dysrhythmia requiring drug therapy) occurred in three patients but resolved with appropriate therapy in each case. Minor complications (ie, dysrhythmia not requiring drug therapy, histamine flush, infiltrated IV line) occurred in 18 patients. There was no significant difference in successful intubation or complication rate between the prehospital and control group. Paralysis allowed airway stabilization in a significant number of critically ill patients who could not otherwise be endotracheally intubated, with a lower incidence of complications than has been previously reported for ED patients. These results suggest that neuromuscular blocking agents can be used safely and effectively at accident scenes by a physician/nurse team.

Adolescent↗