PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

D L Waltz

Publications and source records attributed to D L Waltz.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Automatic derivation of substructures yields novel structural building blocks in globular proteins.

Because the general problem of predicting the tertiary structure of a globular protein from its sequence is so difficult, researchers have tried to predict regular substructures, known as secondary structures, of proteins. Knowledge of the position of these structures in the sequence can significantly constrain the possible conformations of the protein. Traditional protein secondary structures are alpha-helices, beta-sheets, and coil. Secondary structure prediction programs have been developed, based upon several different algorithms. Such systems, despite their varied natures, are noted for their universal limit on prediction accuracy of about 65%. A possible cause for this limit is that traditional secondary structure classes are only a coarse characterization of local structure in proteins. This work presents the results of an alternative approach where local structure classes in proteins are derived using neural network and clustering techniques. These give a set of local structure categories, which we call Structural Building Blocks (SBBs), based upon the data itself, rather than a priori categories imposed upon the data. Analysis of SBBs shows that these categories are general classifications, and that they account for recognized helical and strand regions, as well as novel categories such as N- and C-caps of helices and strands.

Cluster Analysis

Hybrid system for protein secondary structure prediction.

We have developed a hybrid system to predict the secondary structures (alpha-helix, beta-sheet and coil) of proteins and achieved 66.4% accuracy, with correlation coefficients of C(coil) = 0.429, C alpha = 0.470 and C beta = 0.387. This system contains three subsystems ("experts"): a neural network module, a statistical module and a memory-based reasoning module. First, the three experts independently learn the mapping between amino acid sequences and secondary structures from the known protein structures, then a Combiner learns to combine automatically the outputs of the experts to make final predictions. The hybrid system was tested with 107 protein structures through k-way cross-validation. Its performance was better than each expert and all previously reported methods with greater than 0.99 statistical significance. It was observed that for 20% of the residues, all three experts produced the same but wrong predictions. This may suggest an upper bound on the accuracy of secondary structure predictions based on local information from the currently available protein structures, and indicate places where non-local interactions may play a dominant role in conformation. For 64% of the residues, at least two experts were the same and correct, which shows that the Combiner performed better than majority vote. For 77% of the residues, at least one expert was correct, thus there may still be room for improvement in this hybrid approach. Rigorous evaluation procedures were used in testing the hybrid system, and statistical significance measures were developed in analyzing the differences among different methods. When measured in terms of the number of secondary structures (rather than the number of residues) that were predicted correctly, the prediction produced by the hybrid system was also better than those of individual experts.

Amino Acid Sequence