PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Lorusso

Publications and source records attributed to D Lorusso.

62 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Duodenogastric reflux, histology and cell proliferation of the gastric mucosa before and six months after cholecystectomy.

In order to evaluate the effects that an increase in duodenogastric reflux (DGR) has on the mucosal cell proliferation of the non-operated stomach, we made a prospective study on 13 patients (9 female and 4 male, mean age 52 years) both before and 6 months after cholecystectomy, an operation which determines a significant increase in DGR with an intact pyloric sphincter. DGR was evaluated by measuring total intragastric bile acids (dosed by an enzymatic method), and single intragastric bile acids (dosed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography) and it was expressed as Fasting Bile Reflux (FBR) in mumol/h. Gastric cell proliferation was evaluated by measuring (by High Performance Liquid Chromatography) polyamine (putrescine, spermidine and spermine) levels in biopsy specimens taken from the antrum and gastric body. The histology of the antrum and gastric body was also evaluated. After cholecystectomy, there was a significant increase in DGR (delta = 39.23 mumol/h, 95% C.L. 11.69-136.22, sign-test for matched pairs p = 0.0003). The tissue concentration of putrescine in the antrum increased significantly (delta = 8.36 mumol/g of tissue, 95% C.L. 0.34-18.01, sign-test for matched pairs p = 0.013) and there was a worsening of histological findings in the antrum (preoperative chronic atrophic gastritis rate 38.5%, postoperative 69%). In the body there were no significant variations either in polyamine levels or in histology. The increase in DGR and in putrescine concentrations in the antrum were associated negatively (Spearman's rank -0.64, 95% C.L. -0.88 to -0.14).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Asymptomatic gallstones. What to do in patients undergoing colonic surgery for cancer?

Twenty-three patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal cancer in our hospital between 1983 and 1989, underwent concomitant cholecystectomy for asymptomatic gallstones. In order to assess whether additional cholecystectomy increases postoperative morbidity and mortality, a comparison was made between these cases and 23 controlled patients (without gallstones) matched for sex, age (+/- 3 years), Dukes stage and type of primary colonic surgery. The duration of postoperative stay was similar in the two groups (14.1 +/- 4.5 days vs 12.4 +/- 2.3 days). Postoperative complications were more frequent among the case patients than among the controls (34.8% vs 8.7%, p = 0.04), and the same was true for the mortality (8.7% vs 0%). During the same period, another 11 patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis were operated on for colorectal cancer but in these patients gallstones were left in place. Two of the patients died postoperatively and only one of the remaining 9 (11.2%) had an episode of biliary pain. The results of our study would suggest that in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer the risk entailed in carrying out an additional cholecystectomy for asymptomatic gallstones is greater than the risk of future morbidity caused by gallstones left in place.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Complications after elective gastric resection for duodenal ulcer. Multivariate analysis of risk factors.

The records of 545 consecutive patients, who underwent elective Billroth II gastric resection for pyloric or duodenal ulcer were examined retrospectively to identify a group of high-risk patients for life threatening postoperative complications or death. Thirty-two preoperative clinical, endoscopic, surgical and haematological variables were analyzed by stepwise logistic regression. Major complications occurred in 39 patients (7%) and eight patients (1.5%) died. The patient characteristics associated with the major complications and death were liver cirrhosis (Odds ratio 6.7 95% Confidence interval 1.3-33.8), white blood cell count > 10,000/mm3 (Odds ratio 5.5 95% Confidence interval 1.7-17.3), previous abdominal surgery (Odds ratio 4.6 95% Confidence interval 1.7-12.1), and ulcer penetrating contiguous structures (Odds ratio 3.3 95% Confidence interval 1.2-8.9). There was no statistically significant interaction between the above risk factors in causing complications or death. It can be concluded that even if only one of these four risk factors is present in patients undergoing elective surgery for duodenal ulcer a riskless technique, such as proximal gastric vagotomy, should be used instead of Billroth II gastric resection.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Morbidity after video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cholelithiasis associated with liver cirrhosis. A case-control study].

At present laparoscopic cholecystectomy represents the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Authors performed a retrospective case-control study to evaluate whether cirrhosis associated with cholelithiasis increases the risk for morbidity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Twenty-one patients with cholelithiasis and cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A or B) (group A) and 21 controls with cholelithiasis without cirrhosis (group B) entered the study. Controls were paired with cases for age, sex, and indication for cholecystectomy (simple cholelithiasis, acute cholecystitis). The two groups were compared for rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy (19% group A vs 9.5% group B; p = 0.31), morbidity (29.5% group A vs 5.3% group B; p = 0.17), median length of surgery (80 m in the two groups), and median time of postoperative hospitalization (5 days group A vs 3 days group B; p = 0.21). No difference among variables resulted to be statistically significant. Besides, neither common bile duct injuries nor intra or postoperative hemorrhages occurred in patients with cirrhosis. Authors conclude that the laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be considered a safe and effective surgical procedure also for patients with cholelithiasis associated with cirrhosis with a good residual hepatic function.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Does previous gastric resection increase the risks of laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study].

BACKGROUND: Videolaparocholecystectomy is now regarded as the elective surgical technique for the treatment of cholelithiasis. AIMS: In order to evaluate the feasibility and risks of videolaparocholecystectomy in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery the authors performed a retrospective case-control study in a group of 15 patients with cholelithiasis who had previously undergone gastrectomy for peptic ulcer (group A) and a control group of 15 patients with cholelithiasis who had not undergone upper abdominal surgery (group B). METHODS: The control group was matched with the case group for age, sex, surgeon, indications for cholecystectomy (simple cholelithiasis, acute cholecystitis). The following parameters were compared in both groups: laparotomic conversion rate (33% in group A vs 20% in group B; p = 0.317), postoperative complications (0% in group A vs 13% in group B, p = 0.157), reoperations (0% in group A vs 13% in group B, p = 0.157), duration of surgery (median of 78 minutes in group A vs 80 minutes in group B; p = 1.000), duration of postoperative hospital stay (mean of 3 days in group A vs 3.5 days in group B, p = 0.507). RESULTS: None of the differences between the variables examined was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The authors, conclude that videolaparocholecystectomy can be regarded as a safe and effective surgical technique for the treatment of cholelithiasis also in patients who have undergone previous upper abdominal surgery.

Aged↗