PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Lyons

Publications and source records attributed to D Lyons.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Effect of the non peptide angiotensin II antagonist, GR117289C on the vasoconstrictor actions of angiotensin II in the human forearm.

AIMS: GR117289C is a non peptide, selective angiotensin (AT1) receptor antagonist. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this agent, given orally, could attenuate the vasoconstrictor effects of angiotensin II(AII) infused locally into the forearm circulation in man. METHODS: Eight healthy male subjects were studied on four occasions in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. Five hours (approximate time of peak dynamic effect) following dosing with GR117289C (300 mg, 100 mg, 10 mg or placebo), A II was infused in incremental doses (0, 0.1, 0.4, 1.6, 6.2, 25 and 100 pmol min-1) into the left brachial artery, each for 10 min. Forearm blood flow was measured using venous occlusion plethysmography. RESULTS: GR117289C inhibits the vasoconstrictor effects of A II in a dose dependent manner. The active treatment: placebo ratios of forearm blood flow in the infused arm during the highest dose of AII (100 pmol min-1) were: GR117289C 10 mg, 1.12 (95% C.I. 0.81-1.55; P = 0.478), 100 mg, 1.43 (95% C.I. 1.01-2.01; P = 0.042) and 300 mg, 1.62 (95% C.I. 1.17-2.24; P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in blood pressure between each of the treatment groups and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: GR117289C is a pharmacologically active, oral A II antagonist in healthy men.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Cocaine alters cerebral metabolism within the ventral striatum and limbic cortex of monkeys.

The functional consequences of acute cocaine administration in nonhuman primates were assessed using the quantitative 2-[14C]deoxyglucose method. Local rates of cerebral metabolism were determined after an intravenous infusion of 1.0 mg/kg cocaine or vehicle in six awake cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) trained to sit calmly in a primate chair. Cocaine administration decreased glucose utilization in a discrete set of structures that included both cortical and subcortical portions of the limbic system. Glucose metabolism in the core and shell of the nucleus accumbens was decreased markedly, and smaller decrements were observed in the caudate and anterior putamen. In addition, cocaine administration produced significant decreases in limbic cortex. Metabolism was decreased in orbitofrontal cortex (areas 11, 12o, 13, 13a, 13b), portions of the gyrus rectus including area 25, entorhinal cortex, and parts of the hippocampal formation. The cortical regions in which functional activity was altered provide dense projections to the nucleus accumbens, and the decreased activity in these projections may be responsible in part of the large alterations in functional activity within the ventral striatum. Decreased metabolism also was evident in the anterior nuclear group of the thalamus, raphe nuclei, and locus ceruleus. The acute cerebral metabolic effects of cocaine in the conscious macaque, therefore, were contained primarily within a set of interconnected limbic regions, including ventral prefrontal cortex, medial temporal regions, the ventral striatal complex, and anterior thalamus. The decreased rates of glucose metabolism reported here resemble decrements found using positron emission tomography in humans. In the rat, by contrast, metabolic activity increased and changes were focused in subcortical regions. The present results represent an important expansion of the neural circuitry on which cocaine acts in the monkey as compared with the rat, and this in turn implies that cocaine affects a broader spectra of behaviors in primates than in rodents.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of two fluorine-18 labeled benzamide derivatives that bind reversibly to dopamine D2 receptors: in vitro binding studies and positron emission tomography.

The purpose of the present set of studies was to characterize, in vitro and in vivo, two benzamide analogues, 2,3-dimethoxy-N-[1-(4-fluorobenzyl)piperidin4yl]benzamide (MBP) and 4'-fluoroclebopride (FCP), for studying dopamine D2 receptors with Positron Emission Tomography (PET). In vitro binding studies were conducted to determine the affinities of MBP and FCP to the three subtypes of dopamine D2 receptors: D2(long), D3, and D4 receptors. MBP was found to have a high affinity (Ki = 1-8 nM) for all three subtypes of the D2 receptor, whereas FCP had nanomolar affinity (Ki approximately 5.5 nM) for D2(long) and D3 receptors, and a lower affinity for D4 receptors (Ki = 144 nM). In vitro binding studies also revealed that MBP had a relatively high affinity for rho1 receptors (Ki = 11 nM) compared to FCP (Ki = 340 nM). PET imaging studies were conducted in rhesus monkeys with the fluorine-18 labeled analogues of each compound. Both [18F]MBP and [18F]FCP displayed reversible binding kinetics during the 3 h time course of PET. [18F]FCP was found to have a higher basal ganglia:cerebellum ratio and lower variability in the rate of washout from D2 receptors in vivo relative to [18F]MBP. Neither radiotracer was found to produce radiolabeled metabolites capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier. The high rho1 binding affinity and low basal ganglia:cerebellum ratio of [18F]MBP indicate that this ligand may not be suitable for quantitative studies of D2 receptors. The results from the in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that [18F]FCP is a promising ligand for studying D2 receptors with PET.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Isolation and characterization of human tissue kallikrein produced in Escherichia coli: biochemical comparison to the enzymatically inactive prokallikrein and methionyl kallikrein.

This report describes bacterial expression, isolation, and characterization of human tissue kallikrein recombinantly produced in Escherichia coli. Successful production of enzymatically active recombinant human kallikrein requires the following processes: expression, solubilization and refolding of prokallikrein, thermolysin activation, and chromatographic separation. All experimental data confirmed that bacterially derived human kallikrein is properly folded and exhibits expected biochemical functions. As confirmed by SDS-PAGE and reverse-phase HPLC, recombinant kallikrein is apparently pure and is devoid of reduced or other partially folded kallikrein forms. Recombinant kallikrein behaves as a monomeric molecule in solution and exhibits full enzymatic activity in hydrolyzing peptide substrates. The molecule can bind to aprotinin to form kallikrein-inhibitor complex at a 1:1 molar ratio. Peptide mapping analysis derived from pepsin digestion of recombinant kallikrein assigned five disulfide bonds which match those of porcine kallikrein predicted from X-ray structure. Peptides containing unpaired cysteines or mispaired disulfide bonds were not detected. Both properly folded prokallikrein and methionyl kallikrein, containing a propeptide and an initiator methionine at their N-termini, respectively, were also produced and isolated. These two molecules are structurally similar to recombinant kallikrein, but are not enzymatically active.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1996

Indomethacin does not attenuate the hypotensive effect of trandolapril.

This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study to determine if indomethacin attenuates the hypotensive effect of trandolapril. Twenty-three hypertensive patients (diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95-115) requiring NSAID were recruited. Seventeen completed the study. Three week treatment periods: trandolapril 2 mg od and indomethacin 25 mg tds, trandolapril 2 mg and placebo, indomethacin and placebo, placebo and placebo. Clinic and ambulatory BP after 3 weeks of each treatment. Study had 85% power to detect a 5 mm Hg difference in BP (s.d. 7 mm Hg). End of treatment clinic BPs were: 152.9/98 mm Hg (95% CI 147.2, 158.6/95.8, 101.4) with placebo and placebo; 150.4/94.9 mm Hg (95% CI 144.7, 156.1/92.1, 97.7) with trandolapril and indomethacin; 148.2/96.5 mm Hg (95% CI 142.5, 153.9/93.7, 99.3) with trandolapril and placebo; and 156.6/97.4 mm Hg (95% CI 150.9, 162.3/94.6, 100.2) with indomethacin and placebo. There were no significant interactions between trandolapril and indomethacin for clinic systolic BP (SBP) (P = 0.79) or clinic DBP (P = 0.87). When trandolapril treatments (placebo or with indomethacin) were compared to treatments without trandolapril (placebo or indomethacin), trandolapril lowered clinic SBP by 5.4 mm Hg (P = 0.047) and DBP by 2.3 mm Hg (P = 0.08). Mean ambulatory BP was: 140.6/88.2 mm Hg (trandolapril and placebo); 142.8/89.7 mm Hg (trandolapril and indomethacin); 149.6/95.0 mm Hg, (indomethacin and placebo); 147.7/94.0 mm Hg (placebo and placebo). Compared with placebo, trandolapril and placebo lowered BP by 6.5/7.5 mm Hg (P < 0.001, SBP; P < 0.001, DBP). Compared with indomethacin, trandolapril and indomethacin lowered BP by 5.0/5.5 mm Hg (P = 0.001, SBP; P < 0.001, DBP). In the present study trandolapril 2 mg lowered clinic SBP and ambulatory BP, but indomethacin did not attenuate this. Indomethacin had no significant effect on either clinic or ambulatory BP. The antihypertensive effects of trandolapril in this study were modest. Patient selection factors may have contributed to the observed responses, but it seems unlikely from these data that a clinically important drug interaction has occurred.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Benefits of placebos.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1995

Angiotensin II. Adrenergic sympathetic constrictor action in humans.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II (Ang II) facilitates adrenergic neurotransmission in normotensive and hypertensive subjects, whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to depress circulating catecholamine concentrations in some studies. We investigated the effect of local intra-arterial infusion of Ang II into the brachial artery of healthy volunteers during blockade of postsynaptic alpha-receptors with phentolamine. The response was compared with that seen with Ang II infused during nitroprusside administration at a dose designed to give a dilator response similar to that with phentolamine. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ang II (6.25, 25, and 100 pmol/min) was infused alone and then together with sodium nitroprusside (4 micrograms/min) and phentolamine (40 micrograms/min) in eight healthy volunteers. Forearm blood flow was measured by strain-gauge plethysmography. The percentage reduction in forearm blood flow produced by Ang II 100 pmol/min in the phentolamine-predilated vascular bed was significantly lower than that seen in the sodium nitroprusside-predilated forearm bed (28.1 +/- 2.9% versus 52.9 +/- 4.2%; P = .006). Comparison of the rate of change of blood flow in response to quadrupling doses of Ang II during blockade of alpha-receptors with phentolamine and during nitroprusside administration was calculated from the mean slope of the regression line of log-transformed blood flow versus dose of Ang II. The mean slope during nitroprusside administration (-0.16 +/- 0.025) was significantly greater than that during blockade with phentolamine (-0.098 +/- 0.020) (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a significant part of the vasoconstrictive action of exogenous Ang II on forearm resistance vessels in humans is sympathetically mediated.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Conflict of interest in academia.

Conflict of interest in academia has been increasingly recognized over the past decade. Yet, comparatively little is written in respect to this problem. The authors provide an overview of conflict of interest as it applies to nursing research and addresses how it can also affect practice and education. Resources for the development of guidelines to prevent conflicts of interest are presented.

Biomedical Research↗
PubMed1994

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition does not affect response to exogenous angiotensin II in the forearm of mild-moderate hypertensive patients.

It has been proposed that the suppression of endogenous levels of angiotensin II by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, may result in up-regulation of vascular AT1 receptors. This study evaluated the effects of orally administered enalapril on angiotensin II induced vasoconstriction in the human forearm of patients with mild-moderate hypertension. Patients received in random order, enalapril (20 mg) or matched placebo daily for 2 weeks. Forearm blood flow response to increasing doses of angiotensin II was measured using venous occlusion plethysmography at the beginning of the study and at the end of each 2 week treatment period. Treatment with enalapril significantly reduced plasma angiotensin II levels and supine blood pressure compared to placebo. The percentage reductions in forearm blood flow in the infused arm, in response to the maximum dose of angiotensin II (50 pmol.min-1) were 53.2% at baseline, 51.4% on placebo and 59.5% on enalapril. The differences were not significantly different. This study demonstrates that suppression of plasma angiotensin II does not enhance the response to exogenous intra-arterial angiotensin II in the human forearm of mild-moderately hypertensive patients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

Drug treatment: present and future.

The objectives of drug therapy--present and future--for the treatment of raised blood pressure are to prevent the morbid and fatal events which arise in individual patients as a consequence of poorly controlled levels of elevated systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure. The target levels of blood pressure require to be achieved without adverse effects at an affordable cost, over a prolonged period of years. The factors affecting the choice of drugs in such patients include the 'profiling' of the blood pressure to assess the severity of the hypertension, associated diseases and risk factors, concurrent therapy, inter-individual variations in response between patients and cost-effectiveness.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1994

An assessment of lacidipine and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension.

1. The aim of this randomised, double-blind four way crossover study was to assess the interaction between the new calcium antagonist, lacidipine and atenolol, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. 2. Sitting blood pressure at 4 h post-dosing with lacidipine (4 mg) and atenolol (100 mg) alone was significantly lower compared with placebo (137/89 +/- 3/3 mmHg; 142/89 +/- 5/3 mmHg; and 154/98 +/- 5/3 mmHg respectively; P < 0.001). Co-administration of both drugs produced a significant additive effect compared with atenolol and lacidipine alone (124/80 +/- 4/2 mmHg; P < 0.002). 3. Heart rate on treatment with lacidipine alone was significantly greater at 4 h compared with placebo (86 +/- 1 beats min-1 and 74 +/- 2 beats min-1 respectively; P < 0.001). When both drugs were used in combination, there was a significant decrease in pulse rate compared with lacidipine alone (58 +/- 1 beats min-1 and 86 +/- 1 beats min-1 respectively; P < 0.001). 4. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed the statistically significant reduction in blood pressure on co-dosing (120/82 +/- 10/2 mmHg) compared with lacidipine (140/92 +/- 5/3 mmHg) and atenolol (146/90 +/- 6/3 mmHg) given alone (P < 0.05). 5. Lacidipine alone produced a significant exercise tachycardia compared with atenolol alone and the atenolol/lacidipine combination (97 +/- 8 beats min-1; 65 +/- 4 beats min-1 and 75 +/- 7 beats min-1 respectively; P < 0.001). Exercise tolerance was not adversely affected by the co-administration of both lacidipine and atenolol.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Colestipol at varying dosage intervals in the treatment of moderate hypercholesterolaemia.

1. Bile acid sequestrants such as colestipol are effective lipid lowering agents but have a poor reputation for tolerability particularly when administered at the originally recommended doses. We have investigated a low dosage regimen with varying dosage intervals in order to assess efficacy and tolerability. 2. This double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study was conducted to investigate the effect of varying administration schedules of colestipol (10 g daily), against placebo in reducing LDL cholesterol levels in patients with moderate hypercholesterolaemia on the American Heart Association step 1 diet. 3. Colestipol or matched placebo, was administered as 5 g twice daily (COL am/pm) or 10 g once daily in the morning (COL am) or evening (COL pm) at fixed times with meals. 4. All 98 patients who entered the initial 16 week dietary phase, subsequently entered the 12 week active treatment phase and were randomised to placebo or active treatment and to one of the three treatment schedules. Fasting lipid profiles were performed every 4 weeks during both phases. 5. All active treatments significantly reduced LDL and total cholesterol compared with placebo (COL am: 17% and 10%, COL pm: 18% and 10%, COL am/pm: 19% and 12% (P = 0.0001)). HDL cholesterol rose significantly with COL am (5% (P = 0.021)) and COL am/pm (7% (P = 0.002)) when compared with placebo while a marginal increase was seen with COL pm (4% (P = 0.063)). Colestipol tended to increase serum triglyceride concentrations but the changes were not significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition does not affect the response to exogenous angiotensin II in the human forearm.

Suppression of endogenous levels of angiotensin II by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, may result in up-regulation of vascular AT1 receptors. We have evaluated the effects of orally administered enalapril on angiotensin II induced vasoconstriction in the human forearm. Subjects received in random order, enalapril (20 mg) or matched placebo daily for 2 weeks. Forearm blood flow response to increasing doses of angiotensin II was measured using venous occlusion plethysmography at the beginning of the study and at the end of each 2 week treatment period. Treatment with enalapril significantly reduced plasma angiotensin II levels and supine blood pressure compared with placebo. The percentage reductions in forearm blood flow in the infused arm, in response to the maximum dose of angiotensin II (50,000 fmol min-1) were 48.1 +/- 3.6% at baseline, 57.5 +/- 3.6% on placebo and 54.5 +/- 4.2% on enalapril. The differences were not significantly different. This demonstrates that suppression of plasma angiotensin II for a 14 day period does not enhance the response to exogenous intra-arterial angiotensin II in the human forearm of healthy salt replete subjects.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

Systemic hypersensitivity reaction to intravesical BCG.

BCGosis is a recognised complication of intravesical BCG immunotherapy for superficial bladder carcinoma. We present here a case of granulomatous hepatitis, pneumonitis and probable pericarditis resulting from an hypersensitivity reaction to intravesical BCG.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

The effect of antihypertensive therapy on responsiveness to local intra-arterial NG-monomethyl-L-arginine in patients with essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: The nitric oxide (NO) system is abnormal in essential hypertension and the response of the forearm vascular bed to local intra-arterial infusions of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) is diminished in patients with untreated essential hypertension. Animal data suggest that treatment of hypertension may restore normal NO-mediated responses. We have prospectively examined the effect of standard antihypertensive therapy on the responsiveness to local intra-arterial infusions of L-NMMA in 18 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. DESIGN: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Patients were randomized to treatment with 10 mg enalapril daily, 5 mg amlodipine daily or matched placebo for 6 weeks (with dose titration after 2 weeks if necessary). METHODS: Forearm blood flow during direct infusion into the brachial artery of L-NMMA (1, 2 and 4 mumol/min) was measured using venous occlusion plethysmography at the beginning and end of the 6-week treatment period. RESULTS: Both enalapril and amlodipine reduced blood pressure significantly compared with placebo. After 6 weeks of antihypertensive therapy, forearm blood flow (+/- SEM) in response to the maximum dose of L-NMMA (4 mumol/min) was reduced by 54.8 (6.9)% (P = 0.012), 58.9 (7.0)% (P = 0.016) and 33.1 (3.0)% (P = 0.17) in the enalapril, amlodipine and placebo groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between enalapril and amlodipine treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The forearm arterial responsiveness to L-NMMA in newly diagnosed patients with essential hypertension returns to normal with normalization of blood pressure by antihypertensive drugs with different modes of action. It remains to be determined whether this phenomenon is a consequence of the change in pressure per se or a result of the action of either drug by a common or separate mechanism.

Amlodipine↗
PubMed1993

A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of moderate/severe hypertension.

1. The safety and efficacy of amlodipine vs enalapril as monotherapy was evaluated in patients with moderate/severe hypertension (supine DBP 105-125 mm Hg, SBP 140-220 mm Hg). 2. After 2 weeks placebo treatment 31 patients were randomised by the technique of minimisation in an observer-blind study to receive once daily treatment with either amlodipine (15 patients) 5-10 mg, or enalapril (16 patients) 5-20 mg for 8 weeks. The study design concluded with 2 weeks placebo treatment. In addition to clinic measurements, home blood pressure monitoring (Copal UA-251) was performed during the study. 3. Clinic supine systolic blood pressure was reduced from 177 to 152 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 183 to 169 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the intergroup difference -22.1, 0.3, P = 0.06) after 8 weeks treatment. 4. Clinic supine diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 110 to 93 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 109-102 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the intergroup difference -17.7, -2.7, P < 0.01) after 8 weeks treatment. 5. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed these reductions in blood pressure. Although the reduction in blood pressure was greater for the amlodipine treated group, the differences between treatments were not statistically significant. 6. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated. The adverse events occurring most frequently in the amlodipine group were headache (5), peripheral oedema (3), upper respiratory infection (3) and anxiety (2). The adverse events occurring most frequently in the enalapril treated patients were headache (6), dizziness (3) and upper respiratory infection (2).

Adult↗
PubMed1993

A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension.

1. The safety and efficacy of amlodipine and enalapril were compared in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (supine DBP < 95 mm Hg and supine SBP 160-200 mm Hg). 2. After 2 weeks treatment with placebo 31 patients were randomised by the technique of minimisation in an observer-blind study to receive once daily treatment with either amlodipine (16 patients) or enalapril (15 patients) for 8 weeks. The study design concluded with 2 weeks placebo treatment. In addition to clinic measurements, home blood pressure monitoring (Copal UA-251) was performed during the study. 3. Mean supine systolic blood pressure was reduced from 185 to 164 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 183 to 159 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -10.5, 15.3) after 8 weeks treatment. 4. Mean supine diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 86 to 80 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 88 to 80 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -4.9, 7.6) after 8 weeks treatment. 5. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed these reductions in blood pressure, although there was no significant difference between treatments for the reductions in blood pressure. 6. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated. The adverse events occurring most frequently in the amlodipine group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (5) and palpitations (2). The adverse events occurring most frequently in the enalapril group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (2), palpitations (2) and dizziness (3).

Aged↗