Creatin kinase in human tissues.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D M Dawson.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
As many as 89% of gastric ulcer patients experience ulcer recurrences within 1 year of successful healing with conventional antiulcer therapies. Because ranitidine is effective in the healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers and the maintenance of healed duodenal ulcers, we hypothesized that ranitidine would also be effective in the maintenance of healed gastric ulcers. A 48-week, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial was conducted to compare ranitidine 150 mg administered at bedtime with placebo for the maintenance of healed gastric ulcers. Endoscopies were performed at baseline and repeated after 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks of treatment. Gastric ulcer recurrence rates at each scheduled endoscopy were significantly lower in patients receiving ranitidine (5%, 13%, 16%, and 19%, respectively) compared with those receiving placebo (20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%, respectively). Compared with placebo, ranitidine was more effective in maintaining healed gastric ulcers regardless of previous gastric ulcer history, smoking status, age (< 65 vs > or = 65 years), or sex. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in the number of patients experiencing adverse events or laboratory abnormalities. Ranitidine 150 mg administered at bedtime provides safe and effective treatment for the maintenance of healed gastric ulcers.
The recent development of small bone suture anchors has created several potential applications in reconstructive surgery of the foot. Mitek bone anchors are simple to insert, require less aggressive dissection and surgical time than reefing of the redundant posterior tibial tendon, and are a reliable method of tendon-to-bone fixation. Mitek bone anchors are an excellent technique for the treatment of redundant tibialis posterior tendon following a modified Kidner procedure. In modified Kidner procedures involving an excessively large os tibiale externum, Mitek anchoring of the redundant tibialis posterior tendon to the navicular bone is an excellent means for secure plication of the posterior tibial tendon in cases involving intraoperative tendon laxity. A description of the Mitek Anchor System and technique of application in a modified Kinder procedure is presented. The purpose of this study was to describe patient satisfaction and long-term clinical outcomes of the modified Kinder procedure with and without the Mitek bone anchoring system. A retrospective study of the modified Kinder procedure was performed with 13 patients being evaluated, seven with Mitek anchoring and six without. The University of Maryland 100-point Painful Foot Center Scoring System was modified to be more specific to the modified Kinder procedure for assessment of subjective long-term results. Patient overall satisfaction was rated good to excellent by 85.6% of patients in the Mitek group and by 100% of patients in the non-Mitek group. Use of the Mitek anchor allowed for quicker postoperative recovery to resumption of ambulation without assistive devices (average of 3 weeks vs. 4.42 weeks) and a quicker return to pain-free ambulation in normal shoegear (average of 4 weeks vs. 6 weeks). Mitek anchoring of the tibialis posterior tendon, theoretically, increases medial arch support as evidenced by 14% of the Mitek group and 67% of the non-Mitek group requiring postoperative orthotics.
Our work with multiple sclerosis has demonstrated a favorable effect on the course of chronic progressive multiple sclerosis in two-thirds of patients treated with cyclophosphamide/ACTH. However, alternative methods of therapy, or repeated treatments with cyclophosphamide and ACTH are required for longer term control of the illness. We are attempting to assess the efficacy of outpatient maintenance cyclophosphamide, but do not as yet have any data to support the use of this form of treatment. Cyclophosphamide and ACTH can be given to multiple sclerosis patients without significant serious toxicity. Monoclonal antibody therapy of multiple sclerosis is in its beginning stages. The treatment appears to be safe and has produced some interesting data indicating that rapid entry of some labeled lymphocytes into the nervous system can be measured by this technique. Since these are phase one pilot trials designed to assess immune parameters and only small numbers of patients have been treated, no clinical results have been obtained. No adverse effects of monoclonal antibody therapy were observed.