The international immune tolerance study: a multicenter prospective randomized trial in progress.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D M Dimichele.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A North American registry for rare bleeding disorders [factor (F)II, factor (F)VII, factor (F)X, factor (F)V, factor (F)XIII, fibrinogen deficiencies and dysfibrinogenemias] was established to gather information about disease prevalence, genotyping frequency, diagnostic events, clinical manifestations, treatment and prophylaxis strategies, as well as disease- and treatment-related complications. Questionnaires were sent to 225 hemophilia treatment centers in the USA and Canada. Among 26% of responding centers, 294 individuals [4.4% of the registered children (200/4583) and 2.4% of adults (94/3809)] were diagnosed with one or more of the rare bleeding disorders (RBDs) included in this survey. The ethnic distribution for each disorder paralleled that of the general US population with the exception of the disproportionately large number of Latinos with FII deficiency. Only 5.4% of affected individuals were genotyped. An abnormal preoperative bleeding screen most often led to diagnosis. The most common coagulopathy was FVII deficiency; however, 40% of homozygous patients were asymptomatic. FX and FXIII deficiencies caused the most severe bleeding manifestations. Among all RBDs, the most common sites of bleeding were skin and mucus membranes. Multiple products were used to treat hemorrhage; however, half of the bleeding episodes required no therapy. The majority of patients suffered no long-term complications from hemorrhage. Treatment-related complications included viral seroconversion, anemia, allergic reactions and venous access device-related events. This registry provides the most comprehensive information to date about North American individuals with RBDs and could serve as an important resource for both basic scientist and clinician.
Activated prothrombin complex concentrates have been used to treat bleeding episodes for patients who have developed an inhibitor to factor VIII (FVIII). FEIBA-Vh (FVIII bypassing activity, FEIBA) has been used since 1970 for this purpose and with FVIII for immune tolerance programmes. Studies have not been presented to show the safety and efficacy of FEIBA when given over a long period of time to prevent haemophilic arthropathy with bleeding into the joints of these patients. This study was undertaken to ascertain the outcome of haemophilic arthropathy with FEIBA prophylaxis. Data were collected on seven patients with known long-standing high-titre FVIII inhibitors given FEIBA prophylaxis for 3-6(1/2) years. Patients were given 50-100 units of FEIBA three to four times weekly. A functional joint evaluation revealed some degree of arthropathy already present in all patients at time of prophylaxis initiation. Safety was measured by medical status, evidence of thrombosis, life-threatening bleeding and inhibitor titre. Efficacy was measured for joint outcome by a functional physical therapeutic scale. At the conclusion of the study, efficacy was mixed as all of the joints for which the patients were placed on prophylaxis had progressed and developed synovitis. Two patients had a functional improvement in their arthropathy, and all were functional enough to attend regular school. The product was deemed safe for long-term use, as there were no complications of therapy with no thrombosis, no life-threatening bleeding episodes and no anamnesis caused by FEIBA alone. Inhibitor titres fell in all patients over the course of the study. Total product usage ranged from approximately 9373-15,571 U kg(-1) year(-1). FEIBA is safe for long-term prophylaxis when given in the recommended dosage for an extended period of time. Efficacy to prevent arthropathy could not be seen as all patients had some degree of arthropathy at time of prophylaxis initiation. An additional study needs to be performed using FEIBA before arthropathy has developed.
The prothrombin G20210A mutation is a common risk factor for thrombosis which increases the risk of deep vein thrombosis, stroke, and fetal loss. There are few publications of its clinical manifestations in children. Our objective was to determine the clinical manifestations of the prothrombin mutation in children. Via survey of pediatric hematologists, we collected data on children with thrombosis and the prothrombin mutation. Thirty-eight patients with a thrombotic event were identified as having the prothrombin mutation. Children with arterial thrombosis were younger, less than half had additional risk factors present at the time of the event, and had a high frequency of central nervous system thrombosis. Children with venous thrombosis were older, almost always had additional risk factors present, and had thrombosis occur most often in the extremities, although there were also a significant number of events in the central venous and cerebral circulation. There was a striking predilection for central nervous system events as 30% of all the events and 67% of the arterial events occurred there. In all, 14/38 children (37%) had central nervous system thrombosis. Unlike factor V Leiden and deficiencies of proteins C and S which cause venous thromboembolism, the prothrombin mutation in children is often associated with arterial thrombosis and with central nervous system events. In children with the prothrombin mutation and venous thrombosis, other risk factors are usually present. Therefore, children with arterial or venous thrombosis of any location should be evaluated for the presence of the prothrombin mutation.
A multicentre retrospective survey was conducted to assess the efficacy and side-effect profile of porcine factor VIII (pFVIII:C) given by continuous infusion (CI) to patients with congenital haemophilia A and inhibitors. Twenty-nine episodes in 18 patients were treated by CI of pFVIII:C. Efficacy was graded as good in 79% of infusions and fair in 17%. There was a failed response in only one episode. Fourteen percent of patients experienced transfusion reactions with bolus doses, but no reactions were observed in patients given CI. There were no severe reactions. All the reactions resolved following interruption of the infusion and administration of steroids. Premedication did not prevent reactions. In this series the median decrease in platelet count after bolus injection of pFVIII:C was -67 X 10(9) L(-1) compared with a median decrease of -2 x 109 L(-1) during the course of CI, thus, continuous infusion of pFVIII:C appears to have less effect on platelet count than bolus injection. An anamnestic response was associated with 77% of infusions. This high rate of anamnesis reflects patient selection, in that they were all known to have high-level high-responding FVIII inhibitors with cross-reactivity to pFVIII. After reconstitution, the pFVIII:C showed little loss in factor VIII activity in solution over a 24-h period. We conclude that pFVIII:C may be effectively administered by CI to patients with haemophilia A and high-responding FVIII inhibitors. CI is the probably the mode of administration of choice for intensive replacement therapy with pFVIII.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.