Serotonin syndrome with prolonged dysphagia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D M Gardner.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A case in which a home peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring device was recommended led us to review the evidence examining this intervention. The clinical question to be answered was: should these devices be consistently recommended to all patients with asthma? A comprehensive search revealed eight randomized controlled trials, one review and one consensus report. Four trials provided all subjects with asthma education and compared patient-specific action plans based on symptoms to those based on PEF readings. Four trials compared usual asthma care to peak flow monitoring (PFM) and varied in both their content and intensity of asthma education. Six out of eight studies showed improvement in some selected markers of asthma morbidity with home PFM-based action plans. Improvements were also observed in patients using a symptom-based action plan. These studies did not demonstrate any obvious advantage of PFM compared with symptom-based monitoring but did suggest that a monitoring plan with predetermined actions based on PEF measurements or symptoms can lead to improved asthma control. Although not specifically studied, PFM may be more appropriate and effective for patients who have difficulty identifying worsening of asthma control through symptom monitoring.
Otitis media occurs commonly in children, and is usually treated with an antibiotic. In this case report, amoxicillin was prescribed for a 6-year-old boy suffering from acute otitis media. As he had previously experienced a rash after the administration of a penicillin, the medication order was switched from amoxicillin to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). In an effort to determine whether or not this intervention was appropriate, references were found using Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and the Cochrane Library. Issues to be addressed included the need for antibiotics in acute otitis media, the comparative efficacy and tolerability of antimicrobial agents and the reliability of reported penicillin allergies. Amoxicillin and TMP/SMX were found to be first-line agents in the treatment of acute otitis media owing to their efficacy, safety and cost, with neither drug being significantly better than the other. The need to treat otitis media with antibiotics remains controversial. Reported penicillin allergies were found to be an unreliable indicator of a potentially serious reaction. In conclusion, it was found that treatment with TMP/SMX was an appropriate intervention.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (oestrogen with or without progestin) is often initiated with the onset of menopause to decrease symptoms of oestrogen deficiency, such as vasomotor instability (hot flashes) and urogenital effects (1-3). HRT can also prevent long-term consequences of oestrogen deficiency, such as osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease (1-3). The decision to start HRT in peri- and postmenopausal women is complicated by concerns of increased risk for thromboembolic events, uterine cancer and breast cancer (2-4). Thromboembolic stroke is a particular concern due to its association with the use of oral contraceptives with high oestrogen content (3, 4). However, for older women it has been suggested that HRT use decreases or has no effect on stroke risk (5-9). Should these findings apply to a women with a history of thromboembolism, in this case ischemic stroke?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: This prospective, consecutive case-series outcome investigation evaluates the effectiveness of olanzapine in 16 patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. METHOD: Treatment resistance was defined as nonresponsiveness to at least 3 antipsychotic drugs from at least 2 different chemical classes. A minimum baseline score on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) of 45 was required for enrolment. Outcome evaluation measures included the BPRS, Global Assessment Scale (GAS), and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). RESULTS: Subjects (n = 16) has a mean age of 40 years and mean duration of illness of 16 years. Olanzapine treatment was initiated at 5 mg daily and was increased based on clinical judgement up to a maximum of 40 mg daily. Significant decreases in mean BPRS (P < 0.001) and GAS (P < 0.01) scores were observed at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16, compared with baseline. Eight of 16 patients responded to olanzapine, as defined by a 20% decrease in BPRS score by week 16. Dyskinetic movements significantly increased at week 4 (P < 0.01) but did not differ from baseline at weeks 8 and 16. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that olanzapine at moderate to high doses may offer an effective treatment for a significant proportion of patients with schizophrenia nonresponsive to multiple trials of conventional antipsychotics. A randomized controlled trial is encouraged to validate these findings, and comparative trials are required to determine when clinicians should consider this approach.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a narrative review based on clinically relevant evidence specific to the issues surrounding the use of the second generation antipsychotics in schizophrenia. METHOD: MEDLINE and Cochrane Library searches were performed to identify literature pertinent to the available and anticipated novel antipsychotics in North America. Articles that were selected included clinical trials, clinical practice guidelines, reviews and pharmacoeconomic analyses researching the efficacy and safety of the second generation antipsychotics including comparative studies among these agents. Related editorials, letters and newsletter commentaries were reviewed from a variety of sources to provide enhanced depth. RESULTS: Following the advent of clozapine in the 1980s, three other second generation antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine) have become available, with others (eg, ziprasidone) expected in the near future. The single major advance with these agents is their reduced propensity for extrapyramidal side effects and tardive dyskinesia. However, clinicians should be aware of the differential risk for these side effects. The purported advantage for negative symptoms compared with conventional agents has been inconsistent and may not be clinically important. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a wide selection of antipsychotics has heralded the possibility of more effective management of the complex symptoms of schizophrenia. However, this has also made the choice of optimal treatment difficult. It is essential that practitioners understand how these agents compare with each other and with conventional antipsychotics.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk for serotonin syndrome associated with the concomitant use of sumatriptan and the currently contraindicated therapies, that is, the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), serotonin selective-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and lithium. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive search for reports of serotonin syndrome associated with sumatriptan use was conducted by using tertiary drug interaction literature, MEDLINE, EmBASE, Biological Abstracts, Current Contents, Reactions, ClinAlert, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. In addition, related reports from the proprietary manufacturers, the Health Protection Branch of Health Canada, and the World Health Organization Collaborative Centre for International Drug Monitoring were also solicited. RESULTS: The concurrent use of sumatriptan with an SSRI or lithium has been reported to cause symptoms suggestive of serotonin syndrome in 16 and 2 cases, respectively. There were no reports involving MAOIs. In general, the reports indicated a mild-to-moderate, self-limited course with some features consistent with the serotonin syndrome. We found published reports of sumatriptan use without adverse events involving 148 patients receiving SSRIs, 31 patients taking MAOIs, and a small number using lithium. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical evidence supporting the strict contraindication of MAOIs, SSRIs and lithium was not identified. The balance of documented clinical experience pertaining to the use of sumatriptan concurrently with SSRIs or lithium suggests that most patients tolerate this combination without incident. Because there is little reliable experience with sumatriptan in combination with MAOIs, we suggest that sumatriptan should continue to be avoided in patients taking these agents until further data demonstrating safety become available.
OBJECTIVE: Traditional monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) continue to play an important role in the management of a wide variety of clinical conditions. Accordingly, a practical and safe approach to MAOI dietary restrictions remains an essential component of patient management. METHOD: In an effort to refine MAOI dietary recommendations, we report a case of hypertensive crisis following the consumption of a modest amount of tap beer. RESULTS: A well-documented case report involving tap (draft) beer consumed while on an MAOI supports an earlier study, which recommended that all tap beers be restricted on MAOI diets. The 2 cases were remarkably similar in terms of the offending substance, quantity consumed, and subsequent reaction. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of recent tyramine analyses and 2 well-documented case reports, all tap (draft) beers should now be absolutely restricted on MAOI diets because they represent a very significant risk at modest levels of consumption.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Many patients with affective illness show partial or otherwise unsatisfactory responses to standard treatments, encouraging trials of combinations of pharmacologically dissimilar antidepressants. METHOD: Records of consecutive outpatients with affective disorders only partially responsive to treatment with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) or bupropion, alone, were reviewed for changes in specific symptoms and risks of adverse events when an SRI and bupropion were combined. RESULTS: Greater symptomatic improvement was found in 19 (70%) of 27 subjects during a mean +/- SD of 11 +/- 14 months of combined daily use of bupropion (243 +/- 99 mg) with an SRI (31 +/- 16 mg fluoxetine-equivalents) than with either agent alone. Adverse effect risks were similar to those associated with each monotherapy, with a > 10% incidence of sexual dysfunction (N = 11, 41%), insomnia (N = 6, 22%), anergy (N = 4, 15%), and tremor (N = 3, 11%) during combined therapy; there were no seizures. CONCLUSION: With conservative dosing and close monitoring, combinations of SRIs with bupropion in this uncontrolled clinical series appeared to be safe and often more effective than monotherapy.
BACKGROUND: Many monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) diets are considered to be excessively restrictive and founded on poor scientific evidence. We present a safe and practical MAOI diet based on the related clinical and analytic data. METHOD: We used a critical review of the literature and our own tyramine assay results to categorize foods to be restricted absolutely, taken in moderation only, or unrestricted. RESULTS: We recommend that users avoid aged cheese; aged or cured meats (e.g., air-dried sausage); any potentially spoiled meat, poultry, or fish; broad (fava) bean pods; Marmite concentrated yeast extract; sauerkraut; soy sauce and soy bean condiments; and tap beer. Wine and domestic bottled or canned beer are considered safe when consumed in moderation. Other foods not mentioned are considered unrestricted. CONCLUSION: The concerns about perpetuating an overly restrictive MAOI diet include the avoidance by prescribers of a potentially useful treatment option, excessive limitations on lifestyle for patients, and increased risk to patients secondary to noncompliance with the diet. We propose an MAOI diet that has a solid scientific and clinical basis and that is, above all, practical.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Dimenhydrinate may be a relatively common yet unrecognized substance of abuse among adolescents. Abuse of this drug may present as a psychiatric syndrome, particularly depression. Three cases are presented which illustrate this relationship. A review of the literature is presented and suggestions are made for identifying adolescents who abuse dimenhydrinate.