PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D M Perez

Publications and source records attributed to D M Perez.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Phe-308 and Phe-312 in transmembrane domain 7 are major sites of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist binding. Imidazoline agonists bind like antagonists.

Although agonist binding in adrenergic receptors is fairly well understood and involves residues located in transmembrane domains 3 through 6, there are few residues reported that are involved in antagonist binding. In fact, a major docking site for antagonists has never been reported in any G-protein coupled receptor. It has been speculated that antagonist binding is quite diverse depending upon the chemical structure of the antagonist, which can be quite different from agonists. We now report the identification of two phenylalanine residues in transmembrane domain 7 of the alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor (Phe-312 and Phe-308) that are a major site of antagonist affinity. Mutation of either Phe-308 or Phe-312 resulted in significant losses of affinity (4-1200-fold) for the antagonists prazosin, WB4101, BMY7378, (+) niguldipine, and 5-methylurapidil, with no changes in affinity for phenethylamine-type agonists such as epinephrine, methoxamine, or phenylephrine. Interestingly, both residues are involved in the binding of all imidazoline-type agonists such as oxymetazoline, cirazoline, and clonidine, confirming previous evidence that this class of ligand binds differently than phenethylamine-type agonists and may be more antagonist-like, which may explain their partial agonist properties. In modeling these interactions with previous mutagenesis studies and using the current backbone structure of rhodopsin, we conclude that antagonist binding is docked higher in the pocket closer to the extracellular surface than agonist binding and appears skewed toward transmembrane domain 7.

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists↗

Hypotension, autonomic failure, and cardiac hypertrophy in transgenic mice overexpressing the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor.

alpha(1)-Adrenergic receptors (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), and alpha(1D)) are regulators of systemic arterial blood pressure and blood flow. Whereas vasoconstrictory action of the alpha(1A) and alpha(1D) subtypes is thought to be mainly responsible for this activity, the role of the alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1B)AR) in this process is controversial. We have generated transgenic mice that overexpress either wild type or constitutively active alpha(1B)ARs. Transgenic expression was under the control of the isogenic promoter, thus assuring appropriate developmental and tissue-specific expression. Cardiovascular phenotypes displayed by transgenic mice included myocardial hypertrophy and hypotension. Indicative of cardiac hypertrophy, transgenic mice displayed an increased heart to body weight ratio, which was confirmed by the echocardiographic finding of an increased thickness of the interventricular septum and posterior wall. Functional deficits included an increased isovolumetric relaxation time, a decreased heart rate, and cardiac output. Transgenic mice were hypotensive and exhibited a decreased pressor response. Vasoconstrictory regulation by alpha(1B)AR was absent as shown by the lack of phenylephrine-induced contractile differences between ex vivo mesenteric artery preparations. Plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol levels were also reduced in transgenic mice, suggesting a loss of sympathetic nerve activity. Reduced catecholamine levels together with basal hypotension, bradycardia, reproductive problems, and weight loss suggest autonomic failure, a phenotype that is consistent with the multiple system atrophy-like neurodegeneration that has been reported previously in these mice. These results also suggest that this receptor subtype is not involved in the classic vasoconstrictory action of alpha(1)ARs that is important in systemic regulation of blood pressure.

Animals↗

Alpha1-adrenergic receptors: new insights and directions.

The adrenergic receptors play a key role in the modulation of sympathetic nervous system activity as well as a site of action for many therapeutic agents. The alpha1-adrenergic receptor subtypes (alpha1A-, alpha1B-, alpha1D) are the prime mediators of smooth muscle contraction and hypertrophic growth, but their characterization in both binding and function have lagged the other adrenergic family members. Although they are derived from a related ancestral gene and all nine adrenergic receptor family members bind the endogenous ligands, epinephrine and norepinephrine, with roughly similar affinities, there are major differences in the mode of binding, second messenger utilization, and physiological effects of the alpha1-subtypes compared with beta- or alpha2-subtypes. Here, we review the recent literature on aspects of its binding pocket and how it differs from the beta-adrenergic receptor paradigms. We also review the signaling components and aspects of its function and provide new insights into its roles in smooth muscle, growth, neurological, and cardiovascular function.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

Novel aromatic residues in transmembrane domains IV and V involved in agonist binding at alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors.

We examined the role that aromatic residues located in the transmembrane helices of the alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor play in promoting antagonist binding. Since alpha(1)-antagonists display low affinity binding at beta(2)-adrenergic receptors, two phenylalanine residues, Phe-163 and Phe-187, of the alpha(1a)-AR were mutated to the corresponding beta(2)-residue. Neither F163Q nor F187A mutations of the alpha(1a) had any effect on the affinity of the alpha(1)-antagonists. However, the affinity of the endogenous agonist epinephrine was reduced 12.5- and 8-fold by the F163Q and F187A mutations, respectively. An additive loss in affinity (150-fold) for epinephrine was observed at an alpha(1a) containing both mutations. The loss of agonist affinity scenario could be reversed by a gain of affinity with mutation of the corresponding residues in the beta(2) to the phenylalanine residues in the alpha(1a). We propose that both Phe-163 and Phe-187 are involved in independent aromatic interactions with the catechol ring of agonists. The potency but not the efficacy of epinephrine in stimulating phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis was reduced 35-fold at the F163Q/F187A alpha(1a) relative to the wild type receptor. Therefore, Phe-163 and Phe-187 represent novel binding contacts in the agonist binding pocket of the alpha(1a)-AR, but are not involved directly in receptor activation.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Overexpression of the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor causes apoptotic neurodegeneration: multiple system atrophy.

Progress toward elucidating the function of alpha1B-adrenergic receptors (alpha1BARs) in the central nervous system has been constrained by a lack of agonists and antagonists with adequate alpha1B-specificity. We have obviated this constraint by generating transgenic mice engineered to overexpress either wild-type or constitutively active alpha1BARs in tissues that normally express the receptor, including the brain. All transgenic lines showed granulovacular neurodegeneration, beginning in alpha1B-expressing domains of the brain and progressing with age to encompass all areas. The degeneration was apoptotic and did not occur in non-transgenic mice. Correspondingly, transgenic mice showed an age-progressive hindlimb disorder that was parkinsonian-like, as demonstrated by rescue of the dysfunction by 3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine and considerable dopaminergic-neuronal degeneration in the substantia nigra. Transgenic mice also had a grand mal seizure disorder accompanied by a corresponding dysplasia and neurodegeneration of the cerebral cortex. Both behavioral phenotypes (locomotor impairment and seizure) could be partially rescued with the alpha1AR antagonist terazosin, indicating that alpha1AR signaling participated directly in the pathology. Our results indicate that overstimulation of alpha1BAR leads to apoptotic neurodegeneration with a corresponding multiple system atrophy indicative of Shy-Drager syndrome, a disease whose etiology is unknown.

Age Factors↗

Regulation of the cellular localization and signaling properties of the alpha(1B)- and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors by agonists and inverse agonists.

The regulation of the cellular distribution and intracellular signaling properties of the alpha(1B)- and alpha(1D)- adrenoceptor (alpha(1)-AR) subtypes was examined in stably transfected Rat 1 fibroblasts. In unstimulated cells, alpha(1B)-AR expression was noted primarily on the cell surface. Treatment with phenylephrine induced internalization of the alpha(1B)-AR and promoted association with arrestin 2. The internalized alpha(1B)-AR colocalized with the transferrin receptor, an endosomal marker. In unstimulated fibroblasts, the alpha(1D)-AR was detected in a perinuclear orientation and was colocalized with arrestin 2 in a compartment also containing the transferrin receptor. After treatment with prazosin, which exhibits inverse agonist properties, the alpha(1D)-AR was redistributed from intracellular sites to the cellular periphery and was no longer associated with the transferrin receptor or arrestin 2. alpha(1D)-AR-expressing cells exhibited a high degree of basal activity for both inositol phosphate formation and extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK), which was reduced by treatment with prazosin. In these cells, phenylephrine induced a dose-dependent increase in inositol phosphate formation but had no effect on ERK activity. In alpha(1B) -AR-expressing cells, phenylephrine stimulated both inositol phosphate formation and ERK activity. These data show that: 1) there are differences in the cellular localization of the alpha(1)-AR subtypes; 2) the alpha(1B)-AR exhibits expected G protein-coupled receptor activity regarding cellular localization, agonist-mediated internalization, and coupling to second messengers; and 3) the alpha(1D)-AR is constitutively active and, as a result, is localized to intracellular compartments involved in receptor recycling.

Adrenergic Agonists↗

Influence of a lysine 331 counterion on the pK(a) of aspartic acid 125: evidence for a salt-bridge interaction and role in alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor activation.

We have hypothesized previously that a salt-bridge constraint exists in the alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor (AR). Docking of the agonist epinephrine can disrupt this constraint via competition of its protonated amine, leading to an agonist-induced activation of second messengers. The amino acids, K331 and D125, which comprise this salt-bridge, should be closely associated with each other in the unbound form of the alpha(1b)-AR. This ionic association should stabilize the negative charge of D125, leading to an increase in its acid strength or a decreased pK(a). If the charged state of D125 is important for agonist binding, then changing the type of amino acid at position 331 should decrease the acid strength of D125, leading to epinephrine affinity changes for the alpha(1b)-AR. To test this hypothesis, site-directed mutagenesis was performed at position 331 of the alpha(1b)-AR. The effect these substitutions had on D125 acid strength was quantitated via epinephrine affinity changes calculated from competition binding experiments performed at different pH values. For all mutations of the alpha(1b)-AR where the positive charge at position 331 was eliminated, there was a significant increase in the pK(a) ( congruent with 0.73) of an acidic amino acid(s). In addition, there was an increase in the binding affinity of epinephrine for these mutants that was associated with a gain in the basal production of inositol triphosphates. These results are consistent with an aspartic acid residue as the counterion for K331 of the salt-bridge constraint, which disrupted, is a part of the receptor activation process. Moreover, changes in the pK(a) of D125 were not dependent on the type of amino acid substituted at position 331. This suggests a mechanism in which K331 is no longer influencing D125 after salt-bridge disruption in the wild-type alpha(1b)-AR, but may move to another stabilized position, analogous to what has been suggested for bacteriorhodopsin. Differences from the wild-type receptor in D125 pK(a) for the K331 mutations were used to estimate the free-energy potential of the constraining salt-bridge. This free energy ( congruent with 1 kcal/mol) is significant, but weak enough to be consistent with an activational mechanism where docking of the receptor agonist has sufficient free energy to cause disruption of the salt-bridge.

Animals↗

Characteristics for a salt-bridge switch mutation of the alpha(1b) adrenergic receptor. Altered pharmacology and rescue of constitutive activity.

Agonist-dependent activation of the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor is postulated to be initiated by disruption of an interhelical salt-bridge constraint between an aspartic acid (Asp-125) and a lysine residue (Lys-331) in transmembrane domains three and seven, respectively. Single point mutations that disrupt the charges of either of these residues results in constitutive activity. To validate this hypothesis, we used site-directed mutagenesis to switch the position of these amino acids to observe, if possible, regeneration of the salt-bridge reverses that the constitutive activity of the single point mutations. The transiently expressed switch mutant receptor displayed an altered pharmacological profile. The affinity of selective alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor antagonists for the switch mutant (D125K/K331D) was no different from the wild-type alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor, suggesting that both receptors are maintaining similar tertiary structures in the cell membrane. However, there was a significant 4-6-fold decrease in the affinity of protonated amine receptor agonists and a 3-6-fold increase in the affinity of carboxylated catechol derivatives for the switch mutant compared with the wild-type alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor. This pharmacology is consistent with a reversed charge at position 125 in transmembrane domain three. Interestingly, the ability of either a negatively or positively charged agonist to generate soluble inositol phosphates was similar for both types of receptors. Finally, the switch mutant (D125K/K331D) displayed similar basal signaling activity as the wild-type receptor, reversing the constitutive activity of the single point mutations (D125K and K331D). This suggests an ionic constraint has been reformed in the switch mutant analogous to the restraint previously described for the wild-type alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor. These results strongly establish the disruption of an electrostatic interaction as an initial step in the agonist-dependent activation of alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors.

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Agonists↗

Cloning, cell-type specificity, and regulatory function of the mouse alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor promoter.

The functionality of a 3422-base pair promoter fragment from the mouse alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1B)AR) gene was examined. This fragment, cloned from a mouse genomic library, was found to have significant sequence homology to the known human and rat alpha(1B)AR promoters. However, the consensus motif of several key cis-acting elements is not conserved among the rat, human, and mouse genes, suggesting species specificity. Confirming fidelity of the murine promoter, robust in vitro expression of a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter was detected in known alpha(1B)AR-expressing BC(3)H1, NB41A3, and DDT(1)MF-2 cells transiently transfected with a promoter-CAT construct. Conversely, minimal CAT expression was detected in known alpha(1B)AR-negative RAT-1 and R3T3 cells. These findings were extended by transfecting the same promoter-CAT construct into various primary cell types. In support of the hypothesis that alpha(1)ARs are differentially expressed in the smooth muscle of the vasculature, primary cultures of superior mesenteric and renal artery vascular smooth muscle cells showed significantly stronger CAT expression than did vascular smooth muscle cells derived from pulmonary, femoral, and iliac arteries. Primary osteoblastic bone-forming cells, which are known to be alpha(1B)AR negative, showed minimal CAT expression. Indicating regulatory function through cis-acting elements, RAT-1, R3T3, NB41A3, BC(3)H1, and DDT(1)MF2 cells transfected with the promoter-CAT construct all showed increased CAT production when challenged with forskolin or hypoxic conditions. Additionally, tissue-specific regulation of the promoter was observed when cells were simultaneously challenged with both forskolin and hypoxia. These results collectively demonstrate that a 3.4-kb PvuII fragment of the murine alpha(1B)AR gene promoter can: 1) drive tissue-specific production of a CAT reporter in both clonal and primary cell lines; and 2) confer tissue-specific regulation of that CAT reporter when induced by challenge with forskolin and/or hypoxic conditions.

3T3 Cells↗

Expression of multiple alpha1-adrenoceptors on vascular smooth muscle: correlation with the regulation of contraction.

Previous work has shown that the genes encoding each alpha1-adrenoceptor subtype are coexpressed throughout the peripheral vascular system. We have evaluated subtype-selective antibodies as tools to determine the extent of protein expression in arteries. The alpha1A-, alpha1B-, and alpha1D-adrenoceptors were detected in the medial layer of the aorta, caudal, femoral, iliac, renal, superior mesenteric, and mesenteric resistance arteries. In Rat1 fibroblasts expressing each subtype, immunoreactivity was noted both on the cell surface and in a perinuclear orientation. Intense alpha1B-adrenoceptor immunostaining was similarly localized in cultured femoral and renal vascular smooth muscle cells. Although the cellular localization appeared to be the same, immunoreactivity obtained with alpha1A- and alpha1D-adrenoceptors was much less intense than that with the alpha1B-adrenoceptor. The alpha1A-adrenoceptor selective agonist A-61603 was 22-fold more potent in activating renal artery contraction when compared with the femoral artery. The expression of each alpha1-adrenoceptor was significantly decreased by in vivo application of antisense oligonucleotides targeted against each subtype. Inhibition of the expression of only one, the alpha1A in renal and the alpha1D in femoral arteries, reduced the contractile response to naphazoline. The results show: 1) subtype-selective antibodies can be used in tissues and cell culture to localize the alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes, 2) in addition to expression on the cell surface, the alpha1-adrenoceptors are expressed intracellularly, and 3) despite expression of all adrenoceptors, a single subtype mediates the contractile response in the femoral and renal arteries.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Binding, partial agonism, and potentiation of alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor function by benzodiazepines: A potential site of allosteric modulation.

Benzodiazepines, a class of drugs commonly used to induce anesthesia and sedation, can attenuate intracellular calcium oscillations evoked by alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1)-AR) stimulation in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. We postulated a direct action of benzodiazepines in modulating alpha(1)-AR function at the receptor level. Benzodiazepines bound to each of the cloned alpha(1)-AR subtypes (alpha(1a)-, alpha(1b)-, or alpha(1d)-AR) on COS-1 cell membranes transiently transfected to express a single population of alpha(1)-AR subtype. The ability of benzodiazepines to alter alpha(1)-AR signal transduction was investigated by measuring total inositol phosphate generation in rat-1 fibroblast cells, stably transfected to express a single alpha(1)-AR subtype. By themselves, benzodiazepines displayed partial agonism. At alpha(1b)-ARs and alpha(1d)-ARs, the maximal inositol phosphate response to phenylephrine was potentiated almost 2-fold by either midazolam or lorazepam (100 microM). At alpha(1a)-ARs, diazepam, lorazepam, and midazolam all increased the maximal response of the partial agonist clonidine at these receptors, whereas the response to the full agonist phenylephrine was unaltered or inhibited. The potentiating actions of midazolam and its partial agonism at alpha(1)-ARs was blocked by the addition of 1 microM prazosin, an alpha(1)-AR antagonist, and not by a gamma-aminobutyric acid(A)-receptor antagonist. These studies show that benzodiazepines modulate the function of alpha(1)-ARs in vitro, and this is the first report of a potential allosteric site on alpha(1)-ARs that may be therapeutically useful for drug design.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Identification of a conserved switch residue responsible for selective constitutive activation of the beta2-adrenergic receptor.

A cysteine-to-phenylalanine mutation of residue 116 in the third transmembrane domain of the beta2-adrenergic receptor caused selective constitutive activation of Na+/H+ exchange through a pathway not involving cAMP. This selectivity was identified by comparing binding and signaling characteristics of wild-type (WT) versus C116F mutant receptors transiently transfected into COS-1 cells. Indicating constitutive activity, ligand binding to the C116F mutant showed a 78-fold higher than WT affinity for isoproterenol and a 40-fold lower than WT affinity for ICI 118551. Although agonist-independent activation of cAMP production was not exhibited by the C116F mutant, a constitutive stimulation of the Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE1) was observed. This was identified by measuring either basal intracellular pH (pHi) or rate of pHi recovery from cellular acid load. Due to a higher rate of H+ efflux through NHE1, C116F transfectants exhibited a significantly higher pHi (7.42) than did WT transfectants (7.1). Furthermore, the rate of pHi recovery from acid load facilitated by NHE1 was 2.1-fold faster in mutant transfectants than in WT transfectants. The lower rate seen in the WT case was stimulated by epinephrine, and the higher rate seen in the mutant case was inhibited by ICI 118551. These findings, which show that a C116F mutation of the beta2-adrenergic receptor evokes selective constitutive coupling to NHE1 over cAMP, form the basis of our prediction that multiple and distinct activation states can exist in G protein-coupled receptors.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

The third extracellular loop of the beta2-adrenergic receptor can modulate receptor/G protein affinity.

Chimeric receptors of the beta2-adrenergic receptor in which the extracellular loops were replaced with the corresponding amino acids of the alpha1a-adrenergic receptor were generated to measure changes in alpha1-antagonist affinity. Although no changes in alpha1-antagonist affinity were measured in the beta2/alpha1a chimeras, a decreased IC50 (10-fold) for agonists as compared with wild type beta2 control was found because of the replacement of the third extracellular loop (EX3). These agonist high affinity changes were because of a greater proportion of high affinity sites (2-fold) that were convertible to low affinity sites with guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate. Adenylate cyclase activity evoked by the EX3 chimera showed commensurate increases in the basal signal transduction as well as the isoproterenol-stimulated potency, suggesting constitutive activity. However, unlike other constitutively active adrenergic receptor mutants in which the mutation causes G protein-independent changes, the mechanism of the EX3 chimera seems to be attributable to a greater ease with which the active ternary complex is formed because of a higher affinity/coupling of the G protein. Although the changes because of EX3 are indirect and most likely affect helical packing, they support an emerging hypothesis that G protein-coupled receptors have evolved their structure-function relationships to constrain the receptor in an inactive state.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The agonism and synergistic potentiation of weak partial agonists by triethylamine in alpha 1-adrenergic receptor activation: evidence for a salt bridge as the initiating process.

Alpha 1-adrenergic receptor (AR) activation is thought to be initiated by disruption of a constraining interhelical salt bridge (). Disruption of this salt bridge is achieved through a competition for the aspartic acid residue in transmembrane domain three by the protonated amine of the endogenous ligand norepinephrine and a lysine residue in transmembrane domain seven. To further test this hypothesis, we investigated the possibility that a simple amine could mimic an important functional group of the endogenous ligand and break this alpha 1-AR ionic constraint leading to agonism. Triethylamine (TEA) was able to generate concentration-dependent increases of soluble inositol phosphates in COS-1 cells transiently transfected with the hamster alpha 1b-AR and in Rat-1 fibroblasts stably transfected with the human alpha 1a-AR subtype. TEA was also able to synergistically potentiate the second messenger production by weak partial alpha 1-AR agonists and this effect was fully inhibited by the alpha 1-AR antagonist prazosin. However, this synergistic potentiation was not observed for full alpha 1-AR agonists. Instead, TEA caused a parallel rightward shift of the dose-response curve, consistent with the properties of competitive antagonism. TEA specifically bound to a single population of alpha 1-ARs with a Ki of 28.7 +/- 4.7 mM. In addition, the site of binding by TEA to the alpha 1-AR is at the conserved aspartic acid residue in transmembrane domain three, which is part of the constraining salt bridge. These results indicate a direct interaction of TEA in the receptor agonist binding pocket that leads to a disruption of the constraining salt bridge, thereby initiating alpha 1-AR activation.

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Agonists↗

Synergism of constitutive activity in alpha 1-adrenergic receptor activation.

Recently a number of mutations have been found in vitro which maintain alpha 1-adrenergic receptors (ARs) in a partially activated form. We have previously identified two amino acid residue positions in the alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor (AR), Cys128 and Ala204, one in each of the third and fifth transmembrane segments, that constitutively activate the receptor when substituted for a phenylalanine or valine, respectively [Perez et al. (1996) Mol. Pharmacol. 49, 112-122; Hwa et al. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7956-7964]. Another mutation analyzed previously, Ala293Glu, located in the third intracellular loop, also constitutively activates the receptor [Kjelsborg et al. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1430-1433]. All three mutations displayed similar manifestations of constitutive activity such as higher binding affinity and potency for agonists as well as higher basal signal transduction as predicted by the revised ternary complex model of receptor activation. We hypothesized that the individual mutations because of their critical location alter the conformation of the transmembrane helices such that mimicry occur that partially conforms to the activated state, R*. To explore whether these potential conformations are independent, we combined these three mutations in all possible permutations. The combined triple mutation displays 700-fold higher binding affinity for (-)-epinephrine and 20-fold higher basal IP3 release than the wild-type receptor. We also observed that each mutation contributed independently and synergistically to both receptor agonist binding and activation with the combined mutations basal activity exceeding that of the fully-stimulated wild-type receptor. There was also a direct correlation between epinephrine's binding affinity and the degree of constitutive activity. Because the mutations affect different transmembrane domains, these results are consistent with a mechanism that helical movement acts in a concerted fashion in agonist-induced activation, a synergism predicted if multiple helix movement is involved in receptor activation.

Animals↗