Biomedical subjects

D Méry-Mignard

Publications and source records attributed to D Méry-Mignard.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

A phase I-II, dose-escalating trial of ZD9331 in combination with irinotecan (CPT11) in previously pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To establish the recommended dose (RD) of the thymidylate-synthase inhibitor ZD9331 administered with irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer, and to assess toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-tumor activity in a phase I/II open, multicenter, intrapatient chemotherapy dose escalating trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients who failed first-line therapy (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin +/- oxaliplatin) received every 2 weeks CPT-11 180 mg/m2 D1, followed by ZD9331 30-minute infusion D2 at three dose levels: 90, 120 and 150 mg/m2. RESULTS: RD of ZD9331 was established at 90 mg/m2 for the first two cycles, with possibility to escalate at 120 mg/m2 according to safety evaluation. Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (67% of patients), grade 3 vomiting (14%), grade 3 nausea (10%) and grade 3 diarrhea (5%). ZD9331 dose level does not affect the PK of CPT-11 or SN-38. Tumor growth control (PR + SD) was achieved for 14 (66.7%) patients. Median time to progression was 6 months, and median survival was 8.4 months. CONCLUSION: ZD9331 90 mg/m2 combined with CPT-11 180 mg/m2 may be a viable option for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, with possible escalation to 120 mg/m2 of ZD9331 according to safety evaluation.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Antitumour activity of three second-line treatment combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after optimal 5-FU regimen failure: a randomised, multicentre phase II study.

BACKGROUND: We have investigated the efficacy, safety and quality of life profiles of three therapeutic combinations [irinotecan + leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin + LV/5-FU and irinotecan +oxaliplatin] in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of a 5-FU-based regimen, or whose disease had progressed within 6 months of the end of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients were randomised to receive either: (i) irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by an LV 200 mg/m(2) infusion, before a 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by a 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) infusion (LV5FU2 regimen), on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; (ii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by the LV5FU2 regimen on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; or (iii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 200 mg/m(2), both on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat ORRs were 11.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-26.7), 21.2% (95% CI 9.0-38.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 5.1-31.9), respectively, in the three arms. Tumour growth control was >or=60% for all three combinations and overall survivals were 12.2 months (95% CI 9.2-16.0), 11.5 months (95% CI 9.0-14.1) and 11.0 months (95% CI 8.1-12.2), respectively. All patients were evaluable for safety. Main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (33 to 39% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, second-line treatment with irinotecan/LV5FU2, oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 or irinotecan/oxaliplatin, provides good tumour growth control and survival coupled with an acceptable safety profile.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Combination of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan in patients with gastrointestinal tumors: results of two independent phase I studies with pharmacokinetics.

PURPOSE: Two phase I studies of the oxaliplatin and irinotecan combination were performed in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a performance status (PS) of < or = 2 and normal hematologic, hepatic, and renal functions received oxaliplatin (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed 1 hour later by irinotecan administered over a 30-minute period, every 3 weeks. Dose levels that were explored ranged from 85 to 110 mg/m(2) for oxaliplatin and 150 to 250 mg/m(2) for irinotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, irinotecan, SN-38, and its glucuronide, SN-38G, were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas (24 with colorectal cancer [CRC], four with pancreas cancer, four with gastric cancer, three with hepatocarcinoma, and four with other) received 216 treatment cycles. Median age was 54 years (range, 21 to 72 years); 95% had PS of 0 to 1; all but six had failed fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The maximum-tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) in one study and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 250 mg/m(2) in the other study. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia were dose-limiting toxicities; other toxicities included emesis and dose-cumulative neuropathy. Recommended dose for phase II studies is oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2). At this dose (12 patients, 65 cycles), grade 3 and 4 toxicities per patient included the following: emesis in 42% of patients, neutropenia in 33% (febrile episodes in 17%), peripheral neuropathy in 25%, delayed diarrhea in 17%, and thrombocytopenia in 8%. Two patients with Gilbert's syndrome experienced severe irinotecan toxicity. No plasmatic pharmacokinetic interactions were detected. Seven partial responses were observed in 24 CRC patients. CONCLUSION: This combination is feasible, with activity in 5-FU-resistant CRC patients. Phase I studies that explore the every-2-weeks schedule, in addition to phase II studies of this schedule (as well as in combination with 5-FU) as second-line therapy of metastatic CRC, are ongoing.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Irinotecan combined with bolus fluorouracil, continuous infusion fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin every two weeks (LV5FU2 regimen): a clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV), using a biweekly LV5FU2 regimen and increasing doses of CPT-11, and to assess the efficacy of this combination in pretreated patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had metastatic CRC and a World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1. CPT-11 was administered over a 90-minute infusion every 2 weeks at a range of dose levels (100, 120, 150, 180, 200, 220, and 260 mg/m(2)). LV5FU2 was started 1 hour after the end of the biweekly CPT-11 infusion and was also administered on day 2. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were entered onto this trial; 549 cycles were administered. The MTD was not reached at 260 mg/m(2), and a dose level of 300 mg/m(2) was added. The MTD as defined in the protocol was not reached at this dose level either, but all patients had cycles delayed and/or required a dose reduction. This dose was deemed to be the MTD. To take into account both the toxicity of and compliance with the biweekly schedule, the recommended CPT-11 dose was established at 180 to 200 mg/m(2). Antitumor activity was observed at almost all dose levels, with an objective response rate of 22%. Median time to progression was 6.3 months and overall survival was 15 months. CONCLUSION: The biweekly CPT-11/LV5FU2 combination is feasible and safe, without overlapping toxicity. CPT-11 at 180 to 200 mg/m(2) in combination with LV5FU2 has been selected as the recommended dose for further studies.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Clinical trials in oncology: specific methodology problems].

Clinical benefit in oncology patients can only be derived from coordinated and successive experimental trials. The following consensus thus emerged from the working party: The assessment of tolerance during clinical trials requires the actuarial rate of acute adverse events (AE) to be registered and the development of epidemiological structures involved in long-term assessment of AE. Experimental trials have to be assessed according to descriptive epidemiological data (generated in France and Europe) and completed with observational studies on post-marketing medical practice. The principle of an a priori authorization given by the Afssaps for gene and cell therapy trials was legalised in October 2001. The working group spoke strongly in favour of authorizing early trials only validating the process, and for reasonable objectives in terms of viral security assessment of annex therapeutic products. With regard to the development of new antiproliferative agents, the active dose (or optimal biological dose) replaces the maximal tolerable dose. Early efficacy criteria could be biological and specific. With cumulative subacute rather than acute toxicity, these agents can not be properly evaluated with a short term benefit/risk ratio as is done for cytotoxic drugs. Elderly people constitute a fragile, heterogeneous and increasing population, in whom adequate assessment of anticancer agents is mandatory. It is important to promote controlled clinical trials in children and to systematically monitor them over a very long period of time. Only rare tumours may be considered as orphan situations. Finally, a list of all clinical trials conducted in oncology should be made by the Afssaps, with the help of the FNLCC (Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer) who have already begun this work.

Antineoplastic Agents↗