Hyperthermia in cancer treatment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Machin.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study was conducted to test the feasibility of reducing the interval between cycles of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide (ACE) chemotherapy to 2 weeks, thereby increasing dose intensity, by adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to reduce the duration of neutropenia following a cycle. 20 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were prescribed six cycles of 2-weekly ACE, with G-CSF on the intermediate days. 3 patients died during the treatment period and a further 5 had ACE terminated, 3 for toxicity and 2 for progressive disease. Of the 71 intervals between cycles, 42 (59%) were of the prescribed 14 days, 9 (13%) of 15-20 days, 15 (21%) of 21 days and five (7%) longer, but during the first four cycles, 36 (77%) of 47 intervals were of 14 days. The main reason for delay was haematological toxicity. All 20 patients experienced WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, but at 2 weeks after a cycle only 3 had grade 4 and 1 grade 3. 17 patients required blood transfusion and 12 platelet transfusion. The only potentially serious adverse reaction to G-CSF was an episode of rash with facial oedema. Adding G-CSF allows ACE chemotherapy to be intensified by reducing the interval between cycles.
In 1977, Zelen proposed a new design for clinical trials with the aim of increasing recruitment by avoiding some of the problems associated with obtaining informed consent. These 'randomised consent' designs have proved controversial, and have not often been used. This paper explains the statistical aspects of single and double randomised consent designs and reviews some of the ethical issues. All identified published cancer treatment trials using a randomised consent design are considered in some detail. Reasons for and against the use of these designs are summarised.
The aim of this Phase II study was to test the feasibility of intensifying standard chemotherapy in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) by reducing the interval between cycles from 3 to 2 weeks by adding recombinant human methionyl granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) to shorten the duration of neutropenia following each cycle. Thirty-two patients with SCLC were prescribed six cycles of 2-weekly doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1 g/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 120 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2 and 3 (ACE), plus filgrastim in a fixed dose of 300 micrograms s.c. on days 4-14 of each cycle. Three patients died during the treatment period and a further nine had chemotherapy terminated before the sixth cycle, all nine because of toxicity. All 32 patients have been followed up for at least 21 months; 14 (44%) were alive at 12 months and the median survival period was 356 days. Of the 127 intervals between cycles of chemotherapy, 74 (58%) were of the prescribed 14 days, 18 (14%) of 15-20 days, 25 (20%) of 21 days, and 10 (8%) were longer. The results were best during the first four cycles, during which 71% of the 83 intervals were of 14 days and a further 10% were less than 21 days. The main reason for delay was haematological toxicity in 37 of the 53 instances. Symptoms of myelosuppression occurred in 23 patients, but at 14 days after a cycle of chemotherapy, all 127 available neutrophil granulocyte counts were normal. Twenty-one patients received blood transfusion and five platelet transfusion. The only adverse effects attributed to filgastrim were episodes of rash, throat swelling, anorexia and shivering, affecting one patient. We conclude that the policy of adding filgrastim allows the dose intensity of ACE chemotherapy to be increased by reducing the intervals between cycles. The findings reinforce those of a parallel study involving lenograstim.
The need for sample size calculations is briefly reviewed: many of the arguments against small trials are already well known, and we only cursorily repeat them in passing. Problems that arise in the estimation of sample size are then discussed, with particular reference to survival studies. However, most of the issues which we discuss are equally applicable to other types of study. Finally, prognostic factor analysis designs are discussed, since this is another area in which experience shows that far too many studies are of an inadequate size and yield misleading results.
This paper describes the steps taken by the British Medical Research Council (MRC) in developing the MRC RE01 trial, a randomized clinical trial for patients with metastatic renal cancer; we discuss the reasons for adopting a triangular sequential design and the impact that this has upon the monitoring of the trial. It had been suggested to the MRC that a trial of biological agents for metastatic renal carcinoma should be initiated. The Cancer Therapy Committee (CTC) of the MRC, through its associated site specific working parties, is responsible for designing and co-ordinating randomized trials of alternative treatments in cancer in solid tumours. Since no MRC working party for renal carcinoma existed at that time, development began by the formation of an ad hoc group set up under the auspices of the CTC. They assessed, by means of a postal questionnaire, U.K. interest in the trials of, and modalities utilized for, treatment of renal cancer. The responses focused attention on the important questions to ask and indicated the level of potential collaboration. These responses and related clinical and statistical issues suggested a protocol to compare medroxy-progesterone acetate (MPA) against alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN). In view of the special problems of comparing an expensive and potentially toxic therapy with an inexpensive and non-toxic standard, a sequential design was used rather than a fixed sample size design. Statistical issues raised and solutions provided are described. The method of establishing the trial data monitoring committee and a brief review of mortality from renal carcinoma in England and Wales are also included. The trial opened to patient recruitment on 1 January 1992. The formal statements regarding statistical issues that appear in the formal trial protocol (RE01) are set out in the Appendix.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Standardization in the choice of quality of life (QOL) instruments and their application in randomised clinical trials have been advocated and generally accepted. However, there is now an urgent need to address the problems relating to the analysis and presentation of the data thus generated. There are intrinsic difficulties associated with QOL data, namely its multidimensional nature, attrition and missing data, and there is no consensus as to how these problems should be dealt with. This paper therefore considers these problems using interim data from a large Medical Research Council randomised trial in patients with small cell lung cancer and a poor prognosis, in which attrition and compliance are major concerns. Three possible approaches to the analysis of these data, which use different subsets of patients, are examined in detail. The strengths and weaknesses of these three methods are discussed, and examples of their use in the literature are given and compared with other reported approaches. The need for a standard definition of compliance is also emphasised, and a method of presentation suggested. The best current advice is that QOL data should be analysed in a number of different ways, and conclusions reached only when consistency is seen.
OBJECTIVES: This paper investigates the problem of treatment-related deaths in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). DESIGN: To observe and define increased hazard levels, and to identify factors relating to these excess deaths. SETTING: The United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: A total of 2196 patients entered into the series of six randomised clinical trials in SCLC conducted by the Medical Research Council (MRC) Lung Cancer Working Party (LCWP). RESULTS: In this large series of patients an increased risk of death in the second week after commencing the first cycle of chemotherapy was observed, suggesting that of the 10% of patients who died within 3 weeks of starting chemotherapy, half may have been treatment-related. Much less additional risk was associated with subsequent cycles of chemotherapy, and no additional risk with either initial surgery or radiotherapy. Radford et al. [Eur J Cancer 1993; 29A: 81-86] suggested that the risk factors for death from sepsis were a Karnofsky Performance (KP) score of < or = 50 (translated as a WHO performance grade (PS) > or = 3), age > 50 years and three or more drugs in the chemotherapy regimen utilised. Starting with this model we found that our data suggest it can be refined by omitting age and including a white blood cell count > or = 10,000/mm3 (this variable was not tested by Radford), and changing the other categories to WHO PS > or = 2 (KP < or = 70), and four or more drugs. Within our data this revised model identified a high risk group of patients with an excess death rate of more than 15% in the second week after starting chemotherapy. Radford et als' suggestion that high risk patients be given half doses of drugs at the first cycle should be tested in a randomised clinical trial.
The object of this paper is to describe the essential features for the design and conduct of clinical trials. We include aspects of patient eligibility, random allocation to treatment including the principle of uncertainty, assessment of endpoints including those observed at different time points for each patient and trial size. Indications of appropriate methods of analysis are given, and the intention to treat principle is discussed. Some pointers to difficulties associated with data collection and management are included.
This paper investigates the influence on patient survival of an individual clinician's experience with a particular treatment regimen and the collective experience of the centre through which the patient is recruited to a particular clinical trial. Data were available from two series of randomized trials, one series in small cell and the other in non-small cell lung cancer, which were conducted by the Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. Successive small cell trials used the same chemotherapy regimen and successive non-small cell trials the same radiotherapy regimen. We found no evidence that either the degree of experience of individual clinicians with the regimen or the participation in terms of number of patients recruited to centres influenced patient survival. There is a strong suggestion, in non-small cell lung cancer that, as clinicians' experience with the regimen extended, they became increasingly likely to admit patients in poor condition to the trials. We stress how important it is to take account of patient prognostic characteristics in such an analysis, as we found that unadjusted comparisons suggested negative influences of increasing experience with the regimen. The implications for routine audit are self evident, in particular that it is not a substitute for the randomized controlled trial.
A total of 291 consecutive patients with early breast cancer who did not receive any supraclavicular prophylactic irradiation of the ipsilateral fossa have been followed for a minimum of 5 years. Isolated relapse in that site occurred in 4.5% of patients and was controlled by radical radiotherapy with a post-relapse 5-year survival of 33%. Relapse with co-existing distant metastases occurred in a further 7% and no patient survived to 3 years. Supraclavicular fossa irradiation contributes to morbidity, does not improve survival and should be abandoned in favour of delayed treatment for proven recurrence.
Results from a long-term follow-up suggest that in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and normal performance status intensive alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy improve long-term survival rates. In a non-randomised study, 22 patients with SCLC of limited extent and good performance status were prescribed six cycles of etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin and cyclophosphamide at 4 week intervals with doses of thoracic radiotherapy following the second, third and fourth cycles. Although only six patients received all their prescribed treatment, nine (41%) were alive at 1 year, seven (32%) at 2 years, six (27%) at 3 years, and four are still alive at, respectively, 42, 47, 50, and 61 months, all four being in the subgroup of eight patients with WHO performance status grade 0 at the start of treatment. In a comparison with similar patients receiving conventionally scheduled chemotherapy and radiotherapy in a concurrent trial, no difference in survival was seen in the patients with performance status grade 1 or 2, but a large difference in favour of the alternating schedule in those with grade 0 status was seen. We encourage other investigators to report the results achieved with intensive treatment in patients with WHO grade 0 performance status at the start of treatment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The accumulating data from all randomized trials conducted by the Cancer Therapy Committee (CTC) of the British Medical Research Council are monitored on a regular basis. However, for important practical reasons the form of this data monitoring may vary from trial to trial. Thus a trial addressing what is considered a major question in the treatment of cancer patients, (a 'pivotal' or 'high profile' trial), has a formal data monitoring committee (DMC). This is usually made up of two clinicians and one statistician who are completely independent of the trial organization and do not enter patients into the trial. Other trials, which constitute the majority, are monitored by a less formal trial progress group made up of the clinical co-ordinator and trial statistician, sometimes supplemented by a trial participant. Experience with this dual system has led to a new proposal: if the trial progress group wish to modify or stop a trial then they are required to set up and consult an ad hoc DMC for independent advice. This proposal has many advantages, including maximizing the use of resources available, while achieving the degree of objectivity in decision-making required for the many different types of cancer trials conducted by the CTC.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Pathology observer agreement studies are clearly important in the development of new pathology assessments and in the quality control of those assessments in common use. Setting up such studies, and reporting and interpreting their results requires careful thought and statistical expertise. Investigators are advised to seek collaboration with a statistician before embarking on these studies. Pathology reference panel reviews in multicentre studies are useful for checking eligibility when there is a high level of disagreement on the eligibility criterion between local pathologists and the reference panel members, but good agreement between members of the panel. However, such situations are uncommon.