Antibody to more than one bluetongue virus serotype in Western Australia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Maker.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A virus with the characteristics of a polyomavirus was isolated from tissue cultures prepared from the kidneys of a healthy new-born calf.
A serological survey was carried out to detect specific (serotype 20) and a group bluetongue virus antibody in cattle and sheep serums collected in Western Australia during the period January 1 1978 to June 30 1979. Of 18,849 cattle serums examined by the gel diffusion precipitin test (GDPT), 9.7% were positive and 6.1% gave doubtful results. All 1949 sheep serums tested were negative. Precipitin antibody was demonstrated in 22.5% of serums from Kimberley cattle and 3.6% of cattle serums from the Northwest. Serums collected from cattle in the South were consistently negative in GDPT. When 915 serums that reacted in the GDPT were further tested by the complement fixation test (CFT), 164 were positive. The percentage of CFT positive serums increased as the GDPT reaction became stronger. 2467 serums collected from cattle in Kimberley and Northwest areas and tested by the CFT, 175 (7.1%) were positive. These 175 positive serums were also examined by GDPT and 164 doubtful or positive reactions were obtained. The virus neutralisation (VNT) using serotype 20 virus was carried out on 3804 serums, including all serums that reacted in the GDPT, and 57 were positive. When the VNT positive serums were examined in the other 2 tests, 47 serums were either positive or doubtful in the GDPT and 8 were positive in the CFT. The presence of bluetongue virus group antibody in cattle serums closely followed the suggested distribution pattern of Culicoides brevitarsis but specific serotype 20 neutralising antibody was limited to cattle serums from stations situated north of latitude 17 degrees S in an area of mean annual rainfall higher than 700 mm.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
An avian influenza A virus (Hav7 Neq2) isolated from a feral duck in Western Australia was transmitted to groups of broiler chickens by cloaca, mouth, eye drop or spray. No disease or deaths occurred. Serum samples were examined by haemagglutination inhibition test and enzyme linked immunosorbent assays and the results gave reasonable correlation. Chickens infected by cloaca or spray gave the best overall seroconversions.
BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life can be measured by patients' health preferences (utilities or values). No method for measuring health state preferences has been standardized for children with arthritis or other musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs). Such a method is needed for economic evaluations of current and new pediatric treatments. OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess the feasibility of utility measurements in children with MSKDs, 2) to test the validity of the Health Utility Index (HUI) for these children, 3) to assess whether rating scale values can be mathematically converted into meaningful standard gamble (SG) utilities, and 4) to study whether parents can act as proxies for their children with respect to health state preferences. METHODS: Eighty parents of children with MSKDs were consecutively sampled. Their children, if 8 years of age or older (n = 55), were studied concurrently. Utilities of current health states were obtained by using the SG and the HUI in random order. In addition, health state preferences were assessed using categorical and analog rating scales. Traditional nonutility measures of health status (the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire [CHAQ] and the Activities Scale for Kids [ASK]) were also completed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess concordance between the different utility measures and also between the ratings of the parents and their children. RESULTS: Children 8 years of age or older were able to express the strength of their health state preferences using the HUI and rating scales. Children older than 10 years of age were able to use the SG method. The health state utilities of the parents were higher than those of their children. The utilities varied widely depending on the elicitation method. The expected high agreement between the SG and the HUI was not found (ICC = 0.028 for parents, ICC = 0.016 for patients). Unlike the SG, the global utilities derived from the HUI agreed better with preferences derived from rating scales (ICC = 0.23-0.25) and correlated with traditional health status measures (with CHAQ, r = -0.56; with ASK, r = 0.46) both for parents and children. It was not possible to mathematically convert rating scale preferences into SG utilities. The SG utilities were unrelated to results from the rating scales, the CHAQ, and the ASK. Especially for parents, the SG utilities were very high, even when ratings of the other measures indicated poor health. CONCLUSIONS: Although it is possible to measure health utilities for children with MSKDs, the results are highly method dependent. The properties of the HUI in this population are more like those of the traditional health status measures rather than those of the SG. Preferences derived from rating scales, although easily performed, cannot readily be converted into SG utilities. Parents' ratings for their children are impaired by risk aversion.