Biomedical subjects

D Mawman

Publications and source records attributed to D Mawman.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Self-reported benefits from successive bilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults: randomised controlled trial.

Adult users of unilateral Nucleus CI24 cochlear implants with the SPEAK processing strategy were randomised either to receive a second identical implant in the contralateral ear immediately, or to wait 12 months while they acted as controls for late-emerging benefits of the first implant. Twenty four subjects, twelve from each group, completed the study. Receipt of a second implant led to improvements in self-reported abilities in spatial hearing, quality of hearing, and hearing for speech, but to generally non-significant changes in measures of quality of life. Multivariate analyses showed that positive changes in quality of life were associated with improvements in hearing, but were offset by negative changes associated with worsening tinnitus. Even in a best-case scenario, in which no worsening of tinnitus was assumed to occur, the gain in quality of life was too small to achieve an acceptable cost-effectiveness ratio. The most promising strategies for improving the cost-effectiveness of bilateral implantation are to increase effectiveness through enhanced signal processing in binaural processors, and to reduce the cost of implant hardware.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in the elderly: Manchester experience over 13 years.

OBJECTIVES: To objectively evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of cochlear implantation in an elderly population. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Neurotology unit at Manchester Royal Infirmary, a supraregional tertiary referral centre in collaboration with Adult Cochlear Implant Programme at The University of Manchester. PARTICIPANTS: All cochlear implant procedures (38) undertaken on post-lingually deafened elderly patients (age range at the time of implantation 65-80 years, n = 34) in the period from 1989 to 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical and surgical outcomes. Audiological performance outcomes for isolated words, words in sentences in quiet and noise. Functional outcome measures used are self-reported measures of the social, psychological and emotional aspects of quality of life, and the differences between expectations for functional outcomes and the realization of functional outcomes. They included expectation profiles, Glasgow Benefit inventory (GBI) and Glasgow Health Status Inventory Questionnaire (GHSI). RESULTS: There was statistically significant improvement post-implantation of both open and closed set test scores (P < 0.01). Eighty-two percentage of patients were completely satisfied with their cochlear implants. Patients judged that implantation restored half the loss of quality of life that they had experienced as a result of severe-profound deafness with a highly significant (P < 0.001) improvement in overall quality of life after implantation. The commonest post-operative observation was transient mild pyrexia. CONCLUSIONS: The age of a cochlear implant candidate should not be a factor in the candidacy decision-making process. The quality of life of our elderly recipients was significantly improved after cochlear implant.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1997

Cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: a unique positioning and programming problem.

A case is reported in which a Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant was inserted into the basal turn of the cochlea of a patient with advanced otosclerosis. It then passed out of the anterior end of the basal turn into an otospongiotic cavity related to the cochlea. Seven electrodes were located in the basal turn and it was possible to map them sufficiently well for the patient to derive considerable benefit from the implant. The problem of implant induced facial nerve stimulation in otospongiosis is also discussed.

Cochlear Implants↗

PubMed1996

Explantation of a nucleus multichannel cochlear implant and re-implantation into the contralateral ear. A case report of a new strategy.

We present a unique case in which a multichannel cochlear implant device was explanted and the same device was re-implanted into the contralateral ear. A patient with bilateral total deafness secondary to head injury received an implant in his left ear but developed severe facial nerve stimulation. Because this stimulation could not be eliminated effectively with change of programming, it was decided to implant the contralateral ear. Since the device itself was functioning well, it was explanted from the left ear and re-implanted successfully into the right ear. Facial nerve stimulation was minimal in this ear and the patient demonstrated very good speech discrimination. To our knowledge, this is the first description of this strategy.

Aged↗