PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D N Mastronarde

Publications and source records attributed to D N Mastronarde.

28 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Receptive-field properties and classification of cells.

Cells in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) were studied by presentation of visual stimuli and also by simultaneous recording of their ganglion cell inputs in the retina. This paper describes receptive-field properties and a new system of classification for LGN X-cells that appear to receive essentially only one excitatory retinal input. These X-cells were of two distinct classes. The visual responses of one class of cell (XS, single) replicated the basic form of the responses of a retinal X-cell. The other class of cell (XL, lagged) had responses with two remarkable features: their firing lagged 40-80 ms behind that of XS-cells or ganglion cells at response onset, and they fired anomalously at times when XS-cells or ganglion cells would not be firing. Thus, for a flashing spot, XL-cells were inhibited from firing after stimulus onset, during the time when XS-cells or retinal X-cells had an initial transient peak in firing; XL-cells generally had an anomalous peak in firing after stimulus offset, after XS-cells or retinal X-cells had stopped firing. For a moving bar, XS-cells or retinal X-cells responded primarily while the bar was in the receptive-field center, whereas most of a typical XL-cell's response occurred after the bar had left the receptive-field center. The latencies of various features in the visual responses were analyzed. For several visual response latencies, the distribution was clearly bimodal, thus objectively demonstrating the existence of two cell classes. Using only the latencies from spot and bar responses, over 90% of these single-input cells could be reliably identified as belonging to one of the two classes. The remaining cells (7 of 128) were intermediate between the two classes in some but not all respects; because they had some properties in common, these cells were kept in a separate group (XPL, partially lagged). The axons of both XS- and XL-cells could be antidromically activated from visual cortex. Cortical latencies were typically 0.7-2.0 ms for XS-cells but much longer, typically 2.4-5.0 ms, for XL-cells. It is possible that XL-cells have not previously been recognized as a separate class because cells with such long latencies have been recorded infrequently in the past. Responses to central flashing spots were more transient than those of retinal X-cells for most XS-cells and more sustained for most XL-cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. II. Retinal inputs and the generation of receptive-field properties.

The retinal inputs to cells in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) were directly recorded to study the basis for the properties of two classes of LGN X-cells: Xs (single) and XL (lagged). The presence of excitatory or inhibitory input to an LGN cell from a particular simultaneously recorded ganglion cell was assessed with cross-correlograms during unstimulated activity. Because neighboring ganglion cells do not fire independently, features in a retinogeniculate correlogram can arise in two ways that must be distinguished by a direct effect of the ganglion cell on the LGN cell, or by correlated firing between that ganglion cell and some other ganglion cell that is an excitatory or inhibitory input to the LGN cell. It was possible to determine the origin of correlogram features because features indicating a retinogeniculate effect were distinctly different in timing and strength from features arising solely from correlated firing in the retina. The characteristic feature in a correlogram between an LGN cell and an excitatory retinal input was a sharp peak in LGN cell firing rate at the appropriate latency after the firing of the ganglion cell. The characteristic feature for an inhibitory input was a dip in LGN cell firing rate after the firing of the ganglion cell. Typically, this dip lasted 10-40 ms and was followed by a prolonged enhancement in LGN cell firing rate, which may reflect a postinhibitory rebound. XS-cells had a single retinal X input whose excitatory effect caused most of the LGN cell's spikes during stimulated and unstimulated activity. There was no conclusive evidence that any XS-cell received excitatory retinal input from either Y-cells or other X-cells of the same center sign. There was usually evidence for inhibition of XS-cells by retinal X-cells of opposite center sign with receptive fields highly overlapping that of the XS-cell, but rarely evidence for inhibition by Y-cells. XL-cells also had only a single excitatory input, but this X input had a relatively weak effect that caused only a minority of the LGN cell's spikes, typically 17% during maintained activity and 29% during visual stimulation. The input's excitatory effect was immediately followed by strong inhibition of the XL-cell. XL-cells were also inhibited by retinal X-cells of the same center sign that were adjacent (nearest neighbors) to the excitatory input. The strength and latency of both of these inhibitory effects indicate that the inhibition was disynaptic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Two types of cat retinal ganglion cells that are suppressed by contrast.

Despite some controversy in the literature, all available evidence indicates that cat retinal ganglion cells whose firing is suppressed by contrast are of two distinct types. The two types differ principally in whether they are suppressed tonically or transiently by contrast in the receptive field.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1984

Non-uniform postnatal growth of the cat retina.

The distributions of alpha-type ganglion cells in 3-week-old and adult cats were used to measure the increase in the distances between existing cells and thus the amount of growth in various regions of the retina. Growth shows two major non-uniformities. (1) The area centralis is at the point of minimum growth; its area increases by only about 3% while regions near the retinal margin increase in area by about 80%. (2) The retina grows about half as much in linear extent as does the radius of the eye and thus comes to occupy a smaller fraction of the globe. Measurements of retinal dimensions indicate that both non-uniformities also occur from birth to 3 weeks. These non-uniformities have the following implications. (1) They would tend to elongate dendritic fields radially, in the direction of the area centralis, in central retina but perpendicular to this direction in peripheral retina. However, these asymmetries are probably not the primary reason why ganglion cells throughout the retina tend to have radially oriented dendritic fields (Leventhal and Schall, '83). (2) Greater growth in the periphery could contribute to the gradient of increasing dendritic field size from central to peripheral retina if the dendritic fields of ganglion cells passively stretched as the retina expanded. Passive stretching is not the primary determinant of dendritic extent, however, because the dendritic fields of beta-type ganglion cells were found to grow 70% more from 3 weeks to adulthood than can be accounted for by passive stretching. (3) Greater peripheral growth steepens the central-to-peripheral gradient of decreasing ganglion cell density; if this trend also occurs prenatally, it could be the major factor in producing the final adult gradient.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Organization of the cat's optic tract as assessed by single-axon recordings.

The organization of the cat's optic tract was assessed from recordings of single axons during vertical electrode penetrations. To analyse both the order and the scatter of axons in the optic tract, units were pooled from electrode tracks that had evidently passed through nearly equivalent parts of the tract. Receptive field elevation, the most strongly ordered parameter, was primarily organized horizontally, increasing from posteromedial to anterolateral tract. Azimuth tended to increase from dorsal to ventral, but was only half as well organized vertically as elevation was horizontally. Axon type was also organized vertically, at least among axons that were identified as X or Y (contralateral axons of less than 20 degrees eccentricity). Axons of ON-center X-type were located mostly in the dorsal quarter, OFF-center X-type in the dorsal two-thirds, and Y-type (ON- and OFF-center) in the ventral two-thirds of the tract. Another difference between the horizontal and vertical axes was revealed by estimates that axons of one type, from one retinal locus, spread about twice as far vertically as horizontally in the tract. Torrealba et al. ('82) have proposed that the sequential addition of ingrowing axons to the pial surface is a major source of the order in the tract. The differences between horizontal and vertical order seen here suggest an extension of this proposal: the sequential addition of axons to the ventral surface generates the vertical order, while some other process arranges axons horizontally, along the ventral surface, according to receptive field elevation (or some similar one-dimensional retinal coordinate).

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Prior activity influences the velocity of impulses in frog and cat optic nerve fibers.

Under normal visual stimulation, simultaneous recording from ganglion cells in the retina and from the axons of these cells in the brain revealed activity-dependent differences in the velocity of impulse propagation. In frog ganglion cells, spikes initiated 5-500 ms after a previous impulse showed supernormal increases in conduction velocity of up to 17%; spikes initiated 500-2000 ms after a previous one traveled more slowly than a spike initiated after a long period of rest. Cat ganglion cell impulses showed much smaller supernormality (maximum 3%), but exhibited pronounced slowing due to refractoriness and long-term fatigue associated with their high levels of spontaneous activity.

Animals↗
PubMed1983

Correlated firing of cat retinal ganglion cells. I. Spontaneously active inputs to X- and Y-cells.

1. The shared inputs to cat retinal ganglion cells have been investigated by studying correlations in the maintained firing of neighboring ganglion cells. The firing of one cell was recorded from its axon in the optic tract, while that of a neighboring cell was simultaneously recorded with a second electrode in the retina. The recorded cells were of the X- or Y-type and viewed a uniform screen having a luminance of 10 cd/m2. 2. Ganglion cells with overlapping receptive-field centers showed two basic forms of correlated firing: if they had the same center sign (both on-center or both off-center), then they tended to fire at the same time, as shown by a peak in their cross-correlogram; but if they had opposite center signs (an on- and and off-center cell), they tended not to fire at the same time, as shown by a well, or dip, in their cross-correlogram. 3. Both of these tendencies were strongest for cells that were close together and did not appear for cells with nonoverlapping receptive-field centers. The strongest correlations were between neighboring Y-cells, cells with large fields, and the weakest were between X-cells, cells with small fields. In general, the strength of the correlations depended primarily on the area of the overlap between fields. 4. These correlations in maintained firing appear to be principally or entirely caused by shared inputs to the ganglion cells from more distal retinal neurons. The signals from these distal neurons appear to have strong, brief (4-8 ms), well-defined effects on ganglion cells, which are observed even in the absence of a visual stimulus. The inputs responsible for the correlated firing are thus referred to as spontaneously active inputs or simply as active inputs. 5. An analysis of the features in the various types of cross-correlograms supports the following statements about these spontaneously active inputs. a) There are two types of active inputs: inputs excitatory to on-center cells and simultaneously inhibitory to off-center center cells and inputs excitatory to off-center cells and simultaneously inhibitory to on-center cells. b) The active inputs of each type provide excitation to both X- and Y-cells of one center sign and inhibition to both X- and Y-cells of the other center sign. There is no evidence for a special class of more selective inputs providing input only to X-cells or only to Y-cells. c) Active inputs account for the majority (about 80%) of the spikes in the maintained activity of Y-cells but only a small fraction (about 15%) of the spikes in the maintained activity of X-cells. 6. A likely source of the active input signals appears to be spiking amacrine cells with a low rate of spontaneous activity.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD.

We have developed a computer software package, IMOD, as a tool for analyzing and viewing three-dimensional biological image data. IMOD is useful for studying and modeling data from tomographic, serial section, and optical section reconstructions. The software allows image data to be visualized by several different methods. Models of the image data can be visualized by volume or contour surface rendering and can yield quantitative information.

Animals↗