PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D O Bowker

Publications and source records attributed to D O Bowker.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Sensitivity to countermodulating gratings following spatiotemporal adaptation.

Contrast sensitivities to countermodulating gratings were measured with a two-alternative temporal forced-choice procedure following adaptation to a static grating of the same spatial frequency, a homogeneous flickering field of the same temporal frequency, or a countermodulating grating of identical spatial and temporal frequencies. At high spatial frequencies, the temporal-frequency content of the adaptation was not critical, that is, a countermodulating adaptation grating was only slightly more effective at raising threshold than was a static adaptation grating. At low spatial frequencies, the sensitivity to countermodulating test gratings could not be reduced by either a high-contrast stimulus matching the test in the spatial domain only or by one matching the test in the temporal domain only. Adapting to a high-contrast stimulus matching the countermodulating test grating in both spatial- and temporal-frequency domains was effective at reducing test sensitivity for one observer but not for another.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

Suprathreshold spatiotemporal response characteristics of the human visual system.

The apparent contrasts of suprathreshold stationary gratings, countermodulated gratings, and homogeneous flickering fields were assessed with a contrast-matching procedure. Results show that, as stimulus amplitude is increased relative to threshold, variations in apparent contrast with spatiotemporal-frequency content become much less pronounced. In other words, the contrast-matching functions are more uniform across both spatial and temporal frequency at levels of contrast well above threshold. These data are interpreted in terms of a compensatory stage in the visual system that varies its gain characteristics according to the detectability of the stimulus.

Differential Threshold↗

Perceived flicker rate of suprathreshold stimuli: influences of spatial-frequency content and modulation amplitude.

A number of experiments were conducted in which observers had to discriminate the apparent flicker rates of temporally modulated gratings and flickering homogeneous fields. When both intramodal- and cross-modal-matching procedures were used, apparent flicker rate was found to be consistently higher for countermodulating gratings than for homogeneous fields of the same temporal frequency. Also, the apparent flicker rate of countermodulating gratings tended to increase as spatial frequency increased. These effects are more pronounced at low rates of temporal modulation than at high rates and are not dependent on variations in the stimulus's apparent modulation amplitude.

Flicker Fusion↗

Binocular flicker appears faster than monocular flicker.

Observers adjusted the frequency of an auditory click to match the apparent flicker rate of a sinusoidally modulated visual display. Matches made for binocularly viewed flicker were nearly twice those for monocularly viewed flicker but only at high rates of temporal modulation.

Flicker Fusion↗

Spatial frequency discrimination thresholds in different orientations.

Spatial frequency discrimination thresholds were obtained for two observers in horizontal, vertical, and oblique (45 degrees, 135 degrees) meridians. Psychometric discrimination functions derived by a forced-choice procedure were essentially the same for the four meridians at lower spatial frequencies. However, at higher frequencies discrimination thresholds were lower for horizontal and vertical stimuli than for oblique stimuli.

Humans↗