PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

D O Carson

Publications and source records attributed to D O Carson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Electrolyte concentration differences between left and right vitreous humor samples.

Between-eye differences in electrolyte concentrations were studied in 200 medico-legal autopsies using an ion-specific electrode system. Taking the highest of the paired vitreous potassium concentrations, cases < 15 mM/L were classified as biochemically nonputrefied (Cat.1, n = 124), cases 15 to 20 mM/L as early putrefaction (Cat.2, n = 51), and cases > 20 mM/L as biochemically putrefied (Cat.3, n = 25). Mean paired vitreous sodium for all cases (n = 200) was 112 to 173 mM/L (mean 148, standard deviation (SD) = 8.9); between-eye differences were 0 to 8 mM/L (0% to 5.1% of mean), averaging 1.5 mM/L (1%) and with only one case (in Cat.3) outside instrument accuracy (+/- 3 mM/L). Mean paired vitreous chloride for all cases was 73 to 124 mM/L (mean 109, SD = 7.8); between-eye differences were 0 to 9 mM/L (0% to 8.8% of mean), averaging 1.7 mM/L (1.5%) and with 5 of 200 cases outside instrument accuracy (+/- 3 mM/L). Thus between-eye concentration differences of sodium and chloride are tolerable using this methodology. Previous reports of greater variability likely reflect errors introduced by sample manipulation prior to analysis. By contrast, between-eye differences in potassium in Cat.1 cases were 0 to 2.34 mM/L (0% to 21.8% of mean) averaging 0.37 mM/L (3.3%). Significant and erratic between-eye differences in potassium undermine the usefulness of vitreous potassium in estimation of time of death.

Electrolytes

Detection of white restorative dental materials using an alternative light source.

We assessed the value of an alternative light source for detecting white composite dental materials in burned and unburned teeth. Teeth filled with 18 different restorative materials (composite, glass ionomer or hybrid composite), were viewed with a Polilight. Between 415 nm and 555 nm, the glass ionomers showed distinctly different optical properties from the other materials: they either fluoresced or appeared darker. Wavelengths 415 nm to 530 nm gave a general enhancement in composite detection (17 of 18 materials). Light above 590 nm was of little value, enhancing detection in only 2 of 18 materials. After simulated burning of the teeth, there was enhanced visibility of 8 of 18 materials at wavelengths under 350 nm. Burning destroyed the previously distinct optical properties of the glass ionomers. Overall, this alternative light source aids the identification of white composite dental materials and could be used in routine forensic odontology practice.

Burns