Biomedical subjects

D Obias-Manno

Publications and source records attributed to D Obias-Manno.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Unconventional applications in pacemaker therapy.

Since its inception, the principal application of permanent pacing has been for the correction of symptomatic bradycardia. During the past 3 decades, pacemaker therapy indications have evolved, through scientific research and through advances in technology, beyond conduction system disorders and sinus node dysfunction. This article presents recent progress in the application of permanent pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, neurocardiogenic syncope, and in long-QT syndrome. In each clinical entity, certain pacing parameters are crucial for achieving the therapeutic goal. Advanced practice clinicians will encounter these patients in practice and are urged to recognize the therapeutic goal and optimal function of the device.

Cardiomyopathy, Dilated↗

PubMed1996

Adherence and arrhythmic mortality in the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST).

Patient adherence to therapy is essential to assess treatment efficacy, particularly in clinical trials. Active treatment usually is expected to benefit patients. The healthy adherer effect, the association or greater adherence to all health-promoting behaviors, including medication and overall concern for health, explains the improved survival of more adherent patients in both active and placebo medication groups of several clinical trials. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST), a placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial of post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias, in which active medication (encainide or flecainide) led to increased mortality, provided an opportunity to examine the relationship of adherence to survival from a different perspective. We consider whether adherence to active treatment was related to arrhythmic mortality and whether a healthy adherer effect might counteract the effect of treatment on mortality among patients taking active medication. Adherence (average pill count) at the first follow-up visit did not differ in the active treatment (92.2%, standard deviation (SD) = 11.97, n = 574) and placebo (90.8%, SD = 13.66, n = 579) groups. In a Cox proportional hazard regression model, medication adherence predicted arrhythmic mortality among the active (P < 0.0062) but not the placebo medication group. The effect of adherence on arrhythmic mortality was significant beyond the effects of ejection fraction, race, spouse, smoking status, diuretic medication, and history of MI. A 10% increase in adherence led to more than a threefold increase of risk of arrhythmic death. The design of the CAST, which included a titration phase, may have tended to select relatively adherent patients since only those whose arrhythmias were suppressed with active medication were randomized into the trial. The data do not support a strong healthy adherer effect in the CAST. There was no evidence in this study that a healthy adherer effect counterbalanced the effect of the active medication.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

PubMed1991

Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: In the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, designed to test the hypothesis that suppression of ventricular ectopy after a myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of sudden death, patients in whom ventricular ectopy could be suppressed with encainide, flecainide, or moricizine were randomly assigned to receive either active drug or placebo. The use of encainide and flecainide was discontinued because of excess mortality. We examined the mortality and morbidity after randomization to encainide or flecainide or their respective placebo. RESULTS: Of 1498 patients, 857 were assigned to receive encainide or its placebo (432 to active drug and 425 to placebo) and 641 were assigned to receive flecainide or its placebo (323 to active drug and 318 to placebo). After a mean follow-up of 10 months, 89 patients had died: 59 of arrhythmia (43 receiving drug vs. 16 receiving placebo; P = 0.0004), 22 of nonarrhythmic cardiac causes (17 receiving drug vs. 5 receiving placebo; P = 0.01), and 8 of noncardiac causes (3 receiving drug vs. 5 receiving placebo). Almost all cardiac deaths not due to arrhythmia were attributed to acute myocardial infarction with shock (11 patients receiving drug and 3 receiving placebo) or to chronic congestive heart failure (4 receiving drug and 2 receiving placebo). There were no differences between the patients receiving active drug and those receiving placebo in the incidence of nonlethal disqualifying ventricular tachycardia, proarrhythmia, syncope, need for a permanent pacemaker, congestive heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, angina, or need for coronary-artery bypass grafting or angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: There was an excess of deaths due to arrhythmia and deaths due to shock after acute recurrent myocardial infarction in patients treated with encainide or flecainide. Nonlethal events, however, were equally distributed between the active-drug and placebo groups. The mechanisms underlying the excess mortality during treatment with encainide or flecainide remain unknown.

Actuarial Analysis↗