PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D P Foley

Publications and source records attributed to D P Foley.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Electrocardiogram-gated intravascular ultrasound image acquisition after coronary stent deployment facilitates on-line three-dimensional reconstruction and automated lumen quantification.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the feasibility, reliability and reproducibility of electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image acquisition during automated transducer withdrawal and automated three-dimensional (3D) boundary detection for assessing on-line the result of coronary stenting. BACKGROUND: Systolic-diastolic image artifacts frequently limit the clinical applicability of such automated analysis systems. METHODS: In 30 patients, after successful angiography-guided implantation of 34 stents in 30 target lesions, we carried out IVUS examinations on-line with the use of ECG-gated automated 3D analyses and conventional manual analyses of two-dimensional images from continuous pullbacks. These on-line measurements were compared with off-line 3D reanalyses. The adequacy of stent deployment was determined by using ultrasound criteria for stent apposition, symmetry and expansion. RESULTS: Gated image acquisition was successfully performed in all patients to allow on-line 3D analysis within 8.7 +/- 0.6 min (mean +/- SD). Measurements by on-line and off-line 3D analyses correlated closely (r > or = 0.95), and the minimal stent lumen differed only minimally (8.6 +/- 2.8 mm2 vs. 8.5 +/- 2.8 mm2, p = NS). The conventional analysis significantly overestimated the minimal stent lumen (9.0 +/- 2.7 mm2, p < 0.005) in comparison with results of both 3D analyses. Fourteen stents (41%) failed to meet the criteria by both 3D analyses, all of these not reaching optimal expansion, but only 7 (21%) were detected by conventional analysis (p < 0.02). Intraobserver and interobserver comparison of stent lumen measurements by the automated approach revealed minimal differences (0.0 +/- 0.2 mm2 and 0.0 +/- 0.3 mm2) and excellent correlations (r = 0.99 and 0.98, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ECG-gated image acquisition after coronary stent deployment is feasible, permits on-line automated 3D reconstruction and analysis and provides reliable and reproducible measurements; these factors facilitate detection of the minimal lumen site.

Coronary Angiography↗

Clinical and angiographic comparison of matched patients with successful directional coronary atherectomy or stent implantation for primary coronary artery lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the long-term clinical and angiographic effects of successful directional atherectomy and stent implantation and to examine whether restenosis is related to the mechanism of lumen improvement as well as the extent of lumen gain. BACKGROUND: Directional atherectomy and coronary stent implantation have been shown to achieve a more optimal immediate result that may lead to a more favorable long-term angiographic outcome and fewer target vessel revascularizations than does angioplasty. However, it remains to be determined whether one of the devices used in these interventions provides consistently better results than the other. METHODS: To allow meaningful comparisons a prospectively collected series of 117 patients successfully treated with atherectomy were individually matched with a prospectively collected series of 117 patients successfully treated with stent implantation. Matching for baseline characteristics identified patients with identical lesion location and lesion severity, and immediate and late angiographic and clinical outcome were compared. To evaluate the possibility of a procedure effect on restenosis, patients were further matched for both immediate angiographic outcome and baseline characteristics, providing 150 matched patients for comparison. As confirmatory analysis, multivariate models were constructed to predict late lumen diameter. RESULTS: Matching resulted in two comparable groups with equivalent baseline clinical and stenosis characteristics (n = 117 pairs). Atherectomy led to a smaller immediate gain than stenting and, because late loss was similar in both groups, stenting resulted in a larger late lumen (1.96 +/- 0.51 vs. 1.66 +/- 0.55 mm, p < 0.0001). When patients were matched for immediate gain and baseline characteristics (n = 75 pairs), lumen loss was more pronounced after atherectomy, and thus the minimal lumen diameter at follow-up differed significantly between the two groups (1.66 +/- 0.53 vs. 1.90 +/- 0.47 mm, p = 0.004). This beneficial angiographic effect of stenting was accompanied by a reduced need for repeat interventions. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent effect of the interventional device used, whereby less loss and greater lumen diameter at follow-up were predicted for stent implantation than for atherectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Successful stent implantation provided a more favorable long-term angiographic outcome and lower rates of restenosis and need for target lesion revascularization than did atherectomy. This favorable effect of stenting not only is related to a larger, immediate gain, but also seems to attenuate late lumen loss.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Fluvastatin for the prevention of restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: angiographic and methodological background of the fluvastatin angioplasty restenosis trial.

Luminal renarrowing (restenosis) is the major limitation of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), and the search for a 'magic bullet' to prevent this apparent biological healing response to vessel injury has thus far been unsuccessful. Large clinical trials using serial quantitative coronary angiography have, however, provided some valuable insight into this area. In particular, the restenosis process may be measured as the loss in minimal luminal diameter from post-PTCA to follow-up angiography, and is essentially ubiquitous and normally distributed. The angiographic outcome of clinical trials can thus be appropriately evaluated using a continuous rather than a categorical approach, which also considerably reduces the number of patients required. Fluvastatin, a synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, has been shown experimentally to reduce the neointimal proliferative response after PTCA, independent of its lipid-lowering action. The FLuvastatin Angioplasty REstenosis trial was designed to evaluate whether fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily, commencing at least 2 weeks before planned PTCA, can reduce luminal loss by 30% from successful PTCA to follow-up angiography at 26 +/- 2 weeks in 730 evaluable patients.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Coronary stenting.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Biocompatible Materials↗

Provisional stenting--stent-like balloon angioplasty: evidence to define the continuing role of balloon angioplasty for percutaneous coronary revascularization.

To clarify the current role of balloon angioplasty in interventional cardiology, in an era of increasing development of new devices, especially stents, we performed a retrospective comparative evaluation within the well-known BENESTENT trial. We defined a balloon angioplasty result of diameter stenosis less than 30% by quantitative angiography a 'stent-like' result and compared 6-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcome with patients undergoing Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation. Patients having a so-defined 'stent-like' result had similar angiographic and clinical outcomes to patients receiving a stent. It is concluded that achievement of a postangioplasty diameter stenosis less than 30% may be considered clinically equivalent to the average result of Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Immediate and late outcome of excimer laser and balloon coronary angioplasty: a quantitative angiographic comparison based on matched lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare acute lumen changes and late lumen narrowing during and after excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty, measured by quantitative coronary angiography, with the immediate and long-term outcome of balloon angioplasty alone. BACKGROUND: Although excimer laser coronary angioplasty is used as an adjunct or alternative to balloon angioplasty, limited comparative data exist regarding the immediate and long-term efficacy of excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty alone. METHODS: A series of 53 lesions in 47 consecutive patients successfully treated with excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty were individually matched after completion of 6-month follow-up angiography with 53 successfully treated balloon angioplasty lesions according to vessel location, preprocedural minimal lumen diameter and reference diameter. Immediate and long-term angiographic results were assessed by an automated lumen contour detection algorithm. RESULTS: Before intervention in the laser and balloon angioplasty groups, respectively, minimal lumen diameter (mean +/- SD) was 0.73 +/- 0.47 and 0.74 +/- 0.46 mm, and reference diameter was 2.71 +/- 0.42 and 2.72 +/- 0.41 mm. Laser angioplasty was followed by adjunctive balloon dilation in 50 lesions. Mean balloon diameter at maximal inflation was similar in both treatment groups (2.61 +/- 0.32 and 2.65 +/- 0.38 mm, respectively), resulting in similar minimal lumen diameters after intervention of 1.77 +/- 0.41 and 1.78 +/- 0.34 mm, respectively. At follow-up angiography, minimal lumen diameter after excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty was 1.17 +/- 0.63 mm, and that after balloon angioplasty alone was 1.46 +/- 0.67 mm (p = 0.02). The angiographic restenosis rates at follow-up using the 50% diameter stenosis cutoff criterion were 57% and 34%, respectively (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative angiographic analysis of a matched group of 106 successfully treated coronary lesions showed a similar immediate outcome but reduced long-term efficacy of excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty compared with that after balloon angioplasty alone.

Algorithms↗

Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups.

With the increasing clinical application of new devices for percutaneous coronary revascularization, maximization of the acute angiographic result has become widely recognized as a key factor in maintained clinical and angiographic success. What is unclear, however, is whether the specific mode of action of different devices might exert an additional independent effect on late luminal renarrowing. The purpose of this study was to investigate such a difference in the degree of provocation of luminal renarrowing (or 'restenosis propensity') by different devices, among 3660 patients, who had 4342 lesions successfully treated by balloon angioplasty (n = 3797), directional coronary atherectomy (n = 200), Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation (n = 229) or excimer laser coronary angioplasty (n = 116) and who also underwent quantitative angiographic analysis pre- and post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up. To allow valid comparisons between the groups, because of significant differences in coronary vessel size (balloon angioplasty = 2.62 +/- 0.55 mm, directional coronary atherectomy = 3.28 +/- 0.62 mm, excimer laser coronary angioplasty = 2.51 +/- 0.47 mm, Palmaz-Schatz = 3.01 +/- 0.44 mm; P < 0.0001), the comparative measurements of interest selected were the 'relative loss' in luminal diameter (RLoss = loss/vessel size) to denote the restenosis process, and the 'relative lumen at follow-up' (RLfup = minimal luminal diameter at follow up/vessel size) to represent the angiographic outcome. For consistency, lesion severity pre-intervention was represented by the 'relative lumen pre' (RLpre = minimal luminal diameter pre/vessel size) and the luminal increase at intervention was measured as 'relative gain' (relative gain = gain/ vessel size). Differences in restenosis propensity between devices was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Multivariate models were constructed to determine relative loss and relative lumen at follow-up, taking account of relative lumen pre-intervention, lesion location, relative gain, vessel size and the device used. In addition, model-estimated relative loss and relative lumen at follow-up at given relative lumen pre-intervention relative gain and vessel size, were compared among the four groups. Significant differences were detected among the groups both with respect to these estimates, as well as in the degree of influence of progressively increasing relative gain, on the extent of renarrowing (relative loss) and angiographic outcome (relative lumen at follow-up), particularly at higher levels of luminal increase (relative gain). Specifically, lesions treated by balloon angioplasty or Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation (the predominantly 'dilating' interventions) were associated with more favourable angiographic profiles than directional atherectomy or excimer laser (the mainly 'debulking' interventions). Significant effects of lesion severity and location, as well as the well known influence of luminal increase on both luminal renarrowing and late angiographic outcome were also noted. These findings indicate that propensity to restenosis after apparently successful intervention is influenced not only by the degree of luminal enlargement achieved at intervention, but by the device used to achieve it. In view of the clinical implications of such findings, further evaluation in larger randomized patient populations is warranted.

Adult↗

Prevention of restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: rationale and design of the Fluvastatin Angioplasty Restenosis (FLARE) Trial. The FLARE Study Group.

Prevention of restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA) continues to present the greatest therapeutic challenge in interventional cardiology. Experimental and pathological studies describe restenosis as no more than the biologic healing response to arterial injury. Studies of serial quantitative coronary angiography have demonstrated that this biologic process may be measured as the loss in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) from post-PTCA to follow-up angiography and that it is essentially ubiquitous and normally distributed. Thus, quantitative coronary angiography has become the gold standard for evaluation of the angiographic outcome of clinical trials of new agents and devices aimed at prevention of restenosis. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors inhibit biosynthesis of mevalonate, a precursor of non-sterol compounds involved in cell proliferation, and thus may control the neointimal response, which forms the kernel of restenosis. Experimental evidence suggests that fluvastatin may exert a greater direct inhibitory effect on proliferating vascular myocytes than other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, independent of any lipid-lowering action. The Fluvastatin Angioplasty Restenosis (FLARE) Trial was conceived, in collaboration between the Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and Sandoz Pharma, to evaluate the ability of fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily to reduce restenosis after successful single-lesion PTCA. Treatment of suitable patients begins 2 weeks before PTCA and continues after successful PTCA (residual diameter stenosis < 50%, without major cardiac complications) to follow-up angiography at 26 +/- 2 weeks. Restenosis is measured by quantitative coronary angiography at a core laboratory as the loss in MLD from post-PTCA to follow-up angiography. It is calculated (90% power, alpha = 0.05) that 730 evaluable patients will be needed to test the hypothesis that fluvastatin will reduce the expected post-PTCA loss in MLD by 40%. Serial lipid analysis will be carried out at a central laboratory. Trial evaluation is focused on the primary endpoint (change in MLD) but includes primary clinical endpoints (death, myocardial infarction, or the need for coronary artery bypass graft surgery or reintervention up to 40 weeks after PTCA) as well as secondary and tertiary clinical, angiographic, and laboratory endpoints. According to this methodologic approach, the effect of fluvastatin in luminal renarrowing and clinical events after successful PTCA as well as possible associations of lipid parameters with restenosis can be comprehensively investigated.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Quantification of intracoronary volume by videodensitometry: validation study using fluid filling of human coronary casts.

Changes in intracoronary volume reflect the hemodynamic significance of progression or regression of diffuse coronary artery disease where intracoronary catheters cannot be applied for direct measurements due to small vessel dimensions. We have validated the videodensitometric measurement of intracoronary volume with epoxy casts of postmortem human coronary arteries. The volume of 31 coronary segments (cross-sectional areas in a range of 2-13 mm2) measured by fluid-filling using a precision dispenser was compared with the respective single plane intracoronary volume assessments obtained by the videodensitometric algorithm of the new generation Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (CAAS II). The true and measured values of volume were compared by calculation of the mean of the signed differences +/- standard deviation and by linear regression analysis. Videodensitometric measurement of intracoronary volume correlate well with fluid-filling of human coronary artery casts (correlation coefficient: r = 0.99, y = 1.96 +/- 0.99x, standard error of estimate: SEE = 3.96) with a significant trend towards overestimation of true volume values (mean difference = 1.73 +/- 3.64 mm3, P < 0.05). Intracoronary volume estimations can be used to measure changes of luminal dimensions of coronary arteries and may offer a new approach to assessment of progression or regression of diffuse coronary artery disease.

Coronary Angiography↗

Morphologic changes during follow-up after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty: quantitative angiographic analysis in 778 lesions--further evidence for the restenosis paradox. MERCATOR Study Group (Multicenter European Research trial with Cilazapril after Angioplasty to prevent Transluminal Coronary Obstruction and Restenosis).

The purpose of this study was to determine if there are any morphologic characteristics of lesions that renarrow (that is, restenotic lesions) following successful coronary balloon angioplasty that are different from their appearance pretreatment or from the appearance of nonrestenotic lesions that might provide some new insight into the restenosis phenomenon. The study population consisted of 653 patients (778 lesions) with 6 months of angiographic follow-up (94% angiographic follow-up rate) who were participating in the Multicenter European Research trial with Cilazapril after Angioplasty to prevent Transluminal coronary Obstruction and Restenosis (MERCATOR) study. Detailed quantitative angiographic measurements, including the mean diameter of the vessel segment (in millimeters) that was subjected to balloon dilation, were performed preangioplasty, postangioplasty, and at follow-up using the cardiovascular angiographic analysis system to provide some objective measurement of the actual extent of luminal changes in the months following coronary balloon angioplasty. Two different approaches for restenosis were used: (1) static criterion of > 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up and (2) dynamic criteria of > or = 0.40 or > or = 0.72 mm change in minimal lumen diameter between postangioplasty and follow-up. Both approaches identified more severe stenosis to be a typical feature for restenotic lesions before angioplasty compared with nonrestenotic lesions. No differences were observed in lesion length, balloon-inflated vessel segment, or roughness index before angioplasty between the groups. Conflicting data were found for the amount of atherosclerotic plaque, symmetry index, and curvature index. The restenotic lesion at follow-up compared with its initial appearance gave conflicting results depending on which approach was used. The dynamic criteria illustrate that the reference diameter and the mean diameter of the entire segment dilated are reduced during follow-up. Two messages emerge from the study: (1) the restenosis process clearly involves the apparent normal vessel wall adjacent to the actual lesion, probably in response to the unavoidable injury caused by balloon dilatation and (2) the use of percentage diameter stenosis measurements depending on the assumptions of normality for a reference segment will therefore underestimate the true extent of the restenosis process and should be replaced in clinical angiographic studies by absolute luminal measurements.

Adult↗

Angioscopic versus angiographic detection of intimal dissection and intracoronary thrombus.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to compare coronary angioscopy with angiography for the detection of intimal dissection and intracoronary thrombus. BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated previously that coronary angioscopy provides more intravascular detail than cineangiography. Both imaging methods have to be compared directly to assess the additional diagnostic value of angioscopy. METHODS: The angiograms and videotapes of 52 patients who had undergone angioscopy were reviewed independently by two observers unaware of other findings. Classic angiographic definitions were used for dissection and thrombus. Angioscopic dissection was defined as visible cracks or fissures on the lumen surface or mobile protruding structures that are contiguous with the vessel wall. Angioscopic thrombus was defined as a red, white or mixed red and white intraluminal mass. RESULTS: Angiography and angioscopy were in agreement in 40.4% of cases in the absence of thrombus and in 11.5% in the presence of thrombus. No fewer than 25 (48.1%) angioscopically observed thrombi remained undetected at angiography. With angioscopy as the standard, although the specificity of angiography for thrombus was 100%, sensitivity was very low at 19%. Angioscopic dissection was present in 40 patients (76.9%) versus angiographic dissection in 15 patients (28.8%). With regard to dissection, there was no correlation between the two imaging methods (r phi = 0.15, p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary angiography underestimates the presence of intracoronary thrombus. Angioscopy and angiography are complementary techniques for detecting and grading intimal dissections.

Adult↗

The 'Ermenonville' classification of observations at coronary angioscopy--evaluation of intra- and inter-observer agreement. European Working Group on Coronary Angioscopy.

A European coronary angioscopy working group has been established to create and evaluate a classification system for angioscopic observation. The 'Ermenonville' classification features items, graded in 3-5 categories, such as lumen diameter, shape of narrowing, colours of surface, atheroma, dissection, thrombus, etc. Inter- and intra-observer agreement on the interpretation of angioscopic images, using this classification system, was studied within the working group. Kappa values for chance-corrected intra-observer agreement of the diagnostic items were 0.51-0.67. The mean kappa values for inter-observer agreement were very low at 0.13-0.29. The important items, such as red thrombus and dissection were studied after recoding as either present or absent. These items proved to have a good intra-observer agreement, and an acceptable inter-observer agreement after recoding. Other angioscopic diagnoses should be made with caution. Multicentre angioscopy studies should make use of an angioscopy core laboratory. A set of definitions for coronary angioscopy is proposed, and this working group will re-evaluate observer agreements using these definitions.

Angioscopy↗

Influence of coronary vessel size on renarrowing process and late angiographic outcome after successful balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although coronary angioplasty is increasingly applied in the treatment of multivessel disease and a broadening range of vessel size, the influence of vessel size itself on the late results of intervention is unresolved. An influence of vessel size on late outcome would carry implications for the application and evaluation of interventional devices, which are selectively used in larger or smaller vessels. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of vessel size on both the restenosis process and late angiographic outcome in a large homogeneous patient group after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population comprised 3072 patients with 3736 successfully dilated native primary coronary artery lesions and satisfactory quantitative angiographic analysis in multiple identical projections before and after PTCA and at a 6-month follow-up. Late luminal loss, minimal luminal diameter (MLD) at follow-up, and net luminal gain, as well as percent diameter stenosis at follow-up, net gain in percent diameter stenosis, restenosis rates (according to three definitions), and net gain index, were all compared among nine equally sized groups (noniles) according to vessel size. A direct influence of vessel size on continuous measures of late result was also evaluated by linear regression. These evaluations provided conflicting information with no consistent influence of vessel size emerging. To elucidate the independent influence of vessel size on the restenosis process (late loss) and late angiographic outcome (MLD at follow-up), multiple linear regression analysis was performed taking into account luminal gain, preprocedural MLD, and lesion location. In this manner, vessel size was found to be exert a significantly positive influence on MLD at follow-up (P < .0001) and an equally negative effect on loss. Correcting for vessel size by using percent stenosis measurements led to an anticipated neutralization of this influence. Lesion location in the left anterior descending coronary artery was found to be independently associated with greater loss and smaller MLD at follow-up (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing coronary vessel size was found to be independently predictive of decreasing late luminal loss and increasing follow-up MLD after successful balloon angioplasty. Apparently superior or inferior late angiographic results of new interventional devices may thus be explained in part by preferential use in larger or smaller vessels, respectively. Devices that can safely optimize the short-term result of intervention may realize their ultimate long-term value in larger coronary vessels.

Aged↗

Usefulness of repeat coronary angiography 24 hours after successful balloon angioplasty to evaluate early luminal deterioration and facilitate quantitative analysis.

Because of the unavoidable occurrence of vessel disruption after successful coronary balloon angioplasty, the reliability of quantitative angiographic analysis in that setting has been questioned. For this reason and the suggested occurrence of delayed elastic recoil, repeat angiography at 24 hours has been advocated in clinical interventional trials. In this study, these issues are confronted by performing comprehensive quantitative analysis (Cardiovascular Angiographic Analysis System) of coronary angiograms, acquired in multiple identical projections immediately after and 24 hours after angioplasty, in 102 patients with 110 successfully dilated lesions. Vasomotion was controlled by intracoronary nitrate before angiography and all patients were fully anticoagulated (activated partial thromboplastin time 85 to 120 seconds) for > 24 hours. Paired Student's t tests applied to angiographic measurements revealed that there was no significant deterioration in minimal luminal diameter or cross-sectional area from immediately after angioplasty to 24 hours later. It can thus be inferred that there is no phenomenon of delayed elastic recoil, at least during this time period. Measurement accuracy and precision of the Cardiovascular Angiographic Analysis System from the postangioplasty angiogram are highly acceptable, at < 0.01 and +/- 0.20 mm, respectively. Therefore, it is concluded that routine repeat 24-hour angiography is not indicated after successful angioplasty. A highly significant increase (p < 0.001) in reference diameter (+0.11 +/- 0.18 mm) was responsible for the apparent increase in percent diameter stenosis (2.4 +/- 7%), a finding that demonstrates the potential for error by selective application of percent diameter stenosis measurements alone. Preferential use of absolute luminal measurements is thus strongly recommended for clinical trials with angiographic monitoring.

Adult↗

Usefulness of quantitative and qualitative angiographic lesion morphology, and clinical characteristics in predicting major adverse cardiac events during and after native coronary balloon angioplasty. CARPORT and MERCATOR Study Groups.

Major, adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery and reintervention) occur in 4 to 7% of all patients undergoing coronary balloon angioplasty. Prospectively collected clinical data, and angiographic quantitative and qualitative lesion morphologic assessment and procedural factors were examined to determine whether the occurrence of these events could be predicted. Of 1,442 patients undergoing balloon angioplasty for native primary coronary disease in 2 European multicenter trials, 69 had major, adverse cardiac procedural or in-hospital complications after > or = 1 balloon inflation and were randomly matched with patients who completed an uncomplicated in-hospital course after successful angioplasty. No quantitative angiographic variable was associated with major adverse cardiac events in univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate analysis showed that major adverse cardiac events were associated with the following preprocedural variables: (1) unstable angina (odds ratio [OR] 3.11; p < 0.0001), (2) type C lesion (OR 2.53; p < 0.004), (3) lesion location at a bend > 45 degrees (OR 2.34; p < 0.004), and (4) stenosis located in the middle segment of the artery dilated (OR 1.88; p < 0.03); and with the following postprocedural variable: angiographically visible dissection (OR 5.39; p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify variables independently correlated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. The preprocedural multivariate model entered unstable angina (OR 3.77; p < 0.0003), lesions located at a bend > 45 degrees (OR 2.87; p < 0.0005), and stenosis located in the middle portion of the artery dilated (OR 1.95; p < 0.04).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Quantitative angiography during coronary angioplasty with a single angiographic view: a comparison of automated edge detection and videodensitometric techniques.

Little information is available on the reliability of coronary luminal measurements obtained from quantitative analysis of a single angiographic view, an approach that is central to the practical use of on-line quantitative angiography. In the present study we investigated the contribution of two different techniques of quantitative angiography, edge detection (ED) and videodensitometry (VD), to the application of this concept during coronary angioplasty. Forty-six balloon angioplasty procedures were included in this study, all of them performed in a stenosis located in the mid right coronary segment. This coronary location was chosen to optimize data collection on luminal morphology and to minimize the number of factors that may adversely affect quantitative analysis with both techniques. In all cases two orthogonal angiographic projections were obtained before, after balloon dilatation, and at follow-up. Correlation coefficients and differences between orthogonal measurements obtained with each technique were used to evaluate the agreement between orthogonal readings at every stage of the procedure. The obtained correlation coefficients and mean differences (MD) between orthogonal measurements were as follows: before percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography (PTCA), 0.67 (MD 0.01 +/- 0.47 mm2) and 0.57 (MD 0.05 +/- 0.64 mm2) for ED and VD, respectively (Pitman's test for SD, p < 0.05); after balloon dilatation, 0.32 (MD -0.56 +/- 1.53 mm2) and 0.53 (MD -0.15 +/- 1.43 mm2) for ED and VD, respectively (paired t test for MD, p < 0.05); and at follow-up 0.79 (MD -0.15 +/- 0.97 mm2) and 0.73 (MD 0.17 +/- 1.16 mm2) for ED and VD, respectively (p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Restenosis revisited: insights provided by quantitative coronary angiography.

In this editorial, the problem of restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty and other transluminal interventions is reviewed from the perspective of quantitative coronary angiography. The review is largely based on the experience of the Thoraxcentre in the application of quantitative angiography to the study of restenosis over the past decade, with incorporation and discussion of relevant and significant contributions from other groups. Current discrepancies in the angiographic definition of restenosis are highlighted and the use of percent diameter stenosis or MLD as the measurement parameter of choice is objectively addressed. Perspectives on the pathologic paradigm of restenosis are briefly reviewed as a basis from which to evaluate quantitative angiographic information provided by various studies. Particular attention is then paid, in chronologic fashion, to discussion and elaboration of insights to the restenosis process provided by quantitative angiographic studies, which have led to the introduction of some new methodological approaches to the comparison of short- and long-term angiographic luminal changes after various interventions. A word of caution on the potential pitfalls of quantitative angiographic studies is provided and counterbalanced with a discussion of clinical correlations of quantitative angiographic measurements. Finally, a proposal is made for the application of quantitative angiographic measurements to randomized clinical trials for the purpose of comparing new interventional devices.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗