Biomedical subjects

D Pétry

Publications and source records attributed to D Pétry.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

A method for shortening instruments using the Rasch model. Validation on a hand functional measure.

BACKGROUND: Many measurement instruments, particularly measures of hand functional ability, frequently comprise a large number of items. Reduced versions of these instruments can facilitate their use. This work proposes a new method for shortening an instrument. METHODS: The method proposed was based on a scale of item difficulty calculated using the Rasch model. It was applied on a hand functional measure comprising 67 tests. The sample included 194 patients with hand lesions. The shortened instrument obtained was compared with those provided by classic methods used in the literature, with item random choice, and with shortened versions proposed by four independent experts, two rehabilitation physicians and two occupational therapists, who are clinicians familiar with the tool. All the statistical analyses were carried out on a random sub-group of two-thirds of the sample. A cross validation was then carried out on the remaining third. RESULTS: The reduction obtained had score non significantly different from that of the original instrument. In addition, the intra-class correlation coefficient and the Cronbach alpha coefficient were high. Among the different degrees of reduction investigated, the 12-item version seemed to be appropriate. Our method appeared to provide better results in terms of discriminant validity and internal validity than the choices of the four experts. The reductions produced were also better than those obtained by classic methods based on principal component analysis and multiple linear regression, as well as those obtained by random choices of items. CONCLUSION: The method presented is pertinent and useful. The reduction obtained appeared to be better than the choices of experts and the reductions provided by classic methods. The method could be used in other fields.

Accidents↗

PubMed1998

Asymmetry correction equations for hand volume, grip and pinch strengths in healthy working people.

Assessments of oedema and decrease in hand strength are useful for patients with a hand lesion. This study examined the asymmetry of the arms and determined the estimates of the unknown prior to lesion values for hand volume, grip strengths assessed with a Jamar dynamometer (GS[J]) and a Collins dynamometer (GS[C]), and pinch strength with a Jamar pinch gauge (PS) in 100 healthy working people. Hand volume, GS(J), GS(C) and PS of the dominant hand were respectively 3.6 +/- 4.1%, 6.6 +/- 9.2%, 11.7 +/- 11.2%, and 8.0 +/- 13.2% higher than those of the non-dominant hand (p < 0.001). Very good estimates were obtained with the values of the contralateral arm for all the indices studied. The correlation coefficient equalled 0.95 for hand volume, 0.91 for GS(J), 0.83 for GS(C), and 0.72 for PS. These estimates allow us to evaluate the evolution of oedema and hand strengths in patients with hand injury, especially to determine whether they could return to work as they are mostly manual workers with demanding jobs.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Comparison between estimates of hand volume and hand strengths with sex and age with and without anthropometric data in healthy working people.

Edema and hand strength measurements are useful for the recovery assessment of patients with a hand lesion. This work determined and compared estimates of hand volume, grip strengths (measured with a Jamar and a Collins dynamometer), and pinch strength (with a Jamar pinch gauge) in terms of sex and age with or without anthropometric indices in healthy working people. The sample included 100 subjects from within the staffs of two rehabilitation centres. For both grip strengths, multiple linear regression models including body height, weight, and arm muscle area were very good (multiple correlation coefficient R of about 0.84) and clearly better than those obtained with sex and age only. For pinch strength, the best estimate was obtained with sex and arm muscle area (R of 0.76); for hand volume, the model with sex, body height, and weight provided the best result (R of 0.93). These findings suggested that anthropometric indices easy to measure must be taken into account to estimate hand volume and hand strengths.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Personality self-representations of patients with hand injury, and its relationship with work injury.

This study compared the personality self-representations of 288 hand injured patients with those of 959 young people (15-25 years old) randomly selected from the general population (noted GP), and with those of 336 unemployed people of all ages in professional training (U) in Lorraine (north-eastern France). The relationship between patients' personality self-representations and injury was also investigated. Personality self-representations included 14 questions: in your own opinion are you sociable?, at ease with others?, serious?, careful?, dynamic?, optimistic?, worried?, irritable?, clumsy?, solitary?, organised?, ambitious?, do you have a sense of responsibility?, and many plans? The patients had similar self-representations to GP except for the items non clumsy (odds ratio adjusted on age and sex OR = 2.40, p < 0.05) and optimistic (OR = 1.70, but 0.05 < p < 0.10). The frequencies of non irritable, non clumsy and non solitary people were higher in patients than in the U group (OR about 2.40, p < 0.01). By contrast, the other items were more favourable for the U group except for the items sociable, organised and having many plans. Self-representation items were significantly related to some socio-demographic data. The work injured workmen having one or more previous work injuries during the last five years were more at ease with others than the other subjects. Among the work injured workmen who had had no previous work injury during this time, the people aged 29 or less (the highest risk age class) were more optimistic than the others (71% vs 49%, p < 0.05); a difference was also found for the items at ease with others, careful, dynamic, and non worried, but it was not significant possibly due to the small number of subjects. The sum of these five items differed between the two age groups (3.29 +/- 1.49 vs 2.55 +/- 1.68, p < 0.05). These simple items would provide an interesting approach in terms of personality which could explain in part the excess of work injuries in young people, though the work requirement still seemed to be the highest risk factor.

Accidents, Occupational↗