[Carcinoma of the breast in young women].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Palli.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The detection rates of grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN III) in women at the initial and subsequent screenings were studied in Florence for the period 1979 to 1982 to assess the optimal interval between tests and the sensitivity of the screening (cytology plus advised colposcopy in cases with slightly abnormal Papanicolaou tests). The protective interval was calculated to be about three years. No differences in the risk of developing CIN III were observed between women with only an initial screening and women rescreened within the three-year interval. Screening sensitivity was calculated according to two different models: (1) when assumed to be a constant, the sensitivity of our cytologic-colposcopic screening was 0.71, with 0.64 for cytology alone; (2) when assumed to decrease in subsequent screening rounds, the sensitivity was calculated at 0.60 (0.50 in subsequent rounds), with 0.52 for cytology alone. The benefit of an early cytologic rescreening is discussed and compared to a wider use of colposcopy, which, with lower costs, permits a good sensitivity utilizing only one round of screening.
One thousand sixteen gastric cancer (GC) patients and 1623 population controls, interviewed in a multicentric study in Italy, reported their family history for gastric, esophageal, and colorectal cancer. A significant association was found only with a history of GC in a sibling or in a parent [odds ratio (OR), 2.6 and 1.7, respectively], which persisted after adjusting for potential confounders including nutrient intake. Adjusted GC risk was higher for subjects having an affected mother than an affected father (OR, 2.3 and 1.3) and showed a further increase for subjects reporting both parents (OR, 3.0) or two or more siblings affected with GC (OR, 8.5). The proportion of patients with an affected first-degree relative was higher among females, in the elderly, and in high-risk areas. Among adult siblings of controls and cases, GC prevalence reported at interview was 1 and 2.7%, respectively; a further increase was shown in families with at least one parent affected (1.4 and 5.7%). GC risk associated with a positive family history was greater among residents of low-risk areas where risks were increased about two-fold. Among cases, family history of GC was not related to blood group A or to histological type according to the Lauren classification. These findings are discussed in terms of the contributions of genetic and environmental risk factors and their possible interactions.
In a survey of 930 adults aged 35-74 years randomly sampled from the general population of four areas of Italy, two at low and two at high risk for gastric cancer, plasma levels of Helicobacter pylori IgG antibodies were assayed in order to investigate associations with the geographical distribution of gastric cancer and other dietary and life-style factors, as assessed by personal interview. H. pylori positivity (antibody titer above or equal to 10 micrograms/ml), 45% overall, increased with age and was inversely associated with social class but showed little geographical variation or association with dietary variables and blood nutrients. H. pylori positivity was also associated with increased blood levels of pepsinogens, particularly pepsinogen II. The authors discuss these findings in relation to those from a previous case-control study of gastric cancer in the same areas.
In order to evaluate the agreement and accuracy of cervical (vaginal) cytologic diagnoses, 16 cytologists from a large laboratory in Florence, Italy, with experience ranging from 2 to 25 years, independently examined a set of 100 slides. A common reporting form based on a seven-category classification system was used. Concordance was calculated for each pairwise comparison between the 16 cytologists and between each cytologist and the target diagnosis. The values of the kappa statistic for the whole laboratory were .49 for the multiple raters comparison and .59 for the target diagnosis comparison, showing a relatively good degree of agreement.